10-year

10-Year Anniversary Promotion (20% off)

Join GuruFocus Premium Membership Now for Only $279/Year

The largest discount in the last 10 years

Save up to $500 on Global Membership.

Don't Miss It !

Free 7-day Trial
All Articles and Columns »

Buffett on CNBC: "There Should Be Lots of Opportunities in Japan"

November 21, 2011 | About:
matsandalex

matsandalex

10 followers
Warren Buffett appears to be on an international shopping trip. He is currently in Japan visiting manufacturing plants. In an interview with CNBC, Buffett commented on the attractiveness of some European equities.

“When I left Omaha I left an order to buy one European stock which we will undoubtedly be buying today and we’ll probably be buying it tomorrow and the next day and next week and next month,” Buffett said.

“I can think of a dozen European stocks that are quite attractive. Whether they’re more attractive than something else I can find in the United States depends on the prices on any given day or given week but there are European stocks I like,” Buffett said.

Examples of some stocks in Europe that Buffett might be interested in would include Nestle (NSRGY) which is similar to his position in Kraft. Buffett might also be interested in Diageo (DEO) which is similar to Buffett's previous position in Anheuser-Busch (BUD)

Buffett appears to be waiting for a pullback in order to buy more shares of Tesco (TSCDY.PK).

“There are some wonderful businesses in Europe, and the prices have come down on some of them,” he said. "Debt generally doesn’t interest me very much… I do not like currency-based investments under most circumstances. I’d much rather own equities.”

"If the price came down some on Tesco I’d buy some more of that,” Buffett said.

Buffett also said that he's hunting for large companies in Korea that can move the needle.


Rating: 3.6/5 (19 votes)

Comments

mcwillia
Mcwillia - 3 years ago
Warren says here he does not invest on Macro considerations. Well, he ought to avoid Japan then, since the macro risk is especially important there. Runaway yen inflation is structurally in the cards, as is a JGB default, just not as fast as Kyle Bass thinks...below are my reasons (re-posted from another comment of mine). Buffett could buy a wonderful business at a sensible (yen denominated) price there, but a Japanese sovereign crisis may well render that price nonsensical and the company's cash flow either trivial or destroyed. As a Berkshire shareholder, I want him thinking hard about macro before buying Japanese equities or companies.

(Below is re-posted)

Kyle Bass' "Widow-maker" JGB/Yen short won't work, since the crisis won't happen soon enough for the shorts to profit. Here's what will delay it, but it will come.

  • Japan is super-stockpiling forex reserves by its present interventions to suppress the yen. These will later be spent defending the yen, pushing off the crisis day. The present interventions can be done at ZIRP rates, so Japan piles up a forex warchest for free. The current account will add even more over time. Further yen suppression will, too. These forex reserves now equal over 20% of GDP. These will not eliminate a determined currency assault, but they will delay the effects far longer than people suppose. The longer Japan remains the risk-off haven, the bigger this will swell as the government capitalizes on this win-win forex situation. Extrapolation from the costs of their current interventions, Japan could now sustain a 20 yen/$ boost constantly, for over a year.
  • Household savings are still 16x the national budget. As they die in ever greater numbers, death/estate taxes channel a big amount of this directly into the national treasury. This alone could alleviate immediate marginal rollover problems instead of worsening them. Politically, the Diet could easily increase this tax and very quickly reap a windfall. It would be much easier than the sales or vat tax, and the Keidanren plus the banks and LDP would be able to force it through, especially by trading concessions to farmers, whose vote is hugely disproportional to the elderly, owing to perennial failure to redistrict.
  • The budget will certainly cut military spending (greater reliance on U.S. security as we worry about China more) and by increasing the Health co-pay for individuals under the national health insurance. The first is politically very popular, the second is easy via ministerial actions insulated from real democracy. Privatizations of Japan Tobacco, Japan Post, public utilities, etc. will also produce brief windfalls of approximately 2/3 of one year's annual bond dependence.
  • Most importantly, the rollover crisis will be partially self-correcting. The Government will not intervene until the 135-160 range. At that time, the forex stockpile will be twice as powerful as now, and the longer they wait, the easier intervention will be. Meanwhile, Japan GDP will be skyrocketing as the exporting engine explodes to life. Bank and Ins. Co. balance sheets will show net improvement as overseas carry-trade investments increase in value, easing credit and exerting negative rate pressure. In the 170's, tax revenues would be swelling, current account-driven upward pressure on the yen would be extreme, and the forex warchest spending would be decisive.
  • Next, the Japanese people have a ridiculous capacity for austerity, legendary obedience, literally suicidal willingness to support Japan, when asked. If the emperor were to ask the people to 'buy bonds' they would.
  • Also, odds of default are high in countries with external creditors, but politically much harder in countries where sovereign default injures mainly its own nationals. This creates much more political solidarity and appetite for true reform than can has been the case in Greece and Italy, where nationalism is at odds with austerity. In Japan, these forces are in mutual support.
  • The continual productivity gains combined with Japan's low industrial utilization mean that there is much less domestic demand for investment of national savings, so the savings glut burns off even slower and can more easily be lent to the government in the form of JGB's than would be the case in a healthy economy.


Now, none of these individually eliminates a rollover crisis, but collectively they do push it back, beyond what the costs of a current hedge justify. So, this may still be a widow-maker trade.

Please leave your comment:


Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
Free 7-day Trial
FEEDBACK