GuruFocus Premium Membership

Serving Intelligent Investors since 2004. Only 96 cents a day.

Free Trial

Free 7-day Trial
All Articles and Columns »

The True Nature of Fannie Mae (FNM) and Freddie Mac (FRE)

July 31, 2008 | About:

Thomas Tan, CFA

0 followers
Thomas Tan, CFA, column: The True Nature of Fan and Fred. Last Wednesday, WSJ had a great article called "The Fannie Mae Gang" by Paul A. Gigot.

It had good discussion on another aspect of the current mortgage crisis and roles and responsibilities of many players dated back many years ago. It showed us the inner circle of the secret "Skull and Bones" society around Fannie Mae (FNM) and Freddie Mac (FRE). It detailed among, for example, former Fannie Mae Chairman Franklin Raines, former Countrywide Financial CEO Angelo Mozilo and House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank that have helped create the monsters called Fan and Fred.

It wrote, "I recount all this now because it illustrates the perverse nature of Fannie and Freddie that has made them such a relentless and untouchable political force.. . . . The abiding lesson here is what happens when you combine private property with government power. You create political monsters that are protected both by journalists on the left and pseudo capitalists on Wall Street, by liberal Democrats and country club Republicans. Even now, after all the dishonesty and failure, Fannie and Freddie could emerge from this taxpayer rescue more powerful than ever."

There are probably few things more disturbing and scary than this.

Back in 2002, WSJ had an article called "Fannie Mae Enron?", questioning their shaky derivatives accounting. And the person who was angry about the article, obviously besides the then-CEO of Fannie, Mr. Raines, was surprisingly the then-CEO of Countrywide, Mr. Mozilo. Mr. Mozilo loudly insulted Paul Gigot by stating he knew nothing about accounting or mortgage markets, among other things. Apparently Mr. Mozilo and Mr. Raines were partners, with Countrywide feeding mortgages to Fannie to make Mr. Mozilo very rich. Of course, he got to protect his most valuable customer.

Thanks to its quasi-public and quasi-private dual structures, with implicit but correct assumption of government guarantees, Fan and Fred can borrow from financial markets at super low interest rate, enjoyed the spread between such low borrowing rates and much higher mortgage rates in their portfolio from Mr. Mozilo and other originators. If that is not enough, Fannie was creating shaking derivatives from these mortgages to generate more profits, which brought the above WSJ article that was comparing Fannie to Enron. No wonder Mr. Mozilo was angry, so was Mr. Raines, since regulator James Lockhart later on discovered that Fannie had rigged its earnings in a way that allowed it to pay huge bonuses to their executives, especially Mr. Raines who was forced to resign.

Then the famous FOM (friends of Mozilo) in Congress quickly came over to rescue. First, Republican Rep Cliff Stearns of Florida was stripped his subcommittee of jurisdiction over Fan and Fred's accounting by House Speaker Dennis Hastert. Then Barney Frank was taking over the whole show to protect Fan and Fred from stronger regulatory oversight. When Wisconsin Rep. Paul Ryan advocated more supervision for Fan and Fred, Fannie played hardball by calling every mortgage holder in his district, claiming that Mr. Ryan wanted to raise the cost of their mortgages, resulting Mr. Ryan receiving 6,000 telegrams. He left Financial Services committe for a seat on Ways and Means which of course doesn't oversee Fannie anymore.

In addition, the "Fannie Mae Gang" article wrote, "Fan and Fred also couldn't prosper for as long as they have without the support of the political left, both in Congress and the intellectual class. This includes Mr. Frank and Sen. Chuck Schumer (D., N.Y.) on Capitol Hill, as well as Mr. Krugman and the Washington Post's Steven Pearlstein in the press........Yet as studies have shown, about half of the implicit taxpayer subsidy for Fan and Fred is pocketed by shareholders and management. According to the Federal Reserve, the half that goes to homeowners adds up to a mere seven basis points on mortgages. In return for this, Fannie was able to pay no fewer than 21 of its executives more than $1 million in 2002, and in 2003 Mr. Raines pocketed more than $20 million. Fannie's left-wing defenders are underwriters of crony capitalism, not affordable housing." This is similar to some charities that use half of the donations for their "expenses" and only pay out half to the claimed causes.

Fast forward to today, taxpayers not only have paid so much and so dearly to support this crony capitalism of friends of Mozilo, but also have to inject more capital into Fan and Fred, in addition to guaranteeing their trillions of debts issued in the past, many of which should not have been issued and are now held by foreign governments of our trade partners in their currency reserves. Talking about global crony capitalism among many goverments which U.S. taxpayers have to cover all their losses. This is really the beauty of quasi-private and quasi-public dual structures. Profits go to the few Skull & Bones members, while losses are dumped to the whole society, and all is done in the name of "helping poor people to own houses".

The best part of this WSJ article is that one analyst at Sanford C. Bernstein, a Fannie apologist, wrote in 2002 about the "Fannie Mae Enron?" article, "Taxpayer Are on The Hook: This is incorrect. The agencies' debt is not guaranteed by the U.S. Treasury or any agency of the Federal government." We should all hope his great insight from 6 years ago was correct, so that U.S. taxpayers don't need to cover and pay for all these huge losses, since we are quickly going down a slippery path from "too big to fail" to now "too big to be guaranteed".

Back in Savings & Loan crisis, we had the Keating Five. Today in home mortgages, we have the Fannie Mae Gang. Some things never change.

____________

Source: By Thomas Tan, CFA : See his profile at Vestopia

About the author:

Thomas Tan, CFA
GuruFocus - Stock Picks and Market Insight of Gurus

Rating: 3.8/5 (6 votes)

Comments

Sivaram
Sivaram - 6 years ago
If it was the left-wing defenders supporting crony capitalism, what does that make of the Bush administration, Paulson, et al, not to mention the Republican congress all throughout the early 2000's? It's quite easy for a right-wing publication like the WSJ to pin the blame on the left. The fact of the matter is that FNM and FRE got too big, partly pushed on by governments of all stripes, and partly because mortgages became complex and hard to analyze.

Furthermore, Angelo Mozilo may be everyone's public enemy #1 these days but he revolutionized the mortgage industry (from what I can gather.)

Please leave your comment:


Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
Free 7-day Trial
FEEDBACK