Switch to:
Also traded in: France, Germany, Mexico, Switzerland, UK, USA

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.15
CGG's Cash to Debt is ranked lower than
72% of the 259 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 0.43 vs. CGG: 0.15 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
CGG' s Cash to Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.07  Med: 0.27 Max: N/A
Current: 0.15
Equity to Asset 0.30
CGG's Equity to Asset is ranked lower than
77% of the 263 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 0.49 vs. CGG: 0.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
CGG' s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.24  Med: 0.46 Max: 0.55
Current: 0.3
0.24
0.55
F-Score: 2
Z-Score: -0.38
M-Score: -4.03
WACC vs ROIC
9.71%
-29.12%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 3/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) -67.03
CGG's Operating margin (%) is ranked lower than
86% of the 264 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: -2.72 vs. CGG: -67.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
CGG' s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -55.06  Med: 4.80 Max: 21.71
Current: -67.03
-55.06
21.71
Net-margin (%) -82.14
CGG's Net-margin (%) is ranked lower than
89% of the 264 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: -5.99 vs. CGG: -82.14 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
CGG' s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -68.98  Med: -1.67 Max: 13.06
Current: -82.14
-68.98
13.06
ROE (%) -77.51
CGG's ROE (%) is ranked lower than
92% of the 257 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: -5.84 vs. CGG: -77.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
CGG' s ROE (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -78.57  Med: -1.54 Max: 19.96
Current: -77.51
-78.57
19.96
ROA (%) -25.52
CGG's ROA (%) is ranked lower than
88% of the 266 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: -3.01 vs. CGG: -25.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
CGG' s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -24.68  Med: -0.82 Max: 9.39
Current: -25.52
-24.68
9.39
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) -81.74
CGG's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
90% of the 265 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: -1.49 vs. CGG: -81.74 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
CGG' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -85.46  Med: 10.21 Max: 58.47
Current: -81.74
-85.46
58.47
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) -14.60
CGG's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
70% of the 237 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: -3.10 vs. CGG: -14.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CGG' s Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -53.1  Med: -3.10 Max: 13.9
Current: -14.6
-53.1
13.9
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) -25.40
CGG's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
77% of the 173 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: -4.80 vs. CGG: -25.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CGG' s EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -58.4  Med: -1.05 Max: 204.6
Current: -25.4
-58.4
204.6
» CGG's 10-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: Est. 2016-07-30)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Oprt. Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with CGG

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - Services » Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Compare:SZSE:002629, SZSE:300309, OSL:PGS, LSE:HTG, TSX:EFX, NYSE:FTK » details
Traded in other countries:CGG.France, GDG.Germany, CGG N.Mexico, CGG.Switzerland, 0O2V.UK, CGPVF.USA,
CGG is a manufacturer of geophysical equipment. It provides seismic services in data acquisition and processing, both onshore and offshore, to clients in the oil and gas exploration and production industry.

CGG was established on July 23, 1931. The Company is a manufacturer of geophysical equipment and provides seismic services in data acquisition and processing, both onshore and offshore, to clients in the oil and gas exploration and production industry. The Company is organized in three divisions. Acquisition, which comprises Marine: offshore seismic data acquisition that it undertakes either on behalf of a specific client, or for its Multi-Client Business Line (internal activity); Land and Airborne: other seismic data acquisition that it undertakes either on behalf of a specific client, or for its Multi-Client Business Line (internal activity). Geology, Geophysics & Reservoir (GGR) segment comprises the Multi-Client Business Line (development and management of seismic surveys that it undertakes and license to a number of clients on a non-exclusive basis) and the Subsurface Imaging and Reservoir Business Line (processing and imaging of geophysical data, reservoir characterization, geophysical consulting and software services, geological data library and data management solutions). Both business lines regularly combine their offers, generating overall synergies between their respective activities. Equipment, which comprises manufacturing and sales of seismic equipment used for data acquisition, both on land and marine. It carries out the activity in the Equipment segment through its subsidiary Sercel. The Company's competitors are WesternGeco, Global Geophysical Services, BGP, and Geokinetics, and for the shallow water and ocean bottom surveys segments, Seabed Geosolutions BV, its joint venture with Fugro.

