Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.04
NYSE:BMS's Cash to Debt is ranked lower than
92% of the 334 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 0.54 vs. NYSE:BMS: 0.04 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
NYSE:BMS' s Cash to Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.03  Med: 0.08 Max: 0.85
Current: 0.04
0.03
0.85
Equity to Asset 0.34
NYSE:BMS's Equity to Asset is ranked lower than
78% of the 293 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 0.51 vs. NYSE:BMS: 0.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
NYSE:BMS' s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.34  Med: 0.45 Max: 0.53
Current: 0.34
0.34
0.53
Interest Coverage 7.09
NYSE:BMS's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
56% of the 295 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 8.85 vs. NYSE:BMS: 7.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
NYSE:BMS' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.35  Med: 6.13 Max: 7.92
Current: 7.09
4.35
7.92
F-Score: 7
Z-Score: 3.63
M-Score: -2.77
WACC vs ROIC
7.26%
10.01%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 9.81
NYSE:BMS's Operating margin (%) is ranked higher than
76% of the 330 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 5.66 vs. NYSE:BMS: 9.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
NYSE:BMS' s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.37  Med: 8.37 Max: 10.06
Current: 9.81
6.37
10.06
Net-margin (%) 5.67
NYSE:BMS's Net-margin (%) is ranked higher than
65% of the 331 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 3.97 vs. NYSE:BMS: 5.67 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
NYSE:BMS' s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.46  Med: 4.4 Max: 5.88
Current: 5.67
3.46
5.88
ROE (%) 17.91
NYSE:BMS's ROE (%) is ranked higher than
77% of the 323 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 7.76 vs. NYSE:BMS: 17.91 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
NYSE:BMS' s ROE (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.35  Med: 11.7 Max: 18.13
Current: 17.91
9.35
18.13
ROA (%) 6.34
NYSE:BMS's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
68% of the 336 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 3.63 vs. NYSE:BMS: 6.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
NYSE:BMS' s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.09  Med: 5.06 Max: 6.74
Current: 6.34
4.09
6.74
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 22.03
NYSE:BMS's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
75% of the 335 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 12.08 vs. NYSE:BMS: 22.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
NYSE:BMS' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 14.38  Med: 18.7 Max: 22.8
Current: 22.03
14.38
22.8
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) -1.90
NYSE:BMS's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
73% of the 289 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 3.30 vs. NYSE:BMS: -1.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
NYSE:BMS' s Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -5.4  Med: 6.7 Max: 13.6
Current: -1.9
-5.4
13.6
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) 5.60
NYSE:BMS's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
52% of the 260 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 5.20 vs. NYSE:BMS: 5.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
NYSE:BMS' s EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.2  Med: 5.2 Max: 10.9
Current: 5.6
-2.2
10.9
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) 20.30
NYSE:BMS's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
73% of the 237 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 5.70 vs. NYSE:BMS: 20.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
NYSE:BMS' s EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -5.8  Med: 3.9 Max: 20.3
Current: 20.3
-5.8
20.3
» NYSE:BMS's 10-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2016-10-27)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Oprt. Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q3 2015

BMS Guru Trades in Q3 2015

Ray Dalio 7,890 sh (New)
Joel Greenblatt 94,246 sh (+553.08%)
Jim Simons 340,196 sh (+1.34%)
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 41,110 sh (+0.19%)
Mairs and Power 4,758,778 sh (+0.04%)
Chuck Royce 433,200 sh (unchged)
John Burbank Sold Out
Steven Cohen 116,902 sh (-76.62%)
» More
Q4 2015

BMS Guru Trades in Q4 2015

Jim Simons 627,700 sh (+84.51%)
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 41,110 sh (unchged)
Ray Dalio Sold Out
Mairs and Power 4,633,346 sh (-2.64%)
Chuck Royce 378,200 sh (-12.70%)
Steven Cohen 95,000 sh (-18.74%)
Joel Greenblatt 24,258 sh (-74.26%)
» More
Q1 2016

BMS Guru Trades in Q1 2016

Paul Tudor Jones 8,300 sh (New)
Jeremy Grantham 7,000 sh (New)
Jim Simons 857,700 sh (+36.64%)
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 41,110 sh (unchged)
Chuck Royce 378,200 sh (unchged)
Steven Cohen Sold Out
Mairs and Power 4,502,574 sh (-2.82%)
Joel Greenblatt 6,780 sh (-72.05%)
» More
Q2 2016

