Switch to:
Also traded in: France, Germany, Mexico

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 4/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.15
CLF's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
87% of the 1511 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 632.99 vs. CLF: 0.15 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
CLF' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.05  Med: 0.84 Max: No Debt
Current: 0.15
Equity-to-Asset -0.76
CLF's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
99% of the 694 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 0.58 vs. CLF: -0.76 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
CLF' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.93  Med: 0.39 Max: 0.61
Current: -0.76
-0.93
0.61
Interest Coverage 1.20
CLF's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
95% of the 1057 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 10000.00 vs. CLF: 1.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
CLF' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.66  Med: 7.41 Max: 23.59
Current: 1.2
0.66
23.59
Piotroski F-Score: 7
Altman Z-Score: -0.70
Beneish M-Score: -1.26
WACC vs ROIC
10.50%
39.33%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 11.42
CLF's Operating Margin % is ranked higher than
74% of the 715 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 1.28 vs. CLF: 11.42 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
CLF' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -5.26  Med: 14.1 Max: 35.48
Current: 11.42
-5.26
35.48
Net Margin % 8.26
CLF's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
75% of the 718 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 0.21 vs. CLF: 8.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
CLF' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -214.16  Med: 9.7 Max: 24.67
Current: 8.26
-214.16
24.67
ROA % 9.10
CLF's ROA % is ranked higher than
93% of the 1530 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: -9.67 vs. CLF: 9.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
CLF' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -88.81  Med: 6.64 Max: 16.43
Current: 9.1
-88.81
16.43
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 19.76
CLF's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
92% of the 1456 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: -14.33 vs. CLF: 19.76 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
CLF' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.84  Med: 17.03 Max: 39.81
Current: 19.76
-2.84
39.81
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate -22.10
CLF's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked lower than
77% of the 627 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: -3.80 vs. CLF: -22.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
CLF' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -31.8  Med: 15 Max: 34.4
Current: -22.1
-31.8
34.4
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate -46.00
CLF's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
81% of the 1106 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: -19.30 vs. CLF: -46.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
CLF' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -65  Med: 0.7 Max: 302.8
Current: -46
-65
302.8
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate -41.90
CLF's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked lower than
74% of the 983 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: -20.60 vs. CLF: -41.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
CLF' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -41.9  Med: -8.2 Max: 41.8
Current: -41.9
-41.9
41.8
GuruFocus has detected 3 Warning Signs with Cliffs Natural Resources Inc $CLF.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» CLF's 10-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-05-09 Est.)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q1 2016

CLF Guru Trades in Q1 2016

Charles Brandes 30,000 sh (New)
Jim Simons 10,432,099 sh (+52.81%)
Paul Tudor Jones 33,458 sh (+8.67%)
Joel Greenblatt Sold Out
Mairs and Power 10,000 sh (-33.33%)
» More
Q2 2016

CLF Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Charles Brandes 58,500 sh (+95.00%)
Jim Simons 14,513,599 sh (+39.12%)
Mairs and Power 10,000 sh (unchged)
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
» More
Q3 2016

CLF Guru Trades in Q3 2016

Paul Tudor Jones 32,558 sh (New)
Leon Cooperman 1,140,100 sh (New)
Charles Brandes 58,500 sh (unchged)
Mairs and Power Sold Out
Jim Simons 11,350,499 sh (-21.79%)
» More
Q4 2016

CLF Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Leon Cooperman Sold Out
Charles Brandes Sold Out
Jim Simons 9,547,999 sh (-15.88%)
Paul Tudor Jones 19,095 sh (-41.35%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with CLF

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Metals & Mining » Industrial Metals & Minerals    NAICS: 212210    SIC: 1011
Compare:OTCPK:VDNRF, OTCPK:KZMYY, OTCPK:IVPAF, OTCPK:EXXAY, OTCPK:IMPUY, NYSE:CMP, NYSE:BVN, NYSE:SWC, NYSE:PVG, NAS:GSM, NYSE:SLCA, OTCPK:HCHDF, OTCPK:MSNFY, AMEX:NG, OTCPK:IPGDF, OTCPK:AFRBY, NYSE:CCJ, NYSE:HCLP, NYSE:HSC, OTCPK:TMMFF » details
Traded in other countries:CLF.France, CVA.Germany, CLF.Mexico,
Cliffs Natural Resources Inc is a mining and natural resources company. The Company is a supplier of iron ore pellets to the North American steel industry from its mines and pellet plants located in Michigan and Minnesota.

