Switch to:

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 2.25
COH's Cash to Debt is ranked higher than
61% of the 895 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 0.91 vs. COH: 2.25 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
COH' s 10-Year Cash to Debt Range
Min: 0.01  Med: 30.88 Max: N/A
Current: 2.25
Equity to Asset 0.56
COH's Equity to Asset is ranked higher than
63% of the 838 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 0.47 vs. COH: 0.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
COH' s 10-Year Equity to Asset Range
Min: 0.45  Med: 0.66 Max: 0.81
Current: 0.56
0.45
0.81
Interest Coverage No Debt
COH's Interest Coverage is ranked higher than
97% of the 577 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 42.72 vs. COH: No Debt )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
COH' s 10-Year Interest Coverage Range
Min: 45.03  Med: 126.13 Max: 9999.99
Current: No Debt
45.03
9999.99
F-Score: 5
Z-Score: 4.63
M-Score: -3.41
WACC vs ROIC
2.26%
28.71%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 15.70
COH's Operating margin (%) is ranked higher than
90% of the 894 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 3.52 vs. COH: 15.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
COH' s 10-Year Operating margin (%) Range
Min: 3.89  Med: 30.09 Max: 38.03
Current: 15.7
3.89
38.03
Net-margin (%) 10.78
COH's Net-margin (%) is ranked higher than
88% of the 894 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 2.37 vs. COH: 10.78 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
COH' s 10-Year Net-margin (%) Range
Min: 3.34  Med: 19.30 Max: 25.4
Current: 10.78
3.34
25.4
ROE (%) 18.93
COH's ROE (%) is ranked higher than
80% of the 881 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 7.10 vs. COH: 18.93 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
COH' s 10-Year ROE (%) Range
Min: 8.57  Med: 42.34 Max: 57.63
Current: 18.93
8.57
57.63
ROA (%) 12.23
COH's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
88% of the 901 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 3.11 vs. COH: 12.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
COH' s 10-Year ROA (%) Range
Min: 6.19  Med: 28.92 Max: 36.2
Current: 12.23
6.19
36.2
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 67.55
COH's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
88% of the 897 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 13.75 vs. COH: 67.55 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
COH' s 10-Year ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range
Min: 82.12  Med: 172.45 Max: 218.6
Current: 67.55
82.12
218.6
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) 7.50
COH's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
69% of the 722 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 2.80 vs. COH: 7.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
COH' s 10-Year Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: 0  Med: 17.95 Max: 28.8
Current: 7.5
0
28.8
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) -0.50
COH's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
54% of the 599 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 2.20 vs. COH: -0.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
COH' s 10-Year EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: -0.5  Med: 33.50 Max: 84.6
Current: -0.5
-0.5
84.6
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) -1.50
COH's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
51% of the 555 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: -1.30 vs. COH: -1.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
COH' s 10-Year EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: -1.5  Med: 34.60 Max: 58.7
Current: -1.5
-1.5
58.7
» COH's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Guru Trades

Q3 2014

COH Guru Trades in Q3 2014

John Buckingham 181,399 sh (+421.10%)
David Dreman 11,904 sh (+35.03%)
David Rolfe 8,533,938 sh (+8.76%)
James Barrow 315,785 sh (+0.34%)
Brian Rogers 2,000,000 sh (unchged)
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Jeff Auxier 67,300 sh (-0.15%)
Dodge & Cox 17,487,956 sh (-0.17%)
John Rogers 1,615,879 sh (-13.81%)
Joel Greenblatt 645,552 sh (-23.22%)
Jeremy Grantham 731,014 sh (-48.77%)
John Hussman 104,750 sh (-65.63%)
Jim Simons 23,400 sh (-98.49%)
» More
Q4 2014

COH Guru Trades in Q4 2014

Ray Dalio 55,485 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 11,171 sh (New)
Caxton Associates 140,000 sh (New)
Jim Simons 1,156,600 sh (+4842.74%)
David Rolfe 9,961,501 sh (+16.73%)
John Buckingham 182,162 sh (+0.42%)
David Dreman 11,922 sh (+0.15%)
Dodge & Cox 17,489,761 sh (+0.01%)
Brian Rogers 2,000,000 sh (unchged)
John Hussman Sold Out
James Barrow Sold Out
Jeff Auxier 67,150 sh (-0.22%)
John Rogers 1,455,109 sh (-9.95%)
Jeremy Grantham 552,929 sh (-24.36%)
Joel Greenblatt 319,489 sh (-50.51%)
» More
Q1 2015

