As pointed by Warren Buffett, the percentage of total market cap (TMC) relative to the US GNP is “probably the best single measure of where valuations stand at any given moment.”
Over the long term, the returns from stock market are determined by these factors:
1. Interest rate
Interest rates “act on financial valuations the way gravity acts on matter: The higher the rate, the greater the downward pull. That's because the rates of return that investors need from any kind of investment are directly tied to the risk-free rate that they can earn from government securities. So if the government rate rises, the prices of all other investments must adjust downward, to a level that brings their expected rates of return into line. Conversely, if government interest rates fall, the move pushes the prices of all other investments upward.”—Warren Buffett
2. Long Term Growth of Corporate Profitability
Over the long term, corporate profitability reverts to its long term-trend, which is around 6%. During recessions, corporate profit margins shrink, and during economic growth periods, corporate profit margins expand. However, long-term growth of corporate profitability is close to long-term economic growth. The size of the US economy is measured by Gross National Product (GNP). Although GNP is different from GDP (gross domestic product), the two numbers have always been within 1% of each other. For the purpose of calculation, GDP is used here. The U.S. GDP since 1970 is represented by the green line in the first of the three charts to the right.
3. Market Valuations
Over the long run, stock market valuation reverts to its mean. A higher current valuation certainly correlates with lower long-term returns in the future. On the other hand, a lower current valuation level correlates with a higher long-term return. The total market valuation is measured by the ratio of total market cap (TMC) to GNP -- the equation representing Warren Buffett's "best single measure". This ratio since 1970 is shown in the second chart to the right. Gurufocus.com calculates and updates this ratio daily. As of 05/24/2013, this ratio is 110.3%.
We can see that, during the past four decades, the TMC/GNP ratio has varied within a very wide range. The lowest point was about 35% in the previous deep recession of 1982, while the highest point was 148% during the tech bubble in 2000. The market went from extremely undervalued in 1982 to extremely overvalued in 2000.
Based on these historical valuations, we have divided market valuation into five zones:
| Ratio = Total Market Cap / GDP | Valuation |
|---|---|
| Ratio < 50% | Significantly Undervalued |
| 50% < Ratio < 75% | Modestly Undervalued |
| 75% < Ratio < 90% | Fair Valued |
| 90% < Ratio < 115% | Modestly Overvalued |
| Ratio > 115% | Significantly Overvalued |
| Where are we today (05/24/2013)? | Ratio = 110.3%, Modestly Overvalued |
A quick refresher (Thanks to Greenbacked): GDP is “the total market value of goods and services produced within the borders of a country.” GNP is “is the total market value of goods and services produced by the residents of a country, even if they’re living abroad. So if a U.S. resident earns money from an investment overseas, that value would be included in GNP (but not GDP).” While the distinction between the two is important because American firms are increasing the amount of business they do internationally, the actual difference between GNP and GDP is minimal as this chart from the St Louis Fed demonstrates:

GDP in Q4 2012 stood at $15,851.2 billion. GNP at Q3 2012 (the last data point available) stood at $16,054.2 billion. For our present purposes, one substitutes equally as well for the other.
The returns of investing in an individual stock or in the entire stock market are determined by these three factors:
1. Business growth
If we look at a particular business, the value of the business is determined by how much money this business can make. The growth in the value of the business comes from the growth of the earnings of the business growth. This growth in the business value is reflected as the price appreciation of the company stock if the market recognizes the value, which it does, eventually.
If we look at the overall economy, the growth in the value of the entire stock market comes from the growth of corporate earnings. As we discussed above, over thelong term, corporate earnings grow as fast as the economy itself.
2. Dividends
Dividends are an important portion of the investment return. Dividends come from the cash earning of a business. Everything equal, a higher dividend payout ratio, in principle, should result in a lower growth rate. Therefore, if a company pays out dividends while still growing earnings, the dividend is an additional return for the shareholders besides the appreciation of the business value.