Cliffs Natural Resources is the largest producer of iron ore in North America, operating mines in the United States and Canada that supply nearly 50% of North American blast furnace demand. The company also operates an iron ore mine in Australia and several coal mines in the U.S. and owns a large chromite project in Canada.

Top Ranked Articles about Cliffs Natural Resources Inc

Is it Safe to Buy Cliffs Natural Resources? China's slowing economy could depress iron ore prices
After losing more than 75% of its value in 2015, Cliffs Natural Resources (NYSE:CLF) delivered stockholders with huge returns in 2016, as the stock surged over 450%. The main reason behind the company’s awful performance in 2015 was the poor iron ore price that decelerated to $39.60 per dry metric ton in December 2015 from $136 per ton in January 2014. Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 9.03
CLF's PE Ratio is ranked higher than
74% of the 532 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 18.53 vs. CLF: 9.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
CLF' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.91  Med: 10.89 Max: 60.38
Current: 9.03
2.91
60.38
PE Ratio without NRI 8.17
CLF's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked higher than
76% of the 491 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 18.80 vs. CLF: 8.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
CLF' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.17  Med: 8.99 Max: 44.27
Current: 8.17
1.17
44.27
PS Ratio 0.79
CLF's PS Ratio is ranked higher than
73% of the 725 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 1.88 vs. CLF: 0.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
CLF' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.11  Med: 1.06 Max: 4.58
Current: 0.79
0.11
4.58
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 7.72
CLF's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
75% of the 282 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 17.54 vs. CLF: 7.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
CLF' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.86  Med: 12.34 Max: 174.06
Current: 7.72
1.86
174.06
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 5.81
CLF's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
62% of the 445 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 8.67 vs. CLF: 5.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
CLF' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.41  Med: 5.24 Max: 42.19
Current: 5.81
1.41
42.19
EV-to-EBIT 20.27
CLF's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
57% of the 525 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 17.95 vs. CLF: 20.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
CLF' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -85.9  Med: 8.1 Max: 73.1
Current: 20.27
-85.9
73.1
EV-to-EBITDA 13.71
CLF's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
64% of the 565 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 10.62 vs. CLF: 13.71 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
CLF' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2  Med: 7.6 Max: 95
Current: 13.71
2
95
Current Ratio 2.11
CLF's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
51% of the 1463 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 2.22 vs. CLF: 2.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
CLF' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.02  Med: 1.9 Max: 3.09
Current: 2.11
1.02
3.09
Quick Ratio 1.42
CLF's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
54% of the 1463 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 1.72 vs. CLF: 1.42 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
CLF' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.5  Med: 1.21 Max: 2.39
Current: 1.42
0.5
2.39
Days Inventory 89.71
CLF's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
59% of the 581 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 74.72 vs. CLF: 89.71 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
CLF' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 47.81  Med: 63.36 Max: 101.09
Current: 89.71
47.81
101.09
Days Sales Outstanding 22.27
CLF's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
63% of the 583 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 35.22 vs. CLF: 22.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
CLF' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.93  Med: 16.07 Max: 29.23
Current: 22.27
6.93
29.23
Days Payable 22.84
CLF's Days Payable is ranked lower than
75% of the 432 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 50.10 vs. CLF: 22.84 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
CLF' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 21.84  Med: 31.15 Max: 52.41
Current: 22.84
21.84
52.41

Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate -100.00
CLF's 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate is ranked lower than
70% of the 232 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: -20.60 vs. CLF: -100.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate only.
CLF' s 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: -10.6 Max: 115.4
Current: -100
0
115.4
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 4.74
CLF's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked higher than
99% of the 899 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 2.14 vs. CLF: 4.74 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
CLF' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.26  Med: 1.19 Max: 122.38
Current: 4.74
0.26
122.38
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -15.00
CLF's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked lower than
53% of the 1133 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: -12.60 vs. CLF: -15.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
CLF' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -16.9  Med: -2.5 Max: 3.6
Current: -15
-16.9
3.6

