Hide

FocusBar

Subscribe to Premium Member
Switch to:

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a companyย’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.578
HII's Cash to Debt is ranked higher than
68% of the 245 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 0.67 vs. HII: 0.578 )
HII' s 10-Year Cash to Debt Range
Min: 0.49   Max: No Debt
Current: 0.58

Equity to Asset 0.104
HII's Equity to Asset is ranked higher than
51% of the 245 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 0.40 vs. HII: 0.104 )
HII' s 10-Year Equity to Asset Range
Min: 0.1   Max: 0.15
Current: 0.1

0.1
0.15
Interest Coverage 3.1
HII's Interest Coverage is ranked higher than
62% of the 245 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 8.70 vs. HII: 3.1 )
HII' s 10-Year Interest Coverage Range
Min: 1   Max: 6
Current: 3.1

1
6
Z-Score: 1.69
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the companyย’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
ย•ย•3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rankย•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 5.30
HII's Operating margin (%) is ranked higher than
65% of the 245 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 8.00 vs. HII: 5.30 )
HII' s 10-Year Operating margin (%) Range
Min: 1.7   Max: 5.3
Current: 5.3

1.7
5.3
Net-margin (%) 2.2
HII's Net-margin (%) is ranked higher than
62% of the 245 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 5.30 vs. HII: 2.2 )
HII' s 10-Year Net-margin (%) Range
Min: -1.4   Max: 2.2
Current: 2.2

-1.4
2.2
ROE (%) 21.9
HII's ROE (%) is ranked higher than
93% of the 245 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 11.80 vs. HII: 21.9 )
HII' s 10-Year ROE (%) Range
Min: -10.8   Max: 21.9
Current: 21.9

-10.8
21.9
ROA (%) 2.3
HII's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
66% of the 245 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 4.40 vs. HII: 2.3 )
HII' s 10-Year ROA (%) Range
Min: -1.6   Max: 2.3
Current: 2.3

-1.6
2.3
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 16.80
HII's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
73% of the 245 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 20.10 vs. HII: 16.80 )
HII' s 10-Year ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range
Min: 5.4   Max: 16.8
Current: 16.8

5.4
16.8
ยป HII's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2012

HII Guru Trades in Q2 2012

Steven Cohen 29,050 sh (New)
George Soros 100,700 sh (New)
Jim Simons 144,600 sh (New)
Joel Greenblatt 93,077 sh (New)
Jeremy Grantham 15,600 sh (+113.7%)
Eric Mindich 1,759,100 sh (unchged)
Alan Fournier 4,347,499 sh (unchged)
David Einhorn 2,540,696 sh (-7.64%)
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 2,801,987 sh (-24.8%)
Richard Pzena 959,192 sh (-40.7%)
» More
Q3 2012

HII Guru Trades in Q3 2012

RS Investment Management 740,620 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 23,900 sh (New)
Jim Simons 334,700 sh (+131.47%)
George Soros 195,000 sh (+93.64%)
Joel Greenblatt 107,960 sh (+15.99%)
Alan Fournier 4,416,467 sh (+1.59%)
Steven Cohen 29,055 sh (+0.02%)
Eric Mindich 1,759,100 sh (unchged)
David Einhorn 2,139,799 sh (-15.78%)
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 2,000,287 sh (-28.61%)
Richard Pzena 536,156 sh (-44.1%)
Jeremy Grantham 7,254 sh (-53.5%)
» More
Q4 2012

HII Guru Trades in Q4 2012

Jim Chanos 184,000 sh (New)
RS Investment Management 1,044,787 sh (+41.07%)
Jim Simons 369,800 sh (+10.49%)
Eric Mindich 1,799,800 sh (+2.31%)
Alan Fournier 4,416,467 sh (unchged)
David Einhorn Sold Out
George Soros Sold Out
Richard Pzena 520,547 sh (-2.91%)
Joel Greenblatt 95,400 sh (-11.63%)
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 1,718,787 sh (-14.07%)
Steven Cohen 14,795 sh (-49.08%)
Paul Tudor Jones 9,700 sh (-59.41%)
» More
Q1 2013

