10-year

10-Year Anniversary Promotion (20% off)

Join GuruFocus Premium Membership Now for Only $279/Year

Once a decade discount

Save up to $500 on Global Membership.

Don't Miss It !

Free 7-day Trial
All Articles and Columns »

WHY BUFFETT’S INVESTMENT STRATEGY WON’T WORK FOR BUFFETT ANYMORE – BUT FOR YOU IT WILL STILL WORK!

June 03, 2007
Hendrik Oude Nijhuis

Hendrik Oude Nijhuis

0 followers

Why Buffett’s investment strategy won’t work for Buffett anymore – but for you it will still work!

You probably already know that Warren Buffett is the world’s greatest investor of all time. Starting with only $ 100, Buffett made an unprecedented journey in creating a personal fortune of $ 48 billon. A truly unprecedented accomplishment, especially when you consider he never started a company of his own and never invested a single penny in technology stocks. His complete fortune comes from investing in the stock market!

And, as a matter of fact, Buffett’s investment strategy isn’t that complicated: buy shares of quality companies when they are ‘on sale’. That’s all there is! With this straightforward strategy Buffett earned his billions of dollars. But, as we take a deeper look at Buffett’s returns over time something stands out…

Years

Buffett, book value growth (in %)

Returns S&P 500, dividends included (in %)

Buffett / S&P 500

1957 – 1966

1156*

80

14.5 x

1967 – 1976

422

96

4.4

1977 – 1986

1268

260

4.9

1987 – 1996

818

315

2.6

1997 – 2006

270

125

2.2


* The return which Buffett achieved for his partnership then (before fees).

As you see, the outperformance of Buffett compared with the S&P 500 diminishes over time. Between 1957 and 1966 Buffett outperformed the S&P 500 by a massive 14.5 times. In the most recent decade his outperformance has been diminished to ‘only’ 2.2 times the S&P 500. Of course, Buffett still shows that he is able to beat the indexes. But, now only at a fraction of the outperformance he achieved in earlier decades.

So, what’s the reason for this? Has Buffett’s system of buying quality companies on sale stopped working? Or has Buffett lost his ‘Magic Touch’? Twice the answer is negative.

The explanation behind the diminishing returns

The real explanation for the diminishing (relative) returns is actually quite simple. Nowadays, Buffett has to invest large amounts of money. Even investments of a few hundred million dollars aren’t worth the trouble anymore. Just, calculate along with me…

Buffett’s total investments currently have a value of approximately 110 billion dollar. So, should an investment still have some effect on the performance of the total investment portfolio this investment has to be at least 2 billion dollar. And that’s the problem.

As Buffett’s doesn’t want to influence a stock price too much (buying in large quantities drives the price of a stock up…) and wants to remain somewhat flexible, normally it isn’t possible to buy (or sell) more than 10% of the shares in a certain public company.

And, as the 2 billion equals 10% of the market capitalisation, we are speaking of companies with market capitalisations of at least 20 billion dollar. And, simply put, there aren’t that many companies with market capitalisations of over 20 billion!

And, besides the fact that there simply aren’t that many companies with market capitalisations that big, these companies are much more followed and researched by investment analysts and all kinds of investment professionals.

Because of this these companies are priced less inefficient. And voilà, here we have the second reason for the diminishing outperformance of Buffett.

Maybe you didn’t realize it, but as a consequence of this you have actually a considerably advantage over Buffett (unless you are Bill Gates…). After all, you aren’t limited to invest only in these giant, more efficiently priced companies. You can choose from a much, much greater supply of more inefficiently priced companies!

Buffett agrees with this reasoning:

"I think I could make you 50% a year on $1 million. No, I know I could. I guarantee that."

Warren Buffett, Businessweek, 25 th of June, 1999.

Also the returns of a couple of hedge fund managers show that it is an enormous advantage NOT to have too much money to invest. We will look at two of them: Joel Greenblatt and Mohnish Pabrai. Both of these top investors can be considered as Buffett copycats.

Joel Greenblatt

A few years ago, Greenblatt became known to a wider public as author of ‘The Little Book That Beats The Market’. In this book Greenblatt outlines a strategy in line with Buffett’s investment strategy. Greenblatt’s desire for stocks with high returns on invested capital accompanied by high earnings yields is essentially the same as Buffett’s desire for ‘quality companies on sale’.

Greenblatt’s hedge fund earned annual returns of over 40% for over twenty years. In his first ten years he even achieved annual returns of over 50%. And, like Buffett, Greenblatt got the same problem as Buffett: too much money to invest. And that’s why Greenblatt choose to buy out all the external investors in his hedge fund and to continue investing only with his own, private money!

