The Hanover Insurance Group Inc. (THG) filed Annual Report for the period ended 2010-12-31.
Hanover Insuran has a market cap of $1.83 billion; its shares were traded at around $40.93 with a P/E ratio of 135.8 and P/S ratio of 0.5. The dividend yield of Hanover Insuran stocks is 2.9%.
This is the annual revenues and earnings per share of THG over the last 10 years. For detailed 10-year financial data and charts, go to 10-Year Financials of THG.
Highlight of Business Operations:Our consolidated net income was $154.8 million in 2010, compared to $197.2 million in 2009. The $42.4 million decrease is primarily due to a $35.3 million decline in after-tax segment income, principally driven by higher catastrophe losses, which increased $39.9 million, net of taxes. Results in 2009 included a $34.5 million pre-tax gain ($22.3 million, net of taxes) associated with a tender offer whereby we repurchased at a discount a portion of our mandatorily redeemable preferred securities and our senior debentures. In 2010, we repurchased junior debentures which resulted in a $2.0 million loss (see also Significant Transactions). In addition, earnings from our discontinued operations decreased by $7.8 million. Partially offsetting these decreases was a $28.3 million increase in net realized investment gains, from a gain of $1.4 million in 2009, to a gain of $29.7 million in 2010.
Our consolidated net income was $197.2 million in 2009, compared to $20.6 million in 2008. The $176.6 million improvement is primarily due to a $99.2 million improvement in our net realized investment position, from a loss in 2008 of $97.8 million to a gain in 2009 of $1.4 million. Additionally, results associated with the discontinued FAFLIC business improved by $91.9 million. We recognized an $84.8 million loss in 2008 due to its then pending sale, whereas in 2009, we recognized a gain of $7.1 million. In 2009, we also recognized a pre-tax gain of $34.5 million ($22.3 million net of taxes) related to the aforementioned corporate debt repurchases (see also Significant Transactions). These increases in earnings for the period compared to the same period in 2008 were partially offset by lower after-tax segment results of $18.5 million, and the recognition, in 2008, of a $10.1 million gain on the sale of AMGRO, Inc. (AMGRO).
Commercial Lines underwriting profit decreased $81.5 million, to a loss of $20.6 million, in 2010, compared to profit of $60.9 million in 2009. This decrease was primarily due to a reduction in favorable prior year loss and LAE reserve development, increased catastrophe losses resulting from several severe hail, wind and thunderstorm events, and to higher expenses, partially offset by more favorable current accident year loss results. Catastrophe related activity increased $33.0 million in 2010, from $28.6 million in 2009 to $61.6 million in 2010, primarily in our commercial multiple peril line.
Personal Lines underwriting profit increased $45.2 million, to a profit of $1.6 million, in 2010, compared to a loss of $43.6 million in 2009. This increase was primarily due to more favorable current accident year loss results, principally resulting from benign loss trends, which we attribute to improved non-catastrophe weather, and improvement in our mix of business, shifting to a greater proportion of whole account business, continued rate increases in both personal automobile and homeowners lines, and to lower expenses. These were partially offset by increased catastrophe losses due to several severe hail, wind, and thunderstorm events. Catastrophe related activity increased $28.4 million in 2010, from $70.3 million in 2009 to $98.7 million in 2010.
Net premiums written in the personal automobile line of business declined 4.3%, primarily as a result of declines in our core states of Massachusetts, New York and New Jersey of 11.4%, 8.5% and 10.5%, respectively. This decrease resulted primarily from lower policies in force in these core states. Policies in force in the personal automobile line of business decreased 2.0% during 2009 compared to 2008, primarily driven by our efforts to improve or maintain margins in our core states. Decreased policies in force in these states were partially offset by an increase in policies in force in our identified growth states as we continue to manage these states with a focus on profitable growth.