Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.08
DAR's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
83% of the 163 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 0.44 vs. DAR: 0.08 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
DAR' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.01  Med: 0.09 Max: 2.68
Current: 0.08
0.01
2.68
Equity-to-Asset 0.41
DAR's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
61% of the 154 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 0.47 vs. DAR: 0.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
DAR' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.06  Med: 0.38 Max: 0.7
Current: 0.41
-0.06
0.7
Interest Coverage 1.57
DAR's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
89% of the 116 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 9.51 vs. DAR: 1.57 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
DAR' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.21  Med: 8.95 Max: 30.71
Current: 1.57
1.21
30.71
Piotroski F-Score: 7
Altman Z-Score: 1.67
Beneish M-Score: -2.82
WACC vs ROIC
9.41%
3.40%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 4.50
DAR's Operating Margin % is ranked higher than
53% of the 156 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 3.91 vs. DAR: 4.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
DAR' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.16  Med: 11.43 Max: 17.47
Current: 4.5
4.16
17.47
Net Margin % 4.40
DAR's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
62% of the 156 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 2.25 vs. DAR: 4.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
DAR' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.25  Med: 6.43 Max: 9.43
Current: 4.4
1.25
9.43
ROE % 7.65
DAR's ROE % is ranked higher than
61% of the 155 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 4.25 vs. DAR: 7.65 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
DAR' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.23  Med: 12.5 Max: 25.85
Current: 7.65
3.23
25.85
ROA % 3.02
DAR's ROA % is ranked higher than
63% of the 166 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1.08 vs. DAR: 3.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
DAR' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.53  Med: 6.85 Max: 14.63
Current: 3.02
1.53
14.63
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 13.18
DAR's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
62% of the 165 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 7.91 vs. DAR: 13.18 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
DAR' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.39  Med: 37.11 Max: 71.82
Current: 13.18
10.39
71.82
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate 11.10
DAR's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked higher than
72% of the 119 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 0.80 vs. DAR: 11.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
DAR' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -31.8  Med: 3.1 Max: 27.5
Current: 11.1
-31.8
27.5
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate 2.40
DAR's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
52% of the 98 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 3.50 vs. DAR: 2.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
DAR' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -26.8  Med: 1.6 Max: 96.3
Current: 2.4
-26.8
96.3
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate -24.40
DAR's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked lower than
79% of the 87 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 3.20 vs. DAR: -24.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
DAR' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -37.7  Med: 8.95 Max: 93.9
Current: -24.4
-37.7
93.9
GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Signs with Darling Ingredients Inc $DAR.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» DAR's 10-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-03-01)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q1 2016

DAR Guru Trades in Q1 2016

Jim Simons 503,000 sh (+102.09%)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 329,476 sh (+8.89%)
Paul Tudor Jones 57,642 sh (+8.54%)
Mario Cibelli 1,100,000 sh (+0.92%)
Steven Cohen 600,000 sh (unchged)
Ken Fisher 2,107,895 sh (-0.38%)
Steven Cohen 981,600 sh (-42.34%)
Joel Greenblatt 10,666 sh (-85.10%)
» More
Q2 2016

DAR Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Jim Simons 919,800 sh (+82.86%)
Steven Cohen 1,040,900 sh (+6.04%)
Joel Greenblatt 10,666 sh (unchged)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 328,696 sh (-0.24%)
Ken Fisher 2,095,569 sh (-0.58%)
Mario Cibelli 1,040,000 sh (-5.45%)
Paul Tudor Jones 21,259 sh (-63.12%)
» More
Q3 2016

DAR Guru Trades in Q3 2016

Paul Tudor Jones 39,865 sh (+87.52%)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 336,769 sh (+2.46%)
Ken Fisher 2,107,937 sh (+0.59%)
Mario Cibelli 1,040,000 sh (unchged)
Joel Greenblatt 10,666 sh (unchged)
Steven Cohen Sold Out
Jim Simons 914,700 sh (-0.55%)
» More
Q4 2016

DAR Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Joel Greenblatt 13,692 sh (+28.37%)
Mario Cibelli 1,075,000 sh (+3.37%)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 339,417 sh (+0.79%)
Ken Fisher 2,075,252 sh (-1.55%)
Paul Tudor Jones 33,040 sh (-17.12%)
Jim Simons 306,315 sh (-66.51%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with DAR

