Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.03
CMLP's Cash to Debt is ranked lower than
66% of the 98 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 0.09 vs. CMLP: 0.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
CMLP' s Cash to Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0.01 Max: No Debt
Current: 0.03
Equity to Asset 0.61
CMLP's Equity to Asset is ranked higher than
84% of the 106 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 0.40 vs. CMLP: 0.61 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
CMLP' s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.48  Med: 0.62 Max: 0.87
Current: 0.61
0.48
0.87
F-Score: 5
Z-Score: 0.63
M-Score: -2.83
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 2.93
CMLP's Operating margin (%) is ranked lower than
79% of the 107 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 15.38 vs. CMLP: 2.93 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
CMLP' s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.54  Med: 32.55 Max: 35.56
Current: 2.93
3.54
35.56
Net-margin (%) -4.97
CMLP's Net-margin (%) is ranked lower than
86% of the 107 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 9.33 vs. CMLP: -4.97 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
CMLP' s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -3.04  Med: 32.33 Max: 34.62
Current: -4.97
-3.04
34.62
ROE (%) -3.49
CMLP's ROE (%) is ranked lower than
84% of the 109 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 7.85 vs. CMLP: -3.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
CMLP' s ROE (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -3.52  Med: 7.16 Max: 10.81
Current: -3.49
-3.52
10.81
ROA (%) -1.72
CMLP's ROA (%) is ranked lower than
84% of the 113 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 3.76 vs. CMLP: -1.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
CMLP' s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.86  Med: 5.46 Max: 7.79
Current: -1.72
-0.86
7.79
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 1.55
CMLP's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
82% of the 109 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 9.45 vs. CMLP: 1.55 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
CMLP' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.64  Med: 8.81 Max: 14.29
Current: 1.55
2.64
14.29
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) 83.80
CMLP's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
99% of the 74 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: -0.60 vs. CMLP: 83.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CMLP' s Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0.00 Max: 83.8
Current: 83.8
0
83.8
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) 8.20
CMLP's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
59% of the 69 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 6.10 vs. CMLP: 8.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CMLP' s EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0.00 Max: 8.2
Current: 8.2
0
8.2
» CMLP's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2014

CMLP Guru Trades in Q2 2014

NWQ Managers 41,375 sh (New)
Jim Simons 660,790 sh (+101.84%)
» More
Q3 2014

CMLP Guru Trades in Q3 2014

NWQ Managers Sold Out
Jim Simons Sold Out
» More
Q3 2015

CMLP Guru Trades in Q3 2015

Jim Simons 358,157 sh (New)
» More
Q4 2015

CMLP Guru Trades in Q4 2015

Jim Simons Sold Out
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with CMLP

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
Forward P/E 44.05
CMLP's Forward P/E is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 122 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 13.00 vs. CMLP: 44.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward P/E only.
N/A
P/B 0.30
CMLP's P/B is ranked higher than
88% of the 122 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 0.93 vs. CMLP: 0.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
CMLP' s P/B Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.3  Med: 2.19 Max: 3.27
Current: 0.3
0.3
3.27
P/S 0.51
CMLP's P/S is ranked higher than
64% of the 121 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 0.92 vs. CMLP: 0.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
CMLP' s P/S Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.51  Med: 7.03 Max: 34.4
Current: 0.51
0.51
34.4
PFCF 21.31
CMLP's PFCF is ranked lower than
73% of the 90 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 11.66 vs. CMLP: 21.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PFCF only.
CMLP' s PFCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 21.31  Med: 33.78 Max: 44.41
Current: 21.31
21.31
44.41
POCF 3.24
CMLP's POCF is ranked higher than
67% of the 120 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 3.95 vs. CMLP: 3.24 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
CMLP' s POCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.24  Med: 12.79 Max: 50.4
Current: 3.24
3.24
50.4
EV-to-EBIT 64.49
CMLP's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 122 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 16.23 vs. CMLP: 64.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
CMLP' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 24.8  Med: 56.20 Max: 113
Current: 64.49
24.8
113
EV-to-EBITDA 12.06
CMLP's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
61% of the 120 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 11.10 vs. CMLP: 12.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
CMLP' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0.00 Max: 12.06
Current: 12.06
0
12.06
Current Ratio 1.30
CMLP's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
58% of the 112 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 1.20 vs. CMLP: 1.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
CMLP' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.12  Med: 0.88 Max: 2
Current: 1.3
0.12
2
Quick Ratio 1.23
CMLP's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
64% of the 112 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 1.00 vs. CMLP: 1.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
CMLP' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.11  Med: 0.80 Max: 1.73
Current: 1.23
0.11
1.73
Days Inventory 2.06
CMLP's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
90% of the 83 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 14.12 vs. CMLP: 2.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
CMLP' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.41  Med: 15.21 Max: 41
Current: 2.06
1.41
41
Days Sales Outstanding 36.30
CMLP's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
57% of the 98 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 34.20 vs. CMLP: 36.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
CMLP' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 27.11  Med: 35.21 Max: 113.67
Current: 36.3
27.11
113.67
Days Payable 24.69
CMLP's Days Payable is ranked lower than
64% of the 77 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 33.95 vs. CMLP: 24.69 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
CMLP' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0.00 Max: 0
Current: 24.69

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield 26.54
CMLP's Dividend Yield is ranked higher than
94% of the 121 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 9.57 vs. CMLP: 26.54 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield only.
CMLP' s Dividend Yield Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.18  Med: 6.96 Max: 26.54
Current: 26.54
0.18
26.54
Yield on cost (5-Year) 26.54
CMLP's Yield on cost (5-Year) is ranked higher than
89% of the 122 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 11.20 vs. CMLP: 26.54 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Yield on cost (5-Year) only.
CMLP' s Yield on cost (5-Year) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.18  Med: 6.96 Max: 26.54
Current: 26.54
0.18
26.54
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -36.20
CMLP's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked lower than
88% of the 73 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: -8.00 vs. CMLP: -36.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
CMLP' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -36.2  Med: 0.00 Max: 0
Current: -36.2
-36.2
0