COH Guru Trades in Q1 2015

Tom Gayner 18,000 sh (New)
David Rolfe 10,436,200 sh (+4.77%)
John Buckingham 183,355 sh (+0.65%)
Brian Rogers 2,000,000 sh (unchged)
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Ray Dalio Sold Out
Dodge & Cox 17,259,611 sh (-1.32%)
David Dreman 9,329 sh (-21.75%)
Jeremy Grantham 408,729 sh (-26.08%)
Caxton Associates 100,000 sh (-28.57%)
John Rogers 1,013,471 sh (-30.35%)
Joel Greenblatt 216,940 sh (-32.10%)
Jeff Auxier 26,970 sh (-59.84%)
Jim Simons 34,000 sh (-97.06%)
» More
Q2 2015

COH Guru Trades in Q2 2015

Brian Rogers 2,000,000 sh (unchged)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with COH

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Guru Investment Theses on Coach Inc

David Rolfe Comments on Coach - Jul 25, 2014

Coach (COH) shares significantly declined during the quarter and have been a relative detractor since we first began purchasing shares in July 2012. With clearer hindsight, where did we go wrong on our initial timing? Our view then was that the Company's lackluster North American sales slump was largely due to a pause in creative new product. Thus, our initial investment in these shares came far too early in the Company's efforts to reinvigorate their iconic brand.

Of course, the journey in our ownership in Coach, thus far, has been long...and wrong. When we initiated Coach, we recognized that there was increasing competitive encroachment in the North American handbag and accessories market. However, we underestimated the aggressive expansion of Coach’s competitors, as well as the pernicious effects of brand underinvestment during the previous business cycle. The core risk of Coach has been centered on its North American business, which has been losing share over the past, roughly 3 years. Competitors Michael Kors, Kate Spade and Tory Burch have all successfully copied key aspects of the high return on capital Coach playbook, and now the original progenitor of "accessible luxury" now finds itself at the crossroads of not only redefining and rebuilding its own brand, but fighting off it's well entrenched progeny. We still think Coach has a sustainable competitive advantage, and we do not think that the competitive inroads of Coach's peer group are sustainable over the next 3 to 5 years.

In our view, the Company’s competitors have expanded too quickly and will soon reach a point of saturation. For instance, Michael Kors reported roughly $400 million in sales for its fiscal 2009; the Company recently guided to just above $4 billion in sales for the period ending June 2015 - a roughly ten-fold increase in just six years. For more perspective, consider the growth of the Company’s well-known peers: Burberry - an iconic affordable luxury brand that is over 100 years old - eclipsed $400 million in sales 2001. According to IBES estimates, the Company will surpass $4 billion in March 2017. In other words, it has taken Burberry, roughly 16 years to go from $400 million to $4 billion in sales. But that's actually about normal: Ralph Lauren took at least 15 years. Coach: 16 years. Hermes: 22 years, and Tiffany's: 25 years. All told, we think the exclusivity of the Kors value proposition is at risk, and therefore not sustainable.

We attended Coach's Investor Day last month in New York. Over the course of the Company's four-hour presentation we found ourselves nodding our head in agreement as the Company addressed mistakes and shortcomings in their current brand and marketing strategy. We agree too that the Company's comprehensive remedies are welcome news for frustrated shareholders. However, as we sat throughout the detailed presentations from all of the Company's top executives it became quite clear that the "fix” at Coach will be very expensive, inducing a sharp decline in the Company's earnings power over the next 12-18 months - and the projected brand and earnings renewal won't be quick. In fact, the fix will take a few years to fully complete in order for the Company to reclaim their once vaunted industry leading profitability.

While the effects of these competitive pressures and unforced-errors are being felt by shareholders today, we still think Coach’s steady-state earnings power over the next three to fives years will be significantly higher compared to what the business will earn over the next 12-18 months. Further, the Company’s international segment continues to grow at a robust pace, as their revenues represent still small share of each of their geographical addressable markets. We believe the success of the Company’s growth efforts in China and Europe, combined with flat market share in the more mature Japanese market, and a robust balance sheet, is enough to justify a substantial portion of the current market capitalization.

