Switch to:

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.08
BTU's Cash to Debt is ranked lower than
79% of the 148 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 0.35 vs. BTU: 0.08 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
BTU' s 10-Year Cash to Debt Range
Min: 0.01  Med: 0.10 Max: N/A
Current: 0.08
Equity to Asset 0.14
BTU's Equity to Asset is ranked lower than
81% of the 127 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 0.39 vs. BTU: 0.14 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
BTU' s 10-Year Equity to Asset Range
Min: 0.07  Med: 0.28 Max: 0.45
Current: 0.14
0.07
0.45
F-Score: 2
Z-Score: 0.28
M-Score: -3.69
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) -18.21
BTU's Operating margin (%) is ranked lower than
76% of the 140 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 0.17 vs. BTU: -18.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
BTU' s 10-Year Operating margin (%) Range
Min: -4.63  Med: 11.83 Max: 21.28
Current: -18.21
-4.63
21.28
Net-margin (%) -30.03
BTU's Net-margin (%) is ranked lower than
76% of the 140 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: -0.82 vs. BTU: -30.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
BTU' s 10-Year Net-margin (%) Range
Min: -11.59  Med: 4.83 Max: 14.62
Current: -30.03
-11.59
14.62
ROE (%) -65.38
BTU's ROE (%) is ranked lower than
84% of the 141 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: -2.72 vs. BTU: -65.38 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
BTU' s 10-Year ROE (%) Range
Min: -23.76  Med: 12.30 Max: 33.8
Current: -65.38
-23.76
33.8
ROA (%) -14.42
BTU's ROA (%) is ranked lower than
78% of the 151 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: -1.57 vs. BTU: -14.42 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
BTU' s 10-Year ROA (%) Range
Min: -5.76  Med: 2.45 Max: 10.17
Current: -14.42
-5.76
10.17
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) -11.56
BTU's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
68% of the 149 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: -0.96 vs. BTU: -11.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
BTU' s 10-Year ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range
Min: -2.66  Med: 7.85 Max: 19.23
Current: -11.56
-2.66
19.23
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) -4.60
BTU's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
60% of the 114 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: -8.10 vs. BTU: -4.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
BTU' s 10-Year Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: 0  Med: 4.25 Max: 21
Current: -4.6
0
21
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) -36.30
BTU's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
72% of the 92 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: -20.60 vs. BTU: -36.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
BTU' s 10-Year EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: 0  Med: -3.45 Max: 36.4
Current: -36.3
0
36.4
» BTU's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Guru Trades

Q3 2014

BTU Guru Trades in Q3 2014

Donald Smith 764,000 sh (New)
John Burbank 16,238 sh (New)
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 24,895,392 sh (+53.93%)
Arnold Schneider 2,846,015 sh (+20.49%)
Mario Gabelli 730,700 sh (+8.27%)
Ray Dalio 52,000 sh (+7.00%)
Joel Greenblatt 29,064 sh (-9.34%)
» More
Q4 2014

BTU Guru Trades in Q4 2014

Jim Simons 1,655,637 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 70,678 sh (New)
Donald Smith 1,745,391 sh (+128.45%)
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 32,418,264 sh (+30.22%)
Arnold Schneider 3,160,160 sh (+11.04%)
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 32,561,753 sh (unchged)
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 32,561,753 sh (unchged)
Ray Dalio Sold Out
John Burbank Sold Out
Joel Greenblatt Sold Out
Mario Gabelli 636,900 sh (-12.84%)
» More
Q1 2015

BTU Guru Trades in Q1 2015

Arnold Schneider 4,790,748 sh (+51.60%)
Jim Simons 2,096,674 sh (+26.64%)
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 33,238,637 sh (+2.53%)
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Donald Smith 1,745,229 sh (-0.01%)
Mario Gabelli 570,300 sh (-10.46%)
» More
Q2 2015

BTU Guru Trades in Q2 2015

Paul Tudor Jones 43,700 sh (New)
George Soros 1,029,400 sh (New)
Jim Simons 2,626,501 sh (+25.27%)
Arnold Schneider 4,804,091 sh (+0.28%)
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc Sold Out
Donald Smith 1,744,866 sh (-0.02%)
Mario Gabelli 518,900 sh (-9.01%)
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 3,683,350 sh (-88.92%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with BTU

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Top Ranked Articles about Peabody Energy Corp

