Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.05
BMS's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
87% of the 327 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 0.36 vs. BMS: 0.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
BMS' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.04  Med: 0.07 Max: 0.85
Current: 0.05
0.04
0.85
Equity-to-Asset 0.34
BMS's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
77% of the 322 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 0.50 vs. BMS: 0.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
BMS' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.34  Med: 0.46 Max: 0.53
Current: 0.34
0.34
0.53
Interest Coverage 6.80
BMS's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
59% of the 293 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 11.09 vs. BMS: 6.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
BMS' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.35  Med: 6.13 Max: 7.92
Current: 6.8
4.35
7.92
Piotroski F-Score: 8
Altman Z-Score: 3.63
Beneish M-Score: -2.70
WACC vs ROIC
7.97%
10.28%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 10.22
BMS's Operating Margin % is ranked higher than
76% of the 329 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 6.17 vs. BMS: 10.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
BMS' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.37  Med: 8.37 Max: 10.22
Current: 10.22
6.37
10.22
Net Margin % 5.90
BMS's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
62% of the 329 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 4.39 vs. BMS: 5.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
BMS' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.46  Med: 4.4 Max: 5.9
Current: 5.9
3.46
5.9
ROE % 18.81
BMS's ROE % is ranked higher than
80% of the 322 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 8.22 vs. BMS: 18.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
BMS' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.35  Med: 11.7 Max: 19.15
Current: 18.81
9.35
19.15
ROA % 6.45
BMS's ROA % is ranked higher than
67% of the 335 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 3.89 vs. BMS: 6.45 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
BMS' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.09  Med: 5.06 Max: 6.74
Current: 6.45
4.09
6.74
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 22.96
BMS's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
75% of the 334 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 13.69 vs. BMS: 22.96 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
BMS' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 14.38  Med: 18.7 Max: 23.3
Current: 22.96
14.38
23.3
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate -0.80
BMS's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked lower than
71% of the 280 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 3.20 vs. BMS: -0.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
BMS' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -5.4  Med: 6.7 Max: 13.6
Current: -0.8
-5.4
13.6
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate 4.50
BMS's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
54% of the 249 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 5.80 vs. BMS: 4.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
BMS' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.2  Med: 5.2 Max: 10.9
Current: 4.5
-2.2
10.9
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate 10.30
BMS's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked higher than
58% of the 234 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 5.90 vs. BMS: 10.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
BMS' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -5.8  Med: 3.9 Max: 20.3
Current: 10.3
-5.8
20.3
GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with Bemis Co Inc $BMS.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» BMS's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q1 2016

BMS Guru Trades in Q1 2016

Jeremy Grantham 7,000 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 8,300 sh (New)
Jim Simons 857,700 sh (+36.64%)
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 41,110 sh (unchged)
Chuck Royce 378,200 sh (unchged)
Steven Cohen Sold Out
Mairs and Power 4,502,574 sh (-2.82%)
Joel Greenblatt 6,780 sh (-72.05%)
» More
Q2 2016

BMS Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Steven Cohen 394,068 sh (New)
Mairs and Power 4,573,422 sh (+1.57%)
Chuck Royce 378,200 sh (unchged)
Jeremy Grantham Sold Out
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 36,138 sh (-12.09%)
Joel Greenblatt 3,962 sh (-41.56%)
Jim Simons 285,200 sh (-66.75%)
» More
Q3 2016

BMS Guru Trades in Q3 2016

Ray Dalio 4,500 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 6,500 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 891,500 sh (+126.23%)
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 47,248 sh (+30.74%)
Jim Simons 326,500 sh (+14.48%)
Mairs and Power 4,589,277 sh (+0.35%)
Chuck Royce 378,200 sh (unchged)
Joel Greenblatt Sold Out
» More
Q4 2016

BMS Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Joel Greenblatt 18,901 sh (New)
Ray Dalio 77,616 sh (+1624.80%)
Jim Simons 433,000 sh (+32.62%)
Paul Tudor Jones 7,500 sh (+15.38%)
Mairs and Power 4,715,747 sh (+2.76%)
Chuck Royce 364,500 sh (-3.62%)
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 43,818 sh (-7.26%)
Steven Cohen 220,188 sh (-75.30%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with BMS