An example of a recent investment of Joel Greenblatt is his purchase of shares of Aeropostale, a highly profitable clothing retailer. Within only a few months shares of Aeropostale had appreciated over 40%. Greenblatt sold his shares already. With a market cap of around 1 billion dollar at the time of Greenblatt’s purchase, such a transaction would be unthinkable for Buffett.

Mohnish Pabrai

Pabrai, like Greenblatt, can be considered as a Buffett follower:

M r. Buffett deserves all the credit. I am just a shameless cloner .’ – Mohnish Pabrai

In 1999, Pabrai started his investment fund with only 1 million dollar to invest. Now, only eight years later, Pabrai manages over 500 million dollar. Of course, Pabrai’s performance justifies this enormous growth: an annualized return of over 28% (after all fees and expenses).

An example of a recent transaction of Pabrai is his purchase of shares of Cryptologic, a software supplier for casinos on the internet. Total market capitalisation of Cryptologic at the time of Pabrai’s first investment: less then 250 million dollar. Pabrai, meanwhile, has seen this investment increase in value over 50% in less than 6 months. Again, this would be totally unthinkable for Warren Buffett.

But, like Buffett, both Greenblatt and Pabrai will be confronted with the laws of financial gravity. Also their relative returns will diminish over time. For sure, some will claim that Greenblatt and Pabrai just had some good fortune and claim that Buffett’s investments strategy doesn’t work anymore.

But also in the future new Buffett’s will arise. And they will demonstrate the sceptic, once again, that it’s still possible to outperform the market. Simply by buying shares of quality companies when they are on sale!

 

About the author:

Hendrik Oude Nijhuis
GuruFocus - Stock Picks and Market Insight of Gurus

Rating: 3.2/5 (9 votes)

Comments

billytickets
Billytickets - 7 years ago
Yes this is true and in my book I take the reader from zero to millionaire status. Well done
musto
Musto - 7 years ago
I disagree with part of your article that says the large caps may not be as good buys as some of less known stocks such as Pabrai is buying.

Generally speaking this may be true, but it's highly probable that at today's prices a portfolio just made up of 2 large caps such as Berkshire and JNJ will outperform the S&P by a wide margin within the next 3 to 5 years.

billytickets
Billytickets - 7 years ago
musto a concentrated portfolio of fairly priced large caps is the ticket
armeetofo
Armeetofo - 7 years ago
I Love the article like, that is why i am here, i wish it will be more and more to come, good job
TheGreatOn
TheGreatOn - 7 years ago
You can't say he went from $100 to $48 billion without starting a company, all of that 48 billion is his stake in berkshire hathaway (which he bought with money he made from his partnership that he started). Then he used the cash from Berkshire to invest in equities, he didn't use his own personal wealth. It's not the same thing as starting with 100 dollars and building it to 48 billion buy just buying and selling securities.
musto
Musto - 7 years ago


Buffett made all his money investing in the greatest investment in the whole

history of the world.

It's called Warren Edward Buffett.

armeetofo
Armeetofo - 7 years ago
thegreaton:

thanks for your post, i knew warren is smart guy, but i did not realize he is so smart to be pretend to be an investor, now i do understanding he is money mgr only, i rule him out, only mason hawkins left on my investor list
TheGreatOn
TheGreatOn - 7 years ago
Armeetofo:

Most of the world's richest people in history made their wealth from owning only one company. I think buffet realized this at one point in his investment career. The beutiful thing is that he has never paid taxes on any of that 48 billion, since it is all in berkshire shares, which he has never sold. Berkshire Hathaway is the name on the stock certificates of Coca Cola, American Express, etc. etc.
TheGreatOn
TheGreatOn - 7 years ago
1 more thing, i wouldn't even call him a money manager, technically he is just the chairman of berkshire hathaway and he invests his company's excess cash in marketable securities or by buying other companies which is different from what most ceo's do. At most i would call him a ceo who focuses almost exclusively on asset allocation.
armeetofo
Armeetofo - 7 years ago
he donates the shares to the charity foundation to remove tax on his shoulder too, good moves!
tamiki
Tamiki - 7 years ago
What is the difference between him using his own wealth and using float?

Asset allocation is asset allocation, whether it be your money or someone else's.

If the point of asset allocation is to earn a return on your money, isn't that investing?

Please leave your comment:


Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
Free 7-day Trial
FEEDBACK