Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 4/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Equity to Asset 0.32
CLR's Equity to Asset is ranked lower than
77% of the 438 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.52 vs. CLR: 0.32 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
CLR' s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.24  Med: 0.37 Max: 0.57
Current: 0.32
0.24
0.57
Interest Coverage 0.60
CLR's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
95% of the 190 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 69.29 vs. CLR: 0.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
CLR' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.69  Med: 9.56 Max: 43.43
Current: 0.6
5.69
43.43
F-Score: 3
Z-Score: 1.02
M-Score: -3.99
WACC vs ROIC
7.89%
0.47%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 5.41
CLR's Operating margin (%) is ranked higher than
72% of the 440 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -29.97 vs. CLR: 5.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
CLR' s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 21.13  Med: 48.18 Max: 55.57
Current: 5.41
21.13
55.57
Net-margin (%) -2.94
CLR's Net-margin (%) is ranked higher than
68% of the 440 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -37.11 vs. CLR: -2.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
CLR' s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.91  Med: 24.17 Max: 52.33
Current: -2.94
4.91
52.33
ROE (%) -2.06
CLR's ROE (%) is ranked higher than
69% of the 472 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -16.02 vs. CLR: -2.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
CLR' s ROE (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.13  Med: 23.16 Max: 85.39
Current: -2.06
5.13
85.39
ROA (%) -0.66
CLR's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
72% of the 496 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -9.32 vs. CLR: -0.66 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
CLR' s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.57  Med: 8.27 Max: 35.16
Current: -0.66
2.57
35.16
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 1.35
CLR's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
76% of the 483 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -14.60 vs. CLR: 1.35 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
CLR' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.65  Med: 20.11 Max: 82.32
Current: 1.35
6.65
82.32
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) 40.90
CLR's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
87% of the 326 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 5.30 vs. CLR: 40.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CLR' s Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -83.6  Med: 8.60 Max: 190.4
Current: 40.9
-83.6
190.4
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) 38.80
CLR's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
79% of the 271 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 3.40 vs. CLR: 38.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CLR' s EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: -14.00 Max: 343.8
Current: 38.8
0
343.8
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) 29.80
CLR's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
73% of the 258 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.30 vs. CLR: 29.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CLR' s EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -84.4  Med: 3.20 Max: 1103.7
Current: 29.8
-84.4
1103.7
» CLR's 10-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2016-02-24)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Guru Trades

Q4 2014

CLR Guru Trades in Q4 2014

George Soros 349,468 sh (New)
Michael Price 200,000 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 198,200 sh (New)
Jim Simons 863,100 sh (New)
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 268,760 sh (New)
Paul Singer 212,000 sh (New)
Ray Dalio 91,616 sh (+32.97%)
Mario Gabelli 49,180 sh (+10.94%)
John Keeley 83,560 sh (+1.46%)
Paul Singer 500,000 sh (unchged)
Murray Stahl 972,076 sh (-1.29%)
» More
Q1 2015

CLR Guru Trades in Q1 2015

Kyle Bass 17,513 sh (New)
Kyle Bass 17,513 sh (New)
Ray Dalio 119,159 sh (+30.06%)
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc 308,880 sh (+14.93%)
Michael Price 200,000 sh (unchged)
George Soros Sold Out
Steven Cohen Sold Out
Paul Singer Sold Out
Mario Gabelli 49,130 sh (-0.10%)
Jim Simons 798,000 sh (-7.54%)
Murray Stahl 894,719 sh (-7.96%)
John Keeley 35,170 sh (-57.91%)
» More
Q2 2015

CLR Guru Trades in Q2 2015

Steven Cohen 875,000 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 8,160 sh (New)
T Boone Pickens 114,427 sh (New)
Kyle Bass 324,040 sh (+1750.28%)
Michael Price 200,000 sh (unchged)
Mario Gabelli Sold Out
Manning & Napier Advisors, Inc Sold Out
Murray Stahl 882,669 sh (-1.35%)
John Keeley 34,110 sh (-3.01%)
Ray Dalio 109,137 sh (-8.41%)
Jim Simons 579,000 sh (-27.44%)
» More
Q3 2015

