Switch to:

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.12
CHRW's Cash to Debt is ranked lower than
76% of the 745 Companies
in the Global Integrated Shipping & Logistics industry.

( Industry Median: 0.38 vs. CHRW: 0.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
CHRW' s 10-Year Cash to Debt Range
Min: 0.12  Med: 10000.00 Max: No Debt
Current: 0.12
Equity to Asset 0.32
CHRW's Equity to Asset is ranked lower than
73% of the 697 Companies
in the Global Integrated Shipping & Logistics industry.

( Industry Median: 0.45 vs. CHRW: 0.32 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
CHRW' s 10-Year Equity to Asset Range
Min: 0.32  Med: 0.56 Max: 0.63
Current: 0.32
0.32
0.63
Interest Coverage 29.95
CHRW's Interest Coverage is ranked higher than
67% of the 459 Companies
in the Global Integrated Shipping & Logistics industry.

( Industry Median: 8.38 vs. CHRW: 29.95 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
CHRW' s 10-Year Interest Coverage Range
Min: 29.95  Med: 10000.00 Max: 9999.99
Current: 29.95
29.95
9999.99
F-Score: 8
Z-Score: 8.55
M-Score: -2.62
WACC vs ROIC
5.03%
25.77%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 5.67
CHRW's Operating margin (%) is ranked lower than
53% of the 737 Companies
in the Global Integrated Shipping & Logistics industry.

( Industry Median: 6.29 vs. CHRW: 5.67 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
CHRW' s 10-Year Operating margin (%) Range
Min: 1.79  Med: 5.35 Max: 7.72
Current: 5.67
1.79
7.72
Net-margin (%) 3.40
CHRW's Net-margin (%) is ranked lower than
56% of the 738 Companies
in the Global Integrated Shipping & Logistics industry.

( Industry Median: 4.27 vs. CHRW: 3.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
CHRW' s 10-Year Net-margin (%) Range
Min: 1.54  Med: 3.26 Max: 5.23
Current: 3.4
1.54
5.23
ROE (%) 45.26
CHRW's ROE (%) is ranked higher than
97% of the 729 Companies
in the Global Integrated Shipping & Logistics industry.

( Industry Median: 7.36 vs. CHRW: 45.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
CHRW' s 10-Year ROE (%) Range
Min: 18.81  Med: 30.00 Max: 45.27
Current: 45.26
18.81
45.27
ROA (%) 14.97
CHRW's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
96% of the 748 Companies
in the Global Integrated Shipping & Logistics industry.

( Industry Median: 3.01 vs. CHRW: 14.97 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
CHRW' s 10-Year ROA (%) Range
Min: 8.35  Med: 14.90 Max: 24.03
Current: 14.97
8.35
24.03
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 82.68
CHRW's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
96% of the 732 Companies
in the Global Integrated Shipping & Logistics industry.

( Industry Median: 8.73 vs. CHRW: 82.68 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
CHRW' s 10-Year ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range
Min: 77.71  Med: 168.30 Max: 233.6
Current: 82.68
77.71
233.6
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) 13.30
CHRW's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
83% of the 609 Companies
in the Global Integrated Shipping & Logistics industry.

( Industry Median: 3.10 vs. CHRW: 13.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CHRW' s 10-Year Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: 6.1  Med: 13.30 Max: 21.4
Current: 13.3
6.1
21.4
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) 7.50
CHRW's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
60% of the 522 Companies
in the Global Integrated Shipping & Logistics industry.

( Industry Median: 3.70 vs. CHRW: 7.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CHRW' s 10-Year EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: 6.2  Med: 16.30 Max: 46.1
Current: 7.5
6.2
46.1
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) 5.20
CHRW's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
51% of the 446 Companies
in the Global Integrated Shipping & Logistics industry.

