|New Threads Only:|
|New Threads & Replies:|
Forum List » Value Ideas and Strategies|
Share and discuss value investing ideas and investing strategies.
Sprint in Talks with T-Mobile for a Possible Combination
Posted by: Live investor (IP Logged)
Date: December 16, 2013 01:15PM
The U.S. wireless industry is again back with merger news. Late on Friday Wall Street Journal reported that the economy’s third largest wireless operator Sprint (S), which recently completed its deal with the Japanese telecom operator Softbank, is now eyeing T-Mobile (TMUS). The third national wireless operator planning to purchase the fourth national carrier sounds pretty interesting. However, the potential Sprint-T-Mobile merger is an extremely bold step full of hurdles.
Verizon (VZ) and AT&T (T) are two dominant players in the U.S. market, creating a virtual duopoly. Both Sprint and T-Mobile are way behind the two biggies, but recently the two smaller players have taken steps to revitalize and pose challenge to the big two. Softbank acquired an ownership stake in Sprint while T-Mobile purchased regional pay-as-you-go player MetroPCS. These are some major strategic moves that the smaller two national carriers took in order to compete effectively with Verizon and AT&T. Now Sprint plans to gulp T-Mobile.
The Kansas carrier is stuck with a regulatory issue with respect to the T-Mobile merger. The transaction is expected to be valued at $20 billion. So what are the concerns that the proposed merger brings?
Regulators – A Roadblock
Presently the U.S. wireless industry has four major national carriers, namely Verizon, AT&T, Sprint and T-Mobile. But if the third-largest and the fourth-largest carriers consolidate, then there would be three major telecom players instead of four. The Federal Communications Commission, or the FCC, and other regulators are not very encouraging when it comes to the combination between two big players. The primary reason is that consolidation of big entities would create more of a monopolistic or duopolistic environment and kill competition.
In 2011 December, the Department of Justice and Federal Communications Commission shot down the AT&T and T-Mobile merger proposal in fear that it would create a duopoly and crush competition. However, Sprint argues that the Sprint-T-Mobile combination would create a much smaller player compared to AT&T T-Mobile.
But would a Sprint T-Mobile combination really be of any use to consumers? That remains doubtful. There are several other hurdles in connection with potential merger.
The Main Difficulties
First of all, Sprint and T-Mobile run on different networks. The wireless technologies of the two mobile operators are very different and it would give no immediate advantage. The Kansas carrier has CDMA network while T-Mobile runs on GSM. This raises the question of network compatibility. The third-largest carrier recently got rid of the Nextel network which was incompatible with its CDMA. I am sure Sprint wouldn’t want history to repeat itself. It would take a massive amount of capital and time to consolidate Sprint’s and T-Mobile’s network and make them functional.
Second, both Sprint and T-Mobile have a base of prepaid customers which are the least lucrative ones. The consolidated entity would have approximately 53 million prepaid subscribers, which is again way behind Verizon’s 95 million and AT&T’s 72 million customers.
Finally, both Sprint and T-Mobile recently completed their deals with Softbank and MetroPCS. The regulators wouldn’t like so many players to get involved with each other and combine.
The merger proposition might be looking very interesting, but I believe it is better for both Sprint and T-Mobile to stay independent rather than combine with each other. The deal is unlikely to turn fruitful given the regulatory and technological hurdles and other constraints. And in case the deal matures, it would be interesting to see how the new combined entity works to get stronger to compete with the larger two players.
Stocks Discussed: S, TMUS, VZ, T,
Disclaimers: GuruFocus.com is not operated by a broker, a dealer, or a registered investment adviser. Under no circumstances does any information posted on GuruFocus.com represent a recommendation to buy or sell a security. The information on this site, and in its related newsletters, is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, investment advice or recommendations. The gurus may buy and sell securities before and after any particular article and report and information herein is published, with respect to the securities discussed in any article and report posted herein. In no event shall GuruFocus.com be liable to any member, guest or third party for any damages of any kind arising out of the use of any content or other material published or available on GuruFocus.com, or relating to the use of, or inability to use, GuruFocus.com or any content, including, without limitation, any investment losses, lost profits, lost opportunity, special, incidental, indirect, consequential or punitive damages. Past performance is a poor indicator of future performance. The information on this site, and in its related newsletters, is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, investment advice or recommendations. The information on this site is in no way guaranteed for completeness, accuracy or in any other way. The gurus listed in this website are not affiliated with GuruFocus.com, LLC. Stock quotes provided by InterActive Data. Fundamental company data provided by Morningstar, updated daily.