New Threads Only:  Add to Google Reader or Homepage
New Threads & Replies:  Add to Google Reader or Homepage
Forums are for serious investors only. GuruFocus Forum Rules.

Forum List » Guru News and Commentaries
Guru News, Stock picks and commentaries
New Topic Search
Goto Thread: PreviousNext
Goto: Forum ListMessage ListNew TopicSearchLog In
'Macro Tourist' Trade
Posted by: Hedgie (IP Logged)
Date: April 30, 2013 10:18AM

What do Daniel Loeb and Bill Ackman have in common? Both are well known for their hedge fund activist investing. Loeb in the ensuing years has transitioned from activist to macro hedge fund manager; evident from his stellar return in Greek government bonds and most recently, from the Japan trade (initial currency/index trade). Ackman, despite his recent hiccup in few investments such as J.C. Penney (JCP) and Herbalife (HLF), had also dabbled in macro investing such as in Hong Kong dollar back in 2011. As Ackman put it recently, “The current printing of money is a 'non-sustainable' situation." Hong Kong should adjust is currency peg, he said, and he has a small position essentially shorting it.

There is no such thing as an unblemished track record, unless you run a Madoff scheme. Interestingly, while Loeb is short JPY and long JPY index/selected stocks, Kyle Bass has dubbed anyone who is long JPY stock is a “macro tourist.” Bass has taken a short position in Japanese Government Bonds (JGB) since 2010. It remains to be seen if the widow-maker trade will eventually pan out. Nonetheless, as George Soros succinctly puts it, "It's not whether you're right or wrong that's important, but how much money you make when you're right and how much you lose when you're wrong."

Poll: Are you a “macro tourist” or “widow maker”?


Poll 2) : Which trade do you think will give the better absolute returns, irregardless of the holding period/time frame?

Third Point’s first quarter investor letter, copied in verbatim below:

Japanese Macro

We visited Japan last April following the Bank of Japan’s (“BOJ”) announcement of a new policy of targeting a 1% annual inflation rate. We recognized from past experience that meaningful quantitative easing in Japan could provide opportunities like our “don’t fight the Fed” investments in 2009‐10 and European sovereign debt trades in 2012. Meetings with academics and government officials last April convinced us that the articulated “changes” were more rhetorical than practical at the time, but also revealed that many Japanese realized wholesale shifts would be necessary to pull the country out of the deep doldrums it had entered after the tsunami and subsequent nuclear catastrophe of 2011. Despite returning disappointed that this time wasn’t different (yet), we had developed an understanding of the signals that would indicate the start of a paradigm shift if the time came.

In the fall of 2012, we recognized as a critical catalyst the increasing likelihood of a transition to leadership by the Liberal Democratic Party, led by Shinzō Abe. In statements leading up to his election as Prime Minister, Abe had articulated reflationary policies dramatically different than the BOJ’s recent initiatives. Accordingly, we established a position speculating that the Japanese currency would be devalued aggressively and equities would rise once Abe took office. We sized the position decisively after concluding the investment had highly asymmetric outcomes.

The “Abe‐nomics” catalysts have played out essentially as we anticipated, and his approach has been met with unusual public support from the Japanese. Our optimism was reinforced by the appointment of Haruhiko Kuroda as the Governor of the BOJ on February 27. By analyzing Governor Kuroda’s speeches and papers over the past two decades, we recognized him as a proponent of radical change, structural reform, and “dovish” monetary policy. Another important catalyst was the (grumbling) acquiescence by Western powers throughout Q1 as Japan began asserting its case for devaluing its currency.

Despite massive market speculation and an already significant move in the Yen, potential QE measures were simply speculative until last week’s first Kuroda‐led BOJ meeting. We increased our position ahead of the meeting, rejecting the market consensus that the upside was already baked into any policy moves that might be announced. As we had hoped, the Governors managed to exceed even the highest of expectations with their initial actions, ticking all of the boxes we anticipated and adding others. The steps amounted to a complete reboot of the Japanese monetary experiment. The impact of this bold plan should be far‐reaching, not only for Japanese companies but also for Japan’s trading partners.

Perhaps most importantly, from a Third Point process and framework perspective, we have learned that in environments where QE and government intervention are critical engines, our catalyst‐driven approach allows us to find compelling “macro” opportunities. We believe there is still value in our initial currency/index trade reflecting this important structural inflection point and also have taken selected positions in single name stocks that we believe will benefit from this policy shift.

Note: This material may not be suitable for all investors and is not intended to be an offer, or the solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any securities.



Guru Discussed: Bill Ackman: Current Portfolio, Stock Picks
Daniel Loeb: Current Portfolio, Stock Picks
Stocks Discussed: HLF, JCP,
Rate this post:

Rating: 2.6/5 (7 votes)





Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Please Login if you have an account or Create a Free Account if you don't
Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
Free 7-day Trial
FEEDBACK