( Industry Median: 5.50 vs. CHRW: 5.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CHRW' s 10-Year EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: 4.4  Med: 17.45 Max: 81.7
Current: 5.2
4.4
81.7
» CHRW's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2014

CHRW Guru Trades in Q2 2014

John Rogers 42,448 sh (+52.81%)
Jeremy Grantham 420,165 sh (+8.89%)
Bill Frels 2,077,097 sh (+2.43%)
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 5,262,752 sh (+1.67%)
Chuck Royce 316,000 sh (unchged)
Steven Cohen 45,700 sh (unchged)
Yacktman Focused Fund 2,600,000 sh (unchged)
Yacktman Fund 2,900,000 sh (unchged)
Jim Simons Sold Out
Donald Yacktman 6,568,700 sh (-0.22%)
PRIMECAP Management 6,606,593 sh (-6.55%)
Ron Baron 67,720 sh (-36.64%)
Joel Greenblatt 54,369 sh (-90.51%)
Ray Dalio 5,162 sh (-96.50%)
» More
Q3 2014

CHRW Guru Trades in Q3 2014

John Hussman 100,000 sh (New)
Joel Greenblatt 159,452 sh (+193.28%)
Steven Cohen 47,400 sh (+3.72%)
Jeremy Grantham 426,860 sh (+1.59%)
Chuck Royce 316,000 sh (unchged)
Yacktman Fund 2,900,000 sh (unchged)
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc Sold Out
John Rogers Sold Out
Ray Dalio Sold Out
Bill Frels 2,067,308 sh (-0.47%)
Donald Yacktman 6,436,500 sh (-2.01%)
Yacktman Focused Fund 2,500,000 sh (-3.85%)
PRIMECAP Management 5,527,433 sh (-16.33%)
Ron Baron 2,720 sh (-95.98%)
» More
Q4 2014

CHRW Guru Trades in Q4 2014

Paul Tudor Jones 3,200 sh (New)
Jim Simons 16,600 sh (New)
Pioneer Investments 36,404 sh (New)
Ray Dalio 27,026 sh (New)
John Hussman 175,000 sh (+75.00%)
Jeremy Grantham 459,992 sh (+7.76%)
Steven Cohen Sold Out
Bill Frels 2,026,753 sh (-1.96%)
Ron Baron 2,610 sh (-4.04%)
PRIMECAP Management 5,251,441 sh (-4.99%)
Yacktman Fund 2,750,000 sh (-5.17%)
Chuck Royce 296,000 sh (-6.33%)
Donald Yacktman 5,944,096 sh (-7.65%)
Yacktman Focused Fund 2,200,000 sh (-12.00%)
Joel Greenblatt 46,698 sh (-70.71%)
» More
Q1 2015

CHRW Guru Trades in Q1 2015

Steven Cohen 100,000 sh (New)
Joel Greenblatt 96,597 sh (+106.85%)
Paul Tudor Jones 5,800 sh (+81.25%)
Ray Dalio 37,726 sh (+39.59%)
John Hussman 225,000 sh (+28.57%)
Jim Simons 20,900 sh (+25.90%)
Bill Frels 2,030,188 sh (+0.17%)
Yacktman Focused Fund 2,200,000 sh (unchged)
Ron Baron 2,610 sh (unchged)
Pioneer Investments Sold Out
Yacktman Fund 2,700,000 sh (-1.82%)
Donald Yacktman 5,824,009 sh (-2.02%)
Chuck Royce 281,800 sh (-4.80%)
Jeremy Grantham 341,892 sh (-25.67%)
PRIMECAP Management 3,853,618 sh (-26.62%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with CHRW

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Guru Investment Theses on CH Robinson Worldwide Inc

Bill Frels Comments on CH Robinson Worldwide Inc - Jul 31, 2014

Freight shipper and global supply chain consultant C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) gained 21.76% and 9.34% respectively for the second quarter and first six months, and was a strong contributor to Fund performance. The firm’s efforts to better service high-end customers resulted in a favorable report in the first quarter and helped reverse a lackluster, two-year performance trend. As the requirement for “just-in-time” freight delivery becomes increasingly important to a company’s profitability, customers will turn to third-party logistics firms like C.H. Robinson to coordinate shipments and generate the information customers need in real time to manage their inventories and deliveries.

