Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany, Hongkong

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 4/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 1.51
COH's Cash to Debt is ranked higher than
61% of the 917 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 0.78 vs. COH: 1.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
COH' s Cash to Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.01  Med: 30.88 Max: N/A
Current: 1.51
Equity to Asset 0.56
COH's Equity to Asset is ranked higher than
64% of the 897 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 0.47 vs. COH: 0.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
COH' s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.45  Med: 0.66 Max: 0.81
Current: 0.56
0.45
0.81
F-Score: 5
Z-Score: 4.39
M-Score: -2.89
WACC vs ROIC
5.14%
21.14%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 13.34
COH's Operating margin (%) is ranked higher than
87% of the 908 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 3.57 vs. COH: 13.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
COH' s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 14.74  Med: 31.56 Max: 38.03
Current: 13.34
14.74
38.03
Net-margin (%) 8.64
COH's Net-margin (%) is ranked higher than
83% of the 908 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 2.26 vs. COH: 8.64 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
COH' s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.6  Med: 20.78 Max: 25.4
Current: 8.64
9.6
25.4
ROE (%) 14.55
COH's ROE (%) is ranked higher than
74% of the 894 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 7.05 vs. COH: 14.55 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
COH' s ROE (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 16.39  Med: 44.98 Max: 57.63
Current: 14.55
16.39
57.63
ROA (%) 8.34
COH's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
79% of the 917 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 3.06 vs. COH: 8.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
COH' s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.66  Med: 31.87 Max: 36.2
Current: 8.34
9.66
36.2
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 59.50
COH's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
86% of the 913 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 13.87 vs. COH: 59.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
COH' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 64.45  Med: 182.84 Max: 218.6
Current: 59.5
64.45
218.6
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) -2.30
COH's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
71% of the 753 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 2.70 vs. COH: -2.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
COH' s Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.3  Med: 17.70 Max: 28.8
Current: -2.3
-2.3
28.8
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) -19.50
COH's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
83% of the 636 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 2.70 vs. COH: -19.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
COH' s EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -19.5  Med: 32.10 Max: 84.6
Current: -19.5
-19.5
84.6
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) -25.60
COH's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
81% of the 590 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.10 vs. COH: -25.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
COH' s EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -25.6  Med: 33.70 Max: 57.9
Current: -25.6
-25.6
57.9
» COH's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Guru Trades

Q1 2015

COH Guru Trades in Q1 2015

Tom Gayner 18,000 sh (New)
David Rolfe 10,436,200 sh (+4.77%)
John Buckingham 183,355 sh (+0.65%)
T Rowe Price Equity Income Fund 2,000,000 sh (unchged)
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Ray Dalio Sold Out
Dodge & Cox 17,259,611 sh (-1.32%)
Jeff Auxier 65,800 sh (-2.01%)
David Dreman 9,329 sh (-21.75%)
Jeremy Grantham 408,729 sh (-26.08%)
Caxton Associates 100,000 sh (-28.57%)
John Rogers 1,013,471 sh (-30.35%)
Joel Greenblatt 216,940 sh (-32.10%)
Jim Simons 34,000 sh (-97.06%)
» More
Q2 2015

COH Guru Trades in Q2 2015

Ray Dalio 110,106 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 7,800 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 2,588,000 sh (New)
Joel Greenblatt 1,467,278 sh (+576.35%)
Tom Gayner 49,000 sh (+172.22%)
Jeremy Grantham 650,729 sh (+59.21%)
David Rolfe 10,941,844 sh (+4.85%)
John Rogers 1,054,493 sh (+4.05%)
John Buckingham 185,816 sh (+1.34%)
Dodge & Cox 17,317,436 sh (+0.34%)
T Rowe Price Equity Income Fund 2,000,000 sh (unchged)
Caxton Associates Sold Out
Jim Simons Sold Out
David Dreman 7,776 sh (-16.65%)
Jeff Auxier 51,000 sh (-22.49%)
» More
Q3 2015