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Waste Management » Waste Management    NAICS: 311613    SIC: 7389
Compare:NYSE:CVA, NYSE:ADSW, OTCPK:TMRAY, NAS:ECOL, NYSE:CLH, OTCPK:LASKF, NAS:CWST, OTCPK:CTEQF, AMEX:AXU, OTCPK:NWLTF, OTCPK:LLPP, OTCPK:EARK, NAS:RELY, NAS:SMED, OTCPK:NESC, NAS:VTNR, NAS:EEI, OTCPK:GTII, NAS:QRHC, NAS:PESI » details
Traded in other countries:43D.Germany,
Darling Ingredients Inc is a developer & producer of natural ingredients from edible & inedible bio-nutrients, creating customized specialty solutions for customers in the food, pet food, pharmaceutical, feed, fuel, bioenergy & fertilizer industries.

Darling Ingredients Inc was incorporated in Delaware in 1962 under the name "Darling-Delaware Company, Inc. On December 28, 1993, Darling changed its name from "Darling-Delaware Company, Inc." to "Darling International Inc. It is a developer & producer of natural ingredients from edible & inedible bio-nutrients, creating customized specialty solutions for customers in the food, pet food, pharmaceutical, feed, fuel, bioenergy & fertilizer industries. The Company recycles all aspects of animal by-product streams into useable and specialty ingredients, such as gelatin, tallow, feed-grade fats, meat and bone meal, poultry meal, yellow grease, fuel feed stocks, green energy, natural casings and hides. Its value-added products include edible fats, bone products, fertilizers and blood products. The Company also recovers and converts used cooking oil and commercial bakery residuals into valuable feed and fuel ingredients. In addition, the Company provides grease trap collection services and sells used cooking oil collection equipment to restaurants and collects and land applies food residuals. The Company operates in five continents United States, Canada, Europe, China, Australia, and South America. The Company operated in North America and its operations were organized into two segments, Rendering and Bakery. The Rendering segment under The Rothsay brand collected two primary types of animal by-products, (i) beef and pork by-products and (ii) poultry by-products, which are collected from meat and poultry processors, grocery stores, butcher shops and food service establishments. These rendering materials are collected in one of two manners. Certain large suppliers, such as large meat processors and poultry processors, are furnished with bulk containers into which the raw material is loaded. The Company provides the remaining suppliers, grocery stores and butcher shops, with containers in which to deposit the raw material. The Company's North American Rendering segment produces finished products through the grinding, cooking, separating, drying, and blending of various raw materials. The process starts with the collection of animal by-products (including fat, bones, feathers, offal and other animal by-products). The animal by-products are ground and heated to extract water and separate oils and grease from animal tissue as well as to sterilize and make the material suitable as an ingredient for animal feed. The separated oils, tallows, and greases are then centrifuged and/or refined for purity. The remaining solid product is pressed to remove additional oils to create meals. The meal is then sifted through screens and ground further if necessary to produce an appropriately sized protein meal. The bakery feed division, which operates solely within the United States, collects bakery residual materials and processes the raw materials into BBP, including Cookie Meal, an animal feed ingredient used in poultry rations. The Company competes with

