Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.02
CQP's Cash to Debt is ranked lower than
77% of the 98 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 0.09 vs. CQP: 0.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
CQP' s Cash to Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.02  Med: 0.05 Max: No Debt
Current: 0.02
Equity to Asset 0.06
CQP's Equity to Asset is ranked lower than
93% of the 106 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 0.40 vs. CQP: 0.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
CQP' s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.33  Med: -0.19 Max: 0.36
Current: 0.06
-0.33
0.36
Interest Coverage 0.26
CQP's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
99% of the 84 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 5.33 vs. CQP: 0.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
CQP' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.61  Med: 2.23 Max: 9999.99
Current: 0.26
1.61
9999.99
F-Score: 4
Z-Score: 0.39
M-Score: -3.40
WACC vs ROIC
5.53%
0.23%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 9.34
CQP's Operating margin (%) is ranked lower than
60% of the 107 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 15.38 vs. CQP: 9.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
CQP' s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -114.27  Med: 24.04 Max: 78.68
Current: 9.34
-114.27
78.68
Net-margin (%) -160.67
CQP's Net-margin (%) is ranked lower than
95% of the 107 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 9.33 vs. CQP: -160.67 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
CQP' s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -522.29  Med: -80.07 Max: 44.85
Current: -160.67
-522.29
44.85
ROE (%) -43.09
CQP's ROE (%) is ranked lower than
94% of the 109 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 7.85 vs. CQP: -43.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
CQP' s ROE (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -49.89  Med: -36.01 Max: -22.13
Current: -43.09
-49.89
-22.13
ROA (%) -3.72
CQP's ROA (%) is ranked lower than
87% of the 113 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 3.76 vs. CQP: -3.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
CQP' s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -7.72  Med: -4.66 Max: 9.74
Current: -3.72
-7.72
9.74
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) -0.14
CQP's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
84% of the 109 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 9.45 vs. CQP: -0.14 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
CQP' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -3.03  Med: -1.17 Max: 20.21
Current: -0.14
-3.03
20.21
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) -22.80
CQP's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
85% of the 74 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: -0.60 vs. CQP: -22.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CQP' s Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: -31.00 Max: 168.4
Current: -22.8
0
168.4
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) 44.70
CQP's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
87% of the 68 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 2.30 vs. CQP: 44.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CQP' s EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 19.20 Max: 165
Current: 44.7
0
165
» CQP's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2014

CQP Guru Trades in Q2 2014

Leon Cooperman 30,000 sh (New)
Jim Simons 60,000 sh (-67.36%)
» More
Q3 2014

CQP Guru Trades in Q3 2014

Jim Simons 85,000 sh (+41.67%)
Leon Cooperman Sold Out
» More
Q4 2014

CQP Guru Trades in Q4 2014

Jim Simons 41,600 sh (-51.06%)
» More
Q1 2015

CQP Guru Trades in Q1 2015

Jim Simons Sold Out
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with CQP

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Top Ranked Articles about Cheniere Energy Partners LP

Seth Klarman Bets the Farm on Cheniere Energy It's no wonder Klarman and Carl Icahn are betting big
As the author of "Margin of Safety," Seth Klarman (Trades, Portfolio) is often known for his conservative, value-based approach. Recently, however, followers have been surprised at many of his largest positions. Not only do they include volatile biotechnology names like Atara Biotherapeutics Inc. (NASDAQ:ATRA) and Forward Pharma AS (NASDAQ:FWP), but it looks like he’s put 18% of his entire portfolio in Cheniere Energy Inc. (LNG). Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
Forward P/E 21.19
CQP's Forward P/E is ranked lower than
94% of the 121 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 12.41 vs. CQP: 21.19 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward P/E only.
N/A
P/B 8.86
CQP's P/B is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 121 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 0.82 vs. CQP: 8.86 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
CQP' s P/B Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.57  Med: 8.05 Max: 13.05
Current: 8.86
4.57
13.05
P/S 26.18
CQP's P/S is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 120 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 0.87 vs. CQP: 26.18 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
CQP' s P/S Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.99  Med: 15.52 Max: 77.78
Current: 26.18
3.99
77.78
POCF 231.69
CQP's POCF is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 122 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 3.81 vs. CQP: 231.69 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
CQP' s POCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.08  Med: 67.74 Max: 99999999.99
Current: 231.69
7.08
99999999.99
EV-to-EBITDA 375.72
CQP's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 120 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 10.93 vs. CQP: 375.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
CQP' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1503.4  Med: 67.00 Max: 1115.3
Current: 375.72
-1503.4
1115.3
Current Ratio 1.50
CQP's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
71% of the 112 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 1.20 vs. CQP: 1.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
CQP' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.4  Med: 1.94 Max: 4.76
Current: 1.5
0.4
4.76
Quick Ratio 1.49
CQP's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
74% of the 112 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 1.00 vs. CQP: 1.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
CQP' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.4  Med: 1.88 Max: 4.76
Current: 1.49
0.4
4.76
Days Inventory 33.44
CQP's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
81% of the 83 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 14.12 vs. CQP: 33.44 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
CQP' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 15.94  Med: 23.72 Max: 31.49
Current: 33.44
15.94
31.49
Days Sales Outstanding 3.61
CQP's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
95% of the 98 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 34.20 vs. CQP: 3.61 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
CQP' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.05  Med: 1.26 Max: 114.46
Current: 3.61
0.05
114.46
Days Payable 22.21
CQP's Days Payable is ranked lower than
70% of the 77 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 33.95 vs. CQP: 22.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
CQP' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.87  Med: 20.72 Max: 36.78
Current: 22.21
3.87
36.78

