Switch to:

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Equity to Asset 0.61
CMLP's Equity to Asset is ranked higher than
81% of the 106 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 0.40 vs. CMLP: 0.61 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
CMLP' s 10-Year Equity to Asset Range
Min: 0.48  Med: 0.62 Max: 0.87
Current: 0.61
0.48
0.87
F-Score: 5
Z-Score: 0.70
M-Score: -2.83
WACC vs ROIC
4.41%
1.08%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 2.93
CMLP's Operating margin (%) is ranked lower than
80% of the 108 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 15.43 vs. CMLP: 2.93 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
CMLP' s 10-Year Operating margin (%) Range
Min: 3.54  Med: 32.55 Max: 35.56
Current: 2.93
3.54
35.56
Net-margin (%) -4.97
CMLP's Net-margin (%) is ranked lower than
90% of the 108 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 11.95 vs. CMLP: -4.97 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
CMLP' s 10-Year Net-margin (%) Range
Min: -3.04  Med: 32.33 Max: 34.62
Current: -4.97
-3.04
34.62
ROE (%) -3.49
CMLP's ROE (%) is ranked lower than
89% of the 109 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 8.94 vs. CMLP: -3.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
CMLP' s 10-Year ROE (%) Range
Min: -3.52  Med: 7.16 Max: 10.81
Current: -3.49
-3.52
10.81
ROA (%) -1.72
CMLP's ROA (%) is ranked lower than
88% of the 112 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 4.74 vs. CMLP: -1.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
CMLP' s 10-Year ROA (%) Range
Min: -0.86  Med: 5.46 Max: 7.79
Current: -1.72
-0.86
7.79
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 1.55
CMLP's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
86% of the 109 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 10.35 vs. CMLP: 1.55 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
CMLP' s 10-Year ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range
Min: 2.64  Med: 8.81 Max: 14.29
Current: 1.55
2.64
14.29
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) 83.80
CMLP's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
99% of the 74 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 1.20 vs. CMLP: 83.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CMLP' s 10-Year Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: 0  Med: 0.00 Max: 83.8
Current: 83.8
0
83.8
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) 8.20
CMLP's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
62% of the 69 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 5.30 vs. CMLP: 8.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CMLP' s 10-Year EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: 0  Med: 0.00 Max: 8.2
Current: 8.2
0
8.2
» CMLP's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Guru Trades

Q4 2013

CMLP Guru Trades in Q4 2013

First Eagle Investment Sold Out
» More
Q1 2014

CMLP Guru Trades in Q1 2014

Jim Simons 327,386 sh (+0.01%)
» More
Q2 2014

CMLP Guru Trades in Q2 2014

NWQ Managers 41,375 sh (New)
Jim Simons 660,790 sh (+101.84%)
» More
Q3 2014

CMLP Guru Trades in Q3 2014

NWQ Managers Sold Out
Jim Simons Sold Out
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with CMLP