Peabody Insiders Invest in Coal Company
It should come as no surprise to anyone reading this when I say that energy is a hot topic these days – but it is almost always in connection with oil and gas and the dramatic decline in prices at the pump. Read more...
4 Stocks Fund Managers at Manning & Napier Are Buying
Manning & Napier, a $51.1 billion management firm, added to seven positions at the end of the year, according to GuruFocus Real Time Picks. Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/B 0.38
BTU's P/B is ranked higher than
78% of the 129 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 1.07 vs. BTU: 0.38 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
BTU' s 10-Year P/B Range
Min: 0.18  Med: 2.80 Max: 8.31
Current: 0.38
0.18
8.31
P/S 0.10
BTU's P/S is ranked higher than
89% of the 133 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 0.82 vs. BTU: 0.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
BTU' s 10-Year P/S Range
Min: 0.05  Med: 1.52 Max: 4.53
Current: 0.1
0.05
4.53
POCF 2.89
BTU's POCF is ranked higher than
78% of the 65 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 6.47 vs. BTU: 2.89 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
BTU' s 10-Year POCF Range
Min: 1.42  Med: 10.69 Max: 167.72
Current: 2.89
1.42
167.72
Current Ratio 1.11
BTU's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
62% of the 142 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 1.35 vs. BTU: 1.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
BTU' s 10-Year Current Ratio Range
Min: 0.77  Med: 1.13 Max: 2.09
Current: 1.11
0.77
2.09
Quick Ratio 0.85
BTU's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
63% of the 142 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 1.08 vs. BTU: 0.85 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
BTU' s 10-Year Quick Ratio Range
Min: 0.45  Med: 0.87 Max: 1.84
Current: 0.85
0.45
1.84
Days Inventory 30.03
BTU's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
61% of the 129 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 34.04 vs. BTU: 30.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
BTU' s 10-Year Days Inventory Range
Min: 17.72  Med: 29.85 Max: 45.12
Current: 30.03
17.72
45.12
Days Sales Outstanding 17.52
BTU's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
89% of the 120 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 55.58 vs. BTU: 17.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
BTU' s 10-Year Days Sales Outstanding Range
Min: 18.39  Med: 28.50 Max: 55.5
Current: 17.52
18.39
55.5

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield 8.19
BTU's Dividend Yield is ranked higher than
90% of the 147 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 3.78 vs. BTU: 8.19 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield only.
BTU' s 10-Year Dividend Yield Range
Min: 0.29  Med: 0.67 Max: 16.76
Current: 8.19
0.29
16.76
Yield on cost (5-Year) 10.86
BTU's Yield on cost (5-Year) is ranked higher than
91% of the 148 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 4.06 vs. BTU: 10.86 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Yield on cost (5-Year) only.
BTU' s 10-Year Yield on cost (5-Year) Range
Min: 0.38  Med: 0.89 Max: 22.22
Current: 10.86
0.38
22.22
Share Buyback Rate 0.30
BTU's Share Buyback Rate is ranked higher than
78% of the 99 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: -2.40 vs. BTU: 0.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Share Buyback Rate only.
BTU' s 10-Year Share Buyback Rate Range
Min: 0  Med: -0.05 Max: -18.2
Current: 0.3

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Tangible Book 0.36
BTU's Price/Tangible Book is ranked higher than
84% of the 121 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 1.42 vs. BTU: 0.36 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
BTU' s 10-Year Price/Tangible Book Range
Min: 0.37  Med: 1.95 Max: 8.52
Current: 0.36
0.37
8.52
Price/Projected FCF 0.13
BTU's Price/Projected FCF is ranked higher than
89% of the 54 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 0.99 vs. BTU: 0.13 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Projected FCF only.
BTU' s 10-Year Price/Projected FCF Range
Min: 0.13  Med: 1.40 Max: 7.24
Current: 0.13
0.13
7.24
Price/Median PS Value 0.06
BTU's Price/Median PS Value is ranked higher than
95% of the 124 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: 0.58 vs. BTU: 0.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
BTU' s 10-Year Price/Median PS Value Range
Min: 0.06  Med: 0.67 Max: 2.99
Current: 0.06
0.06
2.99
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) -18.72
BTU's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
82% of the 151 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: -0.40 vs. BTU: -18.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
BTU' s 10-Year Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range
Min: -18.72  Med: 5.70 Max: 19.3
Current: -18.72
-18.72
19.3
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) 6.61
BTU's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked higher than
67% of the 70 Companies
in the Global Coal industry.

