On April 15, I sent out a note (here) asking, “Would you short this company?”
My conclusion was simple: it was time to short LULU.
That was at $52.50. Here’s what’s happened since:
Yesterday, with the stock down 16% I found myself tempted to cover. But then I began reading the rather sharp words Chip Wilson had for the Board (here):
I am concerned that the board is not aligned with the core values of product and innovation on which lululemon was founded and on which the company thrived.
I have found a palpable imbalance in board representation, which is heavily weighted towards short-term results at the expense of product, culture and brand and longer-term corporate goals. I believe this is impacting the company’s prospects. My vote today sends a signal to the financial community that the company must address this imbalance if lululemon is to fully recover.
- Warning! GuruFocus has detected 3 Warning Signs with LULU. Click here to check it out.
- LULU 15-Year Financial Data
- The intrinsic value of LULU
- Peter Lynch Chart of LULU
And I tried to rationalize why the Company would publish such an apathetic response (here):
Contrary to Mr. Wilson’s assertions, lululemon’s Board members are aligned with the Company’s core values and possess the necessary expertise to successfully lead lululemon forward.
After some contemplation, I came to another rather simple conclusion: the Company is headed for a rather long Shavasana and there’s no compelling reason to cover the short. So I press on.
Addendum: An angry Chip Wilson is a frightening thought; he is, after all, the single largest shareholder with nearly 28% of the stock (source).