Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany, Mexico, USA

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.15
CHKDP's Cash to Debt is ranked lower than
65% of the 447 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.41 vs. CHKDP: 0.15 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
CHKDP' s Cash to Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0.05 Max: 0.62
Current: 0.15
0
0.62
Equity to Asset 0.20
CHKDP's Equity to Asset is ranked lower than
83% of the 438 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.51 vs. CHKDP: 0.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
CHKDP' s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.33  Med: 0.37 Max: 0.56
Current: 0.2
-0.33
0.56
F-Score: 3
Z-Score: -2.40
M-Score: -5.87
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) -109.49
CHKDP's Operating margin (%) is ranked lower than
66% of the 439 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -28.24 vs. CHKDP: -109.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
CHKDP' s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -116.14  Med: 20.86 Max: 46.59
Current: -109.49
-116.14
46.59
Net-margin (%) -86.34
CHKDP's Net-margin (%) is ranked lower than
63% of the 439 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -37.83 vs. CHKDP: -86.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
CHKDP' s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -75.69  Med: 12.06 Max: 27.34
Current: -86.34
-75.69
27.34
ROE (%) -101.12
CHKDP's ROE (%) is ranked lower than
85% of the 470 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -15.65 vs. CHKDP: -101.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
CHKDP' s ROE (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -41.13  Med: 8.80 Max: 21.85
Current: -101.12
-41.13
21.85
ROA (%) -35.82
CHKDP's ROA (%) is ranked lower than
79% of the 498 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -9.18 vs. CHKDP: -35.82 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
CHKDP' s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -17.02  Med: 4.53 Max: 9.88
Current: -35.82
-17.02
9.88
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) -54.73
CHKDP's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
76% of the 485 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -14.14 vs. CHKDP: -54.73 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
CHKDP' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -30.57  Med: 8.95 Max: 19.58
Current: -54.73
-30.57
19.58
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) 20.60
CHKDP's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
75% of the 329 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 5.30 vs. CHKDP: 20.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CHKDP' s Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -10.2  Med: 15.70 Max: 45.1
Current: 20.6
-10.2
45.1
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) 7.60
CHKDP's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
55% of the 272 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 2.00 vs. CHKDP: 7.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CHKDP' s EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -13.1  Med: 7.55 Max: 45.9
Current: 7.6
-13.1
45.9
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) -7.60
CHKDP's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
58% of the 262 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -0.40 vs. CHKDP: -7.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CHKDP' s EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -46.5  Med: -2.30 Max: 141.6
Current: -7.6
-46.5
141.6
» CHKDP's 10-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2016-02-24)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with CHKDP

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Preferred stocks of Chesapeake Energy Corp

SymbolPriceYieldDescription
CHKDG5.8086.21
CHKVZ448.7579.35
CHKDH80.501454661.53
CHKPRD5.8083.334.50% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock
CHKDP72.5079.325 3/4 % Pfd Shs
CHKDJ295.006.915 3/4 % Cum Non-Voting Conv Pfd Shs Reg-S
4GGB.Singapore0.000.005 3/4 % Conv Pfd Shs Series -A- -144A-
4GJB.Singapore0.000.005 3/4 % Cum Non-Voting Conv Pfd Shs Reg-S
CHKVP130.0044.235 3/4 % Cum Conv Pfd Shs Series -A-
CKRGZ0.000.005 3/4 % Pfd Shs -144A
CHKWZ0.000.005 3/4 % Conv Pfd Shs Series -A- -144A-

