|New Threads Only:|
|New Threads & Replies:|
Forum List » Value Ideas and Strategies|
Share and discuss value investing ideas and investing strategies.
National Presto Industries: Performance Went Poof
Posted by: Frank Voisin (IP Logged)
Date: April 24, 2012 02:43PM
I wrote about National Presto Industries Inc (NPK) back in November (Is Performance About to Go Poof?), questioning whether the company’s performance was heading for a dive due to its extreme reliance on its defense segment (a segment wholly unrelated to its traditional business of selling bacon cookers, deep fryers, pizza ovens and similar products for home users).
Since publishing that, the company’s stock has declined by about 15%. The bulk of the decline came in the days following its full year earnings release on February 21. The market was unimpressed, and for good reason. Revenues for the year declined 10% and earnings 24.5%. The company also cut its famously volatile dividend by 31%. Unfortunately, these full year aggregate figures paper over the larger issues which relate to the rapid decline of the company’s Defense Products segment. Recall this chart from back in November:
National Presto Industries Inc - Segment Revenues, 2000 - 2010
This chart illustrates the importance of the company’s Defense Products segment to the rapid growth in its performance in recent years. As I noted in November,
Quote:Well, it appears the risks inherent in NPK’s reliance on defense sales have come to roost. In Q4 of 2011, defense revenues declined by 23% year over year, which comes on the heels of a decline of 17.8% in Q3 and 25.4% in Q2 (though, in this quarter the prior year presented a uniquely tough comparison). Revenues from the defense segment have simply fallen off a cliff. Let’s look at how the company explains the declines.
For Q4, the company’s press release says (emphasis added):
Quote:For Q3, the company’s press release says (emphasis added):
Quote:For Q2, the company’s press release says (emphasis added):
Quote:One begins to wonder whether only another war will cause the company to stop blaming the “timing of shipments” for declining demand.
Seriously though, there are ways to verify whether the issues are related to the timing of shipments, as the company claims, or whether the real issue is declining demand for this segment’s products. If demand for the company’s products had been similar to the previous year but shipment simply had not taken place (and, consequently, revenues could not be recognized), we would see this demand show up in the segment’s backlog. Simply put, we would expect the company’s defense-related backlog to grow by approximately the decline in defense sales.
Unfortunately, this is not the case. From December 31, 2010 to December 31, 2011, the company’s defense backlog grew by $13 million. Its defense sales over fiscal 2011 declined by almost three times this amount: $38.4 million. This suggests that the company is being disingenuous in blaming the timing of shipments for the rapidly declining performance of its Defense Products segment.
While on the topic of the backlog, there is one more scary thing to note. From the company’s Q4 press release (emphasis added):
Quote:Translation: translating the company’s backlog to sales is far from being a certainty. Given the rapid decline in actual sales versus relatively meager growth in its defense backlog, if demand really is collapsing, we may see this backlog decline at the DOD’s (the customer it refers to) option.
Beyond collapsing defense sales, we are starting to see more signs of weakness. The company’s gross margin in Q4 2011 was 33.52%. The same figure for Q4 2010 was 35.26%, or 174bp higher. Its operating margin showed an even more pronounced contraction, from 32.35% to 28.76% or 359bp. This was the first quarter since defense sales began their rapid decline that the company’s defense margins also signaled problems at hand, and it has contributed to investors’ rush for the exits.
All of these figures are up to date as of December 31, 2011, which is also the date the United States committed to having withdrawn from Iraq. One would expect this to signal even less demand for the company’s defense products going forward. So unfortunately for NPK shareholders, these issues are likely to be just beginning.
What do you think of NPK?
Author Disclosure: None
Stocks Discussed: NPK,
Re National Presto Industries Performance Went Poof
Posted by: mcwillia (IP Logged)
Date: April 24, 2012 03:57PM
Nice article. I exited NPK after last year's brutally frank shareholder letter and the certainty that the defense segment would decline over time. Absorbents might improve from the new diaper machinery but its a tough commodity-like business. Import costs were crimping kitchenware too, and I fear that Jerry Rubin over at Helen of Troy runs a more focused, competitive business (though he is not shareholder friendly enough for my tastes, what with the dilution and no dividend, but his results are impressive.) I like NPK with its quirkiness and pluck, but for now, I'm out.
By the way, their economies of scale are interesting...they can feed soldiers, provide 'em with 40mm ammunition, then take care of them when they soil themselves in battle...(couldn't resist). But seriously, the 40mm system is likely to last a long time, as it is a convenient staple for infantry and does not seem to be anachronistic or easily replaced by some rival technology, at least for a decade or so here, and longer in armed forces around the world. That being said, I don't like the reliance on mercurial government buyers. NPK may do well, but as I mentioned, I'm on the sidelines.
Stocks Discussed: NPK,