Switch to:
Also traded in: Chile, Germany, Mexico

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.05
BTU's Cash to Debt is ranked lower than
81% of the 147 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 0.28 vs. BTU: 0.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
BTU' s Cash to Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.01  Med: 0.10 Max: N/A
Current: 0.05
Equity to Asset 0.11
BTU's Equity to Asset is ranked lower than
83% of the 144 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 0.40 vs. BTU: 0.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
BTU' s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.07  Med: 0.28 Max: 0.45
Current: 0.11
0.07
0.45
F-Score: 1
Z-Score: 0.16
M-Score: -3.56
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) -20.08
BTU's Operating margin (%) is ranked lower than
74% of the 144 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: -0.25 vs. BTU: -20.08 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
BTU' s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -4.63  Med: 13.24 Max: 21.28
Current: -20.08
-4.63
21.28
Net-margin (%) -34.13
BTU's Net-margin (%) is ranked lower than
76% of the 144 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: -1.33 vs. BTU: -34.13 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
BTU' s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -11.59  Med: 9.49 Max: 14.62
Current: -34.13
-11.59
14.62
ROE (%) -86.62
BTU's ROE (%) is ranked lower than
88% of the 141 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: -1.97 vs. BTU: -86.62 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
BTU' s ROE (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -23.76  Med: 15.73 Max: 33.8
Current: -86.62
-23.76
33.8
ROA (%) -16.09
BTU's ROA (%) is ranked lower than
85% of the 149 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: -1.05 vs. BTU: -16.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
BTU' s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -5.76  Med: 5.53 Max: 10.17
Current: -16.09
-5.76
10.17
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) -12.41
BTU's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
74% of the 149 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 1.75 vs. BTU: -12.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
BTU' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.66  Med: 9.50 Max: 19.23
Current: -12.41
-2.66
19.23
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) -4.60
BTU's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
62% of the 118 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: -8.10 vs. BTU: -4.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
BTU' s Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 4.25 Max: 21
Current: -4.6
0
21
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) -36.30
BTU's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
84% of the 96 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: -12.30 vs. BTU: -36.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
BTU' s EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: -3.45 Max: 36.5
Current: -36.3
0
36.5
» BTU's 10-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2016-02-11)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Guru Trades

Q1 2015

BTU Guru Trades in Q1 2015

Arnold Schneider 4,790,748 sh (+51.60%)
Jim Simons 2,096,674 sh (+26.64%)
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 33,238,637 sh (+2.53%)
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Donald Smith 1,745,229 sh (-0.01%)
Mario Gabelli 570,300 sh (-10.46%)
» More
Q2 2015

BTU Guru Trades in Q2 2015

Paul Tudor Jones 43,700 sh (New)
George Soros 1,029,400 sh (New)
Jim Simons 2,626,501 sh (+25.27%)
Arnold Schneider 4,804,091 sh (+0.28%)
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc Sold Out
Donald Smith 1,744,866 sh (-0.02%)
Mario Gabelli 518,900 sh (-9.01%)
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 3,683,350 sh (-88.92%)
» More
Q3 2015

BTU Guru Trades in Q3 2015

George Soros Sold Out
Donald Smith Sold Out
Paul Tudor Jones 160,211 sh (-75.56%)
Arnold Schneider 3,418,726 sh (-95.26%)
Mario Gabelli 284,500 sh (-96.34%)
Jim Simons 1,361,600 sh (-96.54%)
» More
Q4 2015

BTU Guru Trades in Q4 2015

Mario Gabelli Sold Out
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with BTU

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Top Ranked Articles about Peabody Energy Corp