3. Change in the market valuation
Although the value of a business does not change overnight, its stock price often does. The market valuation is usually measured by the well-known ratios such as P/E, P/S, P/B etc. These ratios can be applied to individual businesses, as well as the overall market. The ratio Warren Buffett uses for market valuation, TMC/GNP, is equivalent to the P/S ratio of the economy.
Putting all the three factors together, the return of an investment can be estimated by the following formula:
Investment Return (%) = Dividend Yield (%)+ Business Growth (%)+ Change of Valuation (%)
The first two items of the equation are straightforward. The third item can be calculated if we know the beginning and the ending market ratios of the time period (T) considered. If we assumed the beginning ratio is Rb, and the ending ratio is Re, then the contribution in the change of the valuation can be calculated from this:
(Re/Rb)(1/T)-1
The investment return is thus equal to:
Investment Return (%) = Dividend Yield (%) + Business Growth(%) + (Re/Rb)(1/T)-1
This equation is actually very close to what Dr. John Hussman uses to calculate market valuations. From this equation we can calculate the likely returns an investment in the stock market will generate over a given time period. In the calculation, the time period we used was 8 years, which is about the length of a full economic cycle. The calculated results are shown in the final chart to the right. The green line indicates the expected return if the market trends towards being undervalued (TMC/GNP=40%) over the next 8 years from current levels, the red line indicates the return if the market trends towards being overvalued (TMC/GNP=120%) over the next 8 years. The brown line indicates the return if the market trends towards being fair-valued (TMC/GNP=80%) over the next 8 years.
The thick light blue line in the bottom right chart is the actual annualized return of the stock market over 8 years. We can see the calculations largely predicted the trend in the returns of the stock market. The swing of the market’s returns is related to the change in interest rates.
It has been unfortunate for investors who entered the market after the late 1990s. Since that time, the market has nearly always been overvalued, only dropping to fairly valued since the declines that began in 2008. Since Oct. 2008, for the first time in 15 years, the market has been positioned for meaningful positive returns.
As of 05/24/2013, the stock market is likely to return 2.4% a year in the next 8 years.
Based on these factors, Warren Buffett has made a few market calls in the past. In Nov. 1999, when the Dow was at 11,000, and just a few months before the burst of dotcom bubble, the stock market had gained 13% a year from 1981-1998. Warren Buffett said in a speech to friends and business leaders, “I'd like to argue that we can't come even remotely close to that 12.9... If you strip out the inflation component from this nominal return (which you would need to do however inflation fluctuates), that's 4% in real terms. And if 4% is wrong, I believe that the percentage is just as likely to be less as more.”
Two years after the Nov. 1999 article, when the Dow was down to 9,000, Mr. Buffett said, “I would expect now to see long-term returns run somewhat higher, in the neighborhood of 7% after costs.”
Nine years have passed since the publication of the article of November 22, 1999, and it has been a wild and painful ride for most investors; the Dow climbed as high as 14,000 in October 2007 and retreated painfully back to 8,000 today. Warren Buffett again wrote in Oct. 2008: Equities will almost certainly outperform cash over the next decade, probably by a substantial degree.”
1. Warren Buffett Stock Picks
2. Buffett-Munger Screener: The stocks young Warren Buffett would buy
3. Market Valuations as measured by Shiller P/E ratio
Add Notes, Comments or Ask Questions
Comments
I suppose 1970 - 2013 is too short: It includes one normal down period during 70's and beginning of 80's, but bubble of 2000 was mega bubble.
Luxury Resort Development/safari Boat Sector: Environment
Project Location: MV 40, Maldives
Project Description:
Tourism is the largest economic industry in the Maldives. Maldives is
celebrating for its natural beauty, which includes the azure blue oceans,
white sandy beaches, accompanied by the crystal clear water. Due to its
extraordinary underwater scenery, Maldives is ranked among the best
recreational diving destinations of the world. This makes Maldives one of
the most ideal holiday destinations in the world,
Resort and Safari Boat business is the fastest cost covering business in the
Maldives,
Safari business can cover the cost in Estimated of 2-3 years and Resort
Business covers the cost in an estimated 6-9 years
Business Plan: available,. Transaction Size: US$US$35,000,000 - US$75,000,000
i'm looking for investor or partner who like to build a resort an safari in here maldives if any one like please contact me jageyrose7@live.com +9607460328
I'm giving you a brief intro of our company and the project.