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
Forward P/E 33.33
CMLP's Forward P/E is ranked lower than
91% of the 88 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 20.04 vs. CMLP: 33.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward P/E only.
N/A
P/B 0.36
CMLP's P/B is ranked higher than
96% of the 106 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 2.13 vs. CMLP: 0.36 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
CMLP' s 10-Year P/B Range
Min: 0.37  Med: 2.21 Max: 3.27
Current: 0.36
0.37
3.27
P/S 0.63
CMLP's P/S is ranked higher than
82% of the 106 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 2.43 vs. CMLP: 0.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
CMLP' s 10-Year P/S Range
Min: 0.64  Med: 7.10 Max: 34.4
Current: 0.63
0.64
34.4
PFCF 26.27
CMLP's PFCF is ranked lower than
66% of the 53 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 18.39 vs. CMLP: 26.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PFCF only.
CMLP' s 10-Year PFCF Range
Min: 26.79  Med: 39.17 Max: 44.41
Current: 26.27
26.79
44.41
POCF 3.99
CMLP's POCF is ranked higher than
85% of the 97 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 8.40 vs. CMLP: 3.99 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
CMLP' s 10-Year POCF Range
Min: 4.07  Med: 12.98 Max: 50.4
Current: 3.99
4.07
50.4
EV-to-EBIT 69.82
CMLP's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
93% of the 91 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 20.87 vs. CMLP: 69.82 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
CMLP' s 10-Year EV-to-EBIT Range
Min: 24.8  Med: 52.95 Max: 113
Current: 69.82
24.8
113
Current Ratio 1.30
CMLP's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
57% of the 109 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 1.21 vs. CMLP: 1.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
CMLP' s 10-Year Current Ratio Range
Min: 0.12  Med: 0.88 Max: 2
Current: 1.3
0.12
2
Quick Ratio 1.23
CMLP's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
62% of the 109 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 1.02 vs. CMLP: 1.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
CMLP' s 10-Year Quick Ratio Range
Min: 0.11  Med: 0.80 Max: 1.73
Current: 1.23
0.11
1.73
Days Inventory 2.06
CMLP's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
88% of the 82 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 12.61 vs. CMLP: 2.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
CMLP' s 10-Year Days Inventory Range
Min: 1.41  Med: 15.21 Max: 41
Current: 2.06
1.41
41
Days Sales Outstanding 36.30
CMLP's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
63% of the 99 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 32.34 vs. CMLP: 36.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
CMLP' s 10-Year Days Sales Outstanding Range
Min: 27.11  Med: 35.21 Max: 113.67
Current: 36.3
27.11
113.67

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield 21.52
CMLP's Dividend Yield is ranked higher than
98% of the 120 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 6.72 vs. CMLP: 21.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield only.
CMLP' s 10-Year Dividend Yield Range
Min: 0.18  Med: 6.93 Max: 21.11
Current: 21.52
0.18
21.11
Yield on cost (5-Year) 21.00
CMLP's Yield on cost (5-Year) is ranked higher than
92% of the 119 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 8.72 vs. CMLP: 21.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Yield on cost (5-Year) only.
CMLP' s 10-Year Yield on cost (5-Year) Range
Min: 0.18  Med: 6.93 Max: 21.11
Current: 21
0.18
21.11
Share Buyback Rate -36.20
CMLP's Share Buyback Rate is ranked lower than
88% of the 74 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: -7.80 vs. CMLP: -36.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Share Buyback Rate only.
CMLP' s 10-Year Share Buyback Rate Range
Min: 0  Med: 0.00 Max: -36.2
Current: -36.2

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Tangible Book 0.98
CMLP's Price/Tangible Book is ranked higher than
86% of the 90 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 2.67 vs. CMLP: 0.98 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
CMLP' s 10-Year Price/Tangible Book Range
Min: 1.4  Med: 3.10 Max: 7.37
Current: 0.98
1.4
7.37
Price/Median PS Value 0.09
CMLP's Price/Median PS Value is ranked higher than
99% of the 97 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 0.96 vs. CMLP: 0.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
CMLP' s 10-Year Price/Median PS Value Range
Min: 0.13  Med: 1.01 Max: 4.23
Current: 0.09
0.13
4.23
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) 1.40
CMLP's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
80% of the 106 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 4.30 vs. CMLP: 1.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
CMLP' s 10-Year Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range
Min: 0.9  Med: 1.90 Max: 4
Current: 1.4
0.9
4

Analyst Estimate

Dec15 Dec16 Dec17
Revenue(Mil) 2,187 2,691 2,897
EPS($) -0.26 0.23 0.56
EPS without NRI($) -0.26 0.23 0.56