Several months ago, Coach embarked on an aggressive plan to reinvest in the brand and buttress its competitive positioning in North America. We think this is very necessary after years of underinvestment. This reinvestment plan has included the hiring of a new head of creative, and repositioning the brand by curtailing dilutive impressions, particularly by closing underperforming stores and online "flash-sales" as well as elevating flagship full-price stores to dictate Coach's value proposition of modern luxury. While these investments have hurt sales growth over the past 6 months and will continue to do so for the next 12 months, we think it will lead to a healthier brand impression and a much higher, sustainable level of earnings power in 3 to 5 years.

In our opinion, the Company's competitive positioning remains relatively unassailed in its international markets - especially in faster growing markets, such as Greater China. As the North American business remains challenged, we expect international will come to represent 40% or more of revenues.

We look at future earnings power, particularly over the next 3 to 5 years. While we underestimated the rate of competitive incursion and its effects on Coach's business in the near-term, we still think Coach has the ability to post earnings that are two to three times higher than trough earnings estimates, over the next 3 to 5 years. The Company's total addressable market is expanding at a robust mid to high-single digit rate and should be close to $50 billion in 5 years. We expect that the negative leverage from the Company's aggressive reinvestment will subside over the next 12 to 18 months, and double-digit earnings growth will resume.

Despite the planned sales declines and a dramatic increase in overhead (as a percent of revenues), Coach is still immensely profitable. This speaks to the Company's financial strength and competitive positioning. Currently, we estimate the market is assigning a $2.5 billion value to the Company's North American business - we expect sales in North America to bottom around a similar level, leading to a price to sales multiple of just 1X. We believe that a 1X price/sales is much too low for a Company that has a profitability profile and growth opportunities similar to Coach. That said, our valuation assumptions for North America are predicated on the continued success of Coach's international franchise. In addition, the Company remains dedicated to paying its current dividend, which is nearing a 4% yield. If Coach runs into difficulties overseas, there is a good chance we will move on, as the international business is the financial engine that will drive the near-term transformation in North America and support the Company's fortress balance sheet. Last, and as always, if we find a meaningfully more attractive risk-reward opportunity, we will sell Coach.

Philosophically, we expect stocks to track in-line with earnings growth, over a multi- year time horizon. We continue to think that the Company's aggressive reinvestment in the brand will yield earnings that are at least twice as high as today, particularly over the next 3 to 5 years. All told, we believe that the market has amply discounted the North American business at current prices and that the shares offer an excellent risk-reward profile at current valuations, so we added to positions.

From David Rolfe (Trades, Portfolio)’s Wedgewood Partners Second Quarter 2014 Client Letter.

Check out David Rolfe latest stock trades

John Rogers Comments on Coach Inc. - May 07, 2014

A few of our holdings struggled at quarter end. Specialty retailing Coach, Inc. (COH) de clined –10.91% after missing expectations. The company reported EPS of $1.06 after making $1.23 per share last year. Consensus had been $1.11. The main culprit was lower traffic in retail stores. It has been a very difficult winter for many retailers, but for Coach the more important issue is its st yle turnaround. Stuart Vevers, the new creative director, has his first complete line appearing this spring and hitting stores next fall. As long- term investors, a six-month waiting period is not difficult, but obviously, Wall Street is less patient than we are. We believe the company will emerge with its brand largely intact, new products to captivate customers and better financial results to follow.



From John Rogers (Trades, Portfolio)' Ariel Appreciation Fund first quarter 2014 letter.

Check out John Rogers latest stock trades

David Rolfe Comments on Coach - Oct 22, 2013

Coach (COH)

Coach's stock retreated from gains experienced during the 2 nd Quarter as the Company's same store sales (SSS) in North America disappointed the market. While we pay attention to the trajectory of North American SSS, we are more interested in the Company's consolidated growth and profitability. We think Coach continues to have robust opportunity on both scores as they penetrate markets that are underserved by affordable luxury players and also expand the brand into new product categories in more established markets. We think the Company's peer-leading profitability will be maintained as it continues to own and operate the distribution fronts for nearly 90% of its revenue, a quarter of which we estimate is generated in markets where western luxury competitors have little or no presence, due to a lack of brand awareness and/or distribution capabilities.

