I was a long term bear on US casinos in 2007, more on the fact that I thought Las Vegas exemplified all the things of American consumerism that were going to change - namely excess. [
Oct 3, 2007: A Top in Casino Names? Wynn and Las Vegas Sands] [
Nov 1, 2007: China Can't Save Las Vegas Sands - It's Getting Crox'd] I was not quite as up to speed on the extreme debt exposure of MGM Grand (
MGM) and Las Vegas Sands (
LVS) in particular, which served to threaten bankruptcy at a point. [
Oct 28, 2008: Las Vegas Sands is now a $4 Stock] At their worst these stocks fell some 98%+ from peak to trough but it is becoming clear that these two have become "too big to fail"... with Las Vegas Sands ahead of pace of MGM Grand in fixing its situation. I was under the mistaken assumption that banks would come collect their collateral but with zero major homebuilderbankruptcies, only 1 major public commercial REIT, and zero Las Vegas casinos it seems leniency is the new way of the US world.
So while I still think Las Vegas as a tourist attraction, will take much time to get back to "normal" and the casinos are effectively handing away rooms (I literally saw a deal from Burbank, CA to Wynn Resort ON PRIVATE JET including HOTEL for just over $500), survival no longer seems to be as much of an issue. [
Dec 23, 2008: Wynn Encore Casino Struggling to Fill Rooms During Launch] If in the greatest collapse of housing and commercial real estate almost none of our public companies in those sectors go bankrupt it appears "creative destruction" is something from a bygone era.
In this space specifically we've noted some amendments of credit terms [
Apr 22, 2009: Wynn Resorts, LasVegas Sands Amend Credit Terms] and it continues almost monthly. Yesterday, LVS announced an
issuementof bonds which, while dilutive to current shareholders, continues to "push off any date of reckoning" on their balance sheet.
Las Vegas Sands Corp (LVS), one of the world's largest casino companies, has secured commitments to raise up to $600 million through the sale of exchangeable bonds, the company said on Wednesday.The bonds will have to be swapped for common shares of the company's Macau unit after the unit's pending initial public offering on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange.The sale is part of highly leveraged Las Vegas Sands' efforts to boost its financial strength, the company said. It recently amended its $3.3 billion Macau credit facility and plans to take one of its subsidiaries public.The financing will prevent looming U.S. debt covenant breaks in the third and fourth quarter, Bernstein Research analyst Janet Brashear said in a research note. "Without this stop-gap measure, we had projected that LVS would have approximately $100 million too much debt at September 30 and approximately $400 million too much debt at December 31," she wrote."Completion of the Hong Kong IPO is the last hurdle, but today's development is material as it probably further reduces near-term covenant risk," Bank of America analyst Shaun Kelley said in a research note.The company reported not very stellar results in late July and has rallied 35% since... near term results don't seem to matter. [
Jul 31, 2009: Las Vegas Sands - Disappoints Again] So with that said, one cannot be as bearish as before on the space and in fact might see long term promise as long as these companies can continuously kick the can and convert debt into equity. While that is not a great thing for equity holders, we have come out of an era where dilution in return for survival has seen enormous stock appreciation. See the REIT space. One could apply the same top line theory to the REITs because it appears from this seat that what is happening in that space if the public REITs are going to have a huge advantage over the private ones, as the public entities can float shares any time they are in trouble and apparently there is an insatiable demand to buy REIT stocks by the investment public. This gives the public REIT an out that the private ones do not...
I expect continued volatility in the space, but Las Vegas Sands (
LVS) is looking more interesting for the long term. However, after such a run - I'd like to revisit it when (if) the stock market pulls back and we see a single digit price level again. Putting a valuation on this name is difficult - all I know is it is now appears in America, failure is almost never an option. Just don't call us Japan.
Trader Mark
[
www.fundmymutualfund.com]
About the author:
Mark's equity focus is identifying secular growth trends, and the companies most likely to benefit from these macro trends. Stocks are identified through fundamental analysis, although basic technical analysis is used in determining entry and exit points. With a degree in Economics from the University of Michigan, a broader understanding of the economy as a whole, along with interpreting investor psychology is also a major interest for Mark. His career background has focused on financial analysis in corporate America. Visit Mark's website at http://www.fundmymutualfund.com/Visit Trader Mark's Website
The Strategy of Ben Graham – Warren Buffett’s Mentor
From 1923 to 1957 Warren Buffett’s mentor, Ben Graham, followed a strategy of investing in net-nets. He said: “It always seemed, and still seems ridiculously simple to say that if one can acquire a diversified group of common stocks at a price less than the...net current assets alone…the results should be quite satisfactory. They were so in our experience, for more than 30 years.”
Today net-nets are rare. They are collected under GuruFocus’ Net-Net Screener. GuruFocus also publishes a monthly newsletter which recommends the safest net-nets. All of these are included in GuruFocus Premium Membership.
Click Here to Try It Free!
Feedback
European Shorting
My Portfolios
Browse Gurus
Print
Email
Subscribe RSS
RSS
For what it's worth, Steve Mandel at Lone Pine has sold out of a large position (ca. $450 million) in LVS.
[www.nasdaq.com]
And he bought into a competitor in the emerging Macau market, Melco Crown (MPEL) - although a smaller position (ca. $100 million).
[www.nasdaq.com]
On a recent Gurufocus video, Seth Klarman made a comment to the effect that "...if you are buying, and Steve Mandel at Lone Pine is selling, you should be cautious, since Steve is an outstanding analyst".
vgm