From Bill Frels (Trades, Portfolio)’ Mairs & Power Growth Fund Second Quarter 2014 Commentary.

Check out Bill Frels latest stock trades

Bill Frels Comments on C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc - Jun 25, 2014

On the other side of the equation, our position in C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) with a decline of 10.20% for the quarter was the largest detractor from performance, in part due to falling short on fourth quarter earnings estimates. A freight shipping firm located in Eden Prairie, MN, C.H. Robinson also provides global supply chain consulting and logistics management.



From Bill Frels' Mairs & Power Growth Fund First Quarter 2014 Commentary.



Check out Bill Frels latest stock trades

Baron Funds Comments on C.H. Robinson Worldwide - May 21, 2014

Shares of the leading transportation broker C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) detracted from first quarter performance after the company reported disappointing earnings. Though truckload freight volumes are improving, C.H. Robinson is experiencing margin pressure as cost of capacity increases faster than its ability to pass pricing to shippers. We believe this issue will correct as 2014 unfolds and gross volumes accelerate. Longer term, although we think C.H. Robinson should continue to gain share and benefit from the secular trend of transportation outsourcing to leading logistics firms, we sold our shares for a profit. (Matt Weiss)





From Baron Funds' first quarter 2014 letter to shareholders.



Check out Ron Baron latest stock trades

Yacktman Funds Comment on C.H. Robinson Worldwide - Mar 12, 2014

C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc.’s shares declined modestly due to continued margin pressure in its North American truckload brokerage business....We think C.H. Robinson continues to represent good value at current prices.