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
Forward P/E 6.61
CHKDP's Forward P/E is ranked higher than
82% of the 364 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 20.53 vs. CHKDP: 6.61 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward P/E only.
N/A
P/B 0.91
CHKDP's P/B is ranked lower than
93% of the 552 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.42 vs. CHKDP: 0.91 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
CHKDP' s P/B Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.39  Med: 1.33 Max: 4.87
Current: 0.91
0.39
4.87
P/S 0.09
CHKDP's P/S is ranked higher than
93% of the 551 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.78 vs. CHKDP: 0.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
CHKDP' s P/S Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.09  Med: 1.48 Max: 5.42
Current: 0.09
0.09
5.42
POCF 0.73
CHKDP's POCF is ranked higher than
80% of the 550 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 2.52 vs. CHKDP: 0.73 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
CHKDP' s POCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.72  Med: 3.37 Max: 6.25
Current: 0.73
0.72
6.25
Current Ratio 0.79
CHKDP's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
71% of the 484 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.24 vs. CHKDP: 0.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
CHKDP' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.44  Med: 0.79 Max: 3.11
Current: 0.79
0.44
3.11
Quick Ratio 0.79
CHKDP's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
67% of the 484 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.21 vs. CHKDP: 0.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
CHKDP' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.41  Med: 0.79 Max: 3.05
Current: 0.79
0.41
3.05
Days Sales Outstanding 33.88
CHKDP's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
59% of the 385 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 41.37 vs. CHKDP: 33.88 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
CHKDP' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 35.02  Med: 56.08 Max: 78.58
Current: 33.88
35.02
78.58
Days Payable 40.52
CHKDP's Days Payable is ranked lower than
71% of the 243 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 97.04 vs. CHKDP: 40.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
CHKDP' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 51.3  Med: 160.29 Max: 446.82
Current: 40.52
51.3
446.82

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield 79.32
CHKDP's Dividend Yield is ranked lower than
51% of the 385 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 5.84 vs. CHKDP: 79.32 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield only.
CHKDP' s Dividend Yield Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.44  Med: 1.29 Max: 80.06
Current: 79.32
0.44
80.06
Dividend Growth (3y) 11.90
CHKDP's Dividend Growth (3y) is ranked higher than
66% of the 82 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 4.50 vs. CHKDP: 11.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Growth (3y) only.
CHKDP' s Dividend Growth (3y) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 4.90 Max: 48.1
Current: 11.9
0
48.1
Forward Dividend Yield 33.43
CHKDP's Forward Dividend Yield is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 302 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 6.26 vs. CHKDP: 33.43 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield only.
N/A
Yield on cost (5-Year) 99.32
CHKDP's Yield on cost (5-Year) is ranked higher than
53% of the 391 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 6.83 vs. CHKDP: 99.32 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Yield on cost (5-Year) only.
CHKDP' s Yield on cost (5-Year) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.55  Med: 1.62 Max: 100.25
Current: 99.32
0.55
100.25
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -0.90
CHKDP's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
75% of the 368 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -7.80 vs. CHKDP: -0.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
CHKDP' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -32.1  Med: -15.45 Max: 2.6
Current: -0.9
-32.1
2.6

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) -133.44
CHKDP's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked lower than
89% of the 172 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -12.58 vs. CHKDP: -133.44 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
CHKDP' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -76.1  Med: -24.65 Max: 41.7
Current: -133.44
-76.1
41.7

