The companies I selected include Realty Income (O), Con Edison (ED), Kinder Morgan Energy Partners (KMP) and Philip Morris International (PM).
Realty Income Corporation (O) engages in the acquisition and ownership of commercial retail real estate properties in the United States. The company has long term leases with tenants, which ensures stability of revenues over time. In addition to that, the properties it collects revenues from are located in 49 states. This real estate investment trust is one of the few which didn’t cut distributions during the financial crisis. Yield: 5% (analysis)
Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED), through its subsidiaries, provides electric, gas, and steam utility services in the United States. Utility revenues are stable even during recessions, but don’t increase by much during expansions. Utility companies are natural monopolies in their geographic areas, and typically earn a return on their capital investment that is set by the state they are operating in. Yield: 4.80% (analysis)
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. (KMP) owns and manages energy transportation and storage assets in North America. Pipelines are regulated by the FERC and the transportation rates for oil and gas that flow through them typically increase at the rate of inflation and are not dependent on the volatile price of the underlying. While energy prices are highly volatile, the amount of oil and gas consumed in the US typically changes by a few percentage points every year. Yield: 6.30%(analysis)
Philip Morris International Inc. (PM), through its subsidiaries, engages in the manufacture and sale of cigarettes and other tobacco products in markets outside of the United States. The number of smokers is decreasing in Western Europe, although the price increases have been able to offset any declines in revenues. In addition to that, growth in emerging markets for the brand products the company is producing should boost profitability in the long run. Strategic acquisitions should also add to the bottom line, as would synergies and strategic cost efficiencies are realized over time. Yield: 4.30% (analysis)
2010 could be characterized by the lowest bond yields in several decades. This has caused some investors to shift their portfolios toward dividend stocks. The positive side of most dividend stocks is that unlike fixed income, they could increase their distributions over time. As a result some high dividend stocks such as the ones I selected in 2010 had a very good performance this year. The positive fact of dividend stocks with strong fundamentals is that investors receive a growing stream of dividend income in all market conditions. With even modest capital gains and regular dividend reinvestment, investors could achieve consistent returns over the long haul, which could compound their original investment for many years.
Two of the companies, Con Edison (ED) and Realty Income (O) seem to be trading a little ahead of themselves. As a result I find it difficult to commit new money to them at this moment. The other two companies, Kinder Morgan (KMP) and Philip Morris International (PM) look attractively valued at the moment given their bullish growth prospects and attractive fundamentals. As parto f 2011’s stock picking competition I selected Philip Morris International (PM), Johnson & Johnson (JNJ), Procter & Gamble (PG) and PepsiCo (PEP). You can read the article explaining the reasoning behind these picks here.
Overall, the four stocks delivered a total return of 26.10% in 2010. In comparison, the S&P 500 delivered a total return of 14.60% in 2010. This placed me third in the competition. You could find the results for the other bloggers below:
The Wild Investor +27.15%
Zach Stocks +20.87%
My Traders Journal +10.39%
Intelligent Speculator -0.45%
The Financial Blogger -1.64%
Four Pillars -35.25%
While I own all of the stocks mentioned above, this stock picking competition is not representative of how investors should invest money. I believe that in order to be successful at dividend investing, one has to build a diversified portfolio of stocks, representative of as many sectors as possible. I would also add geographic diversification as a plus, as well as the need to build positions slowly over time, by dollar cost averaging.
Full Disclosure: Long ED, KMP, O, PM
Dividend Growth Investor