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 14.27
DAR's PE Ratio is ranked higher than
67% of the 98 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 19.57 vs. DAR: 14.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
DAR' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.56  Med: 20.7 Max: 217.5
Current: 14.27
3.56
217.5
Forward PE Ratio 16.42
DAR's Forward PE Ratio is ranked higher than
76% of the 17 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 20.88 vs. DAR: 16.42 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PE Ratio without NRI 14.27
DAR's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked higher than
70% of the 99 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 21.00 vs. DAR: 14.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
DAR' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.56  Med: 20.7 Max: 217.5
Current: 14.27
3.56
217.5
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 6.40
DAR's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked higher than
86% of the 58 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 17.31 vs. DAR: 6.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
DAR' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.46  Med: 13.06 Max: 82.08
Current: 6.4
3.46
82.08
PB Ratio 1.05
DAR's PB Ratio is ranked higher than
71% of the 158 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1.85 vs. DAR: 1.05 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
DAR' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.72  Med: 2.05 Max: 5.91
Current: 1.05
0.72
5.91
PS Ratio 0.63
DAR's PS Ratio is ranked higher than
65% of the 152 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1.26 vs. DAR: 0.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
DAR' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.34  Med: 1.03 Max: 1.85
Current: 0.63
0.34
1.85
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 12.50
DAR's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
55% of the 49 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 13.47 vs. DAR: 12.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
DAR' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.4  Med: 14.69 Max: 146.25
Current: 12.5
4.4
146.25
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 5.17
DAR's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked higher than
68% of the 66 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 7.71 vs. DAR: 5.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
DAR' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.14  Med: 8.96 Max: 22.55
Current: 5.17
3.14
22.55
EV-to-EBIT 15.26
DAR's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
55% of the 101 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 17.55 vs. DAR: 15.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
DAR' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.1  Med: 13.15 Max: 67
Current: 15.26
2.1
67
EV-to-EBITDA 7.28
DAR's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
81% of the 107 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 11.84 vs. DAR: 7.28 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
DAR' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.8  Med: 8.4 Max: 21
Current: 7.28
1.8
21
PEG Ratio 1.42
DAR's PEG Ratio is ranked higher than
63% of the 35 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1.65 vs. DAR: 1.42 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG Ratio only.
DAR' s PEG Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.23  Med: 0.83 Max: 217.36
Current: 1.42
0.23
217.36
Shiller PE Ratio 16.94
DAR's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked higher than
76% of the 25 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 31.44 vs. DAR: 16.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
DAR' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 11.71  Med: 30.56 Max: 290.67
Current: 16.94
11.71
290.67
Current Ratio 2.10
DAR's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
72% of the 159 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1.35 vs. DAR: 2.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
DAR' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.25  Med: 1.6 Max: 6.38
Current: 2.1
0.25
6.38
Quick Ratio 1.31
DAR's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
56% of the 159 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1.21 vs. DAR: 1.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
DAR' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.19  Med: 1.22 Max: 6.01
Current: 1.31
0.19
6.01
Days Inventory 51.20
DAR's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
68% of the 126 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 27.82 vs. DAR: 51.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
DAR' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 12.02  Med: 16.66 Max: 51.31
Current: 51.2
12.02
51.31
Days Sales Outstanding 42.08
DAR's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
74% of the 114 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 65.19 vs. DAR: 42.08 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
DAR' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 18.27  Med: 30.71 Max: 44.03
Current: 42.08
18.27
44.03
Days Payable 23.87
DAR's Days Payable is ranked lower than
71% of the 94 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 47.62 vs. DAR: 23.87 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
DAR' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.64  Med: 18.08 Max: 48.14
Current: 23.87
9.64
48.14

Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -11.80
DAR's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked lower than
63% of the 100 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: -5.30 vs. DAR: -11.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
DAR' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -60.1  Med: -8.4 Max: 0
Current: -11.8
-60.1
0

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 0.69
DAR's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked higher than
81% of the 57 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1.22 vs. DAR: 0.69 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
DAR' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.08  Med: 1.04 Max: 2.54
Current: 0.69
0.08
2.54
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-DCF (Earnings Based) 0.61
DAR's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-DCF (Earnings Based) is ranked higher than
86% of the 7 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 0.94 vs. DAR: 0.61 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-DCF (Earnings Based) only.
N/A
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 0.61
DAR's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
80% of the 125 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 0.99 vs. DAR: 0.61 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
DAR' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.03  Med: 0.74 Max: 1.7
Current: 0.61
0.03
1.7
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 6.48
DAR's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
74% of the 171 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 2.37 vs. DAR: 6.48 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
DAR' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.5  Med: 7.6 Max: 47.6
Current: 6.48
1.5
47.6
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % 7.61
DAR's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked higher than
55% of the 64 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 5.52 vs. DAR: 7.61 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
DAR' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -22.7  Med: 26.3 Max: 33.4
Current: 7.61
-22.7
33.4

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $3,321
EPS (TTM) $ 0.89
Beta1.59
Short Percentage of Float2.83%
52-Week Range $8.15 - 15.93
Shares Outstanding (Mil)164.60

Analyst Estimate

Dec16 Dec17 Dec18
Revenue (Mil $) 3,356 3,498
EPS ($) 0.60 0.78 0.97
EPS without NRI ($) 0.60 0.78 0.97
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
N/A
Dividends per Share ($)
» More Articles for DAR