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Packaging & Containers » Packaging & Containers    NAICS: 326112    SIC: 2671
Compare:NYSE:ATR, NYSE:GPK, NYSE:SON, NYSE:GEF, NAS:SLGN, NYSE:OI, NYSE:TUP, OTCPK:SMFTF, NYSE:BERY, OTCPK:WIPKF, OTCPK:VITOF, NYSE:CCK, OTCPK:CCDBF, NAS:MINI, OTCPK:ITPOF, OTCPK:NPKLY, OTCPK:GRVWF, NYSE:PKG, NAS:UFPT, OTCPK:ACOL » details
Traded in other countries:BE7.Germany,
Bemis Co Inc is a manufacturer of flexible packaging products and pressure sensitive materials, selling to customers throughout the United States, Canada, Mexico, South America, Europe, and Asia Pacific.

Bemis Co Inc is a Missouri corporation incorporated in 1885 as Bemis Bro. Bag Company with the name changed to Bemis Company, Inc. in 1965. The Company is a manufacturer of flexible packaging products and pressure sensitive materials, selling to customers throughout the United States, Canada, Mexico, South America, Europe, and Asia Pacific. The Company's business activities are organized around its three reportable business segments, U.S. Packaging, Global Packaging and Pressure Sensitive Materials. The U.S. Packaging segment represents all food, consumer, and industrial products packaging-related manufacturing operations located in the United States. This segment manufactures multilayer polymer, blown and cast film structures to produce packaging sold for food and personal care product applications as well as non-food applications. Additional products include custom thermoformed packaging, and multiwall paper bags. Markets for these products include processed and fresh meat, liquids, frozen foods, cereals, snacks, cheese, coffee, condiments, candy, pet food, bakery, seed, lawn and garden, tissue, fresh produce, personal care and hygiene, disposable diapers, agribusiness, and minerals. The Global Packaging segment includes all packaging-related manufacturing operations located outside of the United States as well as medical device and pharmaceutical packaging manufacturing operations. This segment manufactures multilayer polymer, blown and cast film structures to produce packaging sold for a variety of food, medical, pharmaceutical, personal care, electronics, and industrial applications. Additional products include injection molded plastic and folding carton packaging. Markets for these products include processed and fresh meat, liquids, snacks, cheese, coffee, condiments, candy, bakery, tissue, fresh produce, personal care and hygiene, disposable diapers, agribusiness, pharmaceutical, and medical devices. The Pressure Sensitive Materials segment is a manufacturer of pressure sensitive adhesive coated paper and film substrates sold into label, graphic, and technical product markets. Products for label markets include narrow-web rolls of pressure sensitive paper, film, and metalized film printing stocks used in high-speed printing and die-cutting. Products for graphic markets include pressure sensitive films used for decorative signage through computer-aided plotters, digital and screen printers, and photographic overlaminate and mounting materials including optically clear films with built-in UV inhibitors. Polymer resins and films, paper, inks, adhesives, aluminum, and chemicals constitute the basic raw materials. The Sales offices and plants of Company are located throughout North America, Latin America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific to provide prompt and economical service to more than 30,000 customers. The competitors in the U.S. and Global Packaging segments include Amcor Limited, Berry Plastics Corporation, Bryce Corporation, C