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Tangible Book 0.77
CMLP's Price/Tangible Book is ranked higher than
77% of the 121 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 9999.00 vs. CMLP: 0.77 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
CMLP' s Price/Tangible Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.4  Med: 3.10 Max: 7.37
Current: 0.77
1.4
7.37
Price/Median PS Value 0.07
CMLP's Price/Median PS Value is ranked higher than
98% of the 121 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 0.66 vs. CMLP: 0.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
CMLP' s Price/Median PS Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.13  Med: 1.02 Max: 4.28
Current: 0.07
0.13
4.28
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) 1.60
CMLP's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
75% of the 110 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 5.00 vs. CMLP: 1.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
CMLP' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.9  Med: 1.80 Max: 4
Current: 1.6
0.9
4

More Statistics

Revenue(Mil) $2286
EPS $ -0.76
Short Percentage of Float2.15%
52-Week Range $6.01 - 22.78
Shares Outstanding(Mil)188.31

Analyst Estimate

Dec15 Dec16 Dec17
Revenue(Mil) 2,157 2,572 2,748
EPS($) -0.29 0.14 0.29
EPS without NRI($) -0.29 0.14 0.29

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - Midstream » Oil & Gas Midstream
Compare:WES, ENB, ETE, KMP, SE » details
Traded in other countries:8IY.Germany,
Crestwood Midstream Partners LP, formerly known as Inergy Midstream, L.P., is a Delaware limited partnership formed in November 2011. The Company develops, acquires, owns and operates fee-based assets and operations within the energy midstream sector. The Company owns and operates a diversified portfolio of crude oil and natural gas gathering, processing, storage and transportation assets that connect energy supply with energy demand across North America. The Company has three reporting segments: Gathering and Processing, NGL and crude services, and Storage and Transportation. The Gathering and Processing operations engage in the gathering, processing, treating, compression, transportation and sales of natural gas and the delivery of NGLs. In Gathering and Processing, the Company provides natural gas gathering, processing, treating and compression services to producers in unconventional shale plays located in West Virginia, Wyoming, Texas, Arkansas, New Mexico and Louisiana. The Company owns rich gas systems in the Marcellus, Powder River Basin, Niobrara, Barnett, Granite Wash, and Avalon/Bone Spring Shale plays, and dry gas gathering systems in the Barnett, Fayetteville and Haynesville/Bossier Shale plays. The NGL and crude services operations provide gathering, storage and transportation services to producers, refiners, marketers, and others that effectively provide flow assurances to customers, as well as the production and sale of salt products. Operations in NGL and Crude segment include crude oil rail terminals, the Arrow gathering system, an NGL storage facility, and U.S Salt, LLC. The Storage and Transportation operations provide natural gas storage and transportations services to third parties. The corporate operations include all general and administrative expenses that are not allocated to the reportable segments. The Company owns and operates four natural gas storage facilities located in New York and Pennsylvania that have an aggregate working gas storage capacity of approximately 41.0 Bcf namely Stagecoach, Thomas Corners, Steuben, and Seneca Lake. Further, the Company owns natural gas transportation facilities located in New York and Pennsylvania namely North-South Facilities, MARC I Pipeline, and East Pipeline. Sales of crude oil, NGLs and salt are recognized at the time product is shipped or delivered to the customer depending on the sales terms. The Company is expanding its gathering and compression facilities in the Marcellus Shale.
» More Articles for NYSE:CMLP

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Top Five Insider Buys of the Week Sep 13 2013 

More From Other Websites
Crestwood Holdings LLC -- Moody's changes Crestwood Midstream's outlook to negative Nov 24 2015
Midcoast Energy Partners: Top Midstream MLP Gainer on October 7 Oct 08 2015
Midcoast Energy: Best Midstream MLP Performer on October 5 Oct 06 2015
Tortoise Index Solutions Announces Constituent Change to Indices Due to Merger and Acquisition... Sep 30 2015
Tortoise Index Solutions Announces Constituent Change to Indices Due to Merger and Acquisition... Sep 30 2015
Commodity Prices Impact Midcoast Energy’s Operations Sep 30 2015
Crestwood Equity Partners To Join The Alerian MLP Index And Alerian MLP Equal Weight Index Sep 29 2015
Crestwood Equity Partners To Join The Alerian Natural Gas MLP Index Sep 29 2015
Crestwood Midstream Partners LP Earnings Q2, 2015 Sep 23 2015
Crestwood Midstream: Top Midstream MLP Gainer on September 21 Sep 22 2015
Midcoast Energy’s Year-to-Date Returns Exceed Industry Average Sep 20 2015
American Midstream Fell Due to the Unit Offering Announcement Sep 11 2015
Alerian Announces Changes to the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index Sep 11 2015
What Are Crestwood Midstream’s Expansion Opportunities? Sep 09 2015
Why Didn’t Crestwood Midstream Perform Well? Sep 09 2015
DCP Midstream Rose on Sponsors’ Asset Drop-Down Announcement Sep 09 2015
Holly Energy Partners: Top Midstream MLP Loser on September 4 Sep 08 2015
Crestwood Announces Special Meeting Date for the Proposed Simplification Merger Aug 31 2015
Crestwood Announces Special Meeting Date for the Proposed Simplification Merger Aug 31 2015
JP Energy Partners: Best Midstream MLP Performer on August 28 Aug 31 2015

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
FEEDBACK