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 5.53
CLF's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked lower than
75% of the 382 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 2.01 vs. CLF: 5.53 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
CLF' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.06  Med: 0.81 Max: 118
Current: 5.53
0.06
118
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 0.73
CLF's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
73% of the 615 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 1.08 vs. CLF: 0.73 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
CLF' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.12  Med: 0.89 Max: 2.31
Current: 0.73
0.12
2.31
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 4.89
CLF's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
83% of the 1746 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: -4.17 vs. CLF: 4.89 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
CLF' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.4  Med: 10.8 Max: 40.1
Current: 4.89
1.4
40.1
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % -23.00
CLF's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked lower than
77% of the 297 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: -2.64 vs. CLF: -23.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
CLF' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -23.4  Med: 14.35 Max: 123
Current: -23
-23.4
123

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $2,109
EPS (TTM) $ 0.93
Beta1.50
Short Percentage of Float14.68%
52-Week Range $2.43 - 12.37
Shares Outstanding (Mil)296.40

Analyst Estimate

Dec17
Revenue (Mil $)
EPS ($) -0.04
EPS without NRI ($) -0.04
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
N/A
Dividends per Share ($)
» More Articles for CLF

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Is it Safe to Buy Cliffs Natural Resources? Feb 11 2017 
5 Stocks to Avoid - January 2017 Jan 14 2017 
Analysts’ Hated Stocks Beat Their Adored Stocks in 2016 Jan 11 2017 
17 Questions With Tim Travis of T&T Capital Management Nov 28 2016 
Cliffs Natural Resources: The Rally Is Still Alive Oct 07 2016 
There's Upside in Jim Simons' Cliffs Natural Resources Feb 25 2016 
Is It Time to Bet on Cliffs Natural Resources' Turnaround? Jan 21 2016 
Vale Is a Value Trap in Oversupplied Market Dec 18 2015 
Paragon Shipping Among Jim Simons' Holdings With High Yield Nov 29 2015 
Cliffs Natural Resources: Avoid This Value Trap Nov 18 2015 

More From Other Websites
Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. Announces Final Results of Tender Offers Mar 24 2017
Two Factors That Could Impact AK Steel’s 1Q17 Performance Mar 23 2017
Cliffs Natural (CLF) Down 23.1% Since Earnings Report: Can It Rebound? Mar 23 2017
Are Options Traders Betting on a Big Move in Cliffs Natural Resources (CLF) Stock? Mar 22 2017
Why Nucor and Steel Dynamics Expect Their 1Q17 Profits to Surge Mar 22 2017
How Analyst Sentiments Are Panning Out for Cliffs Natural Resources Mar 21 2017
What Analysts See in Cliffs Natural Resources under Trump’s Presidency Mar 20 2017
Iron Ore Surge: How Are Analysts Rating the Miners? Mar 20 2017
Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. Completes Full Redemption of Senior Secured Notes Mar 15 2017
CLIFFS NATURAL RESOURCES INC. Files SEC form 8-K, Mine Safety - Reporting of Shutdowns and Patterns... Mar 10 2017
Cliffs Natural Resources Inc. Announces Increase in Maximum Payment Amount With Respect to Tender... Mar 10 2017
Valuation Catalysts for Cliffs Natural Resources in 2017 Mar 09 2017
Analysts’ Optimistic Sentiments for Cliffs Natural Resources Mar 09 2017
How Long Can Seaborne Iron Ore Prices Support Cliffs Stock? Mar 08 2017
Can US Steel Prices Provide Upside for Cliffs’s 2017 Earnings? Mar 07 2017
Cliffs Natural Resources: How US Steel Demand Is Progressing Mar 07 2017
How Cliffs Could Benefit from Increasing Capacity Utilization Mar 07 2017
Why the Outlook for US Steel Imports Is Important for Cliffs Mar 06 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)