Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 3/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Equity-to-Asset 0.03
CQP's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
92% of the 106 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 0.40 vs. CQP: 0.03 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
CQP' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.31  Med: 0.03 Max: 0.44
Current: 0.03
-0.31
0.44
Interest Coverage 0.70
CQP's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
93% of the 100 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 4.78 vs. CQP: 0.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
CQP' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.22  Med: 0.7 Max: 2.23
Current: 0.7
0.22
2.23
Piotroski F-Score: 4
Altman Z-Score: 0.55
Beneish M-Score: -0.13
WACC vs ROIC
4.52%
1.83%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 22.76
CQP's Operating Margin % is ranked higher than
59% of the 106 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 17.39 vs. CQP: 22.76 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
CQP' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -114.27  Med: 14.46 Max: 78.68
Current: 22.76
-114.27
78.68
Net Margin % -24.56
CQP's Net Margin % is ranked lower than
94% of the 106 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 8.44 vs. CQP: -24.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
CQP' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -990.08  Med: -89.58 Max: 0.76
Current: -24.56
-990.08
0.76
ROE % -50.16
CQP's ROE % is ranked lower than
94% of the 107 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 6.81 vs. CQP: -50.16 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
CQP' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -45.82  Med: -36.01 Max: -18.88
Current: -50.16
-45.82
-18.88
ROA % -1.90
CQP's ROA % is ranked lower than
79% of the 112 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 2.96 vs. CQP: -1.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
CQP' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -7.89  Med: -5.1 Max: 0.17
Current: -1.9
-7.89
0.17
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 1.40
CQP's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
81% of the 109 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 7.95 vs. CQP: 1.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
CQP' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -3.04  Med: 0.76 Max: 20.59
Current: 1.4
-3.04
20.59
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate 58.90
CQP's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked higher than
99% of the 80 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: -11.40 vs. CQP: 58.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
CQP' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: -23 Max: 165.4
Current: 58.9
0
165.4
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate -8.10
CQP's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked lower than
90% of the 62 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 7.70 vs. CQP: -8.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
CQP' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 8.1 Max: 225.9
Current: -8.1
0
225.9
» CQP's 10-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-05-28 Est.)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

CQP Guru Trades in

Q4 2015

CQP Guru Trades in Q4 2015

T Boone Pickens 57,000 sh (unchged)
» More
Q1 2016

CQP Guru Trades in Q1 2016

T Boone Pickens 16,795 sh (-70.54%)
» More
Q2 2016

CQP Guru Trades in Q2 2016

T Boone Pickens Sold Out
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with CQP

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - Midstream » Oil & Gas Midstream    NAICS: 486210    SIC: 4924
Compare:AMEX:LNG, NYSE:WGP, NYSE:TRGP, NYSE:OKE, NYSE:BPL, NYSE:PBA, NYSE:WES, NYSE:EEP, NYSE:SEP, NYSE:MPLX, NYSE:SXL, OTCPK:IPPLF, NYSE:ENBL, NYSE:ENLK, NYSE:OKS, NYSE:EQM, NYSE:AM, NYSE:SHLX, AMEX:CQH, NYSE:DCP » details
Traded in other countries:C64.Germany,
Headquarter Location:USA
Cheniere Energy Partners LP through its wholly-owned subsidiary owns and operates Sabine Pass LNG receiving terminal and Creole Trail Pipeline located in Louisiana.

Cheniere Energy Partners is a master limited partnership engaged in the LNG export business through its Sabine Pass liquefaction/terminal/pipeline facilities in Louisiana. Upon completion in 2016-18, Cheniere will have four LNG liquefaction trains with total capacity of about 18 mtpa. The firm is exploring options for two more trains at Sabine Pass. CQP's general partner is Cheniere Energy Inc., which also indirectly owns about a 47% stake in CQP's LP units through its controlling stake in Cheniere Energy Partners LP Holdings.

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
Forward PE Ratio 28.01
CQP's Forward PE Ratio is ranked lower than
66% of the 109 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 9999.00 vs. CQP: 28.01 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PB Ratio 24.47
CQP's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
95% of the 106 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 2.18 vs. CQP: 24.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
CQP' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.31  Med: 9.09 Max: 25.95
Current: 24.47
3.31
25.95
PS Ratio 9.86
CQP's PS Ratio is ranked higher than
54% of the 106 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 3.14 vs. CQP: 9.86 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
CQP' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.98  Med: 15.52 Max: 75.27
Current: 9.86
3.98
75.27
EV-to-EBIT 136.50
CQP's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 111 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 20.94 vs. CQP: 136.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
CQP' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1695.4  Med: 13.4 Max: 2147.3
Current: 136.5
-1695.4
2147.3
EV-to-EBITDA 74.26
CQP's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 111 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 13.97 vs. CQP: 74.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
CQP' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2478.7  Med: 22.7 Max: 4216.1
Current: 74.26
-2478.7
4216.1
Current Ratio 1.12
CQP's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
55% of the 108 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 1.05 vs. CQP: 1.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
CQP' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.24  Med: 2.19 Max: 4.76
Current: 1.12
0.24
4.76
Quick Ratio 1.01
CQP's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
60% of the 108 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 0.95 vs. CQP: 1.01 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
CQP' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.23  Med: 2.13 Max: 4.76
Current: 1.01
0.23
4.76
Days Inventory 31.65
CQP's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
73% of the 81 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 16.16 vs. CQP: 31.65 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
CQP' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 24.85  Med: 35.24 Max: 39.29
Current: 31.65
24.85
39.29
Days Sales Outstanding 29.18
CQP's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
66% of the 98 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 35.87 vs. CQP: 29.18 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
CQP' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.05  Med: 7.55 Max: 114.46
Current: 29.18
0.05
114.46
Days Payable 17.09
CQP's Days Payable is ranked lower than
81% of the 80 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 44.51 vs. CQP: 17.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
CQP' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 16.78  Med: 41.8 Max: 491
Current: 17.09
16.78
491