From David Rolfe's Wedgewood Partners third quarter 2013 commentary.


Check out David Rolfe latest stock trades

Top Ranked Articles about Coach Inc

Tom Gayner Buys 4 New Stocks in First Quarter
Tom Gayner (Trades, Portfolio) manages the investing side of Markel Corp, a specialty insurance and financial holding company. A value investor, he looks at each stock as a piece of a business. Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/E(ttm) 18.50
COH's P/E(ttm) is ranked higher than
62% of the 651 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 22.80 vs. COH: 18.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/E(ttm) only.
COH' s 10-Year P/E(ttm) Range
Min: 5.65  Med: 18.39 Max: 39.03
Current: 18.5
5.65
39.03
Forward P/E 16.05
COH's Forward P/E is ranked lower than
54% of the 379 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 15.27 vs. COH: 16.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward P/E only.
N/A
PE(NRI) 18.60
COH's PE(NRI) is ranked higher than
61% of the 648 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 22.60 vs. COH: 18.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE(NRI) only.
COH' s 10-Year PE(NRI) Range
Min: 5.65  Med: 18.39 Max: 39.08
Current: 18.6
5.65
39.08
P/B 3.39
COH's P/B is ranked lower than
72% of the 860 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.76 vs. COH: 3.39 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
COH' s 10-Year P/B Range
Min: 2.46  Med: 7.81 Max: 13.16
Current: 3.39
2.46
13.16
P/S 2.00
COH's P/S is ranked lower than
80% of the 896 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 0.71 vs. COH: 2.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
COH' s 10-Year P/S Range
Min: 1.21  Med: 3.72 Max: 8.52
Current: 2
1.21
8.52
PFCF 9.90
COH's PFCF is ranked higher than
79% of the 457 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 20.15 vs. COH: 9.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PFCF only.
COH' s 10-Year PFCF Range
Min: 6.63  Med: 16.83 Max: 38.93
Current: 9.9
6.63
38.93
POCF 8.10
COH's POCF is ranked higher than
72% of the 611 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 13.53 vs. COH: 8.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
COH' s 10-Year POCF Range
Min: 4.54  Med: 13.88 Max: 29.68
Current: 8.1
4.54
29.68
EV-to-EBIT 11.27
COH's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
68% of the 714 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 15.54 vs. COH: 11.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
COH' s 10-Year EV-to-EBIT Range
Min: 3.2  Med: 11.20 Max: 25.5
Current: 11.27
3.2
25.5
PEG 2.11
COH's PEG is ranked lower than
54% of the 303 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.98 vs. COH: 2.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG only.
COH' s 10-Year PEG Range
Min: 0.19  Med: 0.91 Max: 7.14
Current: 2.11
0.19
7.14
Shiller P/E 10.44
COH's Shiller P/E is ranked higher than
83% of the 472 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 21.97 vs. COH: 10.44 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller P/E only.
COH' s 10-Year Shiller P/E Range
Min: 8.14  Med: 21.99 Max: 64.08
Current: 10.44
8.14
64.08
Current Ratio 4.19
COH's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
91% of the 846 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.56 vs. COH: 4.19 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
COH' s 10-Year Current Ratio Range
Min: 1.24  Med: 2.72 Max: 4.69
Current: 4.19
1.24
4.69
Quick Ratio 3.53
COH's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
93% of the 846 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 0.88 vs. COH: 3.53 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
COH' s 10-Year Quick Ratio Range
Min: 0.42  Med: 1.98 Max: 3.79
Current: 3.53
0.42
3.79
Days Inventory 136.51
COH's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
73% of the 854 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 83.72 vs. COH: 136.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
COH' s 10-Year Days Inventory Range
Min: 94.36  Med: 143.82 Max: 186.77
Current: 136.51
94.36
186.77
Days Sales Outstanding 16.62
COH's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
54% of the 724 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 13.34 vs. COH: 16.62 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
COH' s 10-Year Days Sales Outstanding Range
Min: 10.35  Med: 13.37 Max: 15.69
Current: 16.62
10.35
15.69