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield 8.15
CQP's Dividend Yield is ranked lower than
74% of the 121 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 9.57 vs. CQP: 8.15 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield only.
CQP' s Dividend Yield Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.97  Med: 7.52 Max: 42.08
Current: 8.15
4.97
42.08
Forward Dividend Yield 8.54
CQP's Forward Dividend Yield is ranked lower than
73% of the 121 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 10.78 vs. CQP: 8.54 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield only.
N/A
Yield on cost (5-Year) 8.15
CQP's Yield on cost (5-Year) is ranked lower than
84% of the 122 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 11.20 vs. CQP: 8.15 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Yield on cost (5-Year) only.
CQP' s Yield on cost (5-Year) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.97  Med: 7.52 Max: 42.08
Current: 8.15
4.97
42.08
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -27.40
CQP's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked lower than
82% of the 73 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: -8.00 vs. CQP: -27.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
CQP' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -27.4  Med: -0.30 Max: 0
Current: -27.4
-27.4
0

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Tangible Book 8.87
CQP's Price/Tangible Book is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 122 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 9999.00 vs. CQP: 8.87 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
CQP' s Price/Tangible Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.81  Med: 7.57 Max: 12.39
Current: 8.87
4.81
12.39
Price/Median PS Value 1.68
CQP's Price/Median PS Value is ranked lower than
100% of the 122 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 0.60 vs. CQP: 1.68 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
CQP' s Price/Median PS Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.32  Med: 0.95 Max: 3.06
Current: 1.68
0.32
3.06
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) -0.10
CQP's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
82% of the 110 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 5.00 vs. CQP: -0.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
CQP' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.1  Med: 3.30 Max: 8.9
Current: -0.1
-0.1
8.9

More Statistics

Revenue(Mil) $269
EPS $ -1.26
Beta0.91
Short Percentage of Float3.49%
52-Week Range $19.22 - 34.55
Shares Outstanding(Mil)337.82

Analyst Estimate

Dec15 Dec16 Dec17
Revenue(Mil) 270 1,065 1,959
EPS($) -5.73 1.69 0.94
EPS without NRI($) -5.73 1.69 0.94

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - Midstream » Oil & Gas Midstream
Compare:WES, ENB, ETE, KMP, SE » details
Traded in other countries:C64.Germany,
Cheniere Energy Partners LP is a publicly-held Delaware limited partnership formed on November 21, 2006. The Company through its wholly owned subsidiary, Sabine Pass LNG owns and operates the regasification facilities at the Sabine Pass LNG terminal located on the Sabine Pass deep water shipping channel. The Sabine Pass LNG terminal includes existing infrastructure of five LNG storage tanks with capacity of 16.9 Bcfe, two docks that can accommodate vessels with nominal capacity of up to 266,000 cubic meters and vaporizers with regasification capacity of approximately 4.0 Bcf/d. The Company is developing and constructing natural gas liquefaction facilities (the Liquefaction Project) at the Sabine Pass LNG terminal adjacent to the existing regasification facilities through its wholly owned subsidiary, Sabine Pass Liquefaction. The Company also owns the 94-mile Creole Trail Pipeline through our wholly owned subsidiary, CTPL, which interconnects the Sabine Pass LNG terminal with a number of large interstate pipelines. The Sabine Pass LNG terminal is subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment and natural resources.
» More Articles for CQP

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Seth Klarman Bets the Farm on Cheniere Energy Feb 03 2016 
25 Best-Yielding Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs) Dec 08 2011 
Cheniere Energy Partners LP Reports Operating Results (10-K) Mar 03 2011 
Cheniere Energy Partners LP Reports Operating Results (10-Q) Nov 05 2010 
Cheniere Energy Partners LP Reports Operating Results (10-Q) Aug 06 2010 
Cheniere Energy Partners LP Reports Operating Results (10-Q) May 07 2010 
Cheniere Energy Partners LP Reports Operating Results (10-Q) Nov 06 2009 
Cheniere Energy Partners LP Reports Operating Results (10-Q) May 08 2009 

More From Other Websites
Cheniere Energy Partners LP Holdings, LLC Declares Quarterly Dividend Feb 09 2016
Icahn, others get burned by bad Cheniere bet Feb 01 2016
Cheniere Taps 13 Banks for Sabine Pass Debt Refinancing Jan 25 2016
Cheniere Partners Engages Joint Lead Arrangers to Arrange the Refinancing of Project Debt Jan 25 2016
CHENIERE ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Files SEC form 8-K, Other Events, Financial Statements and Exhibits Jan 22 2016
Cheniere Energy Partners Declares Quarterly Distributions Jan 22 2016
Five Eagle Ford companies to watch as United States becomes natural gas exporter Jan 20 2016
Singapore LNG Spot Index Falls to Lowest Since 2014 Amid Glut Jan 19 2016
Shipment Delay Adds to Cheniere Energy's Woes Jan 15 2016
CHENIERE ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Files SEC form 8-K, Regulation FD Disclosure, Financial Statements... Jan 15 2016
[$$] Glitch Delays Cheniere's Natural-Gas Exports Jan 14 2016
Landmark U.S. LNG exports delayed to late February, March Jan 14 2016
CHENIERE ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Files SEC form 8-K, Regulation FD Disclosure, Financial Statements... Jan 14 2016
Cheniere Partners Expects First LNG Cargo in Late February or March 2016 Jan 14 2016
Cheniere Partners Expects First LNG Cargo in Late February or March 2016 Jan 14 2016
First US LNG Cargo to Begin Loading This Week Jan 11 2016
Cheniere Energy Partners LP breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : January 8, 2016 Jan 08 2016

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
FEEDBACK