Switch to:

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.10
BTU's Cash to Debt is ranked lower than
78% of the 143 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 0.34 vs. BTU: 0.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
BTU' s 10-Year Cash to Debt Range
Min: 0.01  Med: 0.10 Max: N/A
Current: 0.1
Equity to Asset 0.19
BTU's Equity to Asset is ranked lower than
81% of the 124 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 0.38 vs. BTU: 0.19 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
BTU' s 10-Year Equity to Asset Range
Min: 0.07  Med: 0.28 Max: 0.45
Current: 0.19
0.07
0.45
F-Score: 3
Z-Score: 0.63
M-Score: -2.97
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) -2.03
BTU's Operating margin (%) is ranked lower than
62% of the 135 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 0.66 vs. BTU: -2.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
BTU' s 10-Year Operating margin (%) Range
Min: -4.63  Med: 11.83 Max: 21.28
Current: -2.03
-4.63
21.28
Net-margin (%) -13.65
BTU's Net-margin (%) is ranked lower than
69% of the 135 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: -0.06 vs. BTU: -13.65 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
BTU' s 10-Year Net-margin (%) Range
Min: -11.59  Med: 4.83 Max: 14.62
Current: -13.65
-11.59
14.62
ROE (%) -27.33
BTU's ROE (%) is ranked lower than
74% of the 138 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: -0.60 vs. BTU: -27.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
BTU' s 10-Year ROE (%) Range
Min: -23.76  Med: 12.30 Max: 33.8
Current: -27.33
-23.76
33.8
ROA (%) -6.79
BTU's ROA (%) is ranked lower than
66% of the 146 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: -0.56 vs. BTU: -6.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
BTU' s 10-Year ROA (%) Range
Min: -5.76  Med: 2.45 Max: 10.17
Current: -6.79
-5.76
10.17
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) -1.70
BTU's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
56% of the 144 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 0.26 vs. BTU: -1.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
BTU' s 10-Year ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range
Min: -2.66  Med: 7.85 Max: 19.23
Current: -1.7
-2.66
19.23
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) -4.60
BTU's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
60% of the 110 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: -8.20 vs. BTU: -4.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
BTU' s 10-Year Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: 0  Med: 4.25 Max: 21
Current: -4.6
0
21
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) -36.30
BTU's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
73% of the 88 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: -20.60 vs. BTU: -36.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
BTU' s 10-Year EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: 0  Med: -3.45 Max: 36.4
Current: -36.3
0
36.4
» BTU's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Guru Trades

Q3 2014

BTU Guru Trades in Q3 2014

John Burbank 16,238 sh (New)
Donald Smith 764,000 sh (New)
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 24,895,392 sh (+53.93%)
Arnold Schneider 2,846,015 sh (+20.49%)
Mario Gabelli 730,700 sh (+8.27%)
Ray Dalio 52,000 sh (+7.00%)
Joel Greenblatt 29,064 sh (-9.34%)
» More
Q4 2014

BTU Guru Trades in Q4 2014

Paul Tudor Jones 70,678 sh (New)
Jim Simons 1,655,637 sh (New)
Donald Smith 1,745,391 sh (+128.45%)
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 32,418,264 sh (+30.22%)
Arnold Schneider 3,160,160 sh (+11.04%)
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 32,561,753 sh (unchged)
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 32,561,753 sh (unchged)
Joel Greenblatt Sold Out
Ray Dalio Sold Out
John Burbank Sold Out
Mario Gabelli 636,900 sh (-12.84%)
» More
Q1 2015

BTU Guru Trades in Q1 2015

Arnold Schneider 4,790,748 sh (+51.60%)
Jim Simons 2,096,674 sh (+26.64%)
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 33,238,637 sh (+2.53%)
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Donald Smith 1,745,229 sh (-0.01%)
Mario Gabelli 570,300 sh (-10.46%)
» More
Q2 2015

BTU Guru Trades in Q2 2015

Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc Sold Out
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 3,683,350 sh (-88.92%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with BTU

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Top Ranked Articles about Peabody Energy Corp