Our company is Mara'nze Maldives.We are based in Maldives.Our project is developing a tourist resort island.Maldives is well known for its natural beauty.And we have many famous hotel chains of the world investing here in Maldives like, One and only, The four seasons and Hilton.And we have more than 200 running resorts here in Maldives, most of which are very exclusive and built to the very finest standard.Our hotel rooms sell from 200$ to 9000$ per night.And the tourism industry here in Maldives is a multi billion dollar industry.
Even though this project is the first one we are doing as a company, me and my partners have been working in this industry for more than 15 years.So now we joined, and now we have this island in our possession.The island is for developing a tourist resort and is for a term of 50 years.And we intend to build a seven stars resort, with the finest and the best service for our VVIP clients.
As I've mentioned in the previous mail our estimate for this project is about 70000000$.And below I'll just highlight some detail as to how we intend to develop the resort.
Landscaping : 10-15 million
Construction of rooms ( 50 land rooms, 80 water bungalows,5 family water villas, 10 suites and 5 VVIP Presidental suites: 25-30 million
Guest service facilities (2 Restaurants,2 coffee shops,3 bars , swimming pools, Spas, water sports, Diving schools and recreation):25-30 million
Utilities: 3-6 million
Transport facilities: 6-10 million
Staff area: 3 million
The estimated time for construction is about 18-25 months. ( come to Maldives to invest)
Estimated time to recover the investment is 6-9 years.
So please send me your opinion as soon as possible.
Salaam.
we are using different total market cap from what Fortune use. We use Wilshire total market index, which cover about 5000 companies and does not cover private companies.
The important thing here is the current valuation relative to historical mean.
[finance.fortune.cnn.com]
thanks!
This is very interesting to me, but since US companies make a significant amount of their revenues and profits overseas, would it not be more accurate to track market cap vs. global GDP? I think that this metric would show the market to be more attractively valued than by looking at US GDP alone.
Great article. When I look at the chart, I can't help but be struck by the fact that it shows the stock market was undervalued through the 1970s and 1980s when inflation was high, and is not slightly overvalued when inflation is low.
The "slightly overvalued" conclusion also conflicts with our forward P/E, which is around 12, vs a normal of 15 and a normal of 20 when interest rates are very low.
In general, companies justify higher valuations when inflation and interest rates are very low. This is because the inverse of the P/E, the E/P or earnings yield tends to compare very favorably to other investments like bonds.
My question is - would this not be a more accurate valuation indicator if it was adjusted for inflation (or the inverse of inflation)? That would bring the 70s and 80s up and recent valuations down, with the net effect that the valuation forecasts would be in a much tighter range.
This strikes me as more accurate, as well. Without allowing for the inflation environment, this valuation may be accurate if you assume that inflation will eventually normalize. However, inflation often stays very high or very low for very long periods.
Wouldn't including an inflation adjustment in this model make it far more accurate and useful as a valuation measure?
Ed
As you said yesterday: "we don't have daily Total market cap value in our database. But we can probably do something to make it available."
I'd love it !
When can you do this ?
Would you be able to include a daily refresh of you excel sheet available on download instead of the actual quarter refresh ?
[web.wilshire.com]
Could you telle me which data do you use as "total market cap" to calculate your TMC/GDP ratio every day ?
Qhere do you find this data you use every da
we don't have daily Total market cap value in our database. But we can probably do something to make it available.
For the ratio data: the GDP ratio...: ok the GDP is a quarterly data, but the market value is a everyday data: in fact, you give on this page a new ratio everyday...
