GuruFocus Premium Membership

Serving Intelligent Investors since 2004. Only 96 cents a day.

Free Trial

Free 7-day Trial
All Articles and Columns »

Warren Buffett, Got Railroaded in 2009!

December 07, 2010 | About:




In late October, early November of 2009, Warren Buffett announced that Berkshire was purchasing Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad. At the time, Burlington Northern Santa Fe was trading at just under 15 times earnings and offered a dividend yield of 1.9%. Even so, Warren Buffett received mixed reviews from the media. Some even went so far as to question whether or not he had lost his touch. The F.A.S.T. Graphs™ below illustrates the earnings and price correlated relationship that Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad possessed at the time.

Based on this F.A.S.T. Graphs™, (note that the green line represents the earnings growth valuation line on this older version), we felt that this decision was vintage Buffett assuming that he expected the recovery in earnings that 2010 brought. Although price fell before earnings did, the correlation between the two is clearly depicted in the price-earnings correlated F.A.S.T. Graphs™. What is also clear from the graph is that price overshot the drop in earnings indicating extreme undervaluation. Therefore, one might assume, that Warren Buffett recognizing a great bargain, responded accordingly, and bought the whole company.

bni_2009-10-29.png

A little over a year later

Utilizing the EDMP F.A.S.T. Graphs™ research tool, the following analysis looks at how five major railroads were priced at year-end 2009, just after Buffett bought Burlington Northern, followed by what they look like now, just a little under a year later. For each company we will present a historical graph ending in calendar year 2009 which is approximately a month after Warren Buffett bought Burlington Northern Santa Fe. Next, we will present a historical graph updated to current time and then a five-year forecasting graph based on consensus earnings estimates by leading analysts reporting to either FirstCall or Zacks.

This analysis begs the questions of whether Warren Buffett was exercising his great skill as a value investor, where he recognized the extraordinary value this industry then possessed, or did he instigate the strong rally in this sector since, by rousing others to copy his behavior? The F.A.S.T. Graphs™ updated to current time also provide insight into the opportunities created by undervaluation preceding an earnings recovery.

Norfolk Southern Corp., 2005 through year-end 2009 Historical F.A.S.T. Graphs™

Our first example, Norfolk Southern Corp. (NSC) shows earnings falling by over 40% in calendar year 2009 with stock price preceding the earnings decline by falling over 60% before recovering by year-end. In this example, this premature recovery might be attributed to the fact that Norfolk Southern Corp. maintained and then increased their dividend in 2009.

nsc_2009-12-31.png

Norfolk Southern Corp., 2005 through December 6, 2010

The updated F.A.S.T. Graphs™ below shows that stock prices continued to rally and advanced throughout calendar year 2010. It also shows that at 16 times earnings with a 2.3% dividend yield that the stock is fairly valued to only modestly overvalued currently.

nsc_2010-12-03.png

Norfolk Southern Corp. consensus five-year earnings estimator calculator

The five-year earnings estimator and return calculator below indicates the company to be attractively valued based on the consensus five-year earnings growth forecast of 13.5% by 29 analysts reporting to FirstCall and applying the GDF-EDMP modified formula for valuing a business. If the company were to achieve this earnings growth and the market capitalized those earnings at the implied fair value PE ratio of 15, then the expected five-year estimated compounded annual return would equal 14.9% including dividends.

nsc_2010-12-03-forecast.png

Genesee & Wyoming, 2005 through year-end 2009 Historical F.A.S.T. Graphs™

Genesee & Wyoming looked very overvalued in the fall of 2008, before the stock price reverted to the mean by returning to the orange earnings justified valuation line, and then falling significantly below it before recovering by year-end.

gwr_2009-12-31.png

Genesee & Wyoming, 2005 through December 6, 2010

The updated F.A.S.T. Graphs™ below shows that Genesee & Wyoming’s stock price almost tripling off of its lows set in 2009. However, the current price-earnings ratio of 27.1 appears very high.

gwr_2010-12-03.png

Genesee & Wyoming consensus five-year earnings estimator calculator

The five-year earnings estimator and return calculator below indicates the company to be moderately overvalued based on the consensus five-year earnings growth forecast of 18.7% by 14 analysts reporting to Zacks and applying the PEG (price equals growth rate) formula for valuing a business. If the company were to achieve this earnings growth and the market capitalized those earnings at the implied fair value PE ratio of 18.7, then the expected five-year estimated compounded annual return would equal 14.5% even without dividends.

gwr_2010-12-03-forecast.png

Three more examples with dividend kickers

Our next three examples offer very similar, but not identical, price-earnings correlated F.A.S.T. Graphs™. With each example, note how the stock price drop preceded earnings drops and then recovered dramatically as earnings recovered and dividends were maintained and increased. Also, each example appears reasonably priced today based on consensus earnings forecasts going forward. Union Pacific may be slightly overvalued, but only slightly.