Peabody Insiders Invest in Coal Company
It should come as no surprise to anyone reading this when I say that energy is a hot topic these days – but it is almost always in connection with oil and gas and the dramatic decline in prices at the pump. Read more...
4 Stocks Fund Managers at Manning & Napier Are Buying
Manning & Napier, a $51.1 billion management firm, added to seven positions at the end of the year, according to GuruFocus Real Time Picks. Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/B 0.13
BTU's P/B is ranked higher than
92% of the 133 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 1.24 vs. BTU: 0.13 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
BTU' s 10-Year P/B Range
Min: 0.13  Med: 2.80 Max: 8.31
Current: 0.13
0.13
8.31
P/S 0.05
BTU's P/S is ranked higher than
93% of the 131 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 0.90 vs. BTU: 0.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
BTU' s 10-Year P/S Range
Min: 0.05  Med: 1.55 Max: 4.53
Current: 0.05
0.05
4.53
POCF 1.13
BTU's POCF is ranked higher than
93% of the 67 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 8.38 vs. BTU: 1.13 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
BTU' s 10-Year POCF Range
Min: 1.13  Med: 10.74 Max: 167.72
Current: 1.13
1.13
167.72
EV-to-EBIT -33.70
BTU's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
192% of the 78 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 19.33 vs. BTU: -33.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
BTU' s 10-Year EV-to-EBIT Range
Min: -126.9  Med: 13.30 Max: 76
Current: -33.7
-126.9
76
Shiller P/E 191.85
BTU's Shiller P/E is ranked lower than
97% of the 59 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 10.81 vs. BTU: 191.85 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller P/E only.
BTU' s 10-Year Shiller P/E Range
Min: 7.85  Med: 24.02 Max: 640
Current: 191.85
7.85
640
Current Ratio 1.03
BTU's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
63% of the 136 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 1.31 vs. BTU: 1.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
BTU' s 10-Year Current Ratio Range
Min: 0.77  Med: 1.14 Max: 2.09
Current: 1.03
0.77
2.09
Quick Ratio 0.82
BTU's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
64% of the 136 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 1.07 vs. BTU: 0.82 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
BTU' s 10-Year Quick Ratio Range
Min: 0.45  Med: 0.88 Max: 1.84
Current: 0.82
0.45
1.84
Days Inventory 30.59
BTU's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
61% of the 126 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 35.81 vs. BTU: 30.59 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
BTU' s 10-Year Days Inventory Range
Min: 17.72  Med: 29.85 Max: 45.12
Current: 30.59
17.72
45.12
Days Sales Outstanding 23.49
BTU's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
83% of the 119 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 56.32 vs. BTU: 23.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
BTU' s 10-Year Days Sales Outstanding Range
Min: 18.39  Med: 28.50 Max: 55.5
Current: 23.49
18.39
55.5

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield 14.58
BTU's Dividend Yield is ranked higher than
93% of the 138 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 4.08 vs. BTU: 14.58 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield only.
BTU' s 10-Year Dividend Yield Range
Min: 0.29  Med: 0.67 Max: 21.5
Current: 14.58
0.29
21.5
Yield on cost (5-Year) 19.33
BTU's Yield on cost (5-Year) is ranked higher than
91% of the 138 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 4.80 vs. BTU: 19.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Yield on cost (5-Year) only.
BTU' s 10-Year Yield on cost (5-Year) Range
Min: 0.38  Med: 0.89 Max: 28.04
Current: 19.33
0.38
28.04
Share Buyback Rate 0.30
BTU's Share Buyback Rate is ranked higher than
80% of the 93 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: -2.50 vs. BTU: 0.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Share Buyback Rate only.
BTU' s 10-Year Share Buyback Rate Range
Min: 0  Med: -0.05 Max: -18.2
Current: 0.3

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Tangible Book 0.13
BTU's Price/Tangible Book is ranked higher than
92% of the 126 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 1.63 vs. BTU: 0.13 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
BTU' s 10-Year Price/Tangible Book Range
Min: 0.55  Med: 1.98 Max: 8.52
Current: 0.13
0.55
8.52
Price/Projected FCF 0.06
BTU's Price/Projected FCF is ranked higher than
93% of the 54 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 1.30 vs. BTU: 0.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Projected FCF only.
BTU' s 10-Year Price/Projected FCF Range
Min: 0.25  Med: 1.42 Max: 7.24
Current: 0.06
0.25
7.24
Price/Median PS Value 0.03
BTU's Price/Median PS Value is ranked higher than
97% of the 108 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 0.68 vs. BTU: 0.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
BTU' s 10-Year Price/Median PS Value Range
Min: 0.13  Med: 0.70 Max: 2.96
Current: 0.03
0.13
2.96
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) -3.00
BTU's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
65% of the 144 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 0.60 vs. BTU: -3.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
BTU' s 10-Year Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range
Min: 1.3  Med: 5.70 Max: 19.3
Current: -3
1.3
19.3
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) 50.35
BTU's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked higher than
88% of the 68 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: -15.97 vs. BTU: 50.35 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
BTU' s 10-Year Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range
Min: -25  Med: 20.60 Max: 50.3
Current: 50.35
-25
50.3