COH Guru Trades in Q3 2015

Robert Olstein 141,000 sh (New)
Jim Simons 1,013,400 sh (New)
Ray Dalio 464,778 sh (+322.12%)
Steven Cohen 3,025,800 sh (+16.92%)
Tom Gayner 54,000 sh (+10.20%)
John Rogers 1,124,993 sh (+6.69%)
Jeremy Grantham 681,988 sh (+4.80%)
John Buckingham 188,571 sh (+1.48%)
Dodge & Cox 17,378,986 sh (+0.36%)
Jeff Auxier 51,000 sh (unchged)
David Dreman 7,776 sh (unchged)
Steven Cohen 100,000 sh (unchged)
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
David Rolfe 10,512,842 sh (-3.92%)
T Rowe Price Equity Income Fund 1,920,000 sh (-4.00%)
Joel Greenblatt 155,330 sh (-89.41%)
» More
Q4 2015

COH Guru Trades in Q4 2015

Ken Heebner 280,000 sh (New)
Chuck Royce 35,700 sh (New)
Robert Olstein 146,000 sh (+3.55%)
John Rogers 1,148,491 sh (+2.09%)
T Rowe Price Equity Income Fund Sold Out
Jim Simons Sold Out
David Dreman Sold Out
Dodge & Cox 17,371,561 sh (-0.04%)
John Buckingham 176,906 sh (-6.19%)
Jeremy Grantham 423,536 sh (-37.90%)
Jeff Auxier 15,820 sh (-68.98%)
Ray Dalio 40,878 sh (-91.20%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with COH

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Guru Investment Theses on Coach Inc

Wedgewood Partners Comments on Coach - Jan 18, 2016

We also exited our positions in Coach (NYSE:COH) as we have seen the Company’s international unit, particularly in China, dramatically slow (on a constant currency basis). Relatively speaking, their results in China are still exceptional. Coach competes well below the price points of higher-end luxury players, and therefore has avoided the negative side effects of the Chinese Government’s corruption crackdown that has curtailed a wide swath of demand for higher-end luxury goods. However, on an absolute basis, we find it marginally more difficult to make the case for Coach’s long-term, double-digit earnings per share growth rate.



From Wedgewood Partners' fourth quarter 2015 client letter.



Check out David Rolfe latest stock trades

David Rolfe Comments on Coach - Jul 25, 2014

Coach (COH) shares significantly declined during the quarter and have been a relative detractor since we first began purchasing shares in July 2012. With clearer hindsight, where did we go wrong on our initial timing? Our view then was that the Company's lackluster North American sales slump was largely due to a pause in creative new product. Thus, our initial investment in these shares came far too early in the Company's efforts to reinvigorate their iconic brand.

Of course, the journey in our ownership in Coach, thus far, has been long...and wrong. When we initiated Coach, we recognized that there was increasing competitive encroachment in the North American handbag and accessories market. However, we underestimated the aggressive expansion of Coach’s competitors, as well as the pernicious effects of brand underinvestment during the previous business cycle. The core risk of Coach has been centered on its North American business, which has been losing share over the past, roughly 3 years. Competitors Michael Kors, Kate Spade and Tory Burch have all successfully copied key aspects of the high return on capital Coach playbook, and now the original progenitor of "accessible luxury" now finds itself at the crossroads of not only redefining and rebuilding its own brand, but fighting off it's well entrenched progeny. We still think Coach has a sustainable competitive advantage, and we do not think that the competitive inroads of Coach's peer group are sustainable over the next 3 to 5 years.

In our view, the Company’s competitors have expanded too quickly and will soon reach a point of saturation. For instance, Michael Kors reported roughly $400 million in sales for its fiscal 2009; the Company recently guided to just above $4 billion in sales for the period ending June 2015 - a roughly ten-fold increase in just six years. For more perspective, consider the growth of the Company’s well-known peers: Burberry - an iconic affordable luxury brand that is over 100 years old - eclipsed $400 million in sales 2001. According to IBES estimates, the Company will surpass $4 billion in March 2017. In other words, it has taken Burberry, roughly 16 years to go from $400 million to $4 billion in sales. But that's actually about normal: Ralph Lauren took at least 15 years. Coach: 16 years. Hermes: 22 years, and Tiffany's: 25 years. All told, we think the exclusivity of the Kors value proposition is at risk, and therefore not sustainable.

