Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 1.17
CMT's Cash to Debt is ranked higher than
58% of the 1251 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 0.72 vs. CMT: 1.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
CMT' s Cash to Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0.19 Max: 2.22
Current: 1.17
0
2.22
Equity to Asset 0.66
CMT's Equity to Asset is ranked higher than
77% of the 1232 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 0.49 vs. CMT: 0.66 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
CMT' s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.26  Med: 0.38 Max: 0.69
Current: 0.66
0.26
0.69
Interest Coverage 47.50
CMT's Interest Coverage is ranked higher than
76% of the 935 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 10.83 vs. CMT: 47.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
CMT' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.61  Med: 28.42 Max: 120.06
Current: 47.5
2.61
120.06
F-Score: 7
Z-Score: 4.37
M-Score: -2.86
WACC vs ROIC
8.81%
12.69%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 9.26
CMT's Operating margin (%) is ranked higher than
73% of the 1242 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 5.26 vs. CMT: 9.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
CMT' s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.98  Med: 7.79 Max: 11.81
Current: 9.26
2.98
11.81
Net-margin (%) 6.02
CMT's Net-margin (%) is ranked higher than
67% of the 1243 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 3.76 vs. CMT: 6.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
CMT' s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.22  Med: 4.94 Max: 7.34
Current: 6.02
1.22
7.34
ROE (%) 13.67
CMT's ROE (%) is ranked higher than
69% of the 1223 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 8.52 vs. CMT: 13.67 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
CMT' s ROE (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.44  Med: 14.02 Max: 27.1
Current: 13.67
3.44
27.1
ROA (%) 8.70
CMT's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
80% of the 1261 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 3.98 vs. CMT: 8.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
CMT' s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.33  Med: 8.59 Max: 12.72
Current: 8.7
1.33
12.72
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 17.81
CMT's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
60% of the 1258 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 13.17 vs. CMT: 17.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
CMT' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.43  Med: 18.48 Max: 39.78
Current: 17.81
4.43
39.78
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) 5.90
CMT's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
60% of the 1114 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 3.30 vs. CMT: 5.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CMT' s Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -7.9  Med: 6.05 Max: 21.7
Current: 5.9
-7.9
21.7
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) 11.80
CMT's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
64% of the 1012 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 6.50 vs. CMT: 11.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CMT' s EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -42.3  Med: 11.65 Max: 66.1
Current: 11.8
-42.3
66.1
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) 12.50
CMT's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
60% of the 888 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 6.60 vs. CMT: 12.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CMT' s EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -47  Med: 16.90 Max: 208.2
Current: 12.5
-47
208.2
» CMT's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Oprt. Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2015

CMT Guru Trades in Q2 2015

Jim Simons 397,500 sh (+46.52%)
Mario Gabelli 298,119 sh (-13.79%)
» More
Q3 2015

CMT Guru Trades in Q3 2015

Mario Gabelli 293,000 sh (-1.72%)
Jim Simons 326,900 sh (-17.76%)
» More
Q4 2015

CMT Guru Trades in Q4 2015

Jim Simons 315,099 sh (-3.61%)
Mario Gabelli 277,900 sh (-5.15%)
» More
Q1 2016

CMT Guru Trades in Q1 2016

Mario Gabelli 277,900 sh (unchged)
Jim Simons 304,100 sh (-3.49%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with CMT

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Autos » Rubber & Plastics
Compare:OTCPK:PLTYF, NAS:CXDC, NAS:DSWL, NAS:CTIB, OTCPK:SHKGF, OTCPK:GLGI, OTCPK:VYST, OTCPK:CSHEF, OTCPK:AMTY, OTCPK:STCC, OTCPK:NNAN, OTCPK:ABSSF, NYSE:MYE, NAS:AEPI, NYSE:TG, NYSE:WMS, OTCPK:TGLVY, NYSE:CTB, OTCPK:TOTRF, NYSE:TSE » details
Traded in other countries:XQN.Germany,
Core Molding Technologies Inc along with its subsidiaries operates in the plastics market in a family of products known as reinforced plastics. The Company is a manufacturer of sheet molding compound and molder of fiberglass reinforced plastics.

Core Molding Technologies Inc was incorporated in 1996. The Company, along with its subsidiaries, operates in the plastics market in a family of products known as reinforced plastics. The Company is a manufacturer of sheet molding compound (SMC) and molder of fiberglass reinforced plastics. The Company is engaged in the manufacture of large-format moldings and fiberglass processes, including compression molding of SMC, glass mat thermoplastics (GMT) and bulk molding compounds (BMC); spray-up, hand-lay-up, and resin transfer molding (RTM). Additionally, the Company offers reaction injection molding (RIM), utilizing dicyclopentadiene technology. The Company operates four production facilities in Columbus, Ohio; Batavia, Ohio; Gaffney, South Carolina; and Matamoros, Mexico. The Company operates in one business segment as a manufacturer of SMC and molder of fiberglass reinforced plastics. The Company produces and sells SMC and molded products for markets, including light, medium, and heavy-duty trucks, automobiles and automotive aftermarket, marine, construction and other commercial products. The principal raw materials used in the compounding of SMC and the closed and open molding processes are polyester, vinyl ester and epoxy resins, fiberglass rovings, and filler. Other significant raw materials include adhesives for assembly of molded components, in-mold coating, gel-coat, prime paint for preparation of cosmetic surfaces, and hardware (steel components). The raw materials used by the Company include crude oil based, natural gas based and downstream components. The Company's customers include, Navistar, Volvo Group, PACCAR Inc. and Yamaha Motor Manufacturing Corporation of America. The Company faces competition from other molders including, Molded Fiber Glass Companies, Continental Structural Plastics, Ashley Industrial Molding, Sigma Industries and The Composites Group. The Company's manufacturing operations are subject to federal, state, and local environmental laws and regulations.