More Statistics

Beta1.58
Short Percentage of Float0.00%
52-Week Range $67.15 - 1290.00

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - E&P » Oil & Gas E&P
Compare: » details
Traded in other countries:CS1.Germany, CHK.Mexico, CHK.USA,
Chesapeake Energy Corp was incorporated in Oklahoma in 1989. The Company is a natural gas and oil exploration and production Company engaged in the exploration, development and acquisition of properties for the production of natural gas and crude oil from underground reservoirs and it provides marketing and midstream services. The Company operates in three segments which are managed separately because of the nature of its products and services. Its segments includes; exploration and production; marketing, gathering and compression; and oilfield services. The Company's exploration and production operating segment is responsible for finding and producing natural gas, oil and NGL; it's marketing, gathering and compression operating segment is responsible for marketing, gathering and compression of natural gas, oil and NGL; and its oilfield services operating segment is responsible for drilling, oilfield trucking, oilfield rentals, hydraulic fracturing and other oilfield services operations for both Chesapeake-operated wells and wells operated by third parties. The Company focuses its exploration, development, acquisition and production efforts in the two geographic operating divisions; Southern division and Northern Division. The Company's Southern Division includes the Eagle Ford Shale in South Texas, the Granite Wash/Hogshooter, Cleveland, Tonkawa and Mississippi Lime plays in the Anadarko Basin in northwestern Oklahoma, the Texas Panhandle and southern Kansas, the Haynesville/Bossier Shale in northwestern Louisiana and East Texas and the Barnett Shale in the Fort Worth Basin in north-central Texas. Its Northern Division includes the Utica Shale in Ohio, West Virginia and Pennsylvania, the Marcellus Shale in the northern Appalachian Basin in West Virginia and Pennsylvania and the Niobrara Shale in the Powder River Basin in Wyoming. At December 31, 2014, the Company had interests in approximately 45,100 gross productive wells, including properties in which it held an overriding royalty interest. It competes with both integrated and other independent natural gas and oil companies in acquiring desirable leasehold acreage, producing properties and the equipment and expertise necessary to explore, develop and operate its properties and market its production. The Company's exploration and production operations are subject to various types of regulation at the U.S. federal, state and local levels. Such regulation includes requirements for permits to drill and to conduct other operations and for provision of financial assurances covering drilling and well operations.
» More Articles for CHKDP

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
AIG Nominates John Paulson, Icahn Pick to Board of Directors Feb 11 2016 
Longleaf Partners Comments on Chesapeake Energy Jan 22 2016 
Longleaf Partners 4th Quarter Fund Commentary Jan 22 2016 
Longleaf Partners Funds' Fourth-Quarter Letter Jan 18 2016 
Bill Nygren Comments on Chesapeake Energy Jan 08 2016 
Bill Nygren's Oakmark Select Fund Q4 2015 Shareholder Letter Jan 08 2016 
Bill Nygren's Oakmark Fund 4th Quarter 2015 Commentary Jan 08 2016 
Carl Icahn's Energy Stocks Present a Turnaround Trade for 2016 Dec 28 2015 
Microsoft, Intel and National Oilwell Varco Have High Dividend Yields in Bill Nygren's Portfolio Dec 17 2015 
Oil Prices Get No Help From OPEC Dec 07 2015 

More From Other Websites
Chesapeake Energy (CHK) Stock Retreating as Oil Prices Slump Feb 11 2016
The 6 Most Shorted NYSE Stocks: Short Sellers Pile on Alcoa, Freeport-McMoRan Again Feb 10 2016
Jim Cramer's 'Mad Money' Recap: This Oil Pressure Is Not Good Feb 09 2016
Cramer: Checking the Oil Pressure, and It's Not Good Feb 09 2016
Hopes Fall on Emergency OPEC Meeting Feb 09 2016
[$$] Carl Icahn nurses paper losses on energy bets Feb 09 2016
Chesapeake Gets Distress Signal From Credit Swaps Market: Chart Feb 09 2016
Stressed Out: Chesapeake Energy’s Collapse Is a Sign of the Times Feb 09 2016
How the Midstream Sector Could React if CHK Restructures Feb 09 2016
Chesapeake Bankruptcy Rumors Take a Toll on Williams Companies Feb 09 2016
S&P Lowers the Boom on Chesapeake Debt Feb 09 2016
Chesapeake Credit Rating Cut by S&P on `Unsustainable' Debt Feb 09 2016
Where Is Carl Icahn as Chesapeake, Freeport, and Cheniere Fall? Feb 09 2016
RPT-Chesapeake Energy woes cast shadow on U.S. pipeline companies Feb 09 2016
Chesapeake Energy woes cast shadow on U.S. pipeline companies Feb 09 2016
Chesapeake Energy Hires Help to Avoid a 'Lehman Moment' Feb 09 2016
After a Day Like That, We Might Have to Get Out the Ax Feb 09 2016
[$$] Chesapeake Energy: The End Isn’t So Near Feb 09 2016

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
FEEDBACK