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - Midstream » Oil & Gas Midstream
Compare:WES, ENB, ETE, KMP, SE » details
Traded in other countries:8IY.Germany,
Crestwood Midstream Partners LP, formerly known as Inergy Midstream, L.P., is a Delaware limited partnership formed in November 2011. The Company develops, acquires, owns and operates fee-based assets and operations within the energy midstream sector. The Company owns and operates a diversified portfolio of crude oil and natural gas gathering, processing, storage and transportation assets that connect energy supply with energy demand across North America. The Company has three reporting segments: Gathering and Processing, NGL and crude services, and Storage and Transportation. The Gathering and Processing operations engage in the gathering, processing, treating, compression, transportation and sales of natural gas and the delivery of NGLs. In Gathering and Processing, the Company provides natural gas gathering, processing, treating and compression services to producers in unconventional shale plays located in West Virginia, Wyoming, Texas, Arkansas, New Mexico and Louisiana. The Company owns rich gas systems in the Marcellus, Powder River Basin, Niobrara, Barnett, Granite Wash, and Avalon/Bone Spring Shale plays, and dry gas gathering systems in the Barnett, Fayetteville and Haynesville/Bossier Shale plays. The NGL and crude services operations provide gathering, storage and transportation services to producers, refiners, marketers, and others that effectively provide flow assurances to customers, as well as the production and sale of salt products. Operations in NGL and Crude segment include crude oil rail terminals, the Arrow gathering system, an NGL storage facility, and U.S Salt, LLC. The Storage and Transportation operations provide natural gas storage and transportations services to third parties. The corporate operations include all general and administrative expenses that are not allocated to the reportable segments. The Company owns and operates four natural gas storage facilities located in New York and Pennsylvania that have an aggregate working gas storage capacity of approximately 41.0 Bcf namely Stagecoach, Thomas Corners, Steuben, and Seneca Lake. Further, the Company owns natural gas transportation facilities located in New York and Pennsylvania namely North-South Facilities, MARC I Pipeline, and East Pipeline. Sales of crude oil, NGLs and salt are recognized at the time product is shipped or delivered to the customer depending on the sales terms. The Company is expanding its gathering and compression facilities in the Marcellus Shale.
» More Articles for CMLP

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
EnerCom, Inc. to Host 100+ E&P, Oilfield Service and MLP Companies at the Oil & Gas Conference(R) 20 Aug 04 2015 
Top Five Insider Buys of the Week Sep 13 2013 

More From Other Websites
Crestwood Announces Special Meeting Date for the Proposed Simplification Merger Aug 31 2015
Crestwood Announces Special Meeting Date for the Proposed Simplification Merger Aug 31 2015
JP Energy Partners: Best Midstream MLP Performer on August 28 Aug 31 2015
Crestwood Announces Special Meeting Date for the Proposed Simplification Merger Aug 31 2015
Rose Rock Midstream: Top Midstream MLP Loser on August 25 Aug 28 2015
Crestwood Midstream Met Revenue Estimates in 2Q15 Aug 25 2015
Crestwood Midstream’s 2Q15 Distributions Remained Flat Aug 25 2015
Which Segment Could Drive Energy Transfer Partners’ 2Q15 Show? Aug 11 2015
Crestwood Midstream: Top Midstream Gainer on Thursday, August 6 Aug 07 2015
Crestwood Equity Partners LP and Crestwood Midstream Partners LP Earnings Call scheduled for 9:00 am... Aug 05 2015
Q2 2015 Crestwood Midstream Partners LP Earnings Release - Before Market Open Aug 05 2015
Crestwood Midstream Announces Second Quarter 2015 Financial and Operating Results Aug 05 2015
EnerCom, Inc. to Host 100+ E&P, Oilfield Service and MLP Companies at the Oil & Gas Conference(R)... Aug 04 2015
Antero Midstream: Top Midstream Loser on Friday, July 31 Aug 03 2015
Williams Partners Set to Reduce Commodity-Price Exposure Aug 03 2015
Faruqi & Faruqi, LLP Announces Filing of a Class Action Lawsuit Against Crestwood Midstream Partners... Jul 30 2015
Crestwood Equity Announces Quarterly Distribution and Schedules Second Quarter 2015 Earnings Release... Jul 23 2015
Crestwood Midstream Announces Quarterly Distribution and Schedules Second Quarter 2015 Earnings... Jul 23 2015
Crestwood Midstream Announces Quarterly Distribution and Schedules Second Quarter 2015 Earnings... Jul 23 2015
Phillips 66 Partners’ Losing Streak Continues on Tuesday, July 14 Jul 15 2015

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
FEEDBACK