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
8 of the Worst Stocks in Gurus' Portfolios Feb 20 2017 
Private Capital Sells Stake in Cisco Systems Jun 30 2015 
Mario Cibelli Adds to Stakes in SeaWorld, Fidelity National Financial Jun 09 2015 
Weekly 3-Year Low Highlights: ABI, YOKU, DAR, BPT, EFC Mar 23 2015 
Mario Cibelli Adds to Largest Stakes in His Portfolio Mar 21 2015 
Canaccord Genuity Weighs in on 4 Bio-resource Stocks Mar 05 2015 
Archer-Daniels-Midland Is a Major Processor Expanding Abroad Dec 12 2014 
Oil Industry Stocks to Fuel Your Portfolio Jun 29 2014 
An Ancient Business Still Prospers Jun 19 2011 
Darling International - Fat Money May 31 2010 

More From Other Websites
Darling Ingredients Inc. Announces Fourth Quarter And Fiscal Year 2016 Earnings Conference Call And... Feb 24 2017
INVESTOR ALERT: Levi & Korsinsky, LLP Announces an Investigation Involving Possible Breaches of... Feb 17 2017
Gabelli & Company’s Waste & Environmental Services Symposium Feb 15 2017
JBS S.A. Announces Independent Members of the Board of Its Subsidiary JBS Foods International Jan 30 2017
Darling Ingredients to Present at 13th Annual BNP Paribas High Yield & Leveraged Finance Conference Jan 11 2017
DARLING INGREDIENTS INC. Files SEC form 8-K, Change in Directors or Principal Officers Jan 06 2017
SHAREHOLDER ALERT: Levi & Korsinsky, LLP Announces an Investigation Involving Possible Breaches of... Dec 27 2016
DARLING INGREDIENTS INC. Files SEC form 8-K, Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement Dec 20 2016
DARLING INGREDIENTS INC. Files SEC form 8-K, Change in Directors or Principal Officers, Financial... Dec 16 2016
Darling Ingredients Inc. Announces Succession Planning For Chief Financial Officer Dec 15 2016
Darling Ingredients, Inc. – Value Analysis (NYSE:DAR) : December 14, 2016 Dec 14 2016
Is Shutterstock Inc (SSTK) Going to Burn These Hedge Funds? Dec 13 2016
Darling Ingredients, Inc. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : DAR-US : December... Dec 13 2016
Is Manitowoc Foodservice Inc (MFS) A Good Stock To Buy Right Now? Dec 07 2016
Darling Ingredients, Inc. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : DAR-US : December... Dec 01 2016
Hedge Funds Are Selling Darling International Inc. (DAR) Nov 27 2016
ETFs with exposure to Darling Ingredients, Inc. : November 22, 2016 Nov 22 2016
Post Earnings Coverage as Darling Posts Profit after Last Year's Loss Nov 21 2016
Darling Ingredients, Inc. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bullish Manner : DAR-US : November... Nov 21 2016
DARLING INGREDIENTS INC. Financials Nov 18 2016
Darling Ingredients, Inc. :DAR-US: Earnings Analysis: Q3, 2016 By the Numbers : November 14, 2016 Nov 14 2016
Darling Ingredients Inc. Reports Third Quarter 2016 Financial Results: Aggressive Debt Reduction... Nov 10 2016
Darling Ingredients Inc. Announces Third Quarter 2016 Earnings Conference Call And Webcast Nov 08 2016
Darling Ingredients to Host 2016 Investor - Analyst Forum Aug 29 2016
Darling Ingredients Inc. Reports Second Quarter 2016 Financial Results: Feed Segment Drives... Aug 11 2016
Darling Ingredients Inc. Announces Second Quarter 2016 Earnings Conference Call And Webcast Aug 09 2016
Darling Ingredients Inc. To Host Biofuels Low Carbon Fuel Standard Conference Call June 7, 2016 May 31 2016
Darling Ingredients to Present In Upcoming New York Conferences May 27 2016
Darling Ingredients Inc. Reports First Quarter 2016 Financial Results: Strong Food Performance... May 27 2016
Darling Ingredients to Present at 11th Annual Farm to Market Conference May 17 2016
Darling Ingredients Inc. Announces First Quarter 2016 Earnings Conference Call And Webcast May 10 2016
Diamond Green Diesel to be Expanded to 275 Million Gallons Annually Apr 07 2016

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)