North America is not a "Ponzi scheme" as some analysts and executives claimed back in 2009. Here are some chilling excerpts:
The Canadian-based acquisitions
1) South Korea's state-run Korea Gas (Kogas) signed in 2010 an agreement with Canadian independent gas producer Encana (ECA.TO) to jointly develop three unconventional gas fields in British Columbia (BC), Canada. Kogas paid almost C$7.30 per acre and acquired a 50% interest in the fields. Kogas would invest US$1.1 billion over the next five years to jointly develop 720 square kilometers in Encana's Montney and Horn River shale plays in northeastern BC.
2) In 2011, the South African Sasol (SSL) purchased a 50% net working interest in the Canadian Talisman (TLM.TO) Montney assets for C$1.05 billion. Sasol had also purchased a 50% net interest in Talisman’s Farrell Creek Montney properties west of Fort St. John in December 2010. The Canadian Terra Energy (TT.TO) which also holds a significan parcel (130,000 net acres) of Montney land, pointed out at its corporate presentation that Sasol paid a whopping C$38,000 per acre for this liquids-rich Montney land. If we compare this deal with the aforementioned deal of KOGAS, we conclude that Montney land's value rose big in just one year.
3) Sinopec (SHI), China’s biggest refiner, agreed to buy the Canadian Daylight Energy (DAY.TO) for C$2.2 billion (US$2.1 billion) in cash, gaining Canadian oil and shale-gas reserves in its largest acquisition in late 2011. The state-owned Chinese company offered C$10.08 a share for the Calgary-based Daylight which was a 70% premium than Daylight’s average price during the past 20 trading days. The takeover gave the Beijing-based company access to more than 300,000 acres of land in areas rich with oil and natural gas.
4) Malaysia's state-owned oil and natural gas company Petronas agreed to buy the Canadian Progress Energy resources (PRQ.TO) for C$4.8 billion in its biggest deal, as it moves to export Canadian gas from Progress's Montney land to Asia. Petronas offered C$20.45 a share for Progress Energy, 77% more than its close before the deal. Including convertible debentures, the deal is valued around C$5.5 billion, Calgary-based Progress Energy. Progress is the largest holder in the Montney shale-gas area of British Columbia.
5) The Chinese oil producer CNOOC (CEO) expanded its footprint in North America's energy market with a $15.1 billion acquisition of Nexen (NXY), a Canadian company. Nexen's assets in North America include exploration and development in the Gulf of Mexico and shale oil development in British Columbia. Nexen also has operations in the North Sea off the coast of Great Britain and off the coast of Nigeria.
6) The Indian Reliance Industries inked joint ventures with U.S.-based Chevron (CVX), Carrizo (CRZO) and Pioneer (PXD) in 2010. Acquisition of shale gas assets has been a significant venture for RIL and in hopes of transforming itself into a global oil and gas developing enterprise in the coming years, Reliance is on the lookout for additional global opportunities and for extending a hand of partnership to leading oil and gas-developing firms of the world. By adding reserves of natural gas trapped in overseas shale gas assets, Reliance will be able to add to its domestic fuel output substantially. The billionaire Mukesh Ambani who leads RIL is eying shale gas assets in the resource-rich regions of Canada currently, after having successfully acquired and developed similar shale gas assets in Pennsylvania and Texas in the U.S. last year. RIL, one of the top prospects, is presently studying Canadian shale gas assets and evaluating the possibility of likely partnership with its energy firms.
7) ExxonMobil Corp. (XOM), through its subsidiary ExxonMobil Canada Energy, signed an agreement to acquire Calgary-based oil and gas exploration and production firm Celtic Exploration Ltd. (CLT.TO) from Fidelity Management & Research Co. and other investors for $2.9 billion in cash on Oct. 17, 2012. The Canadian Celtic Exploration Ltd. holds leases in Alberta’s gas-producing Duvernay and Montney formations.
The U.S.-Based Acquisitions
1) With the acquisition of Chesapeake (CHK) assets in the Fayetteville Shale ($4.75 billion) in early 2011 and the acquisition of Petrohawk ($12.1 billion plus $3 billion in debt) in 2011, BHP has joined the ranks of non-U.S. companies buying up shale resources in North America. This way, BHP decided to diversify from minerals and mining into oil and gas. Essentially, with the acquisition of Petrohawk, the Anglo-Australian BHP has acquired acreage in the gas-rich Haynesville Shale (225,000 net acres) and Lower Bossier Shale (120,000 net acres), a condensate/wet gas position in the Eagle Ford Shale (332K net acres), and an oil rich position in the Midland and Delaware Basin (325,000 net acres, combined). As of their most recent investor presentation, Petrohawk had proved reserves of 3.4 Tcfe with an additional 27.4 Tcf plus 406 Mmbc plus 495 Mmbngl of risked resource potential. One last important item to note is that BHP not only bought Petrohawk’s assets but also their people and technology. Petrohawk has been one of the innovators in shale gas drilling and with the acquisition, BHP quickly moves ahead of the learning curve.