( Industry Median: -15.41 vs. BTU: 6.61 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
BTU' s 10-Year Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range
Min: -25.1  Med: 20.60 Max: 31.7
Current: 6.61
-25.1
31.7

Analyst Estimate

Dec15 Dec16 Dec17
Revenue(Mil) 5,729 6,009 6,169
EPS($) -1.50 -0.68 -0.65
EPS without NRI($) -1.50 -0.68 -0.65

Business Description

Industry: Coal » Coal
Compare:CNX, CSUAY, YZC, ITAYY, ADOOY » details
Traded in other countries:BTU.Mexico, BTU.Chile, PE5.Germany,
Peabody Energy Corp was incorporated in Delaware in 1998 and became a public company in 2001. Peabody Energy is a private-sector coal company and it owns interests in 30 coal mining operations, including a majority interest in 29 coal operations located in the United States (U.S.) and Australia. The Company's operations consist of four principal segments: three Mining segments and one Trading and Brokerage segment. The Company's three mining segments are Western U.S. Mining, Midwestern U.S. Mining and Australian Mining. Its fifth segment, Corporate and Other, includes mining and export/transportation joint ventures, energy-related commercial activities as well as the management of its coal reserve and real estate holdings. The principal business of the Western and Midwestern U.S. Mining segments is the mining, preparation and sale of thermal coal, sold to electric utilities. The Company's Western U.S. Mining segment consists of its Powder River Basin, Southwest and Colorado operations. The Company's Midwestern U.S. Mining segment consists of its Illinois and Indiana operations. The business of its Australian Mining segment is the mining of various qualities of low-sulfur, high Btu coal (metallurgical coal) as well as thermal coal. Through its Trading and Brokerage segment, the Company is engaged in the brokering of coal sales both as principal and agent in support of various coal production-related activities that may involve coal to be produced from its mines, coal sourcing arrangements with third-party mining companies or offtake agreements with producers. The Company's main U.S. competitors are other large coal producers; including Alpha Natural Resources, Inc., Arch Coal, Inc., Cloud Peak Energy Inc., and CONSOL Energy Inc., Its international competitors include Anglo-American PLC, BHP Billiton, China Coal, Rio Tinto, Shenhua Group and Xstrata PLC.
» More Articles for BTU

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Opportunities In The Depressed Coal Sector Jul 16 2015 
on deck Jul 13 2015 
Why Peabody Energy Can Get Better May 28 2015 
Peabody Energy: This Coal Stock Can Recover Going Forward May 25 2015 
Value In Coal With Alliance Holdings (AHGP) & Alliance Partners (ARLP) May 25 2015 
Peabody And The Coal Mining Industry Currently A Risky Place To Invest May 11 2015 
Manning & Napier Advisors Reduced Stake in High Yield Company May 08 2015 
Investors Shouldn't Hope for a Turnaround at Peabody Energy Apr 28 2015 
Why Peabody Energy Looks Like a Risky Bet Apr 22 2015 
george Feb 26 2015 

More From Other Websites
Electricity Generation in the US Falls Marginally Sep 02 2015
Coal Stocks on a Roller Coaster Ride They Can't Get Off Sep 02 2015
Why Arch Coal Rallied During a Bad Week for the S&P 500 Sep 01 2015
Peabody Energy (BTU) Stock is the 'Chart of the Day' Sep 01 2015
ETF’s with exposure to Peabody Energy Corp. Sep 01 2015
Peabody Energy Corp. is trading above its 50 day moving average Sep 01 2015
Coal: Will the 30% Floor Hold? Sep 01 2015
Patriot Coal Bankruptcy Auction Set Aug 31 2015
Patriot Coal Cleared to Auction Remaining Assets Aug 31 2015
Coal Stocks Couldn't Care Less That Coal Forecasts are Sliding Aug 31 2015
Peabody Energy and Arch Coal Gain as Coal ETF Falls Aug 28 2015
Coal Prices Remain Mostly Steady even as Natural Gas Prices Fall Aug 28 2015
Soros Doesn't Like Coal Stocks; He Likes Money Aug 28 2015
Leveraged Loan Default Rate Soars on Coal Miner Bankruptcies Aug 28 2015
Peabody Energy (BTU) Stock Rises on Possible Debt Restructuring Aug 28 2015
Mid-Day Market Update: Thursday's Movers; U.S. GDP Rises; China's Stocks Jump Aug 27 2015
Abraxas CEO Volunteers for Pay Cut Aug 27 2015
Short-Covering, Possible Debt Swap Send Peabody Stock Soaring Aug 27 2015
Don't Look Now But Coal Stocks are on Fire Aug 27 2015

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
FEEDBACK