HILL-ROM HOLDINGS, INC. Reports Operating Results (10-Q)

Author's Avatar
Jul 26, 2012
HILL-ROM HOLDINGS, INC. (HRC, Financial) filed Quarterly Report for the period ended 2012-06-30.

Hill-rom Holdings, Inc. has a market cap of $1.96 billion; its shares were traded at around $25.87 with a P/E ratio of 13.6 and P/S ratio of 1.2. The dividend yield of Hill-rom Holdings, Inc. stocks is 1.6%. Hill-rom Holdings, Inc. had an annual average earning growth of 3.7% over the past 10 years.

Highlight of Business Operations:

We perform an impairment assessment on goodwill annually during the third fiscal quarter, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of a reporting unit may not be recoverable. These events or conditions include, but are not limited to, a significant adverse change in the business environment; regulatory environment or legal factors; a current period operating or cash flow loss combined with a history of such losses or a projection of continuing losses; a substantial decline in market capitalization of our stock; or a sale or disposition of a significant portion of a reporting unit.

25 Table of Contents

25

The goodwill impairment assessment requires evaluating qualitative factors or performing a quantitative assessment to determine that a reporting unit s carrying value would be more likely than not to exceed its fair value. The qualitative goodwill impairment assessment requires evaluating factors to determine that a reporting unit s carrying value would not more likely than not exceed its fair value. As part of our goodwill qualitative testing process for each reporting unit, we evaluate various factors that are specific to the reporting unit as well as industry and macroeconomic factors in order to determine whether it is reasonably likely to have a material impact on the fair value of our reporting units. Examples of the factors that were considered included the results of the most recent impairment test, current and long-range forecasted financial results, and changes in the strategic outlook or organizational structure of the reporting units. The long-range financial forecasts of the reporting units, which are based upon management s long-term view of our markets and are used by senior management and the Board of Directors to evaluate operating performance were compared to the forecasts used in the prior year analysis to determine if management expectations for the business have changed. Management changes in strategic outlook or organizational structure represent internally driven strategic or organizational changes that could have a material impact on our results of operations or product offerings. Industry, market changes and macroeconomic indicators represent our view on changes outside of the Company that could have a material impact on our results of operations, product offerings or future cash flow forecasts. In the event we were to determine that a reporting unit s carrying value would more likely than not exceed its fair value, quantitative testing would be performed comparing carrying values to estimated fair values. Changes in management intentions, market conditions, operating performance and other similar circumstances could affect the assumptions used in this qualitative impairment test. Changes in the assumptions could result in impairment charges that could be material to our Consolidated Financial Statements in any given period.

The fair value of our reporting units in the first step of our quantitative impairment process requires significant management judgment with respect to forecasted sales, gross margin and selling, general and administrative expenses, capital expenditures, the selection and use of an appropriate discount rate, the selection of comparable public companies and the determination of an appropriate control premium. In addition, the use of third-party appraisals of significant tangible and intangible assets as part of the second step of the impairment test also requires management judgment related to certain inputs and assumptions. There are inherent uncertainties related to each of the above listed assumptions and inputs, and our judgment in applying them. The use of different assumptions, estimates or judgments in either step of the process could materially increase or decrease the related impairment charge.

Read the The complete Report