We attended Coach's Investor Day last month in New York. Over the course of the Company's four-hour presentation we found ourselves nodding our head in agreement as the Company addressed mistakes and shortcomings in their current brand and marketing strategy. We agree too that the Company's comprehensive remedies are welcome news for frustrated shareholders. However, as we sat throughout the detailed presentations from all of the Company's top executives it became quite clear that the "fix” at Coach will be very expensive, inducing a sharp decline in the Company's earnings power over the next 12-18 months - and the projected brand and earnings renewal won't be quick. In fact, the fix will take a few years to fully complete in order for the Company to reclaim their once vaunted industry leading profitability.

While the effects of these competitive pressures and unforced-errors are being felt by shareholders today, we still think Coach’s steady-state earnings power over the next three to fives years will be significantly higher compared to what the business will earn over the next 12-18 months. Further, the Company’s international segment continues to grow at a robust pace, as their revenues represent still small share of each of their geographical addressable markets. We believe the success of the Company’s growth efforts in China and Europe, combined with flat market share in the more mature Japanese market, and a robust balance sheet, is enough to justify a substantial portion of the current market capitalization.

Several months ago, Coach embarked on an aggressive plan to reinvest in the brand and buttress its competitive positioning in North America. We think this is very necessary after years of underinvestment. This reinvestment plan has included the hiring of a new head of creative, and repositioning the brand by curtailing dilutive impressions, particularly by closing underperforming stores and online "flash-sales" as well as elevating flagship full-price stores to dictate Coach's value proposition of modern luxury. While these investments have hurt sales growth over the past 6 months and will continue to do so for the next 12 months, we think it will lead to a healthier brand impression and a much higher, sustainable level of earnings power in 3 to 5 years.

In our opinion, the Company's competitive positioning remains relatively unassailed in its international markets - especially in faster growing markets, such as Greater China. As the North American business remains challenged, we expect international will come to represent 40% or more of revenues.

We look at future earnings power, particularly over the next 3 to 5 years. While we underestimated the rate of competitive incursion and its effects on Coach's business in the near-term, we still think Coach has the ability to post earnings that are two to three times higher than trough earnings estimates, over the next 3 to 5 years. The Company's total addressable market is expanding at a robust mid to high-single digit rate and should be close to $50 billion in 5 years. We expect that the negative leverage from the Company's aggressive reinvestment will subside over the next 12 to 18 months, and double-digit earnings growth will resume.

Despite the planned sales declines and a dramatic increase in overhead (as a percent of revenues), Coach is still immensely profitable. This speaks to the Company's financial strength and competitive positioning. Currently, we estimate the market is assigning a $2.5 billion value to the Company's North American business - we expect sales in North America to bottom around a similar level, leading to a price to sales multiple of just 1X. We believe that a 1X price/sales is much too low for a Company that has a profitability profile and growth opportunities similar to Coach. That said, our valuation assumptions for North America are predicated on the continued success of Coach's international franchise. In addition, the Company remains dedicated to paying its current dividend, which is nearing a 4% yield. If Coach runs into difficulties overseas, there is a good chance we will move on, as the international business is the financial engine that will drive the near-term transformation in North America and support the Company's fortress balance sheet. Last, and as always, if we find a meaningfully more attractive risk-reward opportunity, we will sell Coach.

Philosophically, we expect stocks to track in-line with earnings growth, over a multi- year time horizon. We continue to think that the Company's aggressive reinvestment in the brand will yield earnings that are at least twice as high as today, particularly over the next 3 to 5 years. All told, we believe that the market has amply discounted the North American business at current prices and that the shares offer an excellent risk-reward profile at current valuations, so we added to positions.

From David Rolfe (Trades, Portfolio)’s Wedgewood Partners Second Quarter 2014 Client Letter.

Check out David Rolfe latest stock trades

John Rogers Comments on Coach Inc. - May 07, 2014

A few of our holdings struggled at quarter end. Specialty retailing Coach, Inc. (COH) de clined –10.91% after missing expectations. The company reported EPS of $1.06 after making $1.23 per share last year. Consensus had been $1.11. The main culprit was lower traffic in retail stores. It has been a very difficult winter for many retailers, but for Coach the more important issue is its st yle turnaround. Stuart Vevers, the new creative director, has his first complete line appearing this spring and hitting stores next fall. As long- term investors, a six-month waiting period is not difficult, but obviously, Wall Street is less patient than we are. We believe the company will emerge with its brand largely intact, new products to captivate customers and better financial results to follow.