From Yacktman Funds' 2013 Annual Report - Portfolio Manager's Comments



Check out Donald Yacktman latest stock trades

Top Ranked Articles about CH Robinson Worldwide Inc

Mairs & Power Balanced Fund Second Quarter 2014 Commentary
While the pace of the economic recovery was somewhat better than expected during the quarter, we continued to keep our primary focus on the long-term fundamental attributes that make companies profitable. While attentive, we are not swayed by the macro-economic details underpinning global market events. By emphasizing the long-term view, we can make the subtle, opportunistic adjustments to company positions over time that keep portfolio turnover low and tax consequences in check. Our first mutual fund, the Mairs & Power Growth Fund, founded in 1958, provides a good illustration of this approach, which is employed by the Mairs & Power Balanced and Mairs & Power Small Cap Funds as well. Portfolio turnover for the Growth Fund, compared to its peers, the Morningstar U.S. Large Cap Blend category, was substantially lower for each of the past 10 years. As a result, the Fund’s annual realized taxable capital gains exceeded $1.00 in only two of the past 10 years.
As measured by the Standard and Poor’s Total Return (TR) Index, the stock market advanced 5.23% for the quarter ending June 30, 2014. The market’s strength occurred against a mixed backdrop characterized by a downbeat adjustment to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) (a key barometer of economic health), a rekindling of the War in Iraq, and hints that higher inflation and rising yields might be just around the corner.
The quarter’s biggest economic news was the unexpectedly sharp downward revision of the first quarter’s GDP growth rate from -1% to -2.9%. Like a house guest who won’t leave, the effects of winter’s record cold snap endured and played a major role in depressing the benchmark growth measure, which opened up questions about the long-term hardiness of the U.S. recovery.
Meanwhile, as the Iraq War began appearing on the front pages again, the markets experienced some déjà vu: Would this be like 2003 all over again, when America first conquered Baghdad? The answer turned out to be a “no.” Shrugging off short-term inflationary fears from rising energy prices, the markets behaved with much more equanimity than they did 11 years ago when America’s energy independence goals were still far in the future. Instead, our energy selections were able to benefit from new access to cheaper domestic oil reserves as well as growing demand for improved technologies related to fracking.
Concerns about rising yields and the inflation rate were short-lived as well. Analysts found their expectations subverted when the benchmark 10-year Treasury rate declined from a high of more than 2.80% earlier in the quarter to 2.53% by the end of the period, and the Barclays Capital Government/Credit Bond Index gained 1.92%. Elsewhere, the Fed continued to dial back its monthly bond purchases by an additional $10 billion more per month. In short, the combined threats of the seemingly everlasting Polar Vortex, the Iraq War and inflationary fears could not dampen investor enthusiasm for stocks during the second quarter.
Future Outlook
Everybody likes a winner. And, if the stock market was any gauge during the second quarter, there was a lot to like. Stocks extended their winning streak for the sixth consecutive quarter, as measured by the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index – a phenomenon surpassed only six other times since 1928. After such historic gains, though, should cautious investors grow concerned about the second half of the year? We don’t think so. Successful investment approaches never depend on the positive or negative market performance of any single quarter. At Mairs and Power, we base our portfolio decisions on the facts about companies, not the markets. In particular, we endeavor to identify and invest in those companies that have shown their ability to achieve consistent, above-average growth from a position of demonstrable and durable competitive advantage.
Looking toward year-end, we will continue to closely evaluate corporate earnings and revenue against the multiples we view to be still slightly above historical levels. The price/earnings (P/E) multiple of the S&P 500, a key gauge of corporate earnings health, stood just above its long term average of around 15.5 at quarter-end, almost exactly where it ended the first quarter. This is further proof to us that stock prices continue to be influenced more by actual, organic company earnings and revenue growth than by the Federal Reserve’s waning stimulus program.
While we believe economic conditions appear sufficiently strong to support this current, positive earnings trend, a market correction in the near term would not surprise us. The advantages of investing in well-diversified portfolios, rebalanced regularly, provide one of the better, more reliable routes for meeting long-term goals regardless of the quarter. By focusing our attention on companies and how they perform, we remain confident in our ability to identify, over the course of a full market cycle, those profitable, well-managed firms likely to outperform their competitors regardless of marketplace events.
Balanced Fund Performance
For the second quarter and six months ending June 30, 2014, The Mairs & Power Balanced Fund gained 3.82% and 5.92% respectively; in line with its benchmark composite index (60% S&P 500 Stock Index and 40% Barclays Capital Government/Credit Bond Index), which gained 1.92% and 3.94%, for the periods.
The pace of the economic recovery continued steadily through the first half of the year. It seems a little surprising that it was only 12 months ago last May when the market went into full flight to safety mode after the Fed announced it would scale back the stimulus policy of quantitative easing (QE) sometime in the fall of 2013. All in all, the market stayed in a cool, calm and collected mood during the first half of the year and took war, stimulus tapering, hints of inflation and rising yields in stride.

In general, our selections in energy and higher dividend stocks benefited the portfolio. America’s move to greater energy independence which began more than a decade ago has continued to benefit firms like Schlumberger (SLB) whose businesses are concentrated in oil and gas exploration. Accordingly, Schlumberger proved to be a top contributor to Fund performance for both the past quarter and the past six months through June 30, and gained 20.97% and 30.90%, respectively. Since 2008, Schlumberger has made major investments in technology innovations, product reliability and better processes. As it gains market share, the firm continues to hold leading market positions in proprietary software, patents, and major equipment.
Another strong contributor to performance in the first half of the year was global supply chain consultant C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW), which gained 21.76% and 9.34% respectively for the second quarter and first six months. The firm’s efforts to better service high-end customers resulted in a favorable report in the first quarter and helped reverse a downbeat, two-year performance trend. At its attractive levels of value, we continued to add to our position in C.H. Robinson during the first half of the year.
Healthcare company Medtronic, Inc. (MDT) also contributed to performance, gaining 3.61% and 11.10% for the second quarter and first six months, respectively. Pending a shareholder vote either later this year or in 2015, however, Medtronic is expected to merge with medical device supplier Covidien Plc and change its legal domicile to Ireland. Once completed, the merger will create a taxable event for Fund shareholders who will realize a long-term capital gain estimated at $5.5 million or $0.75 a share. As always, Mairs and Power is committed to a policy of low portfolio turnover, and low exposure to taxable gains; we view this tax event as an anomaly.
Performance detractors included Pentair (PNR), IBM (IBM) and Target (TGT). However, we did not trim any of our positions as we continue to view these selections favorably over the long term.
On the income side, we saw our companies increase their dividends at a rate that outpaced the dividend for our benchmark through the first half of the year. Additionally, interest rates generally declined, especially bonds with durations of 10 years and beyond on the Treasury curve. Overall, bond prices improved during the first half of the year. Accordingly, we maintained a concentration in investment-grade bonds with longer durations as we saw a tightening in yield spreads in the U.S. Government sector. We still think more may be gained on the fixed income side as the Federal Reserve continues to taper back on quantitative easing. For investors who prefer a single vehicle that can straddle the equity and fixed income markets to take advantage of growth opportunities as well as favorable movements in the debt markets, we believe the Mairs & Power Balanced Fund continues to offer an effective way to do so.