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield 4.33
COH's Dividend Yield is ranked higher than
86% of the 991 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.92 vs. COH: 4.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield only.
COH' s 10-Year Dividend Yield Range
Min: 0.25  Med: 1.65 Max: 4.44
Current: 4.33
0.25
4.44
Dividend Payout 0.80
COH's Dividend Payout is ranked higher than
76% of the 610 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 0.42 vs. COH: 0.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout only.
COH' s 10-Year Dividend Payout Range
Min: 0.1  Med: 0.31 Max: 1.24
Current: 0.8
0.1
1.24
Dividend growth (3y) 26.00
COH's Dividend growth (3y) is ranked higher than
89% of the 371 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 4.90 vs. COH: 26.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend growth (3y) only.
COH' s 10-Year Dividend growth (3y) Range
Min: 0  Med: 0.00 Max: 135.1
Current: 26
0
135.1
Yield on cost (5-Year) 60.05
COH's Yield on cost (5-Year) is ranked higher than
100% of the 1009 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 2.35 vs. COH: 60.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Yield on cost (5-Year) only.
COH' s 10-Year Yield on cost (5-Year) Range
Min: 3.47  Med: 22.60 Max: 61.57
Current: 60.05
3.47
61.57
Share Buyback Rate 2.40
COH's Share Buyback Rate is ranked higher than
87% of the 526 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: -0.60 vs. COH: 2.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Share Buyback Rate only.
COH' s 10-Year Share Buyback Rate Range
Min: 5.8  Med: 1.55 Max: -9.9
Current: 2.4

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Net Cash 173.34
COH's Price/Net Cash is ranked lower than
95% of the 81 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 14.21 vs. COH: 173.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Net Cash only.
COH' s 10-Year Price/Net Cash Range
Min: 27.39  Med: 75.85 Max: 1427.25
Current: 173.34
27.39
1427.25
Price/Net Current Asset Value 9.32
COH's Price/Net Current Asset Value is ranked lower than
67% of the 369 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 5.12 vs. COH: 9.32 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Net Current Asset Value only.
COH' s 10-Year Price/Net Current Asset Value Range
Min: 11.76  Med: 19.73 Max: 42.91
Current: 9.32
11.76
42.91
Price/Tangible Book 3.87
COH's Price/Tangible Book is ranked lower than
70% of the 796 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 2.10 vs. COH: 3.87 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
COH' s 10-Year Price/Tangible Book Range
Min: 4.26  Med: 10.27 Max: 15.76
Current: 3.87
4.26
15.76
Price/Projected FCF 0.72
COH's Price/Projected FCF is ranked higher than
77% of the 409 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.29 vs. COH: 0.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Projected FCF only.
COH' s 10-Year Price/Projected FCF Range
Min: 0.64  Med: 1.20 Max: 4.04
Current: 0.72
0.64
4.04
Price/DCF (Earnings Based) 0.75
COH's Price/DCF (Earnings Based) is ranked higher than
83% of the 84 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.19 vs. COH: 0.75 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/DCF (Earnings Based) only.
N/A
Price/Median PS Value 0.53
COH's Price/Median PS Value is ranked higher than
87% of the 702 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.07 vs. COH: 0.53 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
COH' s 10-Year Price/Median PS Value Range
Min: 0.46  Med: 0.97 Max: 2.14
Current: 0.53
0.46
2.14
Price/Graham Number 1.78
COH's Price/Graham Number is ranked lower than
54% of the 489 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.57 vs. COH: 1.78 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Graham Number only.
COH' s 10-Year Price/Graham Number Range
Min: 1.21  Med: 3.09 Max: 5.14
Current: 1.78
1.21
5.14
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) 8.90
COH's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
74% of the 882 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 5.20 vs. COH: 8.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
COH' s 10-Year Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range
Min: 3.9  Med: 8.90 Max: 31.1
Current: 8.9
3.9
31.1
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) 8.84
COH's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked higher than
59% of the 502 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 5.76 vs. COH: 8.84 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
COH' s 10-Year Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range
Min: 6  Med: 21.80 Max: 50.5
Current: 8.84
6
50.5

Analyst Estimate

Jun15 Jun16 Jun17
Revenue(Mil) 4,183 4,210 4,460
EPS($) 1.89 2.07 2.07
EPS without NRI($) 1.89 2.07 2.07