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 5.30
CQP's Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
89% of the 112 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 6.90 vs. CQP: 5.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
CQP' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.97  Med: 6.98 Max: 42.08
Current: 5.3
4.97
42.08
Forward Dividend Yield % 5.30
CQP's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
99% of the 110 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 7.47 vs. CQP: 5.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 5.29
CQP's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 107 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 9.04 vs. CQP: 5.29 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
CQP' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.97  Med: 6.98 Max: 42.08
Current: 5.29
4.97
42.08

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Tangible-Book 24.47
CQP's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked lower than
92% of the 92 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 2.96 vs. CQP: 24.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
CQP' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.49  Med: 10.22 Max: 21.97
Current: 24.47
3.49
21.97
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 0.63
CQP's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
98% of the 92 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 1.15 vs. CQP: 0.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
CQP' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.32  Med: 0.98 Max: 2.59
Current: 0.63
0.32
2.59
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 0.73
CQP's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 112 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 4.78 vs. CQP: 0.73 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
CQP' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.1  Med: 3.05 Max: 9.1
Current: 0.73
0.1
9.1

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $1,100
EPS (TTM) $ -0.78
Beta0.74
Short Percentage of Float4.40%
52-Week Range $25.87 - 33.47
Shares Outstanding (Mil)337.83

Analyst Estimate

Dec17 Dec18 Dec19
Revenue (Mil $) 1,882 2,652 3,234
EPS ($) 1.15 1.72 2.90
EPS without NRI ($) 1.15 1.72 2.90
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
5.00%
Dividends per Share ($) 1.70 2.09 2.64
» More Articles for CQP

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Cheniere Energy Partners Declares Quarterly Distributions Apr 21 2017 
Cheniere Energy Celebrates 100th LNG Cargo Apr 03 2017 
Cheniere Partners Announces Substantial Completion of Train 3 at the Sabine Pass Liquefaction Projec Mar 31 2017 
Seth Klarman Bets the Farm on Cheniere Energy Feb 03 2016 
25 Best-Yielding Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs) Dec 08 2011 
Cheniere Energy Partners LP Reports Operating Results (10-K) Mar 03 2011 
Cheniere Energy Partners LP Reports Operating Results (10-Q) Nov 05 2010 
Cheniere Energy Partners LP Reports Operating Results (10-Q) Aug 06 2010 
Cheniere Energy Partners LP Reports Operating Results (10-Q) May 07 2010 
Cheniere Energy Partners LP Reports Operating Results (10-Q) Nov 06 2009 

More From Other Websites
Cheniere Energy Partners Declares Quarterly Distributions Apr 21 2017
Cheniere Energy Partners LP breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : CQP-US : April... Apr 20 2017
Analysts’ Recommendations for Cheniere Energy Apr 11 2017
Cheniere Energy Rose Last Week: Will Its Gains Continue? Apr 11 2017
Why Cheniere Energy Partners (CQP) Could Beat Earnings Estimates Again Apr 07 2017
What Wall Street Analysts Recommend for Cheniere Energy Apr 06 2017
ETFs with exposure to Cheniere Energy Partners LP : April 5, 2017 Apr 05 2017
A Look at Cheniere Energy’s Technical Indicators Apr 05 2017
Cheniere Energy (CQP) to Take Control of Sabine Pass Train 3 Apr 04 2017
Why Cheniere Energy’s Balance Sheet Looks Alarming Apr 04 2017
Cheniere Energy Partners LP :CQP-US: Earnings Analysis: Q4, 2016 By the Numbers : April 3, 2017 Apr 03 2017
Cheniere Energy Celebrates 100th LNG Cargo Apr 03 2017
Why Cheniere Energy is Outperforming the AMLP in 2017 Mar 31 2017
Cheniere Partners Announces Substantial Completion of Train 3 at the Sabine Pass Liquefaction... Mar 31 2017
Enbridge Buys Spectra, Strengthens Hold in North America Mar 29 2017
CERAWEEK-India looks for 'right prices' to boost LNG, crude imports from U.S. Mar 06 2017
Earnings Estimates Moving Higher for Cheniere Energy (CQP): Time to Buy? Mar 06 2017
Most Analysts Recommend ‘Buys’ on Cheniere Energy Mar 03 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)