From John Rogers (Trades, Portfolio)' Ariel Appreciation Fund first quarter 2014 letter.

Check out John Rogers latest stock trades

Top Ranked Articles about Coach Inc

Wedgewood Partners Comments on Coach Guru stock highlight
We also exited our positions in Coach (NYSE:COH) as we have seen the Company’s international unit, particularly in China, dramatically slow (on a constant currency basis). Relatively speaking, their results in China are still exceptional. Coach competes well below the price points of higher-end luxury players, and therefore has avoided the negative side effects of the Chinese Government’s corruption crackdown that has curtailed a wide swath of demand for higher-end luxury goods. However, on an absolute basis, we find it marginally more difficult to make the case for Coach’s long-term, double-digit earnings per share growth rate. Read more...
Tom Gayner Buys 4 New Stocks in First Quarter
Tom Gayner (Trades, Portfolio) manages the investing side of Markel Corp, a specialty insurance and financial holding company. A value investor, he looks at each stock as a piece of a business. Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/E(ttm) 25.24
COH's P/E(ttm) is ranked lower than
67% of the 1097 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 17.60 vs. COH: 25.24 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/E(ttm) only.
COH' s P/E(ttm) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.67  Med: 18.45 Max: 41.8
Current: 25.24
5.67
41.8
Forward P/E 16.16
COH's Forward P/E is ranked lower than
54% of the 679 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 14.41 vs. COH: 16.16 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward P/E only.
N/A
PE(NRI) 25.24
COH's PE(NRI) is ranked lower than
67% of the 812 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 17.80 vs. COH: 25.24 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE(NRI) only.
COH' s PE(NRI) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.67  Med: 18.48 Max: 41.8
Current: 25.24
5.67
41.8
P/B 3.72
COH's P/B is ranked lower than
91% of the 1158 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.32 vs. COH: 3.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
COH' s P/B Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.46  Med: 7.37 Max: 13.16
Current: 3.72
2.46
13.16
P/S 2.27
COH's P/S is ranked lower than
96% of the 1158 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 0.52 vs. COH: 2.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
COH' s P/S Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.22  Med: 3.55 Max: 8.52
Current: 2.27
1.22
8.52
PFCF 16.77
COH's PFCF is ranked higher than
56% of the 761 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 18.44 vs. COH: 16.77 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PFCF only.
COH' s PFCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.78  Med: 16.37 Max: 38.94
Current: 16.77
6.78
38.94
POCF 11.85
COH's POCF is ranked lower than
51% of the 1023 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 12.39 vs. COH: 11.85 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
COH' s POCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.61  Med: 13.39 Max: 29.68
Current: 11.85
4.61
29.68
EV-to-EBIT 15.90
COH's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
61% of the 1158 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 13.42 vs. COH: 15.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
COH' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.2  Med: 11.30 Max: 25.5
Current: 15.9
3.2
25.5
EV-to-EBITDA 11.78
COH's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
61% of the 1157 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 9.65 vs. COH: 11.78 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
COH' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.9  Med: 9.90 Max: 23.3
Current: 11.78
2.9
23.3
Shiller P/E 13.47
COH's Shiller P/E is ranked higher than
69% of the 356 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 19.41 vs. COH: 13.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller P/E only.
COH' s Shiller P/E Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 11.13  Med: 27.06 Max: 43.77
Current: 13.47
11.13
43.77
Current Ratio 3.13
COH's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
82% of the 903 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.55 vs. COH: 3.13 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
COH' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.24  Med: 2.74 Max: 4.69
Current: 3.13
1.24
4.69
Quick Ratio 2.37
COH's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
86% of the 903 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 0.84 vs. COH: 2.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
COH' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.42  Med: 2.06 Max: 3.79
Current: 2.37
0.42
3.79
Days Inventory 131.99
COH's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
69% of the 863 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 86.91 vs. COH: 131.99 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
COH' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 126.24  Med: 133.35 Max: 168.17
Current: 131.99
126.24
168.17
Days Sales Outstanding 26.15
COH's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
65% of the 692 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 13.65 vs. COH: 26.15 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
COH' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 11.03  Med: 13.00 Max: 19.11
Current: 26.15
11.03
19.11
Days Payable 40.57
COH's Days Payable is ranked lower than
64% of the 712 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 52.46 vs. COH: 40.57 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
COH' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 37.22  Med: 45.57 Max: 67.68
Current: 40.57
37.22
67.68