In conclusion: now that I downloaded you excel sheet with the quarterly GDP data, where can I find the everyday data that you name "Total market cap" ?
With this data, I would be able to create a data sheet, and a TMC/GDP ratio with and everyday value...
Do you have this ? :-)
the thick blue line is the actual return of the market during the 8-year prediction period. We will not know the actual 8-year return of today's market until 2020 (always add 8 to the current year). That is why data is only available until about 2004 today.
Because GDP data is only available quarterly, all data are quarterly there.
I downloaded the TMC/GDP data... You put in your excel sheet, the quarter data (4 lines per one year): why don't you give the everyday data, instead of once a quarter ?
As a premium member I was expecting a real time data access... Is it correct ?
It is only for USA.
Premium Members can download the data.
Ratio < 50% Significantly Undervalued
50% < Ratio < 75% Modestly Undervalued
75% < Ratio < 90% Fair Valued
90% < Ratio < 115% Modestly Overvalued
Ratio > 115% Significantly Overvalued
Does this hold true for all countries or is it specific to the USA?
Investment Return (%) = Dividend Yield (%) + Business Growth(%) + (Re/Rb)(1/T)-1
= Current dividend yield + 10-year average GDP growth rate + (Re/Rb)^(1/T)-1
1. Is "Re" referring to TMC/GDP of any date and Rb (beginning) referring to the TMC/GDP of any earlier date, where T= difference in time? For example if the dates were 1/1/2005 and end date was 1/1/2012 then T=7 years?
Thanks
expected return? I'm still struggling with that.
See this part of the equation in the the text: (Re/Rb)(1/T)-1
Great website as well!
We can make these data available for download. But like any other downloads, it will be for Premium Members only.
Thanks!
GuruFocus.
Thanks.
We are aware that Warren Buffett article had a different total market cap from Wilshire 5000; we referred that article many times in the text. We said "not available" meaning that it is not available to us.
We do have our limitations, and we make mistakes. The good thing is that we are always learning and getting better.
Thank you for pointing it out (again).
On the other hand, what is important here is the current value of the ratio relative to its historical values. The assumption here is that Wilshire 5000 changes in the same way as the whole market. Although it might not be exactly the case, but it is quite close.
Again please understand we are limited by the availability of data.
We are aware that GDP and GNP are different. We explained in the text why we use GDP.
First of all, historically they are always within 2% of each other. Also GDP data updates much earlier than GNP from BEA website, by using GDP we can update the information earlier.
Thanks!
GuruFocus.
[seekingalpha.com]
[seekingalpha.com]
thanks!
Thanks!
GDP as of the 1st quarter 2011 : 13,444.3
GNP as of the 1st quarter 2011 : 13,655.8
TMC/GDP = 104.81
TMC/GNP = 103.19
Either way (GDP or GNP), market seems to be modestly overvalued.
Advance GDP and GNP as of the 2nd quarter 2011 will be released only towards the end of July. Gurufocus, please correct me if I'm wrong.
Hussman uses PPE reverse to the mean, we use TMC/GDP reverse to the mean. In our calculation, profit margin does not play a role, therefore we don't need to do what Hussman and Shiller did to flat the profit margins.
We don't have data for earlier times.
Curious to know how you guess at "business growth"; I think Husmanviews this along the same lines as long-run real earnigns growth. Implicitly you seem to allow the reinvestment of earnings not distributed as dividends, so this will give a higher rate than he uses. Is that right?
On the other hand he effectiviely annuitizes the change in the valuation ratio (P/Normalized E) to some long run average (which is why I think he now forecasts barely any return-after inflation). But what do you do. Please clarify.
Thanks for your attention
PS. Do you have data before the 70's?
[www.whatisguide.net]
Any info would be helpful.
To include the revenue of US companies from international, one needs to use GNP (Gross National Product) instead of GDP, as we explained in the article. But we also explained in the article "The size of the US economy is measured by Gross National Product (GNP). Although GNP is different from GDP (gross domestic product), the two numbers have always been within 1% of each other. For the purpose of calculation, GDP is used here."
