Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.05
CSU's Cash to Debt is ranked lower than
86% of the 221 Companies
in the Global Long-Term Care Facilities industry.

( Industry Median: 0.29 vs. CSU: 0.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
CSU' s Cash to Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.02  Med: 0.12 Max: N/A
Current: 0.05
Equity to Asset 0.15
CSU's Equity to Asset is ranked lower than
87% of the 219 Companies
in the Global Long-Term Care Facilities industry.

( Industry Median: 0.45 vs. CSU: 0.15 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
CSU' s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.15  Med: 0.37 Max: 0.78
Current: 0.15
0.15
0.78
Interest Coverage 0.54
CSU's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
98% of the 157 Companies
in the Global Long-Term Care Facilities industry.

( Industry Median: 9.36 vs. CSU: 0.54 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
CSU' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.44  Med: 1.12 Max: 1.65
Current: 0.54
0.44
1.65
F-Score: 6
Z-Score: 0.88
M-Score: -2.45
WACC vs ROIC
9.45%
2.33%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 4.58
CSU's Operating margin (%) is ranked lower than
64% of the 219 Companies
in the Global Long-Term Care Facilities industry.

( Industry Median: 7.46 vs. CSU: 4.58 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
CSU' s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.21  Med: 8.66 Max: 10.58
Current: 4.58
3.21
10.58
Net-margin (%) -3.02
CSU's Net-margin (%) is ranked lower than
80% of the 221 Companies
in the Global Long-Term Care Facilities industry.

( Industry Median: 4.28 vs. CSU: -3.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
CSU' s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -6.28  Med: 0.08 Max: 2.31
Current: -3.02
-6.28
2.31
ROE (%) -8.79
CSU's ROE (%) is ranked lower than
89% of the 204 Companies
in the Global Long-Term Care Facilities industry.

( Industry Median: 9.24 vs. CSU: -8.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
CSU' s ROE (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -16.13  Med: -0.02 Max: 2.96
Current: -8.79
-16.13
2.96
ROA (%) -1.34
CSU's ROA (%) is ranked lower than
78% of the 222 Companies
in the Global Long-Term Care Facilities industry.

( Industry Median: 3.42 vs. CSU: -1.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
CSU' s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.94  Med: 0.08 Max: 1.11
Current: -1.34
-2.94
1.11
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 2.89
CSU's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
76% of the 221 Companies
in the Global Long-Term Care Facilities industry.

( Industry Median: 19.71 vs. CSU: 2.89 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
CSU' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.11  Med: 4.53 Max: 6.48
Current: 2.89
1.11
6.48
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) 11.70
CSU's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
70% of the 160 Companies
in the Global Long-Term Care Facilities industry.

( Industry Median: 8.20 vs. CSU: 11.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CSU' s Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1.5  Med: 11.70 Max: 22.5
Current: 11.7
-1.5
22.5
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) 15.40
CSU's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
74% of the 128 Companies
in the Global Long-Term Care Facilities industry.

( Industry Median: 7.90 vs. CSU: 15.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CSU' s EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -18.9  Med: 5.50 Max: 18
Current: 15.4
-18.9
18
» CSU's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Guru Trades

Q4 2014

CSU Guru Trades in Q4 2014

Ron Baron 2,523,915 sh (+2.33%)
Jim Simons 799,385 sh (-15.35%)
» More
Q1 2015

CSU Guru Trades in Q1 2015

Ron Baron 2,578,315 sh (+2.16%)
Jim Simons 801,943 sh (+0.32%)
» More
Q2 2015

CSU Guru Trades in Q2 2015

Louis Moore Bacon 200,000 sh (New)
Ron Baron 2,573,815 sh (-0.17%)
Jim Simons 752,600 sh (-6.15%)
» More
Q3 2015

CSU Guru Trades in Q3 2015

Jim Simons 761,100 sh (+1.13%)
Louis Moore Bacon Sold Out
Ron Baron 2,361,315 sh (-8.26%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with CSU

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
Forward P/E 56.18
CSU's Forward P/E is ranked lower than
99% of the 197 Companies
in the Global Long-Term Care Facilities industry.

( Industry Median: 16.05 vs. CSU: 56.18 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward P/E only.
N/A
P/B 3.32
CSU's P/B is ranked lower than
65% of the 306 Companies
in the Global Long-Term Care Facilities industry.

( Industry Median: 2.44 vs. CSU: 3.32 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
CSU' s P/B Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.41  Med: 1.67 Max: 5.93
Current: 3.32
0.41
5.93
P/S 1.12
CSU's P/S is ranked higher than
56% of the 305 Companies
in the Global Long-Term Care Facilities industry.