Ronald L. Kaliebe

William B. Frels

Lead Manager

Co-Manager
Continue reading here. Read more...
Bill Frels Comments on CH Robinson Worldwide Inc
Freight shipper and global supply chain consultant C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (CHRW) gained 21.76% and 9.34% respectively for the second quarter and first six months, and was a strong contributor to Fund performance. The firm’s efforts to better service high-end customers resulted in a favorable report in the first quarter and helped reverse a lackluster, two-year performance trend. As the requirement for “just-in-time” freight delivery becomes increasingly important to a company’s profitability, customers will turn to third-party logistics firms like C.H. Robinson to coordinate shipments and generate the information customers need in real time to manage their inventories and deliveries. Read more...
Bill Frels' Mairs & Power Growth Fund Second Quarter 2014 Commentary
While the pace of the economic recovery was somewhat better than expected during the quarter, we continued to keep our primary focus on the long-term fundamental attributes that make companies profitable. While attentive, we are not swayed by the macro-economic details underpinning global market events. By emphasizing the long-term view, we can make the subtle, opportunistic adjustments to company positions over time that keep portfolio turnover low and tax consequences in check. Our first mutual fund, the Mairs & Power Growth Fund, founded in 1958, provides a good illustration of this approach, which is employed by the Mairs & Power Balanced and Mairs & Power Small Cap Funds as well. Portfolio turnover for the Growth Fund, compared to its peers, the Morningstar U.S. Large Cap Blend category, was substantially lower for each of the past 10 years. As a result, the Fund’s annual realized taxable capital gains exceeded $1.00 in only two of the past 10 years. Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/E(ttm) 19.78
CHRW's P/E(ttm) is ranked lower than
52% of the 597 Companies
in the Global Integrated Shipping & Logistics industry.

( Industry Median: 19.00 vs. CHRW: 19.78 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/E(ttm) only.
CHRW' s 10-Year P/E(ttm) Range
Min: 15.03  Med: 26.86 Max: 41.8
Current: 19.78
15.03
41.8
Forward P/E 17.18
CHRW's Forward P/E is ranked lower than
69% of the 331 Companies
in the Global Integrated Shipping & Logistics industry.

( Industry Median: 13.59 vs. CHRW: 17.18 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward P/E only.
N/A
PE(NRI) 20.00
CHRW's PE(NRI) is ranked lower than
52% of the 584 Companies
in the Global Integrated Shipping & Logistics industry.

( Industry Median: 18.80 vs. CHRW: 20.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE(NRI) only.
CHRW' s 10-Year PE(NRI) Range
Min: 15.01  Med: 26.85 Max: 41.83
Current: 20
15.01
41.83
P/B 8.60
CHRW's P/B is ranked lower than
97% of the 724 Companies
in the Global Integrated Shipping & Logistics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.34 vs. CHRW: 8.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
CHRW' s 10-Year P/B Range
Min: 5.84  Med: 8.59 Max: 11.06
Current: 8.6
5.84
11.06
P/S 0.67
CHRW's P/S is ranked higher than
62% of the 765 Companies
in the Global Integrated Shipping & Logistics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.05 vs. CHRW: 0.67 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
CHRW' s 10-Year P/S Range
Min: 0.61  Med: 1.10 Max: 1.53
Current: 0.67
0.61
1.53
PFCF 15.89
CHRW's PFCF is ranked higher than
58% of the 346 Companies
in the Global Integrated Shipping & Logistics industry.

