Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.17
NYSE:ACM's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
82% of the 912 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.81 vs. NYSE:ACM: 0.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
NYSE:ACM' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.13  Med: 0.57 Max: N/A
Current: 0.17
Equity-to-Asset 0.25
NYSE:ACM's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
75% of the 887 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.41 vs. NYSE:ACM: 0.25 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
NYSE:ACM' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.17  Med: 0.38 Max: 0.53
Current: 0.25
-0.17
0.53
Interest Coverage 1.84
NYSE:ACM's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
88% of the 890 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 23.33 vs. NYSE:ACM: 1.84 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
NYSE:ACM' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.43  Med: 9.33 Max: N/A
Current: 1.84
Piotroski F-Score: 7
Altman Z-Score: 1.88
Beneish M-Score: -3.32
WACC vs ROIC
11.99%
-2.86%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 2.65
NYSE:ACM's Operating Margin % is ranked lower than
66% of the 897 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 4.69 vs. NYSE:ACM: 2.65 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
NYSE:ACM' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.65  Med: 4.41 Max: 5.24
Current: 2.65
0.65
5.24
Net Margin % 0.94
NYSE:ACM's Net Margin % is ranked lower than
69% of the 902 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 3.04 vs. NYSE:ACM: 0.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
NYSE:ACM' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.86  Med: 2.79 Max: 3.62
Current: 0.94
-0.86
3.62
ROE % 4.79
NYSE:ACM's ROE % is ranked lower than
60% of the 894 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 6.79 vs. NYSE:ACM: 4.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
NYSE:ACM' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -5.54  Med: 11.17 Max: 20.26
Current: 4.79
-5.54
20.26
ROA % 1.19
NYSE:ACM's ROA % is ranked lower than
65% of the 919 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 2.62 vs. NYSE:ACM: 1.19 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
NYSE:ACM' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1.54  Med: 4.44 Max: 5.25
Current: 1.19
-1.54
5.25
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 39.76
NYSE:ACM's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
77% of the 911 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 16.22 vs. NYSE:ACM: 39.76 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
NYSE:ACM' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.35  Med: 45.14 Max: 62.15
Current: 39.76
6.35
62.15
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate 11.70
NYSE:ACM's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked higher than
79% of the 847 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 2.80 vs. NYSE:ACM: 11.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
NYSE:ACM' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 8.6 Max: 17.9
Current: 11.7
0
17.9
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate 2.50
NYSE:ACM's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
62% of the 689 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 8.60 vs. NYSE:ACM: 2.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
NYSE:ACM' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 5.15 Max: 49.5
Current: 2.5
0
49.5
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate -35.90
NYSE:ACM's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked lower than
89% of the 624 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 8.40 vs. NYSE:ACM: -35.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
NYSE:ACM' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 4.4 Max: 31.9
Current: -35.9
0
31.9
GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Signs with AECOM $NYSE:ACM.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» NYSE:ACM's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q1 2016

ACM Guru Trades in Q1 2016

Jeremy Grantham 400,000 sh (+63.27%)
David Dreman 9,375 sh (+37.40%)
Richard Pzena 3,257,294 sh (+23.67%)
PRIMECAP Management 7,470,676 sh (+17.13%)
David Einhorn 3,234,706 sh (unchged)
Scott Black 30,848 sh (-1.88%)
Joel Greenblatt 19,244 sh (-75.37%)
» More
Q2 2016

ACM Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Caxton Associates 336,300 sh (New)
Richard Pzena 3,497,198 sh (+7.37%)
PRIMECAP Management 7,538,595 sh (+0.91%)
David Dreman 9,375 sh (unchged)
Jeremy Grantham Sold Out
David Einhorn 3,069,706 sh (-5.10%)
Scott Black 29,222 sh (-5.27%)
Joel Greenblatt 15,911 sh (-17.32%)
» More
Q3 2016

ACM Guru Trades in Q3 2016

David Dreman 9,375 sh (unchged)
Scott Black Sold Out
Caxton Associates Sold Out
PRIMECAP Management 7,341,075 sh (-2.62%)
Richard Pzena 2,793,775 sh (-20.11%)
Joel Greenblatt 11,883 sh (-25.32%)
David Einhorn 2,004,571 sh (-34.70%)
» More
Q4 2016

ACM Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Jim Simons 822,977 sh (New)
Joel Greenblatt 110,692 sh (+831.52%)
David Dreman 13,979 sh (+49.11%)
PRIMECAP Management 7,424,025 sh (+1.13%)
David Einhorn Sold Out
Richard Pzena 2,228,974 sh (-20.22%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with ACM