Donald Smith Loses on Peabody Energy and Tecumseh Products Guru logs gains on Bassett Furniture
Donald Smith (Trades, Portfolio) sold many stocks during the third quarter. Some of them brought him some profits, but he lost on other investments. His biggest quarterly losses were 88% and 60% on Peabody Energy Corp. (BTU) and Tecumseh Products Co. (TECU), but it had a huge gain of 262% on Bassett Furniture Industries Inc. (BSET). Read more...
Donald Smith Sells Out 3 Holdings The divested stocks may have short-selling opportunities
Donald Smith (Trades, Portfolio) began his career as an analyst with Capital Research Company. He then worked his way up to becoming the director, vice president and then portfolio manager of Capital Guardian Trust Co. In 1980, Smith became the CEO of Home Insurance Company, and President of Home Portfolio Advisors Inc. He then purchased the company and changed the name to Donald Smith (Trades, Portfolio) & Co Inc. Smith has over 35 years of experience in the investment industry. He likes to look for hidden value when he conducts his research looking at underappreciated earnings, and holdings with the lowest price Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/B 0.06
BTU's P/B is ranked higher than
97% of the 148 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 0.77 vs. BTU: 0.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
BTU' s P/B Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.05  Med: 2.69 Max: 8.31
Current: 0.06
0.05
8.31
P/S 0.01
BTU's P/S is ranked higher than
99% of the 148 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 0.44 vs. BTU: 0.01 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
BTU' s P/S Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.01  Med: 1.52 Max: 4.53
Current: 0.01
0.01
4.53
Shiller P/E 0.71
BTU's Shiller P/E is ranked higher than
95% of the 39 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 8.52 vs. BTU: 0.71 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller P/E only.
BTU' s Shiller P/E Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.56  Med: 13.04 Max: 42.87
Current: 0.71
0.56
42.87
Current Ratio 1.02
BTU's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
62% of the 149 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 1.23 vs. BTU: 1.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
BTU' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.77  Med: 1.11 Max: 2.09
Current: 1.02
0.77
2.09
Quick Ratio 0.80
BTU's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
66% of the 149 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 1.04 vs. BTU: 0.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
BTU' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.45  Med: 0.85 Max: 1.84
Current: 0.8
0.45
1.84
Days Inventory 28.36
BTU's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
64% of the 132 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 38.32 vs. BTU: 28.36 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
BTU' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 21.69  Med: 27.53 Max: 45.12
Current: 28.36
21.69
45.12
Days Sales Outstanding 22.58
BTU's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
81% of the 126 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 51.67 vs. BTU: 22.58 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
BTU' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 18.39  Med: 28.77 Max: 42.64
Current: 22.58
18.39
42.64

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield 1.75
BTU's Dividend Yield is ranked lower than
66% of the 149 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 5.09 vs. BTU: 1.75 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield only.
BTU' s Dividend Yield Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.29  Med: 0.68 Max: 39.16
Current: 1.75
0.29
39.16
Yield on cost (5-Year) 2.32
BTU's Yield on cost (5-Year) is ranked lower than
66% of the 146 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 5.52 vs. BTU: 2.32 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Yield on cost (5-Year) only.
BTU' s Yield on cost (5-Year) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.38  Med: 0.90 Max: 51.91
Current: 2.32
0.38
51.91
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio 0.30
BTU's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
81% of the 99 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: -3.00 vs. BTU: 0.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
BTU' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -18.2  Med: -0.05 Max: 0
Current: 0.3
-18.2
0

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Tangible Book 0.06
BTU's Price/Tangible Book is ranked higher than
96% of the 148 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 0.79 vs. BTU: 0.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
BTU' s Price/Tangible Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.29  Med: 1.93 Max: 8.53
Current: 0.06
0.29
8.53
Price/Projected FCF 0.02
BTU's Price/Projected FCF is ranked higher than
97% of the 76 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 0.86 vs. BTU: 0.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Projected FCF only.
BTU' s Price/Projected FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.11  Med: 1.38 Max: 9.9
Current: 0.02
0.11
9.9
Price/Median PS Value 0.01
BTU's Price/Median PS Value is ranked higher than
99% of the 148 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 0.41 vs. BTU: 0.01 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
BTU' s Price/Median PS Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.04  Med: 0.66 Max: 2.99
Current: 0.01
0.04
2.99
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) -20.71
BTU's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
89% of the 149 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 0.60 vs. BTU: -20.71 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
BTU' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -20.73  Med: 6.20 Max: 19.4
Current: -20.71
-20.73
19.4
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) 323.85
BTU's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked higher than
94% of the 70 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: -21.11 vs. BTU: 323.85 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
BTU' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -25.4  Med: 21.20 Max: 31.7
Current: 323.85
-25.4
31.7

More Statistics

Revenue(Mil) $5981
EPS $ -112.98
Beta-0.83
Short Percentage of Float35.65%
52-Week Range $2.83 - 123.45
Shares Outstanding(Mil)18.50

Analyst Estimate

Dec15 Dec16 Dec17
Revenue(Mil) 5,618 5,355 5,356
EPS($) -15.98 -13.09 -25.43
EPS without NRI($) -15.98 -13.09 -25.43

