Hide

FocusBar

Subscribe to Premium Member
Free 7-day Trial
All Articles and Columns »

Want to Short Groupon (GRPN)? Be Aware of the Borrowing Costs

November 16, 2011 | About:
Want to Short Groupon (GRPN)? Borrowing Costs are So High You'd Need it to Hit Near Zero to Make a Profit if You Held for a Year.

One of the embedded costs to shorting is the need to borrow the shares first on margin. Usually it's a relatively (although not inconsequential) rate... but with the scarcity of shares available for recent IPO Groupon (GRPN), the borrowing costs are so high on an annualized basis - you'd actually have to see the stock go to zero to make a profit. (Assuming borrowing costs don't fall over time, which they will as more shares are unlocked down the road) Of course, any institution shorting right now is probably doing it on a much shorter time frame than a year - due to cost alone!

  • On paper, Groupon Inc appears to be a juicy target for short sellers: it loses money, it has changed its accounting twice, and its unproven business model faces competition from Google and Amazon. But the shorts may have to wait as betting against the daily deals website is just too expensive right now because of its tiny share float.

  • To make money shorting the $15 billion company, which went public earlier this month, investors would have to see the stock go close to zero for a year-long bet. "It would be very premature and highly risky to consider shorting Groupon soon after the IPO," said Fred Moran, an analyst at Benchmark Co. "It's very difficult to borrow the stock on a newly issued security and it has a very low float."

  • Groupon sold a stake of about 6 percent in its initial public offering, one of the smallest in the past decade. That means there is little stock available for short sellers, who have to borrow shares before they can sell them. If the stock drops, they can buy it back at a lower price, return them to the lender and pocket the difference as profit.

  • A scarce supply had some brokers charging an annual rate of 90 percent to 100 percent last week to borrow Groupon stock, according to two hedge fund managers, one independent trader and one prime broker. They spoke on condition of anonymity to preserve their counterparty relationships.

  • A 100 percent rate, or negative rebate as it is known, means a trader has to pay $20 to borrow a $20 stock for a year. In this instance, Groupon stock would have to drop to close to zero within a year for a short seller to break even. So traders are only shorting the shares for very short periods, such as a few hours, or avoiding the trade all together.

  • Another way to bet against the company is to buy put options, which give the holder the right to sell shares by a given date at a particular price. The cost of put options on Groupon were high on Monday, the first day of options trading. Put options that expire in December and carry a $24 strike price were priced at about $3. Factoring in that premium, an investor would be betting on shares to fall below $21.

  • Call options -- a bet on a stock rise -- traded at a $1.50 premium, suggesting more demand for the stock to fall.

  • "Everyone is expecting the stock to slide and there is definitely a higher skew to put activity, but you need to really believe that there will be a drastic move on the downside to buy puts at this premium," said Ryan Detrick, senior analyst at Schaeffer's Investment Research.




No position

About the author:

Mark's equity focus is identifying secular growth trends, and the companies most likely to benefit from these macro trends. Stocks are identified through fundamental analysis, although basic technical analysis is used in determining entry and exit points. With a degree in Economics from the University of Michigan, a broader understanding of the economy as a whole, along with interpreting investor psychology is also a major interest for Mark. His career background has focused on financial analysis in corporate America. Visit Mark's website at http://www.fundmymutualfund.com/

Visit TraderMark's Website

Tickers in the article:

What Worked in the Stock Market for Long-Term Investors?

Extensive research has found that the companies with predictable revenues and earnings outperform the market average; they also suffer lower probability of loss. As a matter of fact, this kind of companies are exactly what Warren Buffett wants to buy and hold forever. Please read the research about what worked in the stock market:

Part I: What worked in the market from 1998-2008? Part I: Predictability Rank
Part II: Role of Valuations
Part III: Intrinsic Value, Discounted Cash Flow and Margin of Safety


Rating: 3.8/5 (4 votes)

Comments

shaved_head_and_balls
Shaved_head_and_balls - 1 year ago
Your explanation of the cost of shorting stocks is misleading. It's true that "hard-to-borrow" stocks incur high borrowing costs. For stocks that are not hard-to-borrow, a short position will have zero borrowing cost, assuming the stock pays no dividend AND you have enough cash in your account to exceed any paper loss (nightly mark-to-market adjustment) resulting from the stock price rising above the price at which you initially shorted the stock.

Please leave your comment:


More Gurufocus Links

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
Free 7-day Trial
FEEDBACK

This article has been successfully added into your Bookmark.

Members Only. Please Sign Up or Log In first.

Bookmark of this article has been deleted.