Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.08
DAR's Cash to Debt is ranked lower than
87% of the 172 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 0.43 vs. DAR: 0.08 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
DAR' s Cash to Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.01  Med: 0.09 Max: 2.68
Current: 0.08
0.01
2.68
Equity to Asset 0.40
DAR's Equity to Asset is ranked lower than
62% of the 163 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 0.50 vs. DAR: 0.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
DAR' s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.06  Med: 0.38 Max: 0.7
Current: 0.4
-0.06
0.7
Interest Coverage 1.59
DAR's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
89% of the 117 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 10.85 vs. DAR: 1.59 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
DAR' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.21  Med: 8.95 Max: 30.71
Current: 1.59
1.21
30.71
F-Score: 6
Z-Score: 1.64
M-Score: -2.74
WACC vs ROIC
9.34%
-12.44%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 4.60
DAR's Operating margin (%) is ranked higher than
54% of the 166 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 3.37 vs. DAR: 4.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
DAR' s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.16  Med: 11.43 Max: 17.47
Current: 4.6
4.16
17.47
Net-margin (%) 3.27
DAR's Net-margin (%) is ranked higher than
55% of the 166 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 2.06 vs. DAR: 3.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
DAR' s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.25  Med: 6.43 Max: 9.43
Current: 3.27
1.25
9.43
ROE (%) 5.75
DAR's ROE (%) is ranked higher than
57% of the 168 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 3.57 vs. DAR: 5.75 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
DAR' s ROE (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.23  Med: 12.5 Max: 25.85
Current: 5.75
3.23
25.85
ROA (%) 2.23
DAR's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
58% of the 177 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1.20 vs. DAR: 2.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
DAR' s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.53  Med: 6.85 Max: 14.63
Current: 2.23
1.53
14.63
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 11.68
DAR's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
63% of the 174 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 7.21 vs. DAR: 11.68 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
DAR' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.39  Med: 37.11 Max: 71.82
Current: 11.68
10.39
71.82
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) 11.10
DAR's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
69% of the 127 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1.60 vs. DAR: 11.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
DAR' s Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -34.2  Med: 3.1 Max: 27.5
Current: 11.1
-34.2
27.5
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) 2.40
DAR's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
52% of the 109 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 3.50 vs. DAR: 2.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
DAR' s EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -41  Med: 2.4 Max: 96.3
Current: 2.4
-41
96.3
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) -24.40
DAR's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
81% of the 99 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: -0.10 vs. DAR: -24.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
DAR' s EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -37.7  Med: 8.95 Max: 93.9
Current: -24.4
-37.7
93.9
» DAR's 10-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: Est. 2016-11-13)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Oprt. Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q3 2015

DAR Guru Trades in Q3 2015

Joel Greenblatt 563,335 sh (New)
Mario Cibelli 995,000 sh (+33.56%)
Tom Gayner 65,000 sh (unchged)
Steven Cohen 300,000 sh (unchged)
Jim Simons Sold Out
Ken Fisher 2,131,573 sh (-3.77%)
Paul Tudor Jones 52,697 sh (-22.62%)
Steven Cohen 1,500,800 sh (-54.85%)
» More
Q4 2015

DAR Guru Trades in Q4 2015

Jim Simons 248,900 sh (New)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 302,588 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 1,702,400 sh (+13.43%)
Mario Cibelli 1,090,000 sh (+9.55%)
Paul Tudor Jones 53,108 sh (+0.78%)
Steven Cohen 250,000 sh (unchged)
Tom Gayner Sold Out
Ken Fisher 2,115,971 sh (-0.73%)
Joel Greenblatt 71,586 sh (-87.29%)
» More
Q1 2016

DAR Guru Trades in Q1 2016

Jim Simons 503,000 sh (+102.09%)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 329,476 sh (+8.89%)
Paul Tudor Jones 57,642 sh (+8.54%)
Mario Cibelli 1,100,000 sh (+0.92%)
Steven Cohen 600,000 sh (unchged)
Ken Fisher 2,107,895 sh (-0.38%)
Steven Cohen 981,600 sh (-42.34%)
Joel Greenblatt 10,666 sh (-85.10%)
» More
Q2 2016