Business Description

Industry: Coal » Coal
Compare:CNX, CSUAY, YZC, ITAYY, ADOOY » details
Traded in other countries:BTU.Mexico, BTU.Chile, PE5.Germany,
Peabody Energy Corp was incorporated in Delaware in 1998 and became a public company in 2001. Peabody Energy is a private-sector coal company and it owns interests in 30 coal mining operations, including a majority interest in 29 coal operations located in the United States (U.S.) and Australia. The Company's operations consist of four principal segments: three Mining segments and one Trading and Brokerage segment. The Company's three mining segments are Western U.S. Mining, Midwestern U.S. Mining and Australian Mining. Its fifth segment, Corporate and Other, includes mining and export/transportation joint ventures, energy-related commercial activities as well as the management of its coal reserve and real estate holdings. The principal business of the Western and Midwestern U.S. Mining segments is the mining, preparation and sale of thermal coal, sold to electric utilities. The Company's Western U.S. Mining segment consists of its Powder River Basin, Southwest and Colorado operations. The Company's Midwestern U.S. Mining segment consists of its Illinois and Indiana operations. The business of its Australian Mining segment is the mining of various qualities of low-sulfur, high Btu coal (metallurgical coal) as well as thermal coal. Through its Trading and Brokerage segment, the Company is engaged in the brokering of coal sales both as principal and agent in support of various coal production-related activities that may involve coal to be produced from its mines, coal sourcing arrangements with third-party mining companies or offtake agreements with producers. The Company's main U.S. competitors are other large coal producers; including Alpha Natural Resources, Inc., Arch Coal, Inc., Cloud Peak Energy Inc., and CONSOL Energy Inc., Its international competitors include Anglo-American PLC, BHP Billiton, China Coal, Rio Tinto, Shenhua Group and Xstrata PLC.
» More Articles for BTU

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Opportunities In The Depressed Coal Sector Jul 16 2015 
on deck Jul 13 2015 
Why Peabody Energy Can Get Better May 28 2015 
Peabody Energy: This Coal Stock Can Recover Going Forward May 25 2015 
Value In Coal With Alliance Holdings (AHGP) & Alliance Partners (ARLP) May 25 2015 
Peabody And The Coal Mining Industry Currently A Risky Place To Invest May 11 2015 
Manning & Napier Advisors Reduced Stake in High Yield Company May 08 2015 
Investors Shouldn't Hope for a Turnaround at Peabody Energy Apr 28 2015 
Why Peabody Energy Looks Like a Risky Bet Apr 22 2015 
george Feb 26 2015 

More From Other Websites
Which Coal Miners Will Live to Dig Another Day? Jul 31 2015
Powder River Basin Coal Breaks the $10 Barrier: Will It Stay Up? Jul 31 2015
Coal Regains the Top Spot from Natural Gas Jul 30 2015
Surge in Peabody Adds Gains to Coal ETF: Will it Last? - ETF News And Commentary Jul 30 2015
Arch Coal's Q2 Loss Wider than Estimates, Revenues Miss - Analyst Blog Jul 30 2015
Greenlight Capital Boosts Stake in Consol Energy Jul 30 2015
Peabody Energy: Wait, Someone Still Rates It a Buy? Jul 29 2015
RPT-Obamacare case to be turned against government on emissions rule Jul 29 2015
Obamacare case to be turned against government on emissions rule Jul 29 2015
Peabody Energy (BTU) Stock Price Target Cut at Deutsche Bank Jul 29 2015
Alpha Natural Resources’ Possible Bankruptcy: What’s Next? Jul 29 2015
Edited Transcript of BTU earnings conference call or presentation 28-Jul-15 3:00pm GMT Jul 28 2015
Meridian Bancorp posts 2Q profit Jul 28 2015
Meridian Bancorp posts 2Q profit Jul 28 2015
Peabody Energy: 'Structurally Different' Despite Dividend Elimination, Revenue Miss Jul 28 2015
Peabody Q2 Loss Narrower than Expected, Trims Guidance - Analyst Blog Jul 28 2015
Coal Dividends Going the Way of Dinosaurs as Peabody Ends Payout Jul 28 2015
Peabody Energy Stock Makes a Run After Awful Earnings Jul 28 2015
Peabody Energy (BTU) Stock Down on Earnings Miss Jul 28 2015

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
FEEDBACK