CSX Corp., 2005 through year-end 2009 Historical F.A.S.T. Graphs™

csx_2009-12-31.png

CSX Corp., 2005 through December 6, 2010

csx_2010-12-03.png

CSX Corp. consensus five-year earnings estimator calculator

csx_2010-12-03-forecast.png

Union Pacific Corp., 2005 through year-end 2009 Historical F.A.S.T. Graphs™

unp_2009-12-31.png

Union Pacific Corp., 2005 through December 6, 2010

unp_2010-12-03.png

Union Pacific Corp. consensus five-year earnings estimator calculator

unp_2010-12-03-forecast.png

Canadian National Railway Co., 2005 through year-end 2009 Historical F.A.S.T. Graphs™

cni_2009-12-31.png

Canadian National Railway Co., 2005 through December 6, 2010

cni_2010-12-03.png

Canadian National Railway Co. consensus five-year earnings estimator calculator

cni_2010-12-03-forecast.png

Conclusions

As the above F.A.S.T. Graphs™ illustrate, railroad stocks have been on a tear since Warren Buffett made his much ballyhooed purchase of Burlington Northern Santa Fe. Frankly, the valuations of railroad stocks in general at that time appeared very attractive, even based on depressed earnings caused by the great recession. Although earnings were depressed, they remained relatively strong, all things considered. Warren Buffett never lost faith in America, and was willing to put his money where his faith rested. His "Buy American I Am" piece he authored for the New York Times, just before he announced his purchase of Burlington Northern, expressed his conviction.

Warren Buffett's idea that "Fear is the foe of the faddist, but the friend of the fundamentalist" seems to have paid off. Keeping emotions in check during periods of extreme economic stress, like experienced in 2009 is very difficult. On the other hand, when cool heads prevail and analysis is based on reason and common sense, extraordinary profits can be had. As Warren Buffett also says "be greedy when others are fearful, and fearful when others are greedy." It certainly seems to work for him. Now it's up to each investor to choose for themselves whether or not they want to ride the rails along with Warren Buffett today. Hopefully, the above analysis provides some insight.

The opinions in this document are for informational and educational purposes only and should not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell the stocks mentioned or to solicit transactions or clients. Past performance of the companies discussed may not continue and the companies may not achieve the earnings growth as predicted. The information in this document is believed to be accurate, but under no circumstances should a person act upon the information contained within. We do not recommend that anyone act upon any investment information without first consulting an investment advisor as to the suitability of such investments for his specific situation.

Disclosure: Holding none of the positions at the time of writing.

About the author:

Chuck Carnevale
Charles (Chuck) C. Carnevale is the creator of F.A.S.T. Graphs™. Chuck is also co-founder of an investment management firm. He has been working in the securities industry since 1970: he has been a partner with a private NYSE member firm, the President of a NASD firm, Vice President and Regional Marketing Director for a major AMEX listed company, and an Associate Vice President and Investment Consulting Services Coordinator for a major NYSE member firm.

Prior to forming his own investment firm, he was a partner in a 30-year-old established registered investment advisory in Tampa, Florida. Chuck holds a Bachelor of Science in Economics and Finance from the University of Tampa. Chuck is a sought-after public speaker who is very passionate about spreading the critical message of prudence in money management. Chuck is a Veteran of the Vietnam War and was awarded both the Bronze Star and the Vietnam Honor Medal.

Visit Chuck Carnevale's Website


Rating: 3.6/5 (16 votes)

Comments

kfh227
Kfh227 premium member - 3 years ago


railroad capacity:

1) In some areas, more track can be added in parallel.

2) with tunnels, double stacked intermodals can not be used everywhere. Alot of capex went into fixing this issue accross the US recently. Most comapnies!

3) longer consists. UP has one that is 1.5 miles long. Only 1 or 2 people operating it. There are engines at the front, the middle and back. All connected by radio control from the primary engine.

4) A space for this one but it goes with 3. No matter how long a consist is, a gap is needed between them. For two 1 mile consists, a 1 mile gap may be required. The thing is, two 2 mile consists only need that 1 mile gap.

So, 3+4 shows that car denisty is increasing.

2 says that more cargo per foot of car can be transported.

And 1 basically says that there is more parallel track.

In all ways, the rail industry is changing. It is litterally getting wider, longer and taller! And we are only at the beginning of this evolution.

Rail is an incredible investment right now.

Please leave your comment:


Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
Free 7-day Trial
FEEDBACK