2) The Norwegian Statoil (STO) also announced recently the acquisition of Brigham getting unconventional oil expertise as Brigham operates in the Bakken formation of North Dakota. The deal was an all-cash tender offer of all outstanding Brigham shares at $36.50 a share totaling $4.4 billion. Statoil gains a top position in arguably the premiere unconventional oil play in the U.S. Over 3,000 Bakken wells have been drilled since 2004, with 98 being Brigham operated. The Brigham Williston Basin position entails 235,200 net “core development” acres and an additional 140,600 “future development” acres. In their Oct. 5 presentation Brigham noted 794 net remaining locations in their core area. Statoil will be busy for years in the Bakken, even with wells per year at 140. Much has been made of the Statoil technical expertise and how the Brigham technical culture is a good fit. Drilling info data also shows Brigham’s 30-day peak oil rate is 80% above the average. The Brigham type curve shows a peak monthly oil rate of 514 BOE/D.
3) The Chinese giant CNOOC (CEO) has done two JVs with Chesapeake (CHK). In 2010 it bought a 33% position in Chesapeake’s Eagle Ford shale position for $1.1 billion. Then in 2011 it added a 33% stake in Chesapeake’s Colorado acreage in the Niobrara shale for $1.3 billion.
4) In early 2012 Devon Energy (DVN) signed a JV agreement with the Chinese petrochemical company Sinopec (SHI) in a $2.5 billion deal that gives Sinopec a one-third stake in five U.S. emerging plays. These include the Mississippi Lime, Niobrara, Utica, Tuscaloosa Marine, and Michigan plays. Sinopec International Petroleum Exploration & Production Corp, a unit of Sinopec, will make a $900 million cash payment upon closing of the deal and pay $1.6 billion in the form of a drilling carry. Devon (DVN) expects the entire $1.6 billion designated for drilling costs to be spent by the end of 2014. Through 2012, the companies expect to drill about 125 wells in the five plays.
5) The latest JV agreement of August 2012 involves Japan’s Sumitomo Corp. in a $1.4 billion deal. The agreement entitles Sumitomo to a 30% stake in 650,000 net acres in the Permian Basin prospective to the Cline and Midland-Wolfcamp shale. Sumitomo has agreed to invest in the non-operated interests of the project, including leases, existing wells and facilities. Drilling activities are expected to last over a 15-year period, while the entire project life is estimated to be more than 30 years. This will enhance the company’s capital efficiency, future returns and overall financial strength, according to Devon Energy CEO, John Richels. The transaction is expected to close in late September when Sumitomo agreed to pay $340 million in cash and another $1.025 billion in a drilling carry, which would cover 70% of Devon (DVN)’s capital requirements. This is not the first U.S. JV in which Sumitomo has been involved. In 2009, Sumitomo was the first Asian company to participate in shale gas development in the Barnett. The next year, Sumitomo also moved into the Marcellus, striking up a JV there.
6) Another "landing" on a U.S.-based property took place few weeks ago when a Chinese company paid $27.5 million and two Indian ones paid $82.5 million for a 10% and a 30% stake, respectively, in Carrizo (CRZO)'s Niobrara land. Haimo Oil & Gas LLC (Haimo), a subsidiary of Lanzhou Haimo Technologies Co. Ltd., a company formed under the laws of the People's Republic of China, will acquire an undivided interest in approximately 6,000 net acres located primarily in Weld and Adams Counties, Colo., along with associated infrastructure and production of approximately 185 Boe/day for an all-cash payment of $27.5 million. Oil India Ltd. and Indian Oil Corp., which bought the 30% stake, said it intends to invest another $230 million over the next several years to develop the Niobrara acreage. Following the closing of these transactions late in the fourth quarter of 2012, the joint-venture interest ownership participation in Carrizo's Niobrara development activities will stand collectively at 60% Carrizo, 30% OIL/IOCL and 10% Haimo.
The Canadian Oil Sands Are out of Favor
Apart from the 2011 deal when the Chinese CNOOC (CEO) spent $2 billion to purchase the Canadian oil sands operator OPTI Canada and the Sinopec (SHI) $4.65 billion agreement to buy a stake in Syncrude Canada in 2010, the M&A deals favor oil and natural gas over the expensive oil sands of Canada.
The Asian state-owned oil companies are planning in a very holistic way for energy demand over the next few decades, and North American gas is cheap if a company wants to add reserves. Oil sands projects are too big in scale, in terms of advanced investment and the slow pace of return and scale of the infrastructure building, as they will require C$23 billion this year in investments, according to the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers. This is why the foreign companies are holding off on oil sands purchases but are eying Western Canadian natural gas reserves as well as conventional oil deposits instead to quench current supply shortages, said Wenran Jiang, a University of Alberta professor and adviser to the Alberta government on Asian investment. Price discounts for Canadian heavy crude, made from oil sands bitumen, when compared to prices paid for Brent, the international benchmark, are also working against oil sands investments.
U.S. energy companies ConocoPhillips (COP), Marathon Oil Corp. (MRO) and Murphy Oil Corp. (MUR) said recently they are all considering divesting oil-sands assets amid industry concerns about project cost overruns and discounting of Canadian crude prices as export pipeline capacity is squeezed.
All that being said, the consolidation of the oil and the natural gas assets in North America is ongoing, and the question is, "Who is the next acquisition target?"
Disclosure: Long SCS.TO (Second Wave Petroleum), TT.TO (Terra Energy) and Tuscany Intl Drilling (TID.TO).