Switch to:
Also traded in: Argentina, Germany, Mexico, USA

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt No Debt
CXMSF's Cash to Debt is ranked higher than
100% of the 681 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 0.43 vs. CXMSF: No Debt )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
CXMSF' s Cash to Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.02  Med: 0.24 Max: No Debt
Current: No Debt
Equity to Asset 0.25
CXMSF's Equity to Asset is ranked lower than
88% of the 671 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 0.53 vs. CXMSF: 0.25 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
CXMSF' s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.25  Med: 0.36 Max: 0.45
Current: 0.25
0.25
0.45
Interest Coverage 1.01
CXMSF's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
95% of the 481 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 12.89 vs. CXMSF: 1.01 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
CXMSF' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.63  Med: 0.98 Max: 5.96
Current: 1.01
0.63
5.96
F-Score: 5
Z-Score: 0.69
WACC vs ROIC
23.92%
19.20%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 9.08
CXMSF's Operating margin (%) is ranked higher than
63% of the 684 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 6.17 vs. CXMSF: 9.08 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
CXMSF' s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.84  Med: 8.07 Max: 16.23
Current: 9.08
5.84
16.23
Net-margin (%) -1.26
CXMSF's Net-margin (%) is ranked lower than
85% of the 686 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 4.29 vs. CXMSF: -1.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
CXMSF' s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -13.05  Med: -1.26 Max: 13.78
Current: -1.26
-13.05
13.78
ROE (%) -2.11
CXMSF's ROE (%) is ranked lower than
86% of the 667 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 7.28 vs. CXMSF: -2.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
CXMSF' s ROE (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -14.19  Med: -2.22 Max: 24.33
Current: -2.11
-14.19
24.33
ROA (%) -0.55
CXMSF's ROA (%) is ranked lower than
83% of the 690 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 3.26 vs. CXMSF: -0.55 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
CXMSF' s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -4.69  Med: -0.56 Max: 9.71
Current: -0.55
-4.69
9.71
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 10.38
CXMSF's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
54% of the 686 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 11.46 vs. CXMSF: 10.38 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
CXMSF' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -4.68  Med: 6.85 Max: 22.91
Current: 10.38
-4.68
22.91
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) 2.70
CXMSF's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
59% of the 594 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 4.30 vs. CXMSF: 2.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CXMSF' s Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -17.9  Med: 5.80 Max: 32.9
Current: 2.7
-17.9
32.9
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) 15.80
CXMSF's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
70% of the 510 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 5.30 vs. CXMSF: 15.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CXMSF' s EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -48.4  Med: 8.15 Max: 33.2
Current: 15.8
-48.4
33.2
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) -36.00
CXMSF's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
92% of the 459 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 7.70 vs. CXMSF: -36.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
CXMSF' s EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -79.2  Med: -0.40 Max: 57.4
Current: -36
-79.2
57.4
» CXMSF's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with CXMSF

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
Forward P/E 7.07
CXMSF's Forward P/E is ranked higher than
91% of the 341 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 12.92 vs. CXMSF: 7.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward P/E only.
N/A
P/B 0.82
CXMSF's P/B is ranked higher than
69% of the 919 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 1.21 vs. CXMSF: 0.82 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
CXMSF' s P/B Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.19  Med: 1.23 Max: 2.95
Current: 0.82
0.19
2.95
P/S 0.54
CXMSF's P/S is ranked higher than
71% of the 942 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 0.84 vs. CXMSF: 0.54 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
CXMSF' s P/S Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.17  Med: 0.75 Max: 1.82
Current: 0.54
0.17
1.82
EV-to-EBIT 7.99
CXMSF's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
80% of the 876 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 13.15 vs. CXMSF: 7.99 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
CXMSF' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -43.9  Med: 11.35 Max: 119.4
Current: 7.99
-43.9
119.4
EV-to-EBITDA 4.02
CXMSF's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
90% of the 911 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 9.52 vs. CXMSF: 4.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
CXMSF' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.2  Med: 8.00 Max: 17.7
Current: 4.02
-0.2
17.7
Shiller P/E 4.46
CXMSF's Shiller P/E is ranked higher than
90% of the 117 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 19.61 vs. CXMSF: 4.46 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller P/E only.
CXMSF' s Shiller P/E Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.32  Med: 4.41 Max: 9.81
Current: 4.46
1.32
9.81
Current Ratio 1.02
CXMSF's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
81% of the 667 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 1.60 vs. CXMSF: 1.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
CXMSF' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.42  Med: 0.99 Max: 1.27
Current: 1.02
0.42
1.27
Quick Ratio 0.77
CXMSF's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
70% of the 666 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 1.09 vs. CXMSF: 0.77 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
CXMSF' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.31  Med: 0.70 Max: 0.93
Current: 0.77
0.31
0.93
Days Inventory 43.83
CXMSF's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
80% of the 660 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 81.07 vs. CXMSF: 43.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
CXMSF' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 32.38  Med: 44.87 Max: 50.18
Current: 43.83
32.38
50.18
Days Sales Outstanding 59.05
CXMSF's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
52% of the 517 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 59.38 vs. CXMSF: 59.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
CXMSF' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 37.45  Med: 45.37 Max: 57.98
Current: 59.05
37.45
57.98

