New Threads Only:  Add to Google Reader or Homepage
New Threads & Replies:  Add to Google Reader or Homepage
Forums are for serious investors only. GuruFocus Forum Rules.

Forum List » Value Ideas and Strategies
Share and discuss value investing ideas and investing strategies.
New Topic Search
Goto Thread: PreviousNext
Goto: Forum ListMessage ListNew TopicSearchLog In
Conns: From Long to Short?
Posted by: whopper investments (IP Logged)
Date: June 28, 2012 11:00AM

A long, long time ago, I mentioned Conns (CONN) as a potential long idea. At the time, the stock was in the low to mid-single digits and priced at just a fraction of tangible book. I ultimately decided to avoid investing it despite because I was worried about their significant leverage and continued competition in the consumer electronics space (yet that didn’t stop me from going long RSH… OUCH!).

Today, however, the situation is much different, as the stock has run-up substantially and now trades above book value.

I found that really interesting: Conn’s stock has been on a complete tear over the past year, while almost every other consumer electronics stock in the world has been cut in half twice over.

And then I saw this post saying the author was short Conn’s. And I found the thesis incredibly interesting.

Basically, Conn’s consists of two pieces: the actual retail business, and the finance business. The retail business is divided (very roughly) 40/40/20 between consumer electronics, consumer appliances, and furniture/mattresses. The finance business provides financing to Conn’s customers.

Let’s start with the retail business. The appliance and furniture pieces are decent businesses that aren’t extremely vulnerable to the Amazon threat (yet) simply because the items are so large and heavy that they need delivery and installation. But just because they aren’t vulnerable to amazon doesn’t mean they’re great businesses: Conn’s has no competitive advantages over Home Depot, Sears, or any of the dozens of other chains, both local and national, that sell those items.

However, the consumer electronics business is absolutely horrible right now. Not only do they face fierce competition from Wal-Mart and Best Buy, but Amazon is turning them into a “showroom” and demolishing the business. The three “pure play’ consumer electronic stores I can think of (RSH, BBY, and HGG) all trade for between 2x-3x EV / EBITDA and seem priced to go out of business.

So that’s 40% of the retail business that seems set to go away completely. Now, let’s turn to the finance business, and remember- it’s captive to Conn’s sales, so if the consumer electronics piece goes away, a major piece of the finance business goes away.

The finance business provides consumer financing for the purchase of Conn’s goods. They segment their customers into three parts- consumers with credit scores over 650 are referred to low interest financing from GE Capital and Conn’s earns what basically amounts to a referral fee. Consumers with scores under 550 are referred to a rent to own plan through RAC. For consumers with scores between 550 and 650, Conn’s provides in house financing.

Now, 550 – 650 may sound high. But it’s not. 600-650 is consider “bad” or “high risk”, and most lenders consider below 650 sub-prime. Below 600 is “very high risk”. In other words, Conn’s is maintaining a subprime credit portfolio!

And that’s pretty evident in what Conn’s charges for their loans- the average interest rate on their portfolio is over 18%!

Now, that may sound like an outstanding return, but it’s actually not that great once put into context w/ the risk. Conn’s write-off rate is 7-8%, and their debt all carries floating interest rates that are currently ~6%. Put the two together and CONN’s is netting ~4% on the portfolio. A net return of 4% that’s almost entirely dependent on low interest rates doesn’t seem very sustainable to me, nor does it seem like it’s worth the risk, given this type of portfolio is pretty much what took Circuit City down during the financial crisis and almost took Conns down as well.

So those are the qualitative. And honestly, those alone are enough to raise some pretty big red flags (at least IMO). So now let’s look a bit more at the quantitatives.

CONN trades at 9 times forward earnings and 1.4x book value. Let’s take these one at a time.

First- earnings. Best Buy has a much better balance sheet than Conn’s, yet it trades for just 5x forward earnings. True, Conn’s isn’t as “exposed” to amazon as Best Buy, but I can’t find a single retailer w/ a similar sales profile to Conn’s that trades at more than low double-digit earnings multiples.