Business Description

Industry: Retail - Apparel & Specialty » Luxury Goods
Compare:LVMUY, CFRUY, HESAY, PPRUY, PRDSY » details
Traded in other countries:06388.Hongkong, COY.Germany,
Coach Inc was incorporated in the state of Maryland on June 1, 2000. The Company is a New York design house of modern luxury accessories and lifestyle collections. Its product offerings, manufactured by third-party suppliers, include women's and men's bags, women's and men's small leather goods, business cases, footwear, wearables including outerwear, watches, weekend and travel accessories, scarves, sunwear, fragrance, jewelry, travel bags and other lifestyle products. The Company operates in two segments; North America and International. The North America segment includes sales to North American consumers through Coach-operated stores (including the Internet), and sales to wholesale customers and distributors. The International segment includes sales to consumers through Coach-operated stores (including the Internet) and concession shop-in-shops in Japan and mainland China, Coach-operated stores and concession shop-in-shops in Hong Kong, Macau, Singapore, Taiwan, Malaysia, South Korea, the United Kingdom, France, Ireland, Spain, Portugal, Germany and Italy, as well as sales to wholesale customers and distributors in approximately 35 countries. The Company faces competition from European and American luxury brands as well as private label retailers, including some of its wholesale customers. Its imported products are subject to existing or potential duties, tariffs or quotas that may limit the quantity of products that it may import into the U.S. and other countries or may impact the cost of such products.
» More Articles for COH

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Coach: Don’t Beat A Dead Horse Jul 24 2015 
Coach Dividend Hits All-Time High of 4.31% Jul 23 2015 
Qualcomm: A David Rolfe Bargain Stock  Jul 22 2015 
Weekly Three-Year Low Highlights: CM, MRO, CTL, COH Jul 07 2015 
Coach Stock is a Value Trap Jun 27 2015 
Jeff Auxier's Most Undervalued Stocks Jun 15 2015 
Ariel Investments' Top Undervalued Stocks Jun 13 2015 
5-year lows: Fifth Street Finance Corporation, ARMOUR Residential REIT Inc, Adtran Inc, and Coach In Jun 07 2015 
Michael Kors’ Shares Takes The Hit Of A Weak 2016 Outlook May 29 2015 
Pioneer Investments Increases its stake in Estée Lauder May 28 2015 

More From Other Websites
Can Coach (COH) Sustain Earnings Surprise Streak in Q4? - Analyst Blog Jul 31 2015
The week ahead: July employment report Jul 31 2015
VF Corp. Earnings Analysis Q2: By the Numbers Jul 31 2015
TechSmith Launches New Team Collaboration Offering to Its Award-Winning Coach’s Eye App Jul 30 2015
3 Big U.S. Retailers That Could Be Vulnerable to China’s Plunging Stock Market Jul 28 2015
Coach to Host FY15 Fourth Quarter and Year End Earnings Call Jul 28 2015
Coach to Host FY15 Fourth Quarter and Year End Earnings Call Jul 28 2015
Barclays Highlights 'Upside For Some' In Handbag Group, Considers Coach, Kate Spade, Michael Kors Jul 27 2015
RBC Capital Tops the Field in Stock-Picking Jul 25 2015
Raji Khabbaz’s Silver Arrow Is Shorting These Stocks Jul 24 2015
Buckingham's Trade Pair? Coach Upgraded To Neutral, Kors Downgraded To Neutral Jul 23 2015
Coach upgraded by Buckingham Research Jul 23 2015
Customer loyalty: from the S 10 to the S 517 HDH Jul 21 2015
Hot dogs can help offset the Federal Reserve’s interest-rate increases Jul 20 2015
Coach (COH) Stock Gets Price Target, Estimates Reduced at Credit Suisse Jul 17 2015
At Ralph Lauren, the main problem is Ralph Lauren Jul 16 2015
Motor Coach Industries marks new milestone with NJ TRANSIT; Agency places order for 772 MCI Commuter... Jul 15 2015
Meet the female coach breaking barriers in the NBA Jul 14 2015
This Luxury Goods Company Is Poised For A Comeback Jul 10 2015
5 U.S. Stocks With Rising Debt, Falling Revenue Jul 10 2015

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
FEEDBACK