HII Guru Trades in Q1 2013

John Burbank 4,296 sh (New)
RS Investment Management 1,605,758 sh (+53.69%)
Paul Tudor Jones 14,500 sh (+49.48%)
Jim Simons 543,900 sh (+47.08%)
HOTCHKIS & WILEY 1,729,820 sh (+0.64%)
Eric Mindich Sold Out
Jim Chanos Sold Out
Richard Pzena 503,457 sh (-3.28%)
Alan Fournier 4,129,567 sh (-6.5%)
Joel Greenblatt 63,729 sh (-33.2%)
Steven Cohen 5,024 sh (-66.04%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with HII

GuruDate Trades Impact to Portfolio Price Range * (?) Current Price Change from Average Current Shares
Joel Greenblatt 2013-03-31 Reduce -33.2%0.08%$43.17 - $54.08 $ 57.6123%63729
John Burbank 2013-03-31 New Buy0.01%$43.17 - $54.08 $ 57.6123%4296
George Soros 2012-12-31 Sold Out 0.13%$39.87 - $44.96 $ 57.6138%0
George Soros 2012-09-30 Add 93.64%0.06%$38.13 - $42.27 $ 57.6143%195000
Joel Greenblatt 2012-06-30 New Buy0.28%$35.9 - $40.33 $ 57.6151%93077
George Soros 2012-06-30 New Buy0.06%$35.9 - $40.33 $ 57.6151%100700
Jean-Marie Eveillard 2012-03-31 Sold Out 0.05%$31.8 - $41.11 $ 57.6169%0
George Soros 2011-12-31 Sold Out 0.0043%$22.85 - $32.5 $ 57.6197%0
Jean-Marie Eveillard 2011-09-30 Add 61.15%0.01%$24.44 - $35.25 $ 57.6189%294884
George Soros 2011-09-30 Add 24%$24.44 - $35.25 $ 57.6189%10333
Jean-Marie Eveillard 2011-06-30 New Buy0.03%$34.82 - $40.5 $ 57.6152%182984
George Soros 2011-06-30 New Buy$34.82 - $40.5 $ 57.6152%8333
Premium More recent guru trades are included for Premium Members only!!
ยป Financial Charts

Peter Lynch Chart

Guru Investment Theses on Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc

David Einhorn Comments on Huntington Ingalls Industries - Jan 23, 2013

Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII) executed relatively well in difficult circumstances over our holding period and the investment compounded at a high single-digit rate of return despite the challenging macro and federal spending environment. We exited the long position with a small gain.

From David Einhorn's fourth quarter letter.


Check out David Einhorn latest stock trades

Top Ranked Articles about Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc

David Einhorn Comments on Huntington Ingalls Industries
Huntington Ingalls Industries (HII) executed relatively well in difficult circumstances over our holding period and the investment compounded at a high single-digit rate of return despite the challenging macro and federal spending environment. We exited the long position with a small gain. Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/E(ttm) 18.60
HII's P/E(ttm) is ranked higher than
69% of the 206 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 16.50 vs. HII: 18.60 )
HII' s 10-Year P/E(ttm) Range
Min: 7.4   Max: 18.6
Current: 18.6

7.4
18.6
P/B 4.20
HII's P/B is ranked higher than
51% of the 224 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 2.11 vs. HII: 4.20 )
HII' s 10-Year P/B Range
Min: 0.98   Max: 4.2
Current: 4.2

0.98
4.2
P/S 0.43
HII's P/S is ranked higher than
90% of the 237 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 0.92 vs. HII: 0.43 )
HII' s 10-Year P/S Range
Min: 0.18   Max: 0.42
Current: 0.43

0.18
0.42
PFCF 21.80
HII's PFCF is ranked higher than
67% of the 176 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 17.60 vs. HII: 21.80 )
HII' s 10-Year PFCF Range
Min: 4.33   Max: 33.12
Current: 21.8

4.33
33.12
EV-to-EBIT 10.9
HII's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
83% of the 195 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 13.78 vs. HII: 10.9 )
HII' s 10-Year EV-to-EBIT Range
Min: 7.9   Max: 34.2
Current: 10.9