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield 3.91
COH's Dividend Yield is ranked higher than
74% of the 1050 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 2.31 vs. COH: 3.91 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield only.
COH' s Dividend Yield Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.25  Med: 1.85 Max: 4.75
Current: 3.91
0.25
4.75
Dividend Payout 1.03
COH's Dividend Payout is ranked lower than
76% of the 636 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 0.42 vs. COH: 1.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout only.
COH' s Dividend Payout Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.1  Med: 0.33 Max: 8.45
Current: 1.03
0.1
8.45
Dividend Growth (3y) 11.50
COH's Dividend Growth (3y) is ranked higher than
68% of the 398 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 5.30 vs. COH: 11.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Growth (3y) only.
COH' s Dividend Growth (3y) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0.00 Max: 135.1
Current: 11.5
0
135.1
Forward Dividend Yield 3.91
COH's Forward Dividend Yield is ranked higher than
70% of the 945 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 6.56 vs. COH: 3.91 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield only.
N/A
Yield on cost (5-Year) 13.63
COH's Yield on cost (5-Year) is ranked higher than
94% of the 1070 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 2.84 vs. COH: 13.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Yield on cost (5-Year) only.
COH' s Yield on cost (5-Year) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.87  Med: 6.43 Max: 16.51
Current: 13.63
0.87
16.51
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio 2.00
COH's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
85% of the 517 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: -0.50 vs. COH: 2.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
COH' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -9.9  Med: 2.00 Max: 5.8
Current: 2
-9.9
5.8

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Net Current Asset Value 36.35
COH's Price/Net Current Asset Value is ranked lower than
72% of the 695 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 4.00 vs. COH: 36.35 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Net Current Asset Value only.
COH' s Price/Net Current Asset Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 11.76  Med: 20.17 Max: 42.91
Current: 36.35
11.76
42.91
Price/Tangible Book 5.39
COH's Price/Tangible Book is ranked lower than
73% of the 1157 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.92 vs. COH: 5.39 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
COH' s Price/Tangible Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.26  Med: 10.20 Max: 15.76
Current: 5.39
4.26
15.76
Price/Projected FCF 0.94
COH's Price/Projected FCF is ranked higher than
67% of the 824 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.16 vs. COH: 0.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Projected FCF only.
COH' s Price/Projected FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.64  Med: 1.20 Max: 3.39
Current: 0.94
0.64
3.39
Price/Median PS Value 0.65
COH's Price/Median PS Value is ranked higher than
72% of the 1158 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 0.87 vs. COH: 0.65 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
COH' s Price/Median PS Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.31  Med: 1.02 Max: 2.24
Current: 0.65
0.31
2.24
Price/Graham Number 2.50
COH's Price/Graham Number is ranked lower than
63% of the 1011 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 1.34 vs. COH: 2.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Graham Number only.
COH' s Price/Graham Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.23  Med: 2.88 Max: 5.23
Current: 2.5
1.23
5.23
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) 6.32
COH's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
51% of the 887 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 5.90 vs. COH: 6.32 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
COH' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.9  Med: 8.90 Max: 31.1
Current: 6.32
3.9
31.1
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) 1.64
COH's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked lower than
60% of the 509 Companies
in the Global Luxury Goods industry.

