|New Threads Only:|
|New Threads & Replies:|
Forum List » Value Ideas and Strategies|
Share and discuss value investing ideas and investing strategies.
Is Bank of America Worth More Dead than Alive?
Posted by: Charles Sizemore (IP Logged)
Date: October 9, 2013 12:50PM
If there were ever a familiar name left for dead by Wall Street, it would be Bank of America Corporation (BAC). It’s been nearly seven years since Bank of America’s stock price has seen a new high.
Sure, the stock has more than quadrupled from its early 2009 lows. But nearly all of those gains happened in the second and third quarters of 2009. Bank of America has drifted lower in the years that have followed, and its current stock price is down by nearly a quarter since early 2010.
The reasons for lack of investor enthusiasm are well known. Banks were at the center of the 2008-2009 crisis, and Bank of America’s mortgage portfolio was one of the largest and weakest of any major bank and the most at risk for claims from distressed borrowers. New curbs on proprietary trading and higher capital requirements would be a drag on future earnings growth. And higher interest rates would crimp demand for new loans.
But at what price are all of these negatives baked in?
Let’s take a look at the numbers. Bank of America is trading for about 10 times earnings and 0.68 times book value. Using the more stringent metric of price-to-tangible book, which excludes intangible assets such as goodwill, we get a multiple of 1.1 times.
This means that Bank of America is worth nearly as much dead as alive and that investors are assigning virtually no value at all to the bank’s continuing operations. That seems a little harsh given the progress the bank has made in cleaning up its loan book and given the nationwide improvement in home prices. TheS&P Case-Shiller 20-City Home Price Index is up about 12% over the past 12 months alone.
And what about the bank’s outlook? Bank of America isn’t due to report its third-quarter results until the 16th of this month, but we can look to the last release for guidance.
Bank of America’s net charge-offs and provisions for credit losses continue to trend down, from $3.6 billion and $1.8 billion, respectively, in the second quarter of 2012 to $2.1 billion and $1.2 billion in the second quarter of 2013. The number of mortgage loans 60+ days delinquent has been cut by more than half in the past year, from 1.1 million loans in the second quarter of 2012 to 492,000 last quarter. Management expects this to fall to 375,000 by year end.
Overall leverage continues to shrink. And the bank’s Basel III tier 1 capital ratio—at 9.6% as of last quarter—ranks Bank of America ahead of JPMorgan (JPM), U.S. Bancorp (USB), and even Warren Buffett’s favorite, Wells Fargo (WFC).
All of this points to a bank that, while still a mess, is cleaning up its act in a hurry. Meanwhile, Bank of America is showing modest growth in its consumer credit card and auto loan businesses, and its client brokerage assets are up 17% year over year.
With all of this said, what is Bank of America worth?
In the eight years preceding the crisis, shares fetched 2-5 times tangible book value. Given the bank’s diminished earnings potential in these more sober of days, I would use the lower end of that range as the target. A price-to-tangible-book ratio of 1.5 to 2.0 would put Bank of America’s stock price at $18.90 to $25.20, giving an upside of 36%-81% from current prices.
Mohnish Pabrai and Bruce Berkowitz would appear to find value in the stock. Pabrai—a respected value investor known for making concentrated bets—has 22.9% of his funds invested in Bank of America. Berkowitz, manager of the Fairholm Fund and another respected value investor with a reputation for making large, concentrated bets, has 16.9% of his funds invested in Bank of America.
It may not be pretty. But Bank of America is dirt cheap, and it is the largest single holding of two well-respected value investors with phenomenal long-term track records.
Re Is Bank of America Worth More Dead than Alive
Posted by: Seanickson (IP Logged)
Date: October 9, 2013 06:43PM
to justify a tangible book value of 1.5, bank of america needs to show that it can earn at least a 12% return on tangible equity in a normal provision environment. Maybe it will be able to do that, but for now it hasnt quite managed to get to 10%. There are many companies that trade well below tangible book value and thats warranted if their economic performance is below par.
Re Is Bank of America Worth More Dead than Alive
Posted by: vgm (IP Logged)
Date: October 9, 2013 07:49PM
I don't disagree with your thesis. Brian Moynihan has systematically done the right things - and highly praised by Buffett for it. BAC can get back above $20 as it gets back to banking basics. Resumption of a dividend is in sight and there will be huge cashflow which could be used for buybacks. Markets reward companies whose balance sheets are improving and who return to shareholder friendly behaviors.
"...it is the largest single holding of two well-respected value investors with phenomenal long-term track records."
Just to be correct, AIG is Berkowitz's largest holding and BAC second.
Disclaimers: GuruFocus.com is not operated by a broker, a dealer, or a registered investment adviser. Under no circumstances does any information posted on GuruFocus.com represent a recommendation to buy or sell a security. The information on this site, and in its related newsletters, is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, investment advice or recommendations. The gurus may buy and sell securities before and after any particular article and report and information herein is published, with respect to the securities discussed in any article and report posted herein. In no event shall GuruFocus.com be liable to any member, guest or third party for any damages of any kind arising out of the use of any content or other material published or available on GuruFocus.com, or relating to the use of, or inability to use, GuruFocus.com or any content, including, without limitation, any investment losses, lost profits, lost opportunity, special, incidental, indirect, consequential or punitive damages. Past performance is a poor indicator of future performance. The information on this site, and in its related newsletters, is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, investment advice or recommendations. The information on this site is in no way guaranteed for completeness, accuracy or in any other way. The gurus listed in this website are not affiliated with GuruFocus.com, LLC. Stock quotes provided by InterActive Data. Fundamental company data provided by Morningstar, updated daily.