7.9
34.2

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield 0.52
HII's Dividend Yield is ranked lower than
55% of the 245 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 1.23 vs. HII: 0.52 )
HII' s 10-Year Dividend Yield Range
Min: 0.22   Max: 0.42
Current: 0.52

0.22
0.42
Dividend Payout 0.0641
HII's Dividend Payout is ranked higher than
95% of the 129 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 0.40 vs. HII: 0.0641 )
HII' s 10-Year Dividend Payout Range
Min: 0.03   Max: 0.03
Current: 0.06

Yield on cost (5-Year) 0.50
HII's Yield on cost (5-Year) is ranked lower than
59% of the 245 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 1.31 vs. HII: 0.50 )
HII' s 10-Year Yield on cost (5-Year) Range
Min: 0.22   Max: 0.42
Current: 0.5

0.22
0.42

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Net Current Asset Value 3.9
HII's Price/Net Current Asset Value is ranked higher than
76% of the 207 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 7.40 vs. HII: 3.9 )
HII' s 10-Year Price/Net Current Asset Value Range
Min: 2.4   Max: 3
Current: 3.9

2.4
3
Price/Median PS Value 1.5
HII's Price/Median PS Value is ranked lower than
53% of the 225 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 1.00 vs. HII: 1.5 )
HII' s 10-Year Price/Median PS Value Range
Min: 0.8   Max: 1.1
Current: 1.5

0.8
1.1
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) 9.20
HII's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) is ranked higher than
84% of the 245 Companies
in the Global Aerospace & Defense industry.

( Industry Median: 6.80 vs. HII: 9.20 )
HII' s 10-Year Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) Range
Min: 2.9   Max: 12.6
Current: 9.2

2.9
12.6

Business Description

Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. formerly known as New Ships, Inc. was incorporated in Delaware on August 4, 2010. It builds, overhauls & repairs ships primarily for the U.S. Navy and the U.S. Coast Guard. It is the nation's sole industrial designer, builder and refueler of nuclear-powered aircraft carriers, the sole supplier and builder of amphibious assault and expeditionary warfare ships to the U.S. Navy, the sole builder of National Security Cutters for the U.S. Coast Guard. It is also a full-service systems provider for the design, engineering, construction and life cycle support of major programs for the surface ships of, and a provider of fleet support and maintenance services for, the U.S. Navy. Its primary areas of business include the design, construction, repair and maintenance of nuclear-powered ships, such as aircraft carriers and submarines, and non-nuclear ships, such as surface combatants, expeditionary warfare/amphibious assault and coastal defense surface ships, as well as the overhaul and refueling of nuclear-powered ships. Its competitive strengths are it has a a workforce of almost 40,000 shipbuilders, it has an experienced management team, it is capable of manufacturing multiple classes of ships at its heavy industrial facilities, it generates a significant amount of its revenue from contracts for classes of ships for which it is the exclusive provider & it has long-term contracts with visible revenue streams and highly probable backlog based on the U.S. Navy's 30-Year Plan. It's objective is to maintain its leadership position in the U.S. naval shipbuilding industry and to deliver long-term value to its stockholders. To achieve these objectives, it utilizes the following strategies: Align its business to support the U.S. Navy's 30-Year Plan, Ensure capabilities that support new U.S. Navy requirements & Streamline its operations and footprint to deliver more affordable ships. It faces following risks in connection with the general conditions and trends of the industry in which it operates: it depends heavily on a single customer ie the U.S. Government, Contracts with the U.S. Government are subject to uncertain levels of funding, modification due to changes in customer priorities and potential termination, Competition within its market and an increase in bid protests may reduce its revenues and market share, its business could suffer if it is unsuccessful in negotiating new collective bargaining agreements & Unforeseen environmental costs could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition or results of operations.
Company Website
SEC Reports
Industry: Aerospace & Defense
Compare:

Personalized Checklist








Within your circle of competence?
Macro economic environment favorable?
High quality business?
Enough margin of safety with stocks?
Gurus are buying?
Insiders are buying?
Management capable and shareholder friendly?
Catalyst for stock price to appreciate?
Your level of confidence with the research?

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
Free 7-day Trial
FEEDBACK