( Industry Median: 1.19 vs. CSU: 1.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
CSU' s P/S Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.33  Med: 1.15 Max: 2.25
Current: 1.12
0.33
2.25
PFCF 30.66
CSU's PFCF is ranked lower than
69% of the 199 Companies
in the Global Long-Term Care Facilities industry.

( Industry Median: 20.59 vs. CSU: 30.66 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PFCF only.
CSU' s PFCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.28  Med: 25.12 Max: 90.08
Current: 30.66
8.28
90.08
POCF 10.22
CSU's POCF is ranked higher than
72% of the 270 Companies
in the Global Long-Term Care Facilities industry.

( Industry Median: 15.70 vs. CSU: 10.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
CSU' s POCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.05  Med: 14.13 Max: 120
Current: 10.22
4.05
120
EV-to-EBIT 50.99
CSU's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
91% of the 287 Companies
in the Global Long-Term Care Facilities industry.

( Industry Median: 17.94 vs. CSU: 50.99 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
CSU' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.9  Med: 35.20 Max: 186.7
Current: 50.99
10.9
186.7
EV-to-EBITDA 15.50
CSU's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
64% of the 303 Companies
in the Global Long-Term Care Facilities industry.

( Industry Median: 12.93 vs. CSU: 15.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
CSU' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.7  Med: 15.80 Max: 26.4
Current: 15.5
6.7
26.4
Current Ratio 1.10
CSU's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
61% of the 221 Companies
in the Global Long-Term Care Facilities industry.

( Industry Median: 1.33 vs. CSU: 1.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
CSU' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.58  Med: 1.47 Max: 9.42
Current: 1.1
0.58
9.42
Quick Ratio 1.10
CSU's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
56% of the 221 Companies
in the Global Long-Term Care Facilities industry.

( Industry Median: 1.22 vs. CSU: 1.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
CSU' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.58  Med: 1.47 Max: 9.42
Current: 1.1
0.58
9.42
Days Sales Outstanding 7.46
CSU's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
94% of the 188 Companies
in the Global Long-Term Care Facilities industry.

( Industry Median: 46.01 vs. CSU: 7.46 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
CSU' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.34  Med: 7.52 Max: 10.61
Current: 7.46
4.34
10.61
Days Payable 1.04
CSU's Days Payable is ranked lower than
99% of the 146 Companies
in the Global Long-Term Care Facilities industry.

( Industry Median: 42.47 vs. CSU: 1.04 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
CSU' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.03  Med: 6.00 Max: 14.59
Current: 1.04
4.03
14.59

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Tangible Book 3.31
CSU's Price/Tangible Book is ranked higher than
57% of the 204 Companies
in the Global Long-Term Care Facilities industry.

( Industry Median: 4.09 vs. CSU: 3.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
CSU' s Price/Tangible Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.27  Med: 1.30 Max: 5.59
Current: 3.31
0.27
5.59
Price/Projected FCF 1.16
CSU's Price/Projected FCF is ranked higher than
65% of the 172 Companies
in the Global Long-Term Care Facilities industry.

( Industry Median: 1.38 vs. CSU: 1.16 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Projected FCF only.
CSU' s Price/Projected FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.48  Med: 1.50 Max: 2.46
Current: 1.16
0.48
2.46
Price/Median PS Value 0.96
CSU's Price/Median PS Value is ranked higher than
61% of the 298 Companies
in the Global Long-Term Care Facilities industry.

( Industry Median: 1.03 vs. CSU: 0.96 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
CSU' s Price/Median PS Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.29  Med: 0.97 Max: 6.07
Current: 0.96
0.29
6.07
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) 1.96
CSU's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
74% of the 209 Companies
in the Global Long-Term Care Facilities industry.

( Industry Median: 4.40 vs. CSU: 1.96 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
CSU' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.5  Med: 2.80 Max: 9.2
Current: 1.96
0.5
9.2
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) 19.77
CSU's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked higher than
76% of the 101 Companies
in the Global Long-Term Care Facilities industry.