( Industry Median: 21.12 vs. CHRW: 15.89 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PFCF only.
CHRW' s 10-Year PFCF Range
Min: 14.42  Med: 29.61 Max: 68.58
Current: 15.89
14.42
68.58
POCF 15.32
CHRW's POCF is ranked lower than
70% of the 580 Companies
in the Global Integrated Shipping & Logistics industry.

( Industry Median: 9.50 vs. CHRW: 15.32 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
CHRW' s 10-Year POCF Range
Min: 13.59  Med: 25.82 Max: 48.98
Current: 15.32
13.59
48.98
EV-to-EBIT 13.17
CHRW's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
62% of the 609 Companies
in the Global Integrated Shipping & Logistics industry.

( Industry Median: 15.80 vs. CHRW: 13.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
CHRW' s 10-Year EV-to-EBIT Range
Min: 10.6  Med: 16.00 Max: 25
Current: 13.17
10.6
25
PEG 2.63
CHRW's PEG is ranked lower than
60% of the 268 Companies
in the Global Integrated Shipping & Logistics industry.

( Industry Median: 2.06 vs. CHRW: 2.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG only.
CHRW' s 10-Year PEG Range
Min: 0.66  Med: 1.96 Max: 3.92
Current: 2.63
0.66
3.92
Shiller P/E 21.63
CHRW's Shiller P/E is ranked higher than
53% of the 392 Companies
in the Global Integrated Shipping & Logistics industry.

( Industry Median: 22.79 vs. CHRW: 21.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller P/E only.
CHRW' s 10-Year Shiller P/E Range
Min: 18.57  Med: 35.97 Max: 70.66
Current: 21.63
18.57
70.66
Current Ratio 1.12
CHRW's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
56% of the 705 Companies
in the Global Integrated Shipping & Logistics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.25 vs. CHRW: 1.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
CHRW' s 10-Year Current Ratio Range
Min: 1.12  Med: 1.78 Max: 2.02
Current: 1.12
1.12
2.02
Quick Ratio 1.12
CHRW's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
50% of the 705 Companies
in the Global Integrated Shipping & Logistics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.13 vs. CHRW: 1.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
CHRW' s 10-Year Quick Ratio Range
Min: 1.12  Med: 1.78 Max: 2.02
Current: 1.12
1.12
2.02
Days Sales Outstanding 44.23
CHRW's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
53% of the 585 Companies
in the Global Integrated Shipping & Logistics industry.

( Industry Median: 42.08 vs. CHRW: 44.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
CHRW' s 10-Year Days Sales Outstanding Range
Min: 35.27  Med: 43.39 Max: 46.21
Current: 44.23
35.27
46.21

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield 2.39
CHRW's Dividend Yield is ranked lower than
51% of the 874 Companies
in the Global Integrated Shipping & Logistics industry.

( Industry Median: 2.44 vs. CHRW: 2.39 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield only.
CHRW' s 10-Year Dividend Yield Range
Min: 0.72  Med: 1.66 Max: 2.75
Current: 2.39
0.72
2.75
Dividend Payout 0.46
CHRW's Dividend Payout is ranked lower than
59% of the 540 Companies
in the Global Integrated Shipping & Logistics industry.

( Industry Median: 0.37 vs. CHRW: 0.46 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout only.
CHRW' s 10-Year Dividend Payout Range
Min: 0.18  Med: 0.39 Max: 0.57
Current: 0.46
0.18
0.57
Dividend growth (3y) 6.00
CHRW's Dividend growth (3y) is ranked higher than
55% of the 334 Companies
in the Global Integrated Shipping & Logistics industry.