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) 4.86
CGG's Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) is ranked higher than
73% of the 83 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 10.16 vs. CGG: 4.86 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) only.
CGG' s Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.82  Med: 3.34 Max: 96.9
Current: 4.86
0.82
96.9
P/B 0.35
CGG's P/B is ranked higher than
85% of the 256 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 0.80 vs. CGG: 0.35 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
CGG' s P/B Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.14  Med: 0.87 Max: 1.86
Current: 0.35
0.14
1.86
P/S 0.08
CGG's P/S is ranked higher than
92% of the 257 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 0.77 vs. CGG: 0.08 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
CGG' s P/S Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.05  Med: 0.37 Max: 0.87
Current: 0.08
0.05
0.87
PFCF 0.50
CGG's PFCF is ranked higher than
94% of the 129 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 7.98 vs. CGG: 0.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PFCF only.
CGG' s PFCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.38  Med: 2.95 Max: 55.22
Current: 0.5
0.38
55.22
POCF 0.36
CGG's POCF is ranked higher than
93% of the 186 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 4.62 vs. CGG: 0.36 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
CGG' s POCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.24  Med: 1.44 Max: 4.33
Current: 0.36
0.24
4.33
EV-to-EBIT -2.08
CGG's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 130 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 13.86 vs. CGG: -2.08 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
CGG' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -13.9  Med: 5.45 Max: 162.8
Current: -2.08
-13.9
162.8
EV-to-EBITDA 9.09
CGG's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
52% of the 166 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 8.78 vs. CGG: 9.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
CGG' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.3  Med: 4.10 Max: 8.9
Current: 9.09
1.3
8.9
Current Ratio 1.60
CGG's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
56% of the 259 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.76 vs. CGG: 1.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
CGG' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.14  Med: 1.76 Max: 2.84
Current: 1.6
1.14
2.84
Quick Ratio 1.25
CGG's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
60% of the 259 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.49 vs. CGG: 1.25 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
CGG' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.83  Med: 1.44 Max: 2.5
Current: 1.25
0.83
2.5
Days Inventory 77.71
CGG's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
63% of the 203 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 51.80 vs. CGG: 77.71 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
CGG' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 43.65  Med: 55.78 Max: 70.1
Current: 77.71
43.65
70.1
Days Sales Outstanding 115.42
CGG's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
80% of the 231 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 66.61 vs. CGG: 115.42 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
CGG' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 70.3  Med: 89.50 Max: 107.71
Current: 115.42
70.3
107.71

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Projected FCF 0.08
CGG's Price/Projected FCF is ranked higher than
97% of the 116 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 0.84 vs. CGG: 0.08 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Projected FCF only.
CGG' s Price/Projected FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.03  Med: 0.18 Max: 0.83
Current: 0.08
0.03
0.83
Price/Median PS Value 0.22
CGG's Price/Median PS Value is ranked higher than
87% of the 243 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 0.70 vs. CGG: 0.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
CGG' s Price/Median PS Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.07  Med: 0.72 Max: 2.24
Current: 0.22
0.07
2.24
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) -48.10
CGG's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
87% of the 266 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: -0.40 vs. CGG: -48.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
CGG' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.6  Med: 10.45 Max: 47.7
Current: -48.1
0.6
47.7
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) 298.69
CGG's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked higher than
99% of the 142 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Equipment & Services industry.

( Industry Median: 1.12 vs. CGG: 298.69 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
CGG' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -12.8  Med: 29.60 Max: 420
Current: 298.69
-12.8
420

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $1,846
EPS (TTM) $ -7.71
Beta3.23
Short Percentage of Float0.01%
52-Week Range $0.59 - 7.18
Shares Outstanding (Mil)708.26

Analyst Estimate

Dec16 Dec17 Dec18
Revenue (Mil $) 1,553 1,802 2,139
EPS ($) -0.34 -0.08 0.13
EPS without NRI ($) -0.34 -0.08 0.13
EPS Growth Rate
(3Y to 5Y Estimate)
N/A
» More Articles for CGG

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Unique Business Model of Norwegian Oil Service Firm Has Long-Term Value Feb 12 2016 
Screening for Stocks Based on Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio Jan 19 2016 
Screening for Stocks Based on Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio Dec 18 2015 
Screening for Stocks Based on Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio Nov 18 2015 
Screening for Stocks Based on Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio Oct 20 2015 
David Herro's Oakmark International Small Cap Fund's Second Quarter 2014 Letter Jul 10 2014 
Weekly Three-Year Low Highlights: QUNR, CGG, LADR, RARE May 20 2014 
David Herro Comments on CGG Jan 10 2014 
David Herro's Oakmark International Small Cap Fund Fourth Quarter 2013 Jan 09 2014 
CGG: A great business wasted on incapable management Dec 08 2013 

More From Other Websites
CGG GeoSoftware Releases Jason 9.5 to Solve Complex E&P Reservoir Challenges May 26 2016
CGG Registered by Mexico’s National Hydrocarbons Commission May 17 2016
CGG: Registered by CNH to Estimate Reserves in Mexico May 17 2016
ETF’s with exposure to CGG : May 11, 2016 May 11 2016
CGG :CGG-US: Earnings Analysis: Q1, 2016 By the Numbers May 10 2016
CGG GeoSoftware Releases PowerLog 9.5 Petrophysical Software May 03 2016
CGG Announces its 2016 First Quarter Results May 03 2016
2016 First Quarter Results May 03 2016
Agreement to Sell Multi-Physics Business Apr 29 2016
CGG: Enters into a Binding Agreement for the Sale of its Multi-Physics Business Apr 29 2016
CGG Financials Apr 21 2016
Michelin First-Quarter Sales Hold Steady on European Demand Apr 20 2016
ETF’s with exposure to CGG : April 19, 2016 Apr 19 2016
Q1 2016 Results and Conference Call Apr 19 2016
Availability of Document de Référence & Form 20-F for 2015 Apr 19 2016
CGG: announces its 1st quarter 2016 results on Tuesday May 3rd, 2016 Apr 15 2016
Michelin creates new motorcycle racing tires in 3 days Apr 10 2016
CGG upgraded by Societe Generale Apr 08 2016
ETF’s with exposure to CGG : March 21, 2016 Mar 21 2016
CGG :CGG-US: Earnings Analysis: 2015 By the Numbers Mar 09 2016

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)