GuruFocus Premium Membership

Serving Intelligent Investors since 2004. Only 96 cents a day.

Free Trial

Free 7-day Trial
All Articles and Columns »

3 INTERESTING "IN-BETWEEN" MAGIC FORMULA STOCKS: Fuel Systems Solutions, Career Education, Quest Diagnostics

June 22, 2010 | About:
Steve Alexander

Steve Alexander

12 followers
The Magic Formula Investing (MFI) strategy is simply a ranking system. Any particular universe of stocks can be ranked in the strategy's fashion - a composite of highest earnings yield and highest adjusted return on capital, both factors equally weighted. You can apply the strategy to rank any "basket" of stocks, ranging from entire exchange listings (or groups of exchange listings), to a pre-screened list of stocks, and so forth. The possibilities are limitless.The official MFI site allows users to rank all U.S.-listed stocks, separated only by minimum market cap. So, for example, choosing the top 50 stocks with a minimum of $100 million market cap will produce a much different list than choosing the top 50 with a minimum $1 billion market cap. This is useful, as many investors are uncomfortable buying issues of thinly traded, micro-cap stocks that they may not familiar with (even though small-caps drastically improve performance).

MagicDiligence uses three screens in particular to search for stocks to recommend: the top 50 stocks over $50 million market cap (the "small cap" screen), the top 50 over $1 billion ("mid cap"), and the top 30 over $3 billion ("large cap"). By combining the three, we get a good mix of cheap, quality stocks ranging from tiny unknown firms like database software maker Versant (VSNT) to ultra large caps like diversified software maker Microsoft (MSFT).

However, sticking to these three screens means that occasionally a few stocks will slip through the cracks. Setting out to find these, I ran several "in-between" screens: the top 50 over $250 million, top 50 over $500 million, top 50 over $750 million, top 50 over $2 billion, and finally, the top 30 over $5 billion market cap. While there were a number of in-between stocks (about 15 or so), this article will highlight 3 of them that may deserve additional attention from value investors.

Fuel Systems Solutions (FSYS)

Market Cap: $489 million

MFI Earnings Yield: 26.2%

MFI Return on Capital: 78.3%

Cash / Debt / Current Ratio: $74m / $17m / 2.06

5-year Expected Growth Rate: 16.3%

Dividend Yield: N/A

Piotroski Score: 7.0

Comments: Fuel Systems develops components and systems for controlling alternative fuels like natural gas and propane in internal combustion engines. Most sales are in the transportation business (autos, busses, taxis, specialized vehicles) outside of the U.S. In the short-term, company has been buoyed by now-expired tax credits in Italy, and 2010 expectations are down some from last year. Long-term though, the price, abundance, and relative cleanliness of natural gas vs. oil/gasoline could be a significant catalyst for this firm, in both the U.S. and abroad.

Career Education (CECO)

Market Cap: $2.2 billion

MFI Earnings Yield: 12.8%

MFI Return on Capital: 72.0%

Cash / Debt / Current Ratio: $422m / $2m / 1.33

5-year Expected Growth Rate: 12.4%

Dividend Yield: N/A

Piotroski Score: 8.0

Comments: Career Education is a for-profit education company, one of many in MFI (APOL and COCO too). CECO has 90 campuses and over 116,000 students, including some foreign exposure in Europe. These are all great businesses heavily discounted due to fears that the government will institute much more strict standards for federal aid dollars, which usually makes up 80% or more of revenues for these firms. On the other hand, high unemployment has led to swelling enrollments, and the public colleges do not service the typical 30-year old, working student as well as these private players. The whole sector could be a good value play.

Quest Diagnostics (DGX)

Market Cap: $9.5 billion

MFI Earnings Yield: 10.8%

MFI Return on Capital: 106.4%

Cash / Debt / Current Ratio: $463m / $3B / 1.53

5-year Expected Growth Rate: 8.3%

Dividend Yield: 0.80%

Piotroski Score: 7.0

Comments: The largest independent diagnostic medical testing firm in the U.S., with over 2,000 locations. Duopoly with Lab Corp (LH, another on-again off-again MFI stock). Demographics is the story here - as the U.S. population ages and doctors push preventative care, increased clinical testing demand should follow. Quest has solid competitive positioning and fair growth prospects. Risks include a valuation that is not that cheap for an MFI stock and continued breakthroughs in point-of-care diagnostic testing. Still, this looks like an attractive, conservative play at current prices.

Disclosure: Steve owns COCO, APOL

Steve Alexander

http://www.magicdiligence.com

Rating: 3.8/5 (5 votes)

Comments

Hester1
Hester1 - 4 years ago


How do you get a 26% earnings yield on FSYS?
augustabound
Augustabound - 4 years ago




How do you get a 26% earnings yield on FSYS?


I get 14, unless Greenblatt adjust that too.
Alex Garcia
Alex Garcia premium member - 4 years ago
Seems about right. I get 25.8%

I used this guide for my calculation....http://www.magicformulapro.com/2010/05/24/calculating-earnings-yield/
Hesperian
Hesperian - 4 years ago


"On the other hand, high unemployment has led to swelling enrollments, and the public colleges do not service the typical 30-year old, working student as well as these private players."

By "service", do you mean "award a degree to the undeserving, just because the taxpayer foots the bill"?

The truth is those most of those for-profits give out useless degrees to anyone who signs up and goes through the motions. It amounts to little more than scamming the government. I think public universities should be more flexible for the sake of the qualified working adult, but the vast majority of these for-profit colleges are a terrible alternative.
MagicDiligence
MagicDiligence - 4 years ago
Certainly there are long and short arguments against for-profit education, and the shorts are winning right now. Ultimately, though, the stats don't really bear out the arguments against the sector, IMO. Also, a straight comparison of graduation rates and cohort defaults is a little misleading, as you are talking about a totally different student population (18-22 year olds with no responsibilities and parents vs. 33-38 year olds with kids and a job).

Please leave your comment:


Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
Free 7-day Trial
FEEDBACK