( Industry Median: 4.00 vs. CHRW: 6.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend growth (3y) only.
CHRW' s 10-Year Dividend growth (3y) Range
Min: 0  Med: 20.30 Max: 78.3
Current: 6
0
78.3
Yield on cost (5-Year) 3.66
CHRW's Yield on cost (5-Year) is ranked higher than
67% of the 874 Companies
in the Global Integrated Shipping & Logistics industry.

( Industry Median: 2.60 vs. CHRW: 3.66 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Yield on cost (5-Year) only.
CHRW' s 10-Year Yield on cost (5-Year) Range
Min: 1.1  Med: 2.53 Max: 4.19
Current: 3.66
1.1
4.19
Share Buyback Rate 3.60
CHRW's Share Buyback Rate is ranked higher than
88% of the 426 Companies
in the Global Integrated Shipping & Logistics industry.

( Industry Median: -0.90 vs. CHRW: 3.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Share Buyback Rate only.
CHRW' s 10-Year Share Buyback Rate Range
Min: 3.6  Med: 0.05 Max: -1.8
Current: 3.6

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Projected FCF 1.45
CHRW's Price/Projected FCF is ranked higher than
55% of the 352 Companies
in the Global Integrated Shipping & Logistics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.57 vs. CHRW: 1.45 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Projected FCF only.
CHRW' s 10-Year Price/Projected FCF Range
Min: 1.39  Med: 2.38 Max: 3.66
Current: 1.45
1.39
3.66
Price/DCF (Earnings Based) 1.12
CHRW's Price/DCF (Earnings Based) is ranked higher than
62% of the 58 Companies
in the Global Integrated Shipping & Logistics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.26 vs. CHRW: 1.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/DCF (Earnings Based) only.
N/A
Price/Median PS Value 0.61
CHRW's Price/Median PS Value is ranked higher than
89% of the 700 Companies
in the Global Integrated Shipping & Logistics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.12 vs. CHRW: 0.61 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
CHRW' s 10-Year Price/Median PS Value Range
Min: 0.37  Med: 0.86 Max: 1.37
Current: 0.61
0.37
1.37
Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value 2.79
CHRW's Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value is ranked lower than
81% of the 154 Companies
in the Global Integrated Shipping & Logistics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.55 vs. CHRW: 2.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value only.
CHRW' s 10-Year Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value Range
Min: 0.88  Med: 1.68 Max: 3.65
Current: 2.79
0.88
3.65
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) 7.68
CHRW's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
70% of the 746 Companies
in the Global Integrated Shipping & Logistics industry.

( Industry Median: 5.10 vs. CHRW: 7.68 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
CHRW' s 10-Year Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range
Min: 4  Med: 6.20 Max: 9.5
Current: 7.68
4
9.5
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) 11.11
CHRW's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked higher than
71% of the 423 Companies
in the Global Integrated Shipping & Logistics industry.

( Industry Median: 2.03 vs. CHRW: 11.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
CHRW' s 10-Year Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range
Min: 9.6  Med: 18.20 Max: 33.4
Current: 11.11
9.6
33.4

