Free 7-day Trial
All Articles and Columns »

Be the Tiger Woods of Investing: Beat Everybody Else By Avoiding the Big Miss

July 16, 2012 | About:

The Dividend Guy Blog

As I’m coming back from vacation, I asked Paul from Capital Manifesto to write this guest post about investing behaviors. I can relate to this article as in the past two years, my dividend stock picks did very well but I wasn’t able to avoid “the Big Miss”. My two trades on RIM (2011) and on VNP (2012) were two “Big Miss” and brought my whole portfolio down. The funny part is that I’m a similar golfer; I’m doing well overall but I’m always trying to do THE shot that will make my game exciting… or make a triple bogey!

Many people always want to know what the best way to get great returns are. Of course, they are looking for that one magic bullet that will make their portfolio or other investment sparkle and outperform all of their friends. Unfortunately, it NEVER works that way because as one investment gets hot, other investments will start to lag and vice versa. It’s just the way the cookie crumbles, much like everything else in life.

I recently read the controversial book by Tiger Woods’ ex-coach, Hank Haney. He spoke that when he coached Tiger, and other golfers like Mark O’Meara, he always tried to teach them to avoid “the big miss” while playing golf. For those of you golfers out there, this is usually that one horribly errant drive or bunker shot that could make an easy par or bogey into a disastrous triple bogey, or worse. If you have one or two per round, which is a problem I used to have until I got professional lessons, it can mess up your game, your mind, your confidence, and then you will wonder why you even play. Same with investing: If you have your steady investments but every so often you have that ONE or TWO laggards that really drag your portfolio, you will seem like you are never gaining ground on retirement. It can be demoralizing. So the key is to avoid “the big miss” in investments, just like in golf or any other sport you may play.

To continue with the golf analogy, many people know that Tiger Woods has been a dominant force in golf since he arrived in 1996. Yes, he is going through problems now, but even this year he has won two events and seems to have his game coming back. When Tiger was dominating year after year, if you look at his stats, he only average 0.5 to 1.5 strokes per round better than his best peers yet he dominated even the #2 ranked guys because if you add up 0.5 or 1 stroke per round to a four round tournament, it added up to a lot of strokes and a lot of wiggle room.

Warren Buffett is our Tiger Woods in the investment world. He has racked up 20%+ returns since the 1960s and if you look at his yearly performance, he rarely has down years. In fact, I believe he has only had 2 down years in all of those years. Does he have some major advantage over everyone else? I think he does NOW because everyone brings him the best deals. But back in the 1960s and 1970s, when he was crushing even 20% returns, he had the same information as other people in his group but he assessed investments differently. He looked at the base value and if he understood the business and the moving parts, he was willing to invest. Too often, even “expert” investors chase returns and that is where problems happen. Usually when returns become hot, that is when they are poised to have problems. It goes back to my article on the volatility index, when everyone is happy and optimistic is usually when things are ripe for a correction and vice versa. Is this set in stone? Of course not…

…But look at other events of the past: Tech stocks of the late 1990s and real estate of the 2000s. When those sectors were hopping and popping, no one could find a bad investment and no one could say why any investment should be looked at cautiously. You have to be able to break every investment down into its basic form. If you don’t feel comfortable with the outcome, avoid it. This is how you can gain an edge of a few percentage points per year. Look at historic trends in investing, such as the fact that dividend paying stocks have routinely beat the S&P 500 overall by 2-3% per year for decades. If you averaged 2% per year for 30 years on top of the S&P 500, you would have over double the amount of money than if you just matched the S&P 500 return which is already considered a pretty good benchmark!

I don’t have the secret investment advice to get you your edge consistently over time. What I can say is that understanding and avoiding what you have a gut feeling is incorrect is a good way to start investing. Avoid “the big miss” by avoiding what your golf buddy or neighbor is telling you to invest in because this may only cost you a percent or two per year, but if you save that, as you saw in my last paragraph, you would be able to retire with over double the amount of money than following the fun trends.

Author Bio

Paul Gabrail is an investor who prefers to focus on the realistic aspects of the economy. He is never hesitant to offer his oftentimes unique perspective on all matters related to the economy, real estate and personal finance.

He co-founded Select Investment Group, a real estate investment firm that owns and manages 800 rental unit properties and $60 million in assets. He’s also a partner at MGO, a private wealth management firm with more than $400 million in managed assets. For more articles and thoughts like this, you can visit his blog or follow him on Twitter @capmanifesto.

Rating: 3.4/5 (7 votes)


Please leave your comment:

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
Free 7-day Trial