Sensient Technologies Corp. (SXT, Financial) filed Annual Report for the period ended 2010-12-31.
Sensient Technology Corp. has a market cap of $1.65 billion; its shares were traded at around $33.17 with a P/E ratio of 15.4 and P/S ratio of 1.2. The dividend yield of Sensient Technology Corp. stocks is 2.5%. Sensient Technology Corp. had an annual average earning growth of 1.4% over the past 10 years.Mutual Fund and Other Gurus that owns SXT: Mario Gabelli of GAMCO Investors, Chuck Royce of Royce& Associates.
Read the The complete Report
Sensient Technology Corp. has a market cap of $1.65 billion; its shares were traded at around $33.17 with a P/E ratio of 15.4 and P/S ratio of 1.2. The dividend yield of Sensient Technology Corp. stocks is 2.5%. Sensient Technology Corp. had an annual average earning growth of 1.4% over the past 10 years.Mutual Fund and Other Gurus that owns SXT: Mario Gabelli of GAMCO Investors, Chuck Royce of Royce& Associates.
Highlight of Business Operations:
The owner of Pleasant Gardens (Property), an apartment complex adjacent to the General Color Superfund Site, filed a complaint in New Jersey state court in November 2003 against H. Kohnstamm & Co. (now Sensient Colors), the Company, General Color Company, and unknown defendants. Plaintiff sought to hold defendants liable, in an unspecified amount, for damages related to the alleged contamination of the Property. Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the Company without prejudice. Sensient Colors filed an answer denying liability and asserting affirmative defenses. In November 2006, the Camden Redevelopment Agency (Agency) filed condemnation litigation against plaintiff (and other purported interested parties) to take the Property. Sensient Colors was not a party to the condemnation litigation. In advance of its filing, the Agency notified plaintiff that its appraiser had assessed the fair market value of the Property at $7.7 million and that its environmental consultant had estimated the costs for environmental cleanup, purportedly to meet requirements of the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), at $7.5 million. That amount was held in escrow pending the outcome of the lawsuit. Sensient Colors and plaintiff pursued a reduction in the scope and cost of the Agencys proposed environmental cleanup in meetings with the DEP, the Agency and another party involved in the condemnation, the New Jersey Schools Construction Corporation (NJSCC). In March 2007, plaintiff filed an amended complaint naming the Agency, the NJSCC and the DEP as additional defendants in furtherance of this effort. In April 2007, Sensient Colors filed its answer to the amended complaint, including cross claims against these newly added parties. The Agency, the DEP and the New Jersey Schools Development Authority (NJSDA) (which replaced the NJSCC as a state agency effective August 7, 2007) each filed answers, cross-claims and counter-claims; Sensient Colors has responded to all three cross-claims. Document discovery was completed in July 2008, and expert and rebuttal expert reports were exchanged.Read the The complete Report