BMS Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Steven Cohen 394,068 sh (New)
Mairs and Power 4,573,422 sh (+1.57%)
Chuck Royce 378,200 sh (unchged)
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Jeremy Grantham Sold Out
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 36,138 sh (-12.09%)
Joel Greenblatt 3,962 sh (-41.56%)
Jim Simons 285,200 sh (-66.75%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with BMS

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Packaging & Containers » Packaging & Containers
Compare:NYSE:ATR, NYSE:GPK, NYSE:SON, OTCPK:SMFKY, OTCPK:HOYFF, NYSE:BERY, OTCPK:REXFF, NYSE:TUP, NAS:SLGN, OTCPK:CCDBF, NYSE:OI, NYSE:GEF, NYSE:CCK, NYSE:PKG, NAS:MINI, NYSE:MPSX, OTCPK:ITPOF, OTCPK:NPKAF, NYSE:SEE, NAS:UFPT » details
Traded in other countries:BE7.Germany,
Bemis Co Inc is a manufacturer of flexible packaging products and pressure sensitive materials, selling to customers throughout the United States, Canada, Mexico, South America, Europe, and Asia Pacific.

Bemis Co Inc is a Missouri corporation incorporated in 1885 as Bemis Bro. Bag Company with the name changed to Bemis Company, Inc. in 1965. The Company is a manufacturer of flexible packaging products and pressure sensitive materials, selling to customers throughout the United States, Canada, Mexico, South America, Europe, and Asia Pacific. The Company's business activities are organized around its three reportable business segments, U.S. Packaging, Global Packaging and Pressure Sensitive Materials. The U.S. Packaging segment represents all food, consumer, and industrial products packaging-related manufacturing operations located in the United States. This segment manufactures multilayer polymer, blown and cast film structures to produce packaging sold for food and personal care product applications as well as non-food applications. Additional products include custom thermoformed packaging, and multiwall paper bags. Markets for these products include processed and fresh meat, liquids, frozen foods, cereals, snacks, cheese, coffee, condiments, candy, pet food, bakery, seed, lawn and garden, tissue, fresh produce, personal care and hygiene, disposable diapers, agribusiness, and minerals. The Global Packaging segment includes all packaging-related manufacturing operations located outside of the United States as well as medical device and pharmaceutical packaging manufacturing operations. This segment manufactures multilayer polymer, blown and cast film structures to produce packaging sold for a variety of food, medical, pharmaceutical, personal care, electronics, and industrial applications. Additional products include injection molded plastic and folding carton packaging. Markets for these products include processed and fresh meat, liquids, snacks, cheese, coffee, condiments, candy, bakery, tissue, fresh produce, personal care and hygiene, disposable diapers, agribusiness, pharmaceutical, and medical devices. The Pressure Sensitive Materials segment is a manufacturer of pressure sensitive adhesive coated paper and film substrates sold into label, graphic, and technical product markets. Products for label markets include narrow-web rolls of pressure sensitive paper, film, and metalized film printing stocks used in high-speed printing and die-cutting. Products for graphic markets include pressure sensitive films used for decorative signage through computer-aided plotters, digital and screen printers, and photographic overlaminate and mounting materials including optically clear films with built-in UV inhibitors. Polymer resins and films, paper, inks, adhesives, aluminum, and chemicals constitute the basic raw materials. The Sales offices and plants of Company are located throughout North America, Latin America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific to provide prompt and economical service to more than 30,000 customers. The competitors in the U.S. and Global Packaging segments include Amcor Limited, Berry Plastics Corporation, Bryce Corporation, C