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Tangible Book 0.81
CXMSF's Price/Tangible Book is ranked higher than
71% of the 823 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 1.41 vs. CXMSF: 0.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
CXMSF' s Price/Tangible Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.19  Med: 1.42 Max: 5.85
Current: 0.81
0.19
5.85
Price/Projected FCF 1.17
CXMSF's Price/Projected FCF is ranked lower than
55% of the 478 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 1.05 vs. CXMSF: 1.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Projected FCF only.
CXMSF' s Price/Projected FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.24  Med: 1.70 Max: 3.41
Current: 1.17
0.24
3.41
Price/Median PS Value 0.91
CXMSF's Price/Median PS Value is ranked higher than
65% of the 857 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 1.01 vs. CXMSF: 0.91 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
CXMSF' s Price/Median PS Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.32  Med: 1.27 Max: 2.32
Current: 0.91
0.32
2.32
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) 12.50
CXMSF's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
75% of the 682 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 6.60 vs. CXMSF: 12.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
CXMSF' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.8  Med: 7.60 Max: 469.7
Current: 12.5
0.8
469.7
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) 3.90
CXMSF's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked higher than
90% of the 351 Companies
in the Global Building Materials industry.

( Industry Median: 7.04 vs. CXMSF: 3.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
CXMSF' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -35.3  Med: 5.70 Max: 45.2
Current: 3.9
-35.3
45.2

More Statistics

Revenue(Mil) $15024
EPS $ -0.01
Beta1.25
Short Percentage of Float0.00%
52-Week Range $0.41 - 1.06
Shares Outstanding(Mil)12622.67

Analyst Estimate

Dec15 Dec16 Dec17 Dec18
Revenue(Mil) 14,321 15,131 16,484 18,353
EPS($) 0.01 0.03 0.07 0.09
EPS without NRI($) 0.01 0.03 0.07 0.09

Business Description

Industry: Building Materials » Building Materials
Compare: » details
Traded in other countries:CX.Argentina, CEXB.Germany, CEMEX CPO.Mexico, CX.USA,
Cemex SAB de CV was founded in 1906. The Company is engaged in the production, marketing, distribution and sale of cement, ready-mix concrete, aggregates and other construction materials. Cement is a binding agent, which, when mixed with sand, stone or other aggregates and water, produces either ready-mix concrete or mortar. It manufactures cement through a closely controlled chemical process, which begins with the mining and crushing of limestone and clay, and, in some instances, other raw materials. The clay and limestone are then pre-homogenized, a process which consists of combining different types of clay and limestone. It owns the registered trademarks for its brands in Mexico, such as 'Tolteca,' 'Monterrey,' 'Maya,' 'Anahuac,' 'Campana,' 'Gallo,' and 'Centenario.' The Company's competitors includes Lafarge Tarmac, Heidelberg, Aggregate Industries ,Hope Construction Materials , Dyckerhoff, Holcim, Schwenk Lafarge, Italcementi and Vicat. The Company's operations are subject to laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment in the various jurisdictions in which it operates, such as regulations regarding the release of cement dust into the air or emissions of greenhouse gases.
» More Articles for OTCPK:CXMSF

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Brandes Investment Trust Comments on Cemex Feb 08 2016 
Brandes Emerging Markets Value Fund 4th Quarter Commentary Feb 08 2016 
Richard Snow Makes Huge Increases in Big-Name Stocks Jan 08 2016 
CEMEX Can Overcome Balance Sheet Woes Dec 31 2015 
Chris Davis' Stocks Trading Below the Peter Lynch Value Nov 18 2015 
Dodge & Cox Funds 2015 Fixed Income Mid-Year Review Aug 24 2015 
Betting on Mexico's Next Infrastructure Boom Jan 20 2014 
Should You Bet on Cemex's Shares? Jan 09 2014 
Top Five Guru-Held Central American Companies Dec 05 2013 
Rob Citrone's Mexican Bets Dec 02 2013 

More From Other Websites
Why Cemex, Despite Mexican Peso, Can Double Feb 09 2016
Mexico's Cemex sets ambitious asset-sales target, shares soar Feb 04 2016
[$$] Mexico's Cemex Swings to Profit Feb 04 2016
Cemex Latam Holdings posts $22 mln net loss in fourth quarter Feb 04 2016
Mexico's Cemex swings to fourth-quarter profit Feb 04 2016
Cemex Jumps in Mexico After First Annual Profit in Six Years Feb 04 2016
Cemex Earnings Beat Analysts’ Estimates as U.S. Sales Rise Feb 04 2016
Mexico's Indebted Cemex: 60% Upside, Citi Upgrade Says Feb 02 2016
Cemex (CX) Stock Price Target Lowered at Barclays Jan 25 2016
Barclays Says `Cheap' Cemex Can Go Lower as Peso Curbs Rebound Jan 25 2016
Cemex Analyst Calls Spurned as Investors Flee Currency Decline Jan 21 2016
Shares in Mexico's Cemex fall more than 8 pct as peso slumps Jan 20 2016
Cemex traders chase bearish trend Jan 15 2016
Top Stock Pick Cemex Tumbles as Global Growth Concerns Sink Peso Jan 07 2016
Large bearish position targeting Cemex Jan 04 2016
Cemex Seen Poised for Top Mexico Gain Following Fed-Fueled Rout Dec 16 2015
Cemex (CX) Stock Falls Following Analyst Downgrade Dec 14 2015
Credit Suisse Downgrades Cemex, Sees Vulnerability From Leverage And Currency Mismatch Dec 14 2015
Why Are Investors Heading For The Exits In These Five Stocks Today? Dec 07 2015

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
FEEDBACK