( Industry Median: 5.77 vs. COH: 1.64 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
COH' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.8  Med: 22.50 Max: 72.2
Current: 1.64
0.8
72.2

More Statistics

Revenue(Mil) $4238
EPS $ 1.32
Beta0.49
Short Percentage of Float5.96%
52-Week Range $27.22 - 43.87
Shares Outstanding(Mil)277.70

Analyst Estimate

Jun16 Jun17 Jun18
Revenue(Mil) 4,491 4,723 5,002
EPS($) 1.93 2.14 2.55
EPS without NRI($) 1.93 2.14 2.55

Latest Earnings Webcast

» More Conference Calls

Business Description

Industry: Retail - Apparel & Specialty » Luxury Goods
Compare:LVMUY, CFRUY, HESAY, PPRUY, PRDSY » details
Traded in other countries:COY.Germany, 06388.Hongkong,
Coach Inc was incorporated in the State of Maryland on June 1, 2000. The Company is a New York design house of modern luxury accessories and lifestyle collections. Its product offerings, manufactured by third-party suppliers, include women's and men's bags, women's and men's small leather goods, business cases, footwear, wearables including outerwear, watches, weekend and travel accessories, scarves, sunwear, fragrance, jewelry, travel bags and other lifestyle products. The Company operates in two segments; North America and International. The North America segment includes sales to North American consumers through Coach-operated stores (including the Internet), and sales to wholesale customers and distributors. The International segment includes sales to consumers through Coach-operated stores (including the Internet) and concession shop-in-shops in Japan and mainland China, Coach-operated stores and concession shop-in-shops in Hong Kong, Macau, Singapore, Taiwan, Malaysia, South Korea, the United Kingdom, France, Ireland, Spain, Portugal, Germany and Italy, as well as sales to wholesale customers and distributors in approximately 35 countries. The Company faces competition from European and American luxury brands as well as private label retailers, including some of its wholesale customers. Its imported products are subject to existing or potential duties, tariffs or quotas that may limit the quantity of products that it may import into the U.S. and other countries or may impact the cost of such products.
» More Articles for COH

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Wedgewood Partners Comments on Coach Jan 18 2016 
Dodge & Cox Continues to Buy Shell, Coach, Cisco Jan 12 2016 
Inter Parfums Looks Promising Dec 30 2015 
Michael Kors Is on Sale Dec 23 2015 
Coach Is Poised to Grow Nov 19 2015 
The Best Companies of the Retail Industry - August 2015 Aug 23 2015 
Coach's Opportunity for Growth Aug 03 2015 
Coach: Don’t Beat A Dead Horse Jul 24 2015 
Coach Dividend Hits All-Time High of 4.31% Jul 23 2015 
Qualcomm: A David Rolfe Bargain Stock  Jul 22 2015 

More From Other Websites
COACH INC Financials Feb 09 2016
Handbag maker Longchamp bucks luxury goods slowdown Feb 09 2016
Finding Value Inside Opportunity - Analyst Notes on Twenty-First Century Fox, The Kroger, Coach and... Feb 05 2016
Coach, Kors learn smaller can be better Feb 04 2016
COACH INC Files SEC form 10-Q, Quarterly Report Feb 03 2016
Coach’s Overseas Sales: What Do They Mean for Luxury Brands? Feb 03 2016
Michael Kors -- On Its Way to $60? Feb 03 2016
Coach Maintains Revenue Outlook, Raises Operating Income Guidance Feb 02 2016
Coach to Open Swanky Fifth Avenue Flagship to Raise its Luxury Game Feb 02 2016
Coach Reported Mixed Quarterly Results for Fiscal 2Q16 Feb 02 2016
Analyzing Outliers in the Consumer Space Feb 02 2016
Coach to Open ‘Coach House’ on Fifth Avenue in New York City Feb 02 2016
Coach Leases Space for Flagship Store on NYC's Fifth Avenue Feb 02 2016
Analysts' Actions -- Coach, Fitbit, Netflix, Twitter and More Feb 02 2016
[video]Jim Cramer's Top Takeaways: Coach and Dominion Resources Feb 02 2016
Jim Cramer's 'Mad Money' Recap: Use Fundamentals and Forget Patterns Feb 01 2016
Coach: Analysts See Sales Grow, Earnings Fall for Fiscal 2Q16 Feb 01 2016
Management Guidance: Coach’s Projections for Fiscal 2016 Feb 01 2016
Charts Show That Coach Could Climb to $40 Feb 01 2016

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
FEEDBACK