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/E(ttm) 21.68
BMS's P/E(ttm) is ranked lower than
65% of the 266 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 15.69 vs. BMS: 21.68 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/E(ttm) only.
BMS' s P/E(ttm) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 11.04  Med: 19.21 Max: 25.82
Current: 21.68
11.04
25.82
Forward P/E 16.98
BMS's Forward P/E is ranked lower than
70% of the 37 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 15.70 vs. BMS: 16.98 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward P/E only.
N/A
PE(NRI) 21.68
BMS's PE(NRI) is ranked lower than
64% of the 264 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 15.89 vs. BMS: 21.68 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE(NRI) only.
BMS' s PE(NRI) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 11.04  Med: 19.02 Max: 27.75
Current: 21.68
11.04
27.75
Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) 15.51
BMS's Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) is ranked higher than
57% of the 132 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 20.53 vs. BMS: 15.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) only.
BMS' s Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.35  Med: 14.53 Max: 65.42
Current: 15.51
7.35
65.42
P/B 3.61
BMS's P/B is ranked lower than
84% of the 289 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 1.29 vs. BMS: 3.61 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
BMS' s P/B Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.27  Med: 2.09 Max: 4.05
Current: 3.61
1.27
4.05
P/S 1.22
BMS's P/S is ranked lower than
69% of the 328 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 0.78 vs. BMS: 1.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
BMS' s P/S Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.47  Med: 0.85 Max: 1.29
Current: 1.22
0.47
1.29
PFCF 17.23
BMS's PFCF is ranked lower than
56% of the 138 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 14.78 vs. BMS: 17.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PFCF only.
BMS' s PFCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.34  Med: 15.43 Max: 77.96
Current: 17.23
6.34
77.96
POCF 10.10
BMS's POCF is ranked lower than
63% of the 167 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 8.61 vs. BMS: 10.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
BMS' s POCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.46  Med: 9.56 Max: 19.89
Current: 10.1
4.46
19.89
EV-to-EBIT 15.94
BMS's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
63% of the 273 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 12.67 vs. BMS: 15.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
BMS' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.8  Med: 12.75 Max: 18.1
Current: 15.94
7.8
18.1
EV-to-EBITDA 11.37
BMS's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
62% of the 291 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 9.03 vs. BMS: 11.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
BMS' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.1  Med: 8.55 Max: 11.9
Current: 11.37
5.1
11.9
PEG 16.85
BMS's PEG is ranked lower than
92% of the 133 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 1.96 vs. BMS: 16.85 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG only.
BMS' s PEG Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.94  Med: 5.12 Max: 35.34
Current: 16.85
1.94
35.34
Shiller P/E 25.80
BMS's Shiller P/E is ranked lower than
58% of the 53 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 22.12 vs. BMS: 25.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller P/E only.
BMS' s Shiller P/E Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.38  Med: 18.82 Max: 27.14
Current: 25.8
10.38
27.14
Current Ratio 2.07
BMS's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
67% of the 278 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 1.51 vs. BMS: 2.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
BMS' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.29  Med: 2.27 Max: 3.82
Current: 2.07
1.29
3.82
Quick Ratio 1.14
BMS's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
55% of the 278 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 1.06 vs. BMS: 1.14 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
BMS' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.74  Med: 1.31 Max: 3.06
Current: 1.14
0.74
3.06
Days Inventory 63.39
BMS's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
60% of the 311 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 55.93 vs. BMS: 63.39 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
BMS' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 49.68  Med: 56.61 Max: 66.41
Current: 63.39
49.68
66.41
Days Sales Outstanding 47.70
BMS's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
74% of the 223 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 66.90 vs. BMS: 47.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
BMS' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 40.46  Med: 45.3 Max: 51.38
Current: 47.7
40.46
51.38
Days Payable 44.21
BMS's Days Payable is ranked lower than
59% of the 203 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 48.04 vs. BMS: 44.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
BMS' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 28.09  Med: 37.94 Max: 50.75
Current: 44.21
28.09
50.75

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield 2.26
BMS's Dividend Yield is ranked lower than
53% of the 302 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 2.55 vs. BMS: 2.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield only.
BMS' s Dividend Yield Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.1  Med: 2.77 Max: 5.14
Current: 2.26
2.1
5.14
Dividend Payout 0.49
BMS's Dividend Payout is ranked lower than
67% of the 200 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 0.67 vs. BMS: 0.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout only.
BMS' s Dividend Payout Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.31  Med: 0.45 Max: 1.67
Current: 0.49
0.31
1.67
Dividend Growth (3y) 3.80
BMS's Dividend Growth (3y) is ranked higher than
50% of the 158 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 3.80 vs. BMS: 3.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Growth (3y) only.
BMS' s Dividend Growth (3y) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.9  Med: 5.3 Max: 11.5
Current: 3.8
2.9
11.5
Forward Dividend Yield 2.28
BMS's Forward Dividend Yield is ranked lower than
54% of the 284 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 1.16 vs. BMS: 2.28 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield only.
N/A
Yield on cost (5-Year) 2.75
BMS's Yield on cost (5-Year) is ranked higher than
50% of the 373 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 2.87 vs. BMS: 2.75 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Yield on cost (5-Year) only.
BMS' s Yield on cost (5-Year) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.55  Med: 3.37 Max: 6.25
Current: 2.75
2.55
6.25
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio 2.70
BMS's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
92% of the 142 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: -1.40 vs. BMS: 2.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
BMS' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.3  Med: 0.2 Max: 2.7
Current: 2.7
-2.3
2.7