Another reason we use GDP here is because GDP data comes out much earlier than GNP data, as you can imagine why.
Thanks!
GuruFocus.
www.thepolandreport.com
[www.financialculture.com]
[www.financemetrics.com]
this site would be a more accurate place to get TMV. See the top line. The value is updated monthly
<[www.wilshire.com]>
apparently your are using ^dwc for tmv; perhaps you should be using ^w5000
The market index we use is Wilshire5000.
Investment Return % = 1.9% + 6% + (((80/80.5)^1/8) - 1)
This ends up with an expected return of 7.9% not the currently listed 6.2%. What am I missing or doing wrong?
Can you tell what was the TMC/GNP ratio in 2007 2008 and 2009.
[www.financeandmarkets.net]
Just like Buffett - He was piling up cash when markets were overvalued and as soon as market started going into nosedive he started putting cash to work.
Not sure if he was watching market valuation or he just was not finding anything worth buying at the price offered to him?
Do market valuation matter?
that is what make investing so much fun, hard and challenging...
It is like working with humans... so unpredictable....as opposed to say working with computers or machines.
But great leaders know of how to maximize returns from people..and great investors know how to maximize returns from assets like stocks and bonds without taking too much risk.
The first two terms in the calculation are div_yield(%) + business_growth(%), which comes to 1.97% + 6% = 7.97%. The final valuation_change(%) term, if we use fair value = 80% of GDP, comes out to (80/83.9)^(1/8) - 1 = -0.6%. So the average 8-year average return comes out to 7.37%.
Am I making a mistake in this calculation?
The total market value divisor is 1059.32 (in millions) and that puts the
total market at 12.293 (in millions) and the full-cap total market at
13.453 (in millions). The percentages are then 86% and 94%. Why don't
you use the US Total Market full cap? The data can be found at
[www.djindexes.com].
Thanks for posting and updating this information.
Next you make an appeal to authority, by referring to Buffett. I am unsure of just what relationship you are talking about. Is it the fact that stocks are sometimes mis-priced? Buffett has consistently maintained that the intrinsic value of a company is the discounted present value of future "owner earnings," which, while not exactly the same as net cash flows, is pretty close. He apparently believes this strongly, as he put this statement in his Owner's Manual [http://www.berkshirehathaway.com/ownman.pdf]: "Intrinsic value is an all-important concept that offers the only logical approach to evaluating the relative attractiveness of investments and businesses. Intrinsic value can be defined simply: It is the discounted value of the cash that can be taken out of a business during its remaining life."
I will shortly be posting my usual "Quarterly Report on The Porfolio Q4 2009," which will answer your question about my investing returns. You can have the last word in this argument. I am done.
We use Wilshire 5000 for the measurement of total market cap, which is different from what Buffett and Van Den Berg use. They use the total of all stocks traded. We do not have the daily data for that. Their numbers are higher than Wilshire 5000.
But relatively speaking, the overall picture is the same.
GuruFocus.
So, while using the Wishire 5000 is interesting for your Market Cap input, it is somehow very off from Buffett's data points and Van DeBerg's as well. If you're going to use this metric, you should at least make sure that it is accurate. And clearly it is not!
This site just published an article to take this a step further: they backtested this metric as a timing indicator. Interesting is if you only buy at the significantly undervalued and sell at the significantly overvalued, you would have avoided the last two bubbles and made 9.7% (?) per year since 1980. See this link: [www.validfi.com].
Sorry, how do you put an embedded link on gurufocus.com?
JC.
[www.wilshire.com]
Sorry about that.
[www.wilshire.com]
and here:
[www.bea.gov]
For GNP (which runs approximately close to GDP), click on "Full Release and Tables" in right column, and go to Table 3. GNP appears as the second line from the bottom, "Equals: Gross National Product."