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Engineering & Construction » Engineering & Construction    NAICS: 541330    SIC: 8711
Compare:OTCPK:BCKIY, NYSE:PWR, OTCPK:SNCAF, OTCPK:RBWNY, OTCPK:JGCCY, NYSE:JEC, OTCPK:PUODY, OTCPK:KAJMY, OTCPK:SHMUY, NYSE:EME, OTCPK:WSPOF, NYSE:FLR, NYSE:MTZ, OTCPK:CCOHY, NYSE:CBI, NYSE:DY, NYSE:STN, NAS:TTEK, OTCPK:BAFYY, OTCPK:KPELY » details
Traded in other countries:E6Z.Germany,
Aecom provides professional technical and management support services for public and private clients. It provides planning, consulting, architectural & engineering design, and program & construction management services.

AECOM designs, builds, and operates infrastructure projects for governments, businesses, and organizations. It provides consulting and engineering services to clients in transportation, facilities, environmental, and other markets. It generates additional revenue from program and facilities management revolving around maintenance, training, and systems integration. AECOM has three segments: design and consulting services; construction services; and management services. It enters contracts to complete and operate projects, and utilizes employee expertise to establish long-term client relationships. The United States accounts for the majority of sales, but the company provides services to Asia Pacific, Canada, Europe, and other regions.

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 33.24
ACM's PE Ratio is ranked lower than
79% of the 890 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 15.81 vs. ACM: 33.24 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
ACM' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.83  Med: 15.63 Max: 812.25
Current: 33.24
6.83
812.25
Forward PE Ratio 11.68
ACM's Forward PE Ratio is ranked higher than
73% of the 109 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 16.00 vs. ACM: 11.68 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PE Ratio without NRI 33.24
ACM's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked lower than
79% of the 877 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 15.60 vs. ACM: 33.24 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
ACM' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.83  Med: 15.79 Max: 812.25
Current: 33.24
6.83
812.25
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 8.53
ACM's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked higher than
67% of the 477 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 12.58 vs. ACM: 8.53 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
ACM' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.94  Med: 13.34 Max: 126.94
Current: 8.53
3.94
126.94
PB Ratio 1.56
ACM's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
63% of the 930 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.21 vs. ACM: 1.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
ACM' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.68  Med: 1.45 Max: 2.83
Current: 1.56
0.68
2.83
PS Ratio 0.32
ACM's PS Ratio is ranked higher than
74% of the 930 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.61 vs. ACM: 0.32 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
ACM' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.21  Med: 0.4 Max: 0.72
Current: 0.32
0.21
0.72
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 8.71
ACM's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
58% of the 341 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 11.51 vs. ACM: 8.71 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
ACM' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.46  Med: 10.91 Max: 109.67
Current: 8.71
4.46
109.67
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 6.63
ACM's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
58% of the 433 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 8.47 vs. ACM: 6.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
ACM' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.71  Med: 9.1 Max: 182.13
Current: 6.63
3.71
182.13
EV-to-EBIT 19.09
ACM's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
74% of the 782 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 11.63 vs. ACM: 19.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
ACM' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.1  Med: 12.1 Max: 84.2
Current: 19.09
6.1
84.2
EV-to-EBITDA 10.87
ACM's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
59% of the 814 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 9.21 vs. ACM: 10.87 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
ACM' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.8  Med: 9.4 Max: 27.2
Current: 10.87
4.8
27.2
PEG Ratio 2.77
ACM's PEG Ratio is ranked lower than
74% of the 335 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.19 vs. ACM: 2.77 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG Ratio only.
ACM' s PEG Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.29  Med: 2.11 Max: 82.29
Current: 2.77
0.29
82.29
Shiller PE Ratio 25.82
ACM's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked lower than
62% of the 168 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 20.65 vs. ACM: 25.82 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
ACM' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 16.83  Med: 21.67 Max: 29.94
Current: 25.82
16.83
29.94
Current Ratio 1.16
ACM's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
74% of the 845 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.44 vs. ACM: 1.16 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
ACM' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.13  Med: 1.49 Max: 1.7
Current: 1.16
1.13
1.7
Quick Ratio 1.16
ACM's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
57% of the 845 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.26 vs. ACM: 1.16 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
ACM' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.13  Med: 1.49 Max: 1.7
Current: 1.16
1.13
1.7
Days Sales Outstanding 45.97
ACM's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
69% of the 635 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 68.03 vs. ACM: 45.97 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
ACM' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 45.97  Med: 104.89 Max: 121.01
Current: 45.97
45.97
121.01
Days Payable 42.74
ACM's Days Payable is ranked lower than
71% of the 571 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 80.37 vs. ACM: 42.74 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
ACM' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 25.39  Med: 35.4 Max: 49.92
Current: 42.74
25.39
49.92

Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -17.00
ACM's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked lower than
84% of the 497 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: -2.20 vs. ACM: -17.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
ACM' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -47.7  Med: -6.75 Max: 0
Current: -17
-47.7
0

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 0.69
ACM's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked higher than
76% of the 495 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.16 vs. ACM: 0.69 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
ACM' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.58  Med: 0.82 Max: 2.34
Current: 0.69
0.58
2.34
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-DCF (Earnings Based) 3.10
ACM's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-DCF (Earnings Based) is ranked lower than
94% of the 54 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.08 vs. ACM: 3.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-DCF (Earnings Based) only.
N/A
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 0.77
ACM's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
81% of the 844 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.17 vs. ACM: 0.77 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
ACM' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.57  Med: 1.01 Max: 1.73
Current: 0.77
0.57
1.73
Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value 1.80
ACM's Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value is ranked lower than
78% of the 206 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.86 vs. ACM: 1.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value only.
ACM' s Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.36  Med: 1.11 Max: 78.95
Current: 1.8
0.36
78.95
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 5.26
ACM's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
59% of the 940 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 6.65 vs. ACM: 5.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
ACM' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.2  Med: 8.3 Max: 16.5
Current: 5.26
1.2
16.5
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % 28.32
ACM's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked higher than
84% of the 487 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 7.39 vs. ACM: 28.32 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
ACM' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -3.8  Med: 9.4 Max: 34.5
Current: 28.32
-3.8
34.5

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $17,472
EPS (TTM) $ 1.04
Beta1.97
Short Percentage of Float3.43%
52-Week Range $26.46 - 40.72
Shares Outstanding (Mil)155.32

Analyst Estimate

Sep17 Sep18 Sep19
Revenue (Mil $) 18,098 19,090 19,045
EPS ($) 2.96 3.24 3.91
EPS without NRI ($) 2.96 3.24 3.91
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
7.00%
Dividends per Share ($)
» More Articles for ACM

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Primecap Keeps Buying Aecom Sep 10 2015 
Five Speculative and Overvalued Companies to Avoid – August 2015 Aug 20 2015 
Primecap Management Increases Position in Aecom May 26 2015 
Richard Pzena Keeps Buying Aecom May 21 2015 
Aecom Beats Expectations May 14 2015 
Aecom's Earnings Preview May 02 2015 
Should You Buy AECOM After The Recent Correction? Apr 03 2015 
Analyzing David Einhorn's Top Holdings: Aecom Technology Mar 20 2015 
David Einhorn Buys 12 Stocks in Q3 Nov 14 2014 
Weekly Guru Bargains Highlights: TPX, OKE, ACM, SID, DV Aug 05 2012 

More From Other Websites
Trump's Infrastructure Promise Pays Off for AECOM Mar 10 2017
Here's One Company That Hopes Trump Succeeds Mar 10 2017
Final Trade: PHM, XLE & more Mar 09 2017
Paramount condo at Miami Worldcenter obtains $285M construction loan Mar 07 2017
World's Biggest Engineering Firm Plans to Spend Billions to Become Biggest in Infrastructure Mar 06 2017
What Will Trump’s $1T Infrastructure Plan Look Like? Mar 06 2017
AECOM Files SEC form 8-K, Amendments to Articles of Inc. or Bylaws; Change in Fiscal Year,... Mar 03 2017
Aecom: Do the Technicals Match the Infrastructure Story? Feb 28 2017
AECOM Files SEC form 8-K, Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement, Creation of a Direct Financial... Feb 21 2017
Top 4 Long-Term Infrastructure Stocks for 2017 Feb 16 2017
AECOM recognized by Fortune magazine as a World's Most Admired Company for third consecutive year Feb 16 2017
Blog Coverage Jacobs Engineering Wins Property Management Contract from UK's Manchester City Council Feb 16 2017
AECOM Announces Pricing of US $1 Billion in Senior Unsecured Notes Due 2027 Feb 15 2017
AECOM Files SEC form 8-K, Regulation FD Disclosure, Other Events, Financial Statements and Exhibits Feb 15 2017
AECOM -- Moody's assigns Ba3 rating to AECOM's proposed senior unsecured notes Feb 15 2017
ETFs with exposure to AECOM : February 14, 2017 Feb 14 2017
AECOM Financials Feb 14 2017
Brogan BamBrogan is back with a new hyperloop startup Feb 09 2017
AECOM Files SEC form 10-Q, Quarterly Report Feb 08 2017
Aecom CEO Burke Sees Transportation as 'No. 1' U.S. Infrastructure Project Feb 08 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)