There is not a lot of research in this area since most people spend their time contemplating capital accumulation, not spending it. However, there are a few studies on “safe” withdrawal rates. Let’s look at a few of them and consider what could be a better alternative…
The Bengen StudyIn February 1997, the Wall Street Journal columnist Jonathan Clements reported on a study by San Diego based financial planner William Bengen. Bengen looked at year-by-year returns since 1925 for a 50/50 stock/bond portfolio. He assumed half the portfolio was in the S&P 500 and half in intermediate term government bonds. Using a 30 year holding period, he calculated that a 4.1% withdrawal rate would allow you to survive the worst market declines.
The Harvard StudyIn 1973, Harvard University did a study to determine how much they could safely withdraw from their endowment fund without eroding the principal. Assuming a portfolio of 50% stocks and 50% bonds and cash, Harvard’s analysts calculated they could withdraw 4% the first year and then adjust the subsequent year’s withdrawals for inflation. For example, if there was 10% inflation, the second year’s withdrawal would be 4.4% of the initial (i.e., first year) asset value.
The Trinity StudyDallas Morning News columnist Scott Burns has written extensively on a “safe” withdrawal study by three Trinity University researchers. The Trinity Study measures the “success rate” of various portfolios from 1926 to 1995. The “success rate” is the percent of time a retiree could sustain a given withdrawal rate without depleting his retirement assets. The optimal asset mix is 75% stock/25% long term corporate bonds. For a 30 year payout period and a 4% withdrawal rate, this mix had a 98% success rate. At a 3% withdrawal rate, the 75/25 mix had a 100% success rate. Interpolating these results would give you a “safe” withdrawal rate of slightly less than 4%, virtually identical to the Harvard study.
So it seems that 4% is the number that all these studies are pointing to based on on historical data. But is it a safe number if you retire today? More recently Burns wrote:
The established safe-withdrawal-rate rules of thumb are based on long periods of time in which yields were higher than they are today and stock valuations were lower. A growing school of thought believes future withdrawal rates should be reduced to reflect expected lower future returns. This would knock another 1.5 to 2 percentage points off the safe withdrawal rate.You must also consider is that these studies are based on investment returns before expenses. If you’re paying an investment advisor an annual fee of 2% of assets and he has you invested in no-load mutual funds with a 0.5% expense ratio, your annual expenses are 2.5%. Your “safe” withdrawal rate is is now 2.5% lower than what you previously thought.
Dividend Growth Stocks: A Better WayWhen I retire, I want a high degree of assurance that I won’t run out of money, have to start a second career or develop a taste for cheap dog food. I plan on achieving my goal of an ever growing income with a diversified portfolio of high-quality dividend stocks. Why would I settle for trying to live on as little as 1.5% to 4% of my portfolio, when I can build a portfolio of dividend paying stocks that will provide for my needs without depleting the principle. Here are several stocks that I plan to rely on for decades to come:
Abbott Laboratories (ABT) | Dividend Growth: 8.3%| Yield: 3.6%
ABT is a diversified life science company and is a leading maker of drugs, nutritional products, diabetes monitoring devices, and diagnostics.
Genuine Parts Co. (GPC) | Dividend Growth: 2.5%| Yield: 3.2%
GPC is a leading wholesale distributor of automotive replacement parts, industrial parts and supplies, and office products.
Harleysville Group Inc. (HGIC) | Dividend Growth: 8.0%| Yield: 3.7%
HGIC underwrites a broad array of personal and commercial coverages. These insurance coverages are marketed primarily in the Eastern and Midwestern United States.
Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) | Dividend Growth: 8.4%| Yield: 3.4%
JNJ is a leader in the pharmaceutical, medical device and consumer products industries.
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) | Dividend Growth: 7.3%| Yield: 2.7%
KO is the world’s largest soft drink company, KO also has a sizable fruit juice business. Its bottling interests include a 34% stake in NYSE-listed Coca-Cola Enterprises (CCE).
McDonald’s Corporation (MCD) | Dividend Growth: 15.0%| Yield: 2.9%
MCD is the largest fast-food restaurant company in the world, with about 32,500 restaurants in 117 countries.
Medtronic Inc. (MDT) | Dividend Growth: 9.4%| Yield: 2.4%
MDT is a global medical device manufacturer with leadership positions in the pacemaker, defibrillator, orthopedic, diabetes management, and other medical markets.
PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) | Dividend Growth: 6.5%| Yield: 2.9%
PepsiCo, Inc. is a major international producer of branded beverage and snack food products.
The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) | Dividend Growth: 7.0%| Yield: 3.0%
PG is a leading consumer products company markets household and personal care products in more than 180 countries.
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (WMT) | Dividend Growth: 11.0%| Yield: 2.3%
WMT is the largest retailer in North America. The company operates retail stores in various formats worldwide. It operates through three segments: Wal-Mart Stores, Sam’s Club, and International.
Not all of these stocks are a buy today, but they are ones you will eventually want to add to your dividend portfolio. Retirement planning doesn’t have to be difficult. A financially successful retirement requires planning, discipline and execution. The sooner you start, the easier it is. Don’t risk running out of money before you run out of life.
Full Disclosure: Long ABT, GPC, HGIC, JNJ, KO, MCD, MDT, PEP, PG, WMT. See a list of all my income holdings here.
- What Determines A Dividend Stock’s Yield
- Archive | Dividends Value
- 10 Stocks With Sustainable Dividend Growth
- 20 Dividend Stocks With A 20% Yield In 20 Years
- When Is A Lot of Cash A Bad Thing?
Sources: Dallas News, Retire Early, passionsaving.com