On Wednesday, the company opened up ever so slightly: Terry Myerson, Corporate Vice President of the Windows Phone Division, spoke to investors at the Mobile World Congress (link here); some of the highlights from the event appear below:
The biggest challenge: building customer awareness – “Delivering that right experience to the end user, that's very much on my mind; and then we just need all sorts of ads to ensure they find out about it. In many ways, I think that our biggest challenges right now are not with regard to building a product. I think the reviews are all great. The customer satisfaction scores are great. And our challenges are really about building consumer awareness.”
On OEM partner Nokia (NOK) – “Well, with Nokia what we have is our most committed OEM… essentially we can do work on the demand side with consumers, but we need to do work on the supply side, and having a partner who is very clearly working to make that market is critical. And so we're doing everything we can to support them.”
On marketing changes – “I think the big change we're making at the highest level is, we have invested our marketing efforts historically through partner marketing… our emphasis in the phone space will be on consumer marketing. I think that we need to rebuild the Windows [Phone] brand with consumers, and drive demand up there.”
Urgency of the marketing push – “It really takes time to build up speed… and we are, unfortunately, changing our marketing approach, [so] picking up speed again is going to take us a little time. And I'm not talking time in years, I'm talking time in months. And we're focused on marketing.”
Still quite vague, but at least one thing is starting to become clear: Microsoft will be making a big push to grab the attention of consumers; considering the lead that Android (GOOG) and iOS (AAPL) have, they are going to need it.
About the author:I'm a value investor, with a focus on patience; I look to buy great companies that are suffering from short term issues, and hope to load up when these opportunities present themselves. As this would suggest, I run a fairly concentrated portfolio by most standards, usually with 8-10 names; from the perspective of a businessman rather than a market participant / stock trader, I believe this is more than sufficient diversification.
I hope to own a collection of great businesses; to ever sell one, I would demand a substantial premium to the average market valuation due to what I believe are the understated benefits to the long term investor of superior fundamentals and time on intrinsic value. I don't have a target when I purchase a stock; my goal is to replicate the underlying returns of the business in question - which if I've done my job properly, should be very attractive over a period of many years.