CLR Guru Trades in Q3 2015

Jim Simons 1,332,922 sh (+130.21%)
Michael Price 200,000 sh (unchged)
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Kyle Bass Sold Out
John Keeley 33,020 sh (-3.20%)
Ray Dalio 105,100 sh (-3.70%)
T Boone Pickens 108,000 sh (-5.62%)
Murray Stahl 812,930 sh (-7.90%)
Steven Cohen 120,000 sh (-86.29%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with CLR

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Top Ranked Articles about Continental Resources Inc

Weekly CEO Buys Highlight: CLR, KMI, TEP, HLX, MRO
According to GuruFocus Insider Data, these are the largest CEO buys during the past week. The overall trend of CEOs is illustrated in the chart below: Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
Forward P/E 526.32
CLR's Forward P/E is ranked lower than
97% of the 366 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 19.88 vs. CLR: 526.32 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward P/E only.
N/A
P/B 1.58
CLR's P/B is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 559 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.46 vs. CLR: 1.58 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
CLR' s P/B Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.47  Med: 5.39 Max: 16.07
Current: 1.58
1.47
16.07
P/S 2.17
CLR's P/S is ranked lower than
95% of the 559 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.86 vs. CLR: 2.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
CLR' s P/S Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.79  Med: 6.39 Max: 22.07
Current: 2.17
0.79
22.07
POCF 2.94
CLR's POCF is ranked lower than
52% of the 559 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 2.84 vs. CLR: 2.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
CLR' s POCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.81  Med: 9.88 Max: 26.15
Current: 2.94
2.81
26.15
EV-to-EBIT 78.02
CLR's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
88% of the 307 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 8.20 vs. CLR: 78.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
CLR' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -798.3  Med: 17.60 Max: 133.2
Current: 78.02
-798.3
133.2
EV-to-EBITDA 7.75
CLR's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
60% of the 457 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 5.96 vs. CLR: 7.75 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
CLR' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.9  Med: 11.00 Max: 50.6
Current: 7.75
3.9
50.6
Shiller P/E 8.98
CLR's Shiller P/E is ranked higher than
51% of the 185 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 9.41 vs. CLR: 8.98 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller P/E only.
CLR' s Shiller P/E Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.7  Med: 15.57 Max: 29.65
Current: 8.98
0.7
29.65
Current Ratio 0.86
CLR's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
67% of the 484 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.25 vs. CLR: 0.86 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
CLR' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.56  Med: 0.89 Max: 1.72
Current: 0.86
0.56
1.72
Quick Ratio 0.78
CLR's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
68% of the 484 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.22 vs. CLR: 0.78 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
CLR' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.52  Med: 0.81 Max: 1.49
Current: 0.78
0.52
1.49
Days Inventory 93.19
CLR's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
84% of the 214 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 24.21 vs. CLR: 93.19 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
CLR' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.74  Med: 57.12 Max: 106.73
Current: 93.19
10.74
106.73
Days Sales Outstanding 46.06
CLR's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
56% of the 386 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 40.59 vs. CLR: 46.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
CLR' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 24.19  Med: 69.17 Max: 102.24
Current: 46.06
24.19
102.24
Days Payable 588.11
CLR's Days Payable is ranked higher than
96% of the 244 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 104.09 vs. CLR: 588.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
CLR' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 163.46  Med: 756.78 Max: 1408.96
Current: 588.11
163.46
1408.96

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Tangible Book 1.61
CLR's Price/Tangible Book is ranked lower than
99% of the 559 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 9999.00 vs. CLR: 1.61 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
CLR' s Price/Tangible Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.25  Med: 5.31 Max: 13.92
Current: 1.61
2.25
13.92
Price/Median PS Value 0.35
CLR's Price/Median PS Value is ranked higher than
50% of the 557 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.61 vs. CLR: 0.35 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
CLR' s Price/Median PS Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.14  Med: 1.03 Max: 3.43
Current: 0.35
0.14
3.43
Price/Graham Number 1.03
CLR's Price/Graham Number is ranked lower than
64% of the 309 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.71 vs. CLR: 1.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Graham Number only.
CLR' s Price/Graham Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.34  Med: 2.62 Max: 9.51
Current: 1.03
1.34
9.51
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) 1.20
CLR's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
69% of the 494 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -10.80 vs. CLR: 1.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
CLR' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.8  Med: 5.60 Max: 19.9
Current: 1.2
0.8
19.9
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) 22.93
CLR's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked higher than
87% of the 172 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -12.53 vs. CLR: 22.93 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
CLR' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1  Med: 16.00 Max: 56.1
Current: 22.93
-1
56.1

