1. How to use GuruFocus - Tutorials
  2. What Is in the GuruFocus Premium Membership?
  3. A DIY Guide on How to Invest Using Guru Strategies
Dr. Paul Price
Dr. Paul Price
Articles (487)  | Author's Website |


April 29, 2013 | About:
Everything works sometimes. Nothing works every time.

Stock market chartists (technical analysts) claim they can predict the future by studying past share, index or commodity price action. They can draw lines that ‘prove’ specific levels are ‘support’ and others are ‘resistance.’

The problem is that it doesn’t work most of the time. Even a broken clock is correct twice a day. Technical analysts constantly trot out their ‘broken clock’ winners to suck you in to the idea that you can profit without understanding what you are investing on a fundamental basis.

What does a TA practitioner do when a presumed support level is violated? They note the next support price that they have identified from past trading. If the new, lower price holds, they can declare victory. If not, it’s on to yet another cheaper target.

Does price action indicate that the ‘smart money’ knows how a quarterly report will look, or how the market will react to it? Take a look at just a few days of trading from last week in the shares of infrastructure play Aegion (NASDAQ:AEGN).


The company was due to report after the close on Wednesday April 24th. By mid-morning on Monday the stock was down 3.2% from the previous Friday’s close. Did that mean ‘get out’ because somebody knew the news was going to be bad? By 11:00 am on Wednesday the shares were up to $21.63, 5.8% higher than the previous week’s close. Did that make them a buy because insiders were sure the quarterly report would be great?

Oops. A mini flash-crash in AEGN sent the stock reeling to a weekly low of $19.72 in just seconds. Trend reversals like that shouldn’t be ignored! But wait, right after the open on Thursday, AEGN popped to $22.47.


From Wednesday’s low to Thursday’s high the shares had moved 13.95%. The only thing those widely varied quotes told you for sure was where you could buy or sell. From 4:00 pm on April 19 to 4:00 pm on April 26 the stock moved from $20.44 - $21.07. The enormous gyrations were simply noise that needed to be ignored unless you wanted to sell high or buy low. Doing that is the antithesis of technical analysis.


I challenge all readers to show me any published technical analysis that could have helped traders make money in the Russell 2000 over the past two months. Following trends would have caused severe whiplash accompanied by extreme money hemorrhaging.

Do your accounts a favor. Stop reading about technical trading. Do homework on fundamentals then buy when prices are low. Your future net worth will thank you for making the effort.

For value investment ideas click here ... http://marketshadows.com/newsletter-articles

About the author:

Dr. Paul Price

Visit Dr. Paul Price's Website

Rating: 4.0/5 (21 votes)


MritikCapital - 3 years ago
Hi Dr Price,

A thoroughly enjoyable article! I find your articles simple yet very profound and they make me think. Keep them coming.
AriePermadi premium member - 3 years ago
I agree with you, TA = BS

But well it give some perspective on psychology.
Vgm - 3 years ago
"If your financial advisor starts talking about beta and other technical terms, zip up your purse and walk away." Buffett
Sww - 3 years ago
Buffett mentioned couple times he tried it (TA) before he read The Intelligent Investors and he is 19.
Doug Taylor
Doug Taylor premium member - 3 years ago
While I agree value investing based on fundamentals is best I do think even a value investor can at least get some clues from charts. A solid company with good fundamentals is a great buy but I like to get it at a good price so I do like to get prices that appear to have support where the price rebounds off of over a period of time. If that is not the bottom and the company is good I buy more at the next support level down.

Good article, I know when I first started I only used technical analysis and after thinking I had seen a pattern enough to feel it was reliable it failed when I bought a stock based on it often.
THEITMAN714 - 3 years ago
I agree with your conclusion that TA=BS.

There is no predictive value in it outside of occassionally being a self-fulfilling prophecy for day traders....

Please leave your comment:

GuruFocus Mobile App

User Generated Screeners

chrispageROC 10yr new FCF filter
MTNestActive filters 052516
morsy.hananBuffet Soros
Doug TaylorNet cash dividend
DBrizanProspects 6May2016
DBrizanProspects 5May2016
DBrizanholdings & prospects 25May2016
matt.baker52 week low

Select portfolio(s):

  • Loading...

Why you are interested?

Your selection and notes will be stored in your portfolio.

Login to add portfolio
Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)