Business Description

Industry: Transportation & Logistics » Integrated Shipping & Logistics
Compare:UPS, DPSGY, FDX, KHNGY, LFUGY » details
Traded in other countries:CH1A.Germany,
CH Robinson Worldwide Inc is a service company reincorporated in Delaware in 1997 as the successor to a business existing, in various legal forms, since 1905. The Company is the third party logistics company in the world providing freight transportation services and logistics solutions to companies of all sizes, in a wide variety of industries. In 2014, the Company handled approximately 14.3 million shipments and worked with more than 46,000 active customers. It operates through a network of 281 offices, which it calls branches, in North America, Europe, Asia, South America, and Australia. It has developed transportation and distribution networks to provide transportation and supply chain services. The Company has contractual relationships with approximately 66,000 transportation companies, including motor carriers, railroads, and air freight and ocean carriers. As an integral part of its transportation services, it provides a wide range of value-added logistics services, such as freight consolidation, supply chain consulting and analysis, optimization, and reporting. In addition to transportation, it provides sourcing services (Sourcing). Its Sourcing business is buying, selling, and marketing of fresh produce which was its original business when the Company was founded in 1905. The Company supplies fresh produce through its network of independent produce growers and suppliers. Its customers include grocery retailers and restaurants, produce wholesalers, and foodservice distributors. In many cases, the Company also arranges the logistics and transportation of the products it sells and provides related supply chain services such as replenishment, category management, and merchandising. The Company provides fee-based payment services ("Payment Services")through its subsidiary, T-Chek Systems, Inc., ("T-Chek"). T-Chek provided a variety of payment management and business intelligence services to motor carrier companies and to fuel distributors. Those services included funds transfer, fuel purchasing, and online expense management. For of these services, T-Chek charged a fee per transaction. It competes against logistics companies as well as transportation providers that own equipment, third party freight brokers, internet matching services, internet freight brokers, and carriers offering logistics services and also compete against carriers internal sales forces.
» More Articles for CHRW

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Avon, Energizer Top List of Most Widely-Held Mid-Caps Jun 18 2015 
C.H. Robinson Worldwide Dividend Stock Analysis Jun 09 2015 
8 Dividend Picks With A Predictable Growing Business Feb 07 2015 
CH Robinson Worldwide Has Plenty of Room to Grow Dec 12 2014 
Mairs & Power Balanced Fund Second Quarter 2014 Commentary Jul 31 2014 
Bill Frels Comments on CH Robinson Worldwide Inc Jul 31 2014 
Bill Frels' Mairs & Power Growth Fund Second Quarter 2014 Commentary Jul 31 2014 
Bill Frels Comments on C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc Jun 25 2014 
Bill Frels' Mairs & Power Growth Fund First Quarter 2014 Commentary Jun 25 2014 
Morning Coffee: Widely Held Guru Stocks Trading Near Historical Low P/S Jun 04 2014 

More From Other Websites
Food transport costs rising Jul 01 2015
C.H. Robinson Worldwide Second Quarter 2015 Earnings Conference Call Jun 24 2015
C.H. Robinson Worldwide Second Quarter 2015 Earnings Conference Call Jun 24 2015
CHEP Poland Honours C.H. Robinson with Relationship Award Jun 23 2015
Avon, Energizer Top List of Most Widely-Held Mid-Caps Jun 18 2015
East Coast Ports to see Panama Canal Boost -Report Jun 18 2015
U.S. East Coast Ports Could Gain 10 Percent Additional Share Following Panama Canal Expansion Jun 18 2015
How This Trucking Company Can Deliver 11.9% Returns Per Year Jun 10 2015
C.H. Robinson’s TMC Division Offers Mission Produce a Scalable Supply Chain Solution Jun 05 2015
Five Below shares jump after hours on upbeat outlook Jun 03 2015
From CFO TO CIO: Operations Savvy Lifts C.H. Robinson Exec May 28 2015
Dump CH Robinson (CHRW) from Your Portfolio: Here's Why - Analyst Blog May 28 2015
Logistics Movers: C.H. Robinson Inc. Names Andrew Clarke as CFO May 27 2015
C.H. Robinson Names Andrew Clarke as Chief Financial Officer May 26 2015
C H ROBINSON WORLDWIDE INC Files SEC form 8-K, Change in Directors or Principal Officers, Financial... May 26 2015
C.H. Robinson Names Andrew Clarke as Chief Financial Officer May 26 2015
C.H. Robinson Celebrates 25 Years of Business in Mexico May 26 2015
C H ROBINSON WORLDWIDE INC Files SEC form 8-K, Change in Directors or Principal Officers, Financial... May 19 2015
Mike Short Named President of C.H. Robinson’s Global Forwarding Division May 18 2015
Mike Short Named President of C.H. Robinson’s Global Forwarding Division May 18 2015

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
FEEDBACK