GuruFocus Premium Membership

Serving Intelligent Investors since 2004. Only 96 cents a day.

Free Trial

Free 7-day Trial
All Articles and Columns »

Absolute and Relative Valuation Models Indicate the Same: Abbot Is a Buy

March 31, 2014 | About:
James Miller Phd

James Miller Phd

3 followers

Abbott Laboratories (ABT) is engaged in the discovery, development, manufacture and sale of health care products. Market-based metrics indicate that the stock is relatively undervalued. So now let's take a look at the intrinsic value of this company and try to explain to investors the reasons why it is a good buy or not. With a dividend-payment history that affirms its commitment to maximize shareholder wealth, the company raised its quarterly dividend by 57% to $0.22 per share from $0.14. Its dividend yield is 1.67%, ahead of the industry yield of 1.35%. This makes it interesting to analyze the Discount Dividend Model.

In this article, we present a model that is by no means the be-all and end-all for valuation. The purpose is to force investors to evaluate different assumptions about growth and future prospects.

Valuation

In stock valuation models, dividend discount models (DDM) define cash flow as the dividends to be received by the shareholders. Extending the period indefinitely, the fundamental value of the stock is the present value of an infinite stream of dividends according to John Burr Williams.

Although this is theoretically correct, it requires forecasting dividends for many periods, so we can use some growth models like: Gordon (constant) growth model, the Two or Three stage growth model or the H-Model (which is a special case of a two-stage model).

To start with, the Gordon Growth Model (GGM) assumes that dividends increase at a constant rate indefinitely.

Let's estimate the inputs for modeling:

Required Rate of Return (r)

The capital asset pricing model (CAPM) estimates the required return on equity using the following formula: required return on stockj = risk-free rate + beta of j x equity risk premium

Assumptions:

Risk-Free Rate: Rate of return on LT Government Debt: RF = 2.67%

Beta: β =0.72

GGM equity risk premium = (1-year forecasted dividend yield on market index) + (consensus long-term earnings growth rate) – (long-term government bond yield) = 2.13% + 11.97% - 2.67% = 11.43%[1]

rABT = RF + βABT [GGM ERP]

= 2.67% + 0.72 [11.43%]

= 10.9%

Dividend growth rate (g)

The sustainable growth rate is the rate at which earnings and dividends can grow indefinitely assuming that the firm´s debt-to-equity ratio is unchanged and it doesn't issue new equity.

g = b x ROE

b = retention rate

ROE can be estimated using Dupont formula:

Because for most companies, the GGM is unrealistic, let´s consider the H-Model which assumes a growth rate that starts high and then declines linearly over the high growth stage, until it reverts to the long-run rate, a smoother transition to the mature phase growth rate that is more realistic.

Dividend growth rate (g) implied by Gordon growth model (long-run rate)

With the GGM formula and simple math:

The growth rates are:

Year

Value

g(t)

1

g(1)

9.26%

2

g(2)

9.04%

3

g(3)

8.83%

4

g(4)

8.62%

5

g(5)

8.41%

G(2), g(3) and g(4) are calculated using linear interpolation between g(1) and g(5).

Calculation of Intrinsic Value

Year

Concept

Amount

Present value

0

Div 0

0.88

 

1

Div 1

0.96

0.87

2

Div 2

1.05

0.85

3

Div 3

1.14

0.84

4

Div 4

1.24

0.82

5

Div 5

1.34

0.80

5

Terminal Value

58.49

34.87

Intrinsic value

   

39.05

Current share price

   

38.31

Final Comment

When the stock price is lower than the intrinsic value, the stock is said to be undervalued and it makes sense to buy the stock. We have covered just one valuation method and investors should not be relied on alone in order to determine a fair (over/under) value for a potential investment.

Hedge fund gurus have also been active in the company. Gurus like Paul Tudor Jones (Trades, Portfolio), Jim Simons (Trades, Portfolio) and Daniel Loeb (Trades, Portfolio) have bought it.

Disclosure: James Miller holds no position in any stocks mentioned.


[1] This values where obtained from Blommberg´s CRP function.


Rating: 5.0/5 (4 votes)

Voters:

Comments

Please leave your comment:


Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
Free 7-day Trial
FEEDBACK