CUTR has been successfully added into Your Stock Email Alerts list.
You can manage your stock email alerts here.
CUTR has been removed from your Stock Email Alerts list.
GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a companys financial situation is. It is based on these factors
1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.
A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.
| vs
industry |
vs
history |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash to Debt | No Debt |
CUTR's Cash to Debt is ranked lower than
469483% of the 213 Companies in the Global Medical Devices industry. ( Industry Median: 6.22 vs. CUTR: No Debt ) |
CUTR'
s 10-Year Cash to Debt Range
Min: No Debt Max: No Debt Current: No Debt |
| Equity to Asset | 0.77 |
CUTR's Equity to Asset is ranked lower than
518134% of the 193 Companies in the Global Medical Devices industry. ( Industry Median: 0.58 vs. CUTR: 0.77 ) |
CUTR'
s 10-Year Equity to Asset Range
Min: -0.27 Max: 0.86 Current: 0.77 |
| Interest Coverage | No Debt |
CUTR's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
617283% of the 162 Companies in the Global Medical Devices industry. ( Industry Median: 249.00 vs. CUTR: No Debt ) |
CUTR'
s 10-Year Interest Coverage Range
Min: No Debt Max: No Debt Current: No Debt |
| F-Score: 4 |
|
| Z-Score: 5.35 |
|
| M-Score: -2.34 |
|
1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank
| vs
industry |
vs
history |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating margin (%) | -8.80 |
CUTR's Operating margin (%) is ranked lower than
671140% of the 149 Companies in the Global Medical Devices industry. ( Industry Median: 10.20 vs. CUTR: -8.80 ) |
CUTR'
s 10-Year Operating margin (%) Range
Min: -20.8 Max: 22 Current: -8.8 |
| Net-margin (%) | -8.5 |
CUTR's Net-margin (%) is ranked lower than
689654% of the 145 Companies in the Global Medical Devices industry. ( Industry Median: 7.90 vs. CUTR: -8.5 ) |
CUTR'
s 10-Year Net-margin (%) Range
Min: -32.9 Max: 18.3 Current: -8.5 |
| ROE (%) | -7.2 |
CUTR's ROE (%) is ranked lower than
684931% of the 146 Companies in the Global Medical Devices industry. ( Industry Median: 9.10 vs. CUTR: -7.2 ) |
CUTR'
s 10-Year ROE (%) Range
Min: -17.5 Max: 190.8 Current: -7.2 |
| ROA (%) | -5.8 |
CUTR's ROA (%) is ranked lower than
684931% of the 146 Companies in the Global Medical Devices industry. ( Industry Median: 5.90 vs. CUTR: -5.8 ) |
CUTR'
s 10-Year ROA (%) Range
Min: -14.6 Max: 18.7 Current: -5.8 |
| ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) | -164.50 |
CUTR's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
684931% of the 146 Companies in the Global Medical Devices industry. ( Industry Median: 23.90 vs. CUTR: -164.50 ) |
CUTR'
s 10-Year ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range
Min: -1189.6 Max: 227.2 Current: -164.5 |
| Revenue Growth (%) | 7.9 |
CUTR's Revenue Growth (%) is ranked lower than
1052631% of the 95 Companies in the Global Medical Devices industry. ( Industry Median: 7.50 vs. CUTR: 7.9 ) |
CUTR'
s 10-Year Revenue Growth (%) Range
Min: -13.9 Max: 38.8 Current: 7.9 |
| EBITDA Growth (%) | -15 |
CUTR's EBITDA Growth (%) is ranked lower than
1587300% of the 63 Companies in the Global Medical Devices industry. ( Industry Median: 8.70 vs. CUTR: -15 ) |
CUTR'
s 10-Year EBITDA Growth (%) Range
Min: -15 Max: 60.2 Current: -15 |
| EPS Growth (%) | -23.3 |
CUTR's EPS Growth (%) is ranked lower than
1923075% of the 52 Companies in the Global Medical Devices industry. ( Industry Median: 11.60 vs. CUTR: -23.3 ) |
CUTR'
s 10-Year EPS Growth (%) Range
Min: -23.3 Max: 94.4 Current: -23.3 |
| Charles Brandes 37,925 sh (+4.33%) Mario Gabelli 560,885 sh (+0.54%) | Chuck Royce 10,700 sh (unchged) | Jim Simons 540,900 sh (-1.62%) |
| Jim Simons 555,100 sh (+2.63%) | Chuck Royce 10,700 sh (unchged) | Charles Brandes 37,920 sh (-0.01%) Mario Gabelli 560,000 sh (-0.16%) |
| Jim Simons 578,600 sh (+4.23%) Mario Gabelli 580,000 sh (+3.57%) | Chuck Royce 10,700 sh (unchged) | Charles Brandes 14,543 sh (-61.65%) |
| Steven Cohen 10,109 sh (New) Jim Simons 670,100 sh (+15.81%) | Chuck Royce 10,700 sh (unchged) | Charles Brandes Sold Out Mario Gabelli 575,000 sh (-0.86%) |