More Statistics

Revenue(Mil) $3402
EPS $ -0.27
Beta1.20
Short Percentage of Float28.85%
52-Week Range $13.94 - 53.65
Shares Outstanding(Mil)373.01

Analyst Estimate

Dec15 Dec16 Dec17
Revenue(Mil) 2,669 2,114 2,554
EPS($) -0.29 -0.67 0.04
EPS without NRI($) -0.29 -0.67 0.04

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - E&P » Oil & Gas E&P
Compare:OJSCY, APC, APA, HRTPY, SGTZY » details
Traded in other countries:C5L.Germany,
Continental Resources Inc was formed in 1967 in the state of Oklahoma. It is an independent crude oil and natural gas exploration and production company with properties in the North, South and East regions of the United States. The North region consists of properties north of Kansas and west of the Mississippi River and includes North Dakota Bakken, Montana Bakken, and the Red River units. The South region includes Kansas and all properties south of Kansas and west of the Mississippi River including various plays in the South Central Oklahoma Oil Province ("SCOOP"), Northwest Cana and Arkoma areas of Oklahoma. The East region is comprised of undeveloped leasehold acreage east of the Mississippi River. Its exploration drilling in North Dakota focused on evaluating the productivity of the Lower Three Forks "benches" which include the Three Forks 2 ("TF2"), Three Forks 3 ("TF3"), and the Three Forks 4 ("TF4") reservoirs. The Company sells its products to midstream marketing companies or crude oil refining companies at the lease. The crude oil and natural gas industry in the United States is subject to various types of regulation at the federal, state and local levels. Laws, rules, regulations, policies, and interpretations affecting its industry have been pervasive and are continuously reviewed by legislators and regulators, including the imposition of new or increased requirements on them and other industry participants.
» More Articles for CLR

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
The Right Kind of Oil Company to Own in This Market – All Cash Dec 29 2015 
T. Boone Pickens' Largest New Buys During Second Quarter Sep 24 2015 
KEELEY Mid Cap Value Fund First Quarter 2015 Commentary Jun 17 2015 
Why Continental Resources Can Make a Comeback May 27 2015 
Cimarex Energy Had One of the Highest Growth Rates Among Petroleum Companies Apr 24 2015 
March Madness Round 3: Kinder Morgan vs Disney Mar 24 2015 
Continental Resources' New Discoveries Make It a Smart Long-Term Bet Mar 23 2015 
Why Continental Resources Is a Good Long-Term Buy Mar 17 2015 
Weekly CEO Buys Highlight: CLR, KMI, TEP, HLX, MRO Mar 16 2015 
Legendary Value Investor Michael Price's New 13-f Filing Feb 18 2015 

More From Other Websites
Independent Oil & Gas Equities Technical Notes -- Range Resources, Apache, Continental Resources,... Feb 02 2016
Continental Resources (CLR) Stock Tumbling as Oil Prices Sink Feb 01 2016
Falling Earnings Estimates Signal Weakness Ahead for Continental Resources (CLR) Feb 01 2016
Harold Hamm Expects $60 Oil, Says America Will Double Output Again Feb 01 2016
U.S Drillers Post Billions In Losses As Hedges Roll Off Jan 30 2016
Continental Resources 2016 Guidance & Oil Price Impact Jan 29 2016
CONTINENTAL RESOURCES, INC Files SEC form 8-K, Results of Operations and Financial Condition,... Jan 28 2016
Baker Hughes Warns Rigs May Drop Another 30% After 46% Dive Jan 28 2016
Continental Resources Announces 2016 Budget Of $920 Million In Non-Acquisition Capital Expenditures Jan 27 2016
Continental Resources To Announce Fourth Quarter And Full-Year 2015 Results On Wednesday, February... Jan 27 2016
Continental Resources (CLR) Stock Gaining on Higher Oil Prices Jan 27 2016
Will Spending Cuts Have Impact on Oil Glut? Jan 27 2016
How Long Can Oil Companies Keep Up This 'Do More With Less' Thing? Jan 27 2016
U.S. shale firms, struggling to profit with $30 oil, slash spending more Jan 27 2016
[$$] Continental Resources Slashes Annual Spending by 66% Jan 26 2016
[$$] US shale groups slash spending Jan 26 2016
Oil surges on hopes for output cuts to trim glut Jan 26 2016

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
FEEDBACK