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 19.90
BMS's PE Ratio is ranked lower than
60% of the 275 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 15.69 vs. BMS: 19.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
BMS' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 11.04  Med: 19.31 Max: 25.82
Current: 19.9
11.04
25.82
Forward PE Ratio 16.72
BMS's Forward PE Ratio is ranked higher than
59% of the 34 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 17.21 vs. BMS: 16.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PE Ratio without NRI 19.90
BMS's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked lower than
62% of the 263 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 15.86 vs. BMS: 19.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
BMS' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 11.04  Med: 19.15 Max: 27.75
Current: 19.9
11.04
27.75
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 18.43
BMS's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked lower than
55% of the 130 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 15.72 vs. BMS: 18.43 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
BMS' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.35  Med: 14.71 Max: 65.42
Current: 18.43
7.35
65.42
PB Ratio 3.63
BMS's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
81% of the 326 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 1.44 vs. BMS: 3.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
BMS' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.27  Med: 2.13 Max: 4.05
Current: 3.63
1.27
4.05
PS Ratio 1.18
BMS's PS Ratio is ranked lower than
61% of the 332 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 0.85 vs. BMS: 1.18 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
BMS' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.47  Med: 0.86 Max: 1.29
Current: 1.18
0.47
1.29
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 20.52
BMS's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
64% of the 135 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 16.76 vs. BMS: 20.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
BMS' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.34  Med: 15.46 Max: 77.96
Current: 20.52
6.34
77.96
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 10.75
BMS's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
53% of the 169 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 10.22 vs. BMS: 10.75 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
BMS' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.46  Med: 9.58 Max: 19.89
Current: 10.75
4.46
19.89
EV-to-EBIT 14.68
BMS's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
57% of the 275 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 12.34 vs. BMS: 14.68 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
BMS' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.8  Med: 13 Max: 18.1
Current: 14.68
7.8
18.1
EV-to-EBITDA 10.53
BMS's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
56% of the 293 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 9.67 vs. BMS: 10.53 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
BMS' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.1  Med: 8.6 Max: 11.9
Current: 10.53
5.1
11.9
PEG Ratio 7.11
BMS's PEG Ratio is ranked lower than
85% of the 135 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 1.66 vs. BMS: 7.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG Ratio only.
BMS' s PEG Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.94  Med: 5.46 Max: 35.34
Current: 7.11
1.94
35.34
Shiller PE Ratio 24.65
BMS's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked higher than
51% of the 51 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 24.28 vs. BMS: 24.65 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
BMS' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.44  Med: 18.8 Max: 27
Current: 24.65
10.44
27
Current Ratio 2.02
BMS's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
68% of the 307 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 1.50 vs. BMS: 2.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
BMS' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.29  Med: 2.25 Max: 3.82
Current: 2.02
1.29
3.82
Quick Ratio 1.07
BMS's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
50% of the 307 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 1.09 vs. BMS: 1.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
BMS' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.74  Med: 1.26 Max: 3.06
Current: 1.07
0.74
3.06
Days Inventory 63.75
BMS's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
58% of the 306 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 59.87 vs. BMS: 63.75 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
BMS' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 49.68  Med: 60.32 Max: 66.41
Current: 63.75
49.68
66.41
Days Sales Outstanding 42.10
BMS's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
87% of the 244 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 70.10 vs. BMS: 42.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
BMS' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 40.46  Med: 45.23 Max: 51.38
Current: 42.1
40.46
51.38
Days Payable 43.96
BMS's Days Payable is ranked lower than
62% of the 219 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 51.46 vs. BMS: 43.96 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
BMS' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 28.09  Med: 37.94 Max: 50.75
Current: 43.96
28.09
50.75

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 2.37
BMS's Dividend Yield % is ranked higher than
54% of the 309 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 2.24 vs. BMS: 2.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
BMS' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.1  Med: 2.75 Max: 5.14
Current: 2.37
2.1
5.14
Dividend Payout Ratio 0.47
BMS's Dividend Payout Ratio is ranked lower than
70% of the 208 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 0.30 vs. BMS: 0.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout Ratio only.
BMS' s Dividend Payout Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.45  Med: 0.53 Max: 0.7
Current: 0.47
0.45
0.7
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate 3.70
BMS's 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate is ranked lower than
51% of the 154 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 3.90 vs. BMS: 3.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate only.
BMS' s 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.9  Med: 4.4 Max: 11.5
Current: 3.7
2.9
11.5
Forward Dividend Yield % 2.43
BMS's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
52% of the 292 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 2.59 vs. BMS: 2.43 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 2.86
BMS's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked higher than
54% of the 391 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 2.63 vs. BMS: 2.86 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
BMS' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.54  Med: 3.33 Max: 6.22
Current: 2.86
2.54
6.22
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio 3.10
BMS's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
95% of the 132 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: -1.40 vs. BMS: 3.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
BMS' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.3  Med: 0.2 Max: 3.1
Current: 3.1
-2.3
3.1