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Tangible Book 52.19
BMS's Price/Tangible Book is ranked lower than
98% of the 268 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 1.31 vs. BMS: 52.19 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
BMS' s Price/Tangible Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.47  Med: 4.74 Max: 53.19
Current: 52.19
2.47
53.19
Price/Projected FCF 1.46
BMS's Price/Projected FCF is ranked lower than
61% of the 126 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 1.24 vs. BMS: 1.46 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Projected FCF only.
BMS' s Price/Projected FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.62  Med: 1.02 Max: 2.26
Current: 1.46
0.62
2.26
Price/Median PS Value 1.44
BMS's Price/Median PS Value is ranked lower than
66% of the 292 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 1.21 vs. BMS: 1.44 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
BMS' s Price/Median PS Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.67  Med: 1.1 Max: 1.54
Current: 1.44
0.67
1.54
Price/Graham Number 7.09
BMS's Price/Graham Number is ranked lower than
95% of the 190 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 1.03 vs. BMS: 7.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Graham Number only.
BMS' s Price/Graham Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.21  Med: 1.95 Max: 7.21
Current: 7.09
1.21
7.21
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) 6.28
BMS's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
52% of the 330 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 6.40 vs. BMS: 6.28 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
BMS' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.5  Med: 7.8 Max: 12.8
Current: 6.28
5.5
12.8
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) 6.42
BMS's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked higher than
62% of the 165 Companies
in the Global Packaging & Containers industry.

( Industry Median: 2.46 vs. BMS: 6.42 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
BMS' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.4  Med: 10.3 Max: 15.5
Current: 6.42
5.4
15.5

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $3,990
EPS (TTM) $ 2.34
Beta0.93
Short Percentage of Float4.26%
52-Week Range $38.91 - 54.19
Shares Outstanding (Mil)94.71

Analyst Estimate

Dec16 Dec17 Dec18
Revenue (Mil $) 4,052 4,189 4,351
EPS ($) 2.72 2.97 3.35
EPS w/o NRI ($) 2.72 2.97 3.35
EPS Growth Rate
(3Y to 5Y Estimate)
6.79%
Dividends Per Share ($) 1.17 1.21 1.24
» More Articles for NYSE:BMS

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Investors Should Consider This Packaging Company May 20 2016 
Good Times Are Here Again for This Packaging Company Apr 20 2016 
Investors Should Take a Look at Bemis Sep 25 2015 
Bemis: Primed to Grow Further Aug 12 2015 
Manning & Napier Raises Stake in Bemis Aug 03 2015 
Sealed Air's Positive Earnings Surprise Jul 28 2015 
Bemis: A Stock with Good Momentum May 31 2015 
Bemis: Leading the High-Barrier Packaging Industry Mar 24 2015 
A Closer Look at Bemis Co Mar 05 2015 
Avery Dennison Continues to be a Market Leader Dec 10 2014 

More From Other Websites
ETF’s with exposure to Bemis Co., Inc. : September 26, 2016 Sep 26 2016
BEMIS CO INC Files SEC form 8-K, Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement, Creation of a Direct... Sep 15 2016
Study Finds 90% of UK Consumers Are Open to Cooking Meat Products in Packaging Sep 13 2016
Study Finds 90% of UK Consumers Are Open to Cooking Meat Products in Packaging Sep 13 2016
Bemis Prices Senior Notes, Gets Baa2 Rating from Moody's Sep 12 2016
Bemis Issues Notes, Moody’s Rates as ‘Baa2’ Sep 09 2016
BEMIS CO INC Files SEC form 8-K, Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement, Other Events, Financial... Sep 09 2016
Bemis Announces Senior Notes Offering Sep 08 2016
Bemis Announces Senior Notes Offering Sep 08 2016
ETF’s with exposure to Bemis Co., Inc. : August 23, 2016 Aug 23 2016
Bemis Co., Inc. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bullish Manner : BMS-US : August 22, 2016 Aug 22 2016
ETF’s with exposure to Bemis Co., Inc. : August 11, 2016 Aug 11 2016
Bemis Co., Inc. :BMS-US: Earnings Analysis: Q2, 2016 By the Numbers : August 10, 2016 Aug 10 2016
Bemis Declares Dividend of $0.29 Per Share Aug 08 2016
BEMIS CO INC Financials Aug 04 2016
Bemis Company Declares Regular Quarterly Dividend Aug 04 2016
Bemis Company Declares Regular Quarterly Dividend Aug 04 2016
A Look at Bemis Company’s Performance in 2Q16 Aug 02 2016
BEMIS CO INC Files SEC form 10-Q, Quarterly Report Jul 29 2016
Edited Transcript of BMS earnings conference call or presentation 28-Jul-16 4:00pm GMT Jul 29 2016

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)