Business Description

Industry: Coal » Coal
Compare:CNX, CSUAY, YZC, ITAYY, ADOOY » details
Traded in other countries:BTU.Chile, PE51.Germany, BTU.Mexico,
Peabody Energy Corp was incorporated in Delaware in 1998 and became a public company in 2001. Peabody Energy is a private-sector coal company and it owns interests in 30 coal mining operations, including a majority interest in 29 coal operations located in the United States (U.S.) and Australia. The Company's operations consist of four principal segments: three Mining segments and one Trading and Brokerage segment. The Company's three mining segments are Western U.S. Mining, Midwestern U.S. Mining and Australian Mining. Its fifth segment, Corporate and Other, includes mining and export/transportation joint ventures, energy-related commercial activities as well as the management of its coal reserve and real estate holdings. The principal business of the Western and Midwestern U.S. Mining segments is the mining, preparation and sale of thermal coal, sold to electric utilities. The Company's Western U.S. Mining segment consists of its Powder River Basin, Southwest and Colorado operations. The Company's Midwestern U.S. Mining segment consists of its Illinois and Indiana operations. The business of its Australian Mining segment is the mining of various qualities of low-sulfur, high Btu coal (metallurgical coal) as well as thermal coal. Through its Trading and Brokerage segment, the Company is engaged in the brokering of coal sales both as principal and agent in support of various coal production-related activities that may involve coal to be produced from its mines, coal sourcing arrangements with third-party mining companies or offtake agreements with producers. The Company's main U.S. competitors are other large coal producers; including Alpha Natural Resources, Inc., Arch Coal, Inc., Cloud Peak Energy Inc., and CONSOL Energy Inc., Its international competitors include Anglo-American PLC, BHP Billiton, China Coal, Rio Tinto, Shenhua Group and Xstrata PLC.
» More Articles for BTU

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Muhlenkamp Memorandum: Investment Seminar Recap Jan 19 2016 
Donald Smith Loses on Peabody Energy and Tecumseh Products, Gains on Bassett Furniture Jan 07 2016 
Donald Smith Sells Out 3 Holdings Dec 26 2015 
Paragon Shipping Among Jim Simons' Holdings With High Yield Nov 29 2015 
Guru's Pile Into Commodities. Time to Follow Suit? Sep 14 2015 
Opportunities In The Depressed Coal Sector Jul 16 2015 
Why Peabody Energy Can Get Better May 28 2015 
Peabody Energy: This Coal Stock Can Recover Going Forward May 25 2015 
Value In Coal With Alliance Holdings (AHGP) & Alliance Partners (ARLP) May 25 2015 
Peabody And The Coal Mining Industry Currently A Risky Place To Invest May 11 2015 

More From Other Websites
US Electricity Generation Remains Steady, But Will Coal Producers? Feb 05 2016
Peabody Energy: When a Downgrade Doesn't Matter Feb 04 2016
Top Analyst Upgrades and Downgrades: GoPro, Illumina, Mattel, Match, Peabody, Petrobras, Wayfair,... Feb 04 2016
Calstrs board votes to divest from four coal companies Feb 03 2016
CNX Coal Resources Q4 Earnings, Revenues Miss Estimates Jan 29 2016
Meridian Bancorp posts 4Q profit Jan 26 2016
Meridian Bancorp posts 4Q profit Jan 26 2016
Peabody Energy (BTU) in Focus: Stock Up 8.1% in Session Jan 26 2016
Peabody Energy Has Multiple Undisclosed SEC Probes, New Report Warns Jan 25 2016
Peabody continues to evaluate debt exchanges, buybacks Jan 25 2016
Peabody Energy To Announce Results For The Year Ended December 31, 2015 Jan 25 2016
Peabody Energy To Announce Results For The Year Ended December 31, 2015 Jan 25 2016
PEABODY ENERGY CORP Files SEC form 8-K, Regulation FD Disclosure, Financial Statements and Exhibits Jan 22 2016
Peabody Energy Announces Agreement To Sell Interest In Prairie State Energy Campus; Updates Asset... Jan 21 2016
Peabody Energy Announces Agreement To Sell Interest In Prairie State Energy Campus; Updates Asset... Jan 21 2016
Could Peabody be the next miner headed for bankruptcy? Jan 21 2016
The Coal Miner `On Everybody's List' as Next Bankruptcy Victim Jan 20 2016
Arch Coal’s Path to Bankruptcy: The Beginning Jan 19 2016
Obama Leaves Decisions to Successor With Coal Leasing Halt Jan 15 2016

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
FEEDBACK