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/E(ttm) 8.51
CMT's P/E(ttm) is ranked higher than
76% of the 1004 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 14.60 vs. CMT: 8.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/E(ttm) only.
CMT' s P/E(ttm) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.06  Med: 10.50 Max: 33.84
Current: 8.51
2.06
33.84
Forward P/E 24.94
CMT's Forward P/E is ranked lower than
95% of the 112 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 10.31 vs. CMT: 24.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward P/E only.
N/A
PE(NRI) 8.51
CMT's PE(NRI) is ranked higher than
76% of the 1010 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 14.79 vs. CMT: 8.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE(NRI) only.
CMT' s PE(NRI) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.06  Med: 10.49 Max: 34.45
Current: 8.51
2.06
34.45
Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) 6.40
CMT's Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) is ranked higher than
82% of the 536 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 15.07 vs. CMT: 6.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) only.
CMT' s Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.02  Med: 9.83 Max: 742.5
Current: 6.4
2.02
742.5
P/B 1.11
CMT's P/B is ranked higher than
58% of the 1209 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.43 vs. CMT: 1.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
CMT' s P/B Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.31  Med: 1.27 Max: 2.62
Current: 1.11
0.31
2.62
P/S 0.52
CMT's P/S is ranked higher than
58% of the 1225 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 0.68 vs. CMT: 0.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
CMT' s P/S Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.08  Med: 0.47 Max: 1.14
Current: 0.52
0.08
1.14
PFCF 5.30
CMT's PFCF is ranked higher than
86% of the 456 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 13.35 vs. CMT: 5.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PFCF only.
CMT' s PFCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.33  Med: 12.61 Max: 988.67
Current: 5.3
4.33
988.67
POCF 4.13
CMT's POCF is ranked higher than
76% of the 634 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 7.46 vs. CMT: 4.13 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
CMT' s POCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.84  Med: 5.24 Max: 51.45
Current: 4.13
0.84
51.45
EV-to-EBIT 5.51
CMT's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
84% of the 1034 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 11.99 vs. CMT: 5.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
CMT' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.9  Med: 7.00 Max: 25.4
Current: 5.51
2.9
25.4
EV-to-EBITDA 4.08
CMT's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
84% of the 1085 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 8.47 vs. CMT: 4.08 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
CMT' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.1  Med: 5.00 Max: 10.5
Current: 4.08
2.1
10.5
PEG 0.82
CMT's PEG is ranked higher than
66% of the 551 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.41 vs. CMT: 0.82 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG only.
CMT' s PEG Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.11  Med: 0.58 Max: 7.96
Current: 0.82
0.11
7.96
Shiller P/E 13.52
CMT's Shiller P/E is ranked higher than
75% of the 194 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 25.43 vs. CMT: 13.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller P/E only.
CMT' s Shiller P/E Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.46  Med: 14.03 Max: 31.25
Current: 13.52
3.46
31.25
Current Ratio 2.27
CMT's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
73% of the 1108 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.56 vs. CMT: 2.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
CMT' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.19  Med: 1.87 Max: 2.84
Current: 2.27
1.19
2.84
Quick Ratio 1.79
CMT's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
75% of the 1108 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.12 vs. CMT: 1.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
CMT' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.88  Med: 1.42 Max: 2.41
Current: 1.79
0.88
2.41
Days Inventory 29.71
CMT's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
82% of the 1202 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 58.68 vs. CMT: 29.71 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
CMT' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 20.24  Med: 30.02 Max: 42.5
Current: 29.71
20.24
42.5
Days Sales Outstanding 59.83
CMT's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
50% of the 1014 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 59.83 vs. CMT: 59.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
CMT' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 32.86  Med: 52.98 Max: 71.58
Current: 59.83
32.86
71.58
Days Payable 21.73
CMT's Days Payable is ranked lower than
84% of the 990 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 51.98 vs. CMT: 21.73 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
CMT' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 18.36  Med: 28.68 Max: 31.55
Current: 21.73
18.36
31.55