Second- book value. When a company trades above book value, it’s generally because the market is forecasting the company can earn excess ROE in the future. If a company’s cost of equity is 10% and it can earn 10% ROE, than it’s fair value is going to be book value. Since CONN’s trades above book value, the market is clearly forecasting excess returns.

But, even putting the negative consumer electronic industry issues aside, I wonder if Conn’s can earn ROE in excess of their cost of equity over a full cycle. Check out their ROE for the past ten years here. Remember, CONN’s employs a tremendous of leverage- assets are more than double equity (debt ~= equity), and they lease basically all of their stores. That’s two big piles of leverage, and yet CONN’s still averages only mid-teen ROE during the boom years (which were especially kind to all three of CONN’s categories due to the housing boom), and zero or negative returns during bad years. Over the whole cycle, their average ROE was in the single digits, well below their cost of equity even ignoring their leverage.

Finally, there’s concerns over incentives. The company plans to open 5-7 new stores this year, all in completely new markets. They only have 65 stores total, so this is a pretty big increase in store count. Given their ROE is currently barely positive, their current return on invested capital is likely below their WACC, and the company is quite levered, I have to wonder if it’s really in shareholders best interests for the company to be expanding instead of focusing on paying down debt. However, I have no doubt that it is in management’s best interest- the top executives share ownership pales in comparison to their salaries and bonus, and increasing the company’s size will increase the bonus / salaries they are eligible for.

There are plenty of other concerns and places to look if you’re interested in Conns as a potential short, including their re-aging practices and their plan to remodel all of their stores over the next two years (which should serve as a significant cash drag).

But ultimately, this is a long only blog, and (from my point of view, at least) the asymmetrical risk/reward of shorting anything but a complete outright fraud makes it a pretty poor bet. Just thought I’d bring the idea up for those interested.

No disclosure



Stocks Discussed: CONN,
Rate this post:

Rating: 4.7/5 (9 votes)



Conns From Long to Short
Posted by: batbeer2 (IP Logged)
Date: June 28, 2012 11:36AM

Thanks for an article worth reading.

The short thesis is flawed. This is not just a bad retailer plus a poor-mans bank. This is a marriage of a retailer and a bank with some very interesting effects.

The whole point of this business is that Conns is intimately familiar with the finances of customers in a given area. They attract customers that have no where else to go (for Amazon you need a credit card). The Conn's customer will get credit at an appropriate rate (everyone needs a fridge).

A competitor could come in. In the first two years they would attract the customers even Conn's turns away. You would be in deep trouble. So, Conn's grows one city/area at a time. Once they know the place and the people that live there, the bank part becomes profitable and they move on to the next city.

Yes, this is not a nice business but it serves a function and you have no hope of competing.

I'm not a buyer at these prices but I believe it would be a very dumb short.


Stocks Discussed: CONN,
Rate this post:

Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes)



Conns From Long to Short
Posted by: Jae Jun (IP Logged)
Date: June 29, 2012 04:01PM

I also looked at CONN a while back and thought it wasn't worth it. I recall faintly that I had a short conversation with Batbeer about it or something related to CONN but turns out I was way way wrong.

I won't short just because of the low interest rate variable. That leaves it too much to chance but interesting none the less.


Stocks Discussed: CONN,
Rate this post:

Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes)



Conns From Long to Short
Posted by: Invest E Gator (IP Logged)
Date: June 30, 2012 01:17AM

Hi whopper. That guy has an interesting blog that you linked, his idea as far as shorting Conn's is very well thought out and it's quite educational to read as he follows the trail sniffing out clues to validate his thesis.Personally, shorting isn't my thing as I wouldn't be in my comfort zone managing a situation like his, but it sure is interesting to follow. Excellent find!


Stocks Discussed: CONN,
Rate this post:

Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes)





Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Please Login if you have an account or Create a Free Account if you don't
Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
Free 7-day Trial
FEEDBACK
Hide