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Tangible-Book 60.40
BMS's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked lower than
99% of the 303 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 1.44 vs. BMS: 60.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
BMS' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.99  Med: 4.71 Max: 58.53
Current: 60.4
2.99
58.53
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 1.43
BMS's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked lower than
58% of the 123 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 1.24 vs. BMS: 1.43 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
BMS' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.72  Med: 1.05 Max: 1.83
Current: 1.43
0.72
1.83
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 1.37
BMS's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked lower than
57% of the 287 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 1.22 vs. BMS: 1.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
BMS' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.69  Med: 1.13 Max: 1.47
Current: 1.37
0.69
1.47
Price-to-Graham-Number 7.31
BMS's Price-to-Graham-Number is ranked lower than
95% of the 229 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 0.99 vs. BMS: 7.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Graham-Number only.
BMS' s Price-to-Graham-Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.47  Med: 2.06 Max: 7.08
Current: 7.31
1.47
7.08
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 6.80
BMS's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
53% of the 336 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 6.50 vs. BMS: 6.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
BMS' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.5  Med: 7.7 Max: 12.8
Current: 6.8
5.5
12.8
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % 8.15
BMS's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked higher than
59% of the 174 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 5.72 vs. BMS: 8.15 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
BMS' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.4  Med: 10.3 Max: 15.5
Current: 8.15
5.4
15.5

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $4,004
EPS (TTM) $ 2.48
Beta0.97
Short Percentage of Float5.25%
52-Week Range $47.06 - 54.19
Shares Outstanding (Mil)92.45

Analyst Estimate

Dec17 Dec18 Dec19
Revenue (Mil $) 4,113 4,227 4,279
EPS ($) 2.93 3.15 3.50
EPS without NRI ($) 2.93 3.15 3.50
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
4.94%
Dividends per Share ($) 1.23 1.27 1.28
» More Articles for BMS

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Bemis' Outlook Appears Strong Jan 27 2017 
7 Cheap Stocks Based on Price-Sales Jan 18 2017 
Investors Should Consider This Packaging Company May 20 2016 
Good Times Are Here Again for This Packaging Company Apr 20 2016 
Investors Should Take a Look at Bemis Sep 25 2015 
Bemis: Primed to Grow Further Aug 12 2015 
Manning & Napier Raises Stake in Bemis Aug 03 2015 
Sealed Air's Positive Earnings Surprise Jul 28 2015 
Bemis: A Stock with Good Momentum May 31 2015 
Bemis: Leading the High-Barrier Packaging Industry Mar 24 2015 

More From Other Websites
BEMIS CO INC Financials Feb 23 2017
BEMIS CO INC Files SEC form 10-K, Annual Report Feb 17 2017
Seven Dividend Stocks Rewarding Shareholders With A Raise Feb 13 2017
Bemis Company Announces 34th Consecutive Annual Dividend Increase Feb 09 2017
Bemis Associates to Showcase Innovations, Collaborations at ISPO Munich Feb 03 2017
ETFs with exposure to Bemis Co., Inc. : February 2, 2017 Feb 02 2017
Bemis Co., Inc. :BMS-US: Earnings Analysis: 2016 By the Numbers : January 30, 2017 Jan 30 2017
Bemis (BMS) Beats on Q4 Earnings by a Penny; Sales Lag Jan 30 2017
Bemis Co., Inc. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : BMS-US : January 30, 2017 Jan 30 2017
Edited Transcript of BMS earnings conference call or presentation 26-Jan-17 5:00pm GMT Jan 26 2017
Bemis Company Inc Earnings Call scheduled for 12:00 pm ET today Jan 26 2017
BEMIS CO INC Files SEC form 8-K, Results of Operations and Financial Condition, Financial Statements... Jan 26 2017
Q4 2016 Bemis Company Inc Earnings Release - Before Market Open Jan 26 2017
Bemis beats 4Q profit forecasts Jan 26 2017
Bemis beats 4Q profit forecasts Jan 26 2017
Bemis Company Reports 2016 Results and 2017 Outlook Jan 26 2017
Bemis Co., Inc. : BMS-US: Dividend Analysis : November 16th, 2016 (record date) : By the numbers :... Jan 12 2017
Bemis Co., Inc. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bullish Manner : BMS-US : January 5, 2017 Jan 05 2017
The Juice is Nearly Loose for Bristol-Myers, Ritholtz's Brown Contends Dec 19 2016
Bemis Co., Inc. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : BMS-US : December 16, 2016 Dec 16 2016

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)