( Industry Median: 10.86 vs. CSU: 19.77 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
CSU' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -9  Med: 6.40 Max: 20
Current: 19.77
-9
20

More Statistics

Revenue(Mil) $405
EPS $ -0.43
Beta1.43
Short Percentage of Float6.01%
52-Week Range $15.17 - 27.75
Shares Outstanding(Mil)29.52

Analyst Estimate

Dec15 Dec16
Revenue(Mil) 412 459
EPS($) 0.24 0.45
EPS without NRI($) 0.24 0.45

Business Description

Industry: Health Care Providers » Long-Term Care Facilities
Compare:SRZ, BKD, EXETF, NHC, KND » details
Traded in other countries:13C.Germany,
Capital Senior Living Corp was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware in October 1996. The Company is an operators of senior living communities in the United States in terms of resident capacity. The Company provides senior living services to the elderly, including independent living and assisted living services, and also provides home care services at one of its communities. By offering a variety of services and encouraging the active participation of the resident and the resident's family and medical consultants, the Company is able to customize its service plan to meet the specific needs and desires of each resident. As of December 31, 2013, the Company operated 112 senior living communities in 26 states with an aggregate capacity of approximately 14,600 residents, including 62 senior living communities which the Company either owned or in which the Company had an ownership interest and 50 senior living communities that the Company leased. As of December 31, 2013, the Company also operated one home care agency. The Company focuses on providing quality care and services that are personalized and tailored to meet the individual needs of each community resident. Its residences and services are designed to provide a broad range of care that permits residents to age in place as their needs change and as they develop further physical or cognitive frailties. The Company primarily competes with Brookdale Senior Living Inc., Emeritus Corporation, and Five Star Quality Care, Inc.
» More Articles for CSU

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Baron Funds Comments on Capital Senior Living Corp. Nov 26 2013 
My 3 Favorite Dividend Stocks at All-Time-Highs | Stock List Dec 27 2012 
Baron Funds Comments on Capital Senior Living Corp. May 24 2012 
Capital Senior Living Corp. Reports Operating Results (10-K) Mar 14 2011 
Capital Senior Living Corp. (CSU) President & COO Keith N Johannessen sells 60,000 Shares Jan 13 2011 
Capital Senior Living Corp. Reports Operating Results (10-Q) Nov 05 2010 
Capital Senior Living Corp. (CSU) CEO & Vice Chairman of Board Lawrence A Cohen sells 7,721 Shares Oct 15 2010 
Capital Senior Living Corp. Reports Operating Results (10-Q) Aug 05 2010 
Capital Senior Living Corp. Reports Operating Results (10-Q) May 06 2010 
Capital Senior Living Corp. (CSU) CEO & Vice Chairman of Board Lawrence A Cohen sells 34,409 Shares Feb 03 2010 

More From Other Websites
Capital Senior Living Corporation Announces Release Date for Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2015... Feb 10 2016
Red Alder Releases New Presentation to Shareholders of Capital Senior Living Corporation Jan 25 2016
Team Health Holdings (TMH) Catches Eye: Stock Jumps 5.1% Jan 18 2016
Zacks Investment Ideas feature highlights: Amazon, Goodyear Tire, Shell Midstream, Capital Senior... Jan 15 2016
CAPITAL SENIOR LIVING CORP Files SEC form 8-K, Other Events, Financial Statements and Exhibits Jan 14 2016
CAPITAL SENIOR LIVING CORPORATION ANNOUNCES CONTINUATION OF $10 MILLION STOCK REPURCHASE PROGRAM Jan 14 2016
Capital Senior Living Corporation Announces Continuation of $10 Million Stock Repurchase Program Jan 14 2016
Genesis Healthcare (GEN) in Focus: Stock Adds 7.3% in Session Dec 31 2015
Investors Need to Be Selective in 2016, Here's Why Dec 22 2015
Screening for Stocks or Napping Is Better Than Watching Fed Events Dec 18 2015
Capital Senior Living Corp. Earnings Analysis: Q3, 2015 By the Numbers Dec 18 2015
Concord Medical Services (CCM) Jumps: Stock Rises 14.1% Dec 14 2015
Lucus Advisors LLC Releases Public Letter to Board of Directors of Capital Senior Living Corporation Dec 10 2015
Capital Senior Living Told to Seek Sale by Red Alder Fund Dec 10 2015
Capital Senior Living Corp. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : December 9,... Dec 09 2015
CAPITAL SENIOR LIVING CORP Financials Dec 08 2015
Five Star Quality Care (FVE) Jumps: Stock Rises 9.2% Dec 04 2015
CAPITAL SENIOR LIVING CORPORATION TO PRESENT AT THE 26th ANNUAL OPPENHEIMER HEALTHCARE CONFERENCE ON... Dec 02 2015
Capital Senior Living Corporation to Present at the 26th Annual Oppenheimer Healthcare Conference on... Dec 02 2015
Is Capital Senior Living Corporation (CSU) A Good Stock To Buy? Nov 30 2015

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
FEEDBACK