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Net Current Asset Value 6.76
CMT's Price/Net Current Asset Value is ranked lower than
59% of the 535 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 4.92 vs. CMT: 6.76 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Net Current Asset Value only.
CMT' s Price/Net Current Asset Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.22  Med: 12.44 Max: 184
Current: 6.76
6.22
184
Price/Tangible Book 1.17
CMT's Price/Tangible Book is ranked higher than
60% of the 1172 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.57 vs. CMT: 1.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
CMT' s Price/Tangible Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.35  Med: 1.29 Max: 3.42
Current: 1.17
0.35
3.42
Price/Projected FCF 0.72
CMT's Price/Projected FCF is ranked higher than
70% of the 613 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.11 vs. CMT: 0.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Projected FCF only.
CMT' s Price/Projected FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.15  Med: 0.90 Max: 2.08
Current: 0.72
0.15
2.08
Price/Median PS Value 1.10
CMT's Price/Median PS Value is ranked lower than
52% of the 1182 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.08 vs. CMT: 1.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
CMT' s Price/Median PS Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.18  Med: 0.86 Max: 1.88
Current: 1.1
0.18
1.88
Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value 1.47
CMT's Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value is ranked lower than
68% of the 335 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.01 vs. CMT: 1.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value only.
CMT' s Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.14  Med: 0.55 Max: 5.93
Current: 1.47
0.14
5.93
Price/Graham Number 0.67
CMT's Price/Graham Number is ranked higher than
70% of the 839 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 1.04 vs. CMT: 0.67 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Graham Number only.
CMT' s Price/Graham Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.19  Med: 0.82 Max: 2.94
Current: 0.67
0.19
2.94
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) 18.17
CMT's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
87% of the 1241 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 7.00 vs. CMT: 18.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
CMT' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.9  Med: 14.30 Max: 34.3
Current: 18.17
3.9
34.3
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) 10.90
CMT's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked higher than
62% of the 685 Companies
in the Global Rubber & Plastics industry.

( Industry Median: 5.44 vs. CMT: 10.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
CMT' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.5  Med: 20.00 Max: 48.9
Current: 10.9
1.5
48.9

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $194.9
EPS (TTM) $ 1.55
Beta1.02
Short Percentage of Float5.29%
52-Week Range $9.23 - 23.71
Shares Outstanding (Mil)7.71

Analyst Estimate

Dec16 Dec17
Revenue (Mil $) 176 178
EPS ($) 0.54 0.58
EPS w/o NRI ($) 0.54 0.58
EPS Growth Rate
(3Y to 5Y Estimate)
N/A
» More Articles for CMT

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Tweedy Browne's Recent Stock Purchases Still Try to Follow Graham's Philosophy During the Market's A Nov 13 2014 
Give It Away, Give It Away, Give It Away Now! Aug 22 2013 
Strattec Security Corporation: A Potential Double from Today's Price Jan 25 2013 
Core Molding Technology May 08 2012 
Core Molding Technologies Inc. Reports Operating Results (10-Q) Nov 15 2010 

More From Other Websites
CORE MOLDING TECHNOLOGIES INC Files SEC form 8-K, Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement,... Jun 22 2016
ETF’s with exposure to Core Molding Technologies, Inc. : June 20, 2016 Jun 20 2016
Core Molding Technologies, Inc. :CMT-US: Earnings Analysis: Q1, 2016 By the Numbers May 18 2016
CORE MOLDING TECHNOLOGIES INC Financials May 17 2016
CORE MOLDING TECHNOLOGIES INC Files SEC form 8-K, Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security... May 12 2016
CORE MOLDING TECHNOLOGIES INC Files SEC form 8-K, Results of Operations and Financial Condition,... May 09 2016
CORE MOLDING TECHNOLOGIES REPORTS FIRST QUARTER 2016 RESULTS May 09 2016
Core Molding Technologies Reports First Quarter 2016 Results May 09 2016
CORE MOLDING TECHNOLOGIES INC Files SEC form 8-K, Regulation FD Disclosure, Financial Statements and... Apr 11 2016
CORE MOLDING TECHNOLOGIES INC Files SEC form 10-K, Annual Report Mar 11 2016
CORE MOLDING TECHNOLOGIES INC Files SEC form 8-K, Results of Operations and Financial Condition,... Mar 10 2016
Core Molding Technologies Reports Results for the 2015 Fourth Quarter and Full Year Mar 10 2016
Core Molding Technologies, Inc. Earnings Analysis: Q3, 2015 By the Numbers Dec 22 2015
Should You Buy Core Molding Technologies, Inc. (CMT)? Nov 26 2015
CORE MOLDING TECHNOLOGIES REPORTS RESULTS FOR THE THIRD QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 Nov 11 2015
CORE MOLDING TECHNOLOGIES INC Files SEC form 10-Q, Quarterly Report Nov 06 2015
CORE MOLDING TECHNOLOGIES INC Files SEC form 8-K, Results of Operations and Financial Condition,... Nov 05 2015
Core Molding Technologies posts 3Q profit Nov 05 2015
Core Molding Technologies Reports Results for the Third Quarter Ended September 30, 2015 Nov 05 2015
ETF’s with exposure to Core Molding Technologies, Inc. : September 14, 2015 Sep 14 2015

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)