DAR Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Jim Simons 919,800 sh (+82.86%)
Steven Cohen 1,040,900 sh (+6.04%)
Joel Greenblatt 10,666 sh (unchged)
Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss 328,696 sh (-0.24%)
Ken Fisher 2,095,569 sh (-0.58%)
Mario Cibelli 1,040,000 sh (-5.45%)
Paul Tudor Jones 21,259 sh (-63.12%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with DAR

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Waste Management » Waste Management
Compare:NYSE:CVA, NYSE:BIN, OTCPK:TMRAY, NYSE:CLH, OTCPK:BOTRF, NAS:ECOL, OTCPK:FMOCF, OTCPK:EARK, NAS:CWST, NYSE:TRR, OTCPK:CXEE, OTCPK:CTEQF, AMEX:AXU, OTCPK:NWLTF, OTCPK:LLPP, NAS:AQMS, OTCPK:SGGHU, NAS:SMED, NAS:PESI, OTCPK:PGTK » details
Traded in other countries:43D.Germany,
Darling Ingredients Inc is a developer & producer of natural ingredients from edible & inedible bio-nutrients, creating customized specialty solutions for customers in the food, pet food, pharmaceutical, feed, fuel, bioenergy & fertilizer industries.

Darling Ingredients Inc was incorporated in Delaware in 1962 under the name "Darling-Delaware Company, Inc. On December 28, 1993, Darling changed its name from "Darling-Delaware Company, Inc." to "Darling International Inc. It is a developer & producer of natural ingredients from edible & inedible bio-nutrients, creating customized specialty solutions for customers in the food, pet food, pharmaceutical, feed, fuel, bioenergy & fertilizer industries. The Company recycles all aspects of animal by-product streams into useable and specialty ingredients, such as gelatin, tallow, feed-grade fats, meat and bone meal, poultry meal, yellow grease, fuel feed stocks, green energy, natural casings and hides. Its value-added products include edible fats, bone products, fertilizers and blood products. The Company also recovers and converts used cooking oil and commercial bakery residuals into valuable feed and fuel ingredients. In addition, the Company provides grease trap collection services and sells used cooking oil collection equipment to restaurants and collects and land applies food residuals. The Company operates in five continents United States, Canada, Europe, China, Australia, and South America. The Company operated in North America and its operations were organized into two segments, Rendering and Bakery. The Rendering segment under The Rothsay brand collected two primary types of animal by-products, (i) beef and pork by-products and (ii) poultry by-products, which are collected from meat and poultry processors, grocery stores, butcher shops and food service establishments. These rendering materials are collected in one of two manners. Certain large suppliers, such as large meat processors and poultry processors, are furnished with bulk containers into which the raw material is loaded. The Company provides the remaining suppliers, grocery stores and butcher shops, with containers in which to deposit the raw material. The Company's North American Rendering segment produces finished products through the grinding, cooking, separating, drying, and blending of various raw materials. The process starts with the collection of animal by-products (including fat, bones, feathers, offal and other animal by-products). The animal by-products are ground and heated to extract water and separate oils and grease from animal tissue as well as to sterilize and make the material suitable as an ingredient for animal feed. The separated oils, tallows, and greases are then centrifuged and/or refined for purity. The remaining solid product is pressed to remove additional oils to create meals. The meal is then sifted through screens and ground further if necessary to produce an appropriately sized protein meal. The bakery feed division, which operates solely within the United States, collects bakery residual materials and processes the raw materials into BBP, including Cookie Meal, an animal feed ingredient used in poultry rations. The Company competes with