| Guru | Date | Trades | Impact to Portfolio | Price Range * (?) | Current Price | Change from Average | Current Shares | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charles Brandes | 2013-03-31 | Sold Out | $8.95 - $13.03 | $ 9.48 | -17% | 0 | ||
| Charles Brandes | 2012-12-31 | Reduce -61.65% | $7.34 - $9.77 | $ 9.48 | 12% | 14543 | ||
| Mario Gabelli | 2011-03-31 | Reduce -47.71% | 0.03% | $8.08 - $9.94 | $ 9.48 | 7% | 503085 | |
| Charles Brandes | 2010-12-31 | Add 102.41% | $7.01 - $8.39 | $ 9.48 | 26% | 54255 |
More recent guru trades are included for Premium Members only!!| vs
industry |
vs
history |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| P/B | 1.40 |
CUTR's P/B is ranked lower than
490196% of the 204 Companies in the Global Medical Devices industry. ( Industry Median: 2.20 vs. CUTR: 1.40 ) |
CUTR'
s 10-Year P/B Range
Min: 0.68 Max: 6.79 Current: 1.4 |
| P/S | 1.74 |
CUTR's P/S is ranked lower than
465116% of the 215 Companies in the Global Medical Devices industry. ( Industry Median: 2.05 vs. CUTR: 1.74 ) |
CUTR'
s 10-Year P/S Range
Min: 0.93 Max: 7.8 Current: 1.74 |
| PFCF | 94.80 |
CUTR's PFCF is ranked lower than
813007% of the 123 Companies in the Global Medical Devices industry. ( Industry Median: 20.43 vs. CUTR: 94.80 ) |
CUTR'
s 10-Year PFCF Range
Min: 9.76 Max: 1164 Current: 94.8 |
| EV-to-EBIT | 333.3 |
CUTR's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
558659% of the 179 Companies in the Global Medical Devices industry. ( Industry Median: 19.60 vs. CUTR: 333.3 ) |
CUTR'
s 10-Year EV-to-EBIT Range
Min: 5.6 Max: 695.7 Current: 333.3 |
| Shiller P/E | 6258.3 |
CUTR's Shiller P/E is ranked lower than
100% of the Companies in the Global Medical Devices industry. ( Industry Median: vs. CUTR: 6258.3 ) |
CUTR'
s 10-Year Shiller P/E Range
Min: 23.19 Max: 6258.3 Current: 6258.3 |
| vs
industry |
vs
history |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Price/Net Cash | 2.2 |
CUTR's Price/Net Cash is ranked lower than
1449274% of the 69 Companies in the Global Medical Devices industry. ( Industry Median: 10.90 vs. CUTR: 2.2 ) |
CUTR'
s 10-Year Price/Net Cash Range
Min: 1.4 Max: 4.7 Current: 2.2 |
| Price/Net Current Asset Value | 8.2 |
CUTR's Price/Net Current Asset Value is ranked lower than
523560% of the 191 Companies in the Global Medical Devices industry. ( Industry Median: 13.00 vs. CUTR: 8.2 ) |
CUTR'
s 10-Year Price/Net Current Asset Value Range
Min: 7.2 Max: 28 Current: 8.2 |
| Price/Tangible Book | 1.6 |
CUTR's Price/Tangible Book is ranked lower than
520833% of the 192 Companies in the Global Medical Devices industry. ( Industry Median: 3.00 vs. CUTR: 1.6 ) |
CUTR'
s 10-Year Price/Tangible Book Range
Min: 1 Max: 3.8 Current: 1.6 |
| Price/DCF (Projected) | 1.8 | ||
| Price/Median PS Value | 0.8 |
CUTR's Price/Median PS Value is ranked lower than
510204% of the 196 Companies in the Global Medical Devices industry. ( Industry Median: 1.00 vs. CUTR: 0.8 ) |
CUTR'
s 10-Year Price/Median PS Value Range
Min: 0.6 Max: 2.2 Current: 0.8 |
| Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) | 0.30 |
CUTR's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) is ranked lower than
591715% of the 169 Companies in the Global Medical Devices industry. ( Industry Median: 4.90 vs. CUTR: 0.30 ) |
CUTR'
s 10-Year Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) Range
Min: 0.1 Max: 17.8 Current: 0.3 |
| Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) | -0.92 |
CUTR's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) is ranked lower than
1666665% of the 60 Companies in the Global Medical Devices industry. ( Industry Median: 7.85 vs. CUTR: -0.92 ) |
CUTR'
s 10-Year Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) Range
Min: 19.4 Max: 24.8 Current: -0.92 |
| Industry: | Medical Devices |
|---|---|
| Compare: | MDT, SYK, SMA, ZMH, STJ |
| Weekly CFO Sells Highlight: MSCC, BMRN, VAL, CUTR, REX, CIEN Oct 02 2011 |
| Stocks Trading Below Net Cash: Adaptec Inc (ADPT), AuthenTec Inc (AUTH) and Cutera Inc (CUTR). Feb 16 2009 |