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/E(ttm) 19.57
DAR's P/E(ttm) is ranked lower than
54% of the 98 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 19.50 vs. DAR: 19.57 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/E(ttm) only.
DAR' s P/E(ttm) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.56  Med: 21.49 Max: 217.5
Current: 19.57
3.56
217.5
Forward P/E 17.21
DAR's Forward P/E is ranked higher than
69% of the 16 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 21.28 vs. DAR: 17.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward P/E only.
N/A
PE(NRI) 19.57
DAR's PE(NRI) is ranked lower than
52% of the 100 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 19.50 vs. DAR: 19.57 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE(NRI) only.
DAR' s PE(NRI) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.56  Med: 21.49 Max: 217.5
Current: 19.57
3.56
217.5
Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) 6.96
DAR's Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) is ranked higher than
77% of the 60 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 14.84 vs. DAR: 6.96 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) only.
DAR' s Price/Owner Earnings (ttm) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.46  Med: 14.03 Max: 82.08
Current: 6.96
3.46
82.08
P/B 1.09
DAR's P/B is ranked higher than
69% of the 160 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1.64 vs. DAR: 1.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
DAR' s P/B Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.72  Med: 2.09 Max: 5.91
Current: 1.09
0.72
5.91
P/S 0.65
DAR's P/S is ranked higher than
66% of the 164 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1.31 vs. DAR: 0.65 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
DAR' s P/S Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.34  Med: 1.02 Max: 1.85
Current: 0.65
0.34
1.85
PFCF 13.37
DAR's PFCF is ranked higher than
53% of the 53 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 13.65 vs. DAR: 13.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PFCF only.
DAR' s PFCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.4  Med: 15.43 Max: 224.38
Current: 13.37
4.4
224.38
POCF 5.35
DAR's POCF is ranked higher than
65% of the 72 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 7.74 vs. DAR: 5.35 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
DAR' s POCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.14  Med: 9.49 Max: 22.55
Current: 5.35
3.14
22.55
EV-to-EBIT 17.46
DAR's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
51% of the 103 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 17.22 vs. DAR: 17.46 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
DAR' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.1  Med: 13.2 Max: 67
Current: 17.46
2.1
67
EV-to-EBITDA 7.86
DAR's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
72% of the 111 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 11.30 vs. DAR: 7.86 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
DAR' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.8  Med: 8.4 Max: 21
Current: 7.86
1.8
21
PEG 1.96
DAR's PEG is ranked lower than
56% of the 43 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1.85 vs. DAR: 1.96 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG only.
DAR' s PEG Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.28  Med: 0.82 Max: 217.36
Current: 1.96
0.28
217.36
Shiller P/E 17.59
DAR's Shiller P/E is ranked higher than
79% of the 24 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 30.78 vs. DAR: 17.59 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller P/E only.
DAR' s Shiller P/E Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 11.71  Med: 30.79 Max: 290.67
Current: 17.59
11.71
290.67
Current Ratio 2.15
DAR's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
74% of the 168 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1.34 vs. DAR: 2.15 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
DAR' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.25  Med: 1.52 Max: 6.38
Current: 2.15
0.25
6.38
Quick Ratio 1.37
DAR's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
57% of the 168 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1.23 vs. DAR: 1.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
DAR' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.19  Med: 1.17 Max: 6.01
Current: 1.37
0.19
6.01
Days Inventory 52.25
DAR's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
74% of the 131 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 24.62 vs. DAR: 52.25 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
DAR' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 12.02  Med: 16.66 Max: 52.25
Current: 52.25
12.02
52.25
Days Sales Outstanding 43.96
DAR's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
70% of the 125 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 66.52 vs. DAR: 43.96 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
DAR' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 18.27  Med: 30.71 Max: 44.03
Current: 43.96
18.27
44.03
Days Payable 25.11
DAR's Days Payable is ranked lower than
66% of the 105 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 41.01 vs. DAR: 25.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
DAR' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.64  Med: 18.08 Max: 48.14
Current: 25.11
9.64
48.14

Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -11.80
DAR's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked lower than
66% of the 106 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: -4.90 vs. DAR: -11.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
DAR' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -60.1  Med: -8.4 Max: 0
Current: -11.8
-60.1
0

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Projected FCF 0.68
DAR's Price/Projected FCF is ranked higher than
78% of the 59 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1.23 vs. DAR: 0.68 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Projected FCF only.
DAR' s Price/Projected FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.08  Med: 1.04 Max: 2.7
Current: 0.68
0.08
2.7
Price/DCF (Earnings Based) 0.83
DAR's Price/DCF (Earnings Based) is ranked higher than
73% of the 11 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1.02 vs. DAR: 0.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/DCF (Earnings Based) only.
N/A
Price/Median PS Value 0.63
DAR's Price/Median PS Value is ranked higher than
79% of the 145 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1.00 vs. DAR: 0.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
DAR' s Price/Median PS Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.03  Med: 0.74 Max: 1.72
Current: 0.63
0.03
1.72
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) 5.71
DAR's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
70% of the 176 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 2.20 vs. DAR: 5.71 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
DAR' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.5  Med: 7.5 Max: 47.6
Current: 5.71
1.5
47.6
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) 6.75
DAR's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked lower than
54% of the 65 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 7.82 vs. DAR: 6.75 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
DAR' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -22.4  Med: 26.1 Max: 33.4
Current: 6.75
-22.4
33.4

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $3,320
EPS (TTM) $ 0.66
Beta1.66
Short Percentage of Float2.29%
52-Week Range $7.78 - 15.93
Shares Outstanding (Mil)164.59

Analyst Estimate

Dec16 Dec17 Dec18
Revenue (Mil $) 3,374 3,498
EPS ($) 0.58 0.75 1.16
EPS w/o NRI ($) 0.58 0.75 1.16
EPS Growth Rate
(3Y to 5Y Estimate)
N/A
Dividends Per Share ($)
» More Articles for DAR

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Private Capital Sells Stake in Cisco Systems Jun 30 2015 
Mario Cibelli Adds to Stakes in SeaWorld, Fidelity National Financial Jun 09 2015 
Weekly 3-Year Low Highlights: ABI, YOKU, DAR, BPT, EFC Mar 23 2015 
Mario Cibelli Adds to Largest Stakes in His Portfolio Mar 21 2015 
Canaccord Genuity Weighs in on 4 Bio-resource Stocks Mar 05 2015 
Archer-Daniels-Midland Is a Major Processor Expanding Abroad Dec 12 2014 
Oil Industry Stocks to Fuel Your Portfolio Jun 29 2014 
An Ancient Business Still Prospers Jun 19 2011 
Darling International - Fat Money May 31 2010 
Darling International Inc Reports Operating Results (10-Q) Nov 12 2009 

More From Other Websites
Darling Ingredients Inc. -- Moody's Affirms Darling's Ratings; Outlook Stable Sep 21 2016
Darling Ingredients to Present at Credit Suisse 2016 Global Credit Products Conference Sep 16 2016
ETF’s with exposure to Darling Ingredients, Inc. : September 16, 2016 Sep 16 2016
DARLING INGREDIENTS INC. Files SEC form 8-K, Regulation FD Disclosure, Financial Statements and... Sep 14 2016
ETF’s with exposure to Darling Ingredients, Inc. : September 2, 2016 Sep 02 2016
Darling Ingredients to Host 2016 Investor - Analyst Forum Aug 29 2016
Darling Ingredients to Host 2016 Investor - Analyst Forum Aug 29 2016
DARLING INGREDIENTS INC. Financials Aug 20 2016
ETF’s with exposure to Darling Ingredients, Inc. : August 17, 2016 Aug 17 2016
Darling Ingredients, Inc. :DAR-US: Earnings Analysis: Q2, 2016 By the Numbers : August 15, 2016 Aug 15 2016
Edited Transcript of DAR earnings conference call or presentation 12-Aug-16 12:30pm GMT Aug 12 2016
How Will Darling Ingredients (DAR) Stock React to Q2 Beat? Aug 11 2016
Darling misses 2Q profit forecasts Aug 11 2016
Darling misses 2Q profit forecasts Aug 11 2016
DARLING INGREDIENTS INC. Files SEC form 8-K, Results of Operations and Financial Condition,... Aug 11 2016
Darling Ingredients Inc. Reports Second Quarter 2016 Financial Results: Feed Segment Drives... Aug 11 2016
Darling Ingredients Inc. Reports Second Quarter 2016 Financial Results: Feed Segment Drives... Aug 11 2016
Q2 2016 Darling Ingredients Inc Earnings Release - After Market Close Aug 11 2016

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)