Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 4/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.07
DAR's Cash to Debt is ranked lower than
87% of the 165 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 0.56 vs. DAR: 0.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
DAR' s Cash to Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.01  Med: 0.09 Max: 2.68
Current: 0.07
0.01
2.68
Equity to Asset 0.37
DAR's Equity to Asset is ranked lower than
65% of the 160 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 0.47 vs. DAR: 0.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
DAR' s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.06  Med: 0.37 Max: 0.7
Current: 0.37
-0.06
0.7
Interest Coverage 1.40
DAR's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
94% of the 88 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 12.80 vs. DAR: 1.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
DAR' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.21  Med: 8.95 Max: 30.71
Current: 1.4
1.21
30.71
F-Score: 7
Z-Score: 1.49
M-Score: -2.95
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 4.17
DAR's Operating margin (%) is ranked lower than
51% of the 160 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 4.20 vs. DAR: 4.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
DAR' s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.16  Med: 11.43 Max: 17.47
Current: 4.17
4.16
17.47
Net-margin (%) 1.78
DAR's Net-margin (%) is ranked lower than
52% of the 160 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1.87 vs. DAR: 1.78 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
DAR' s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.25  Med: 6.43 Max: 9.43
Current: 1.78
1.25
9.43
ROE (%) 3.39
DAR's ROE (%) is ranked lower than
51% of the 157 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 4.74 vs. DAR: 3.39 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
DAR' s ROE (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.23  Med: 12.50 Max: 25.85
Current: 3.39
3.23
25.85
ROA (%) 1.27
DAR's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
51% of the 166 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1.18 vs. DAR: 1.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
DAR' s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.53  Med: 6.85 Max: 14.63
Current: 1.27
1.53
14.63
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 9.52
DAR's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
53% of the 164 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 8.24 vs. DAR: 9.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
DAR' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 11.91  Med: 37.11 Max: 71.82
Current: 9.52
11.91
71.82
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) 15.50
DAR's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
83% of the 117 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 2.30 vs. DAR: 15.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
DAR' s Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -31.2  Med: 2.05 Max: 27
Current: 15.5
-31.2
27
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) -4.20
DAR's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
56% of the 96 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: -0.50 vs. DAR: -4.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
DAR' s EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -26.2  Med: -1.30 Max: 95.4
Current: -4.2
-26.2
95.4
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) -35.80
DAR's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked lower than
85% of the 91 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 2.20 vs. DAR: -35.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
DAR' s EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -37.6  Med: 19.60 Max: 93.5
Current: -35.8
-37.6
93.5
» DAR's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Guru Trades

Q1 2015

DAR Guru Trades in Q1 2015

Paul Tudor Jones 128,122 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 5,079,700 sh (+217.94%)
Mario Cibelli 685,000 sh (+197.83%)
Private Capital Sold Out
Mario Gabelli Sold Out
Chuck Royce Sold Out
Ken Fisher 2,237,851 sh (-0.54%)
Jim Simons 554,800 sh (-27.93%)
Third Avenue Management 271,325 sh (-38.62%)
» More
Q2 2015

DAR Guru Trades in Q2 2015

Tom Gayner 65,000 sh (New)
Mario Cibelli 745,000 sh (+8.76%)
Steven Cohen 400,000 sh (unchged)
Third Avenue Management Sold Out
Ken Fisher 2,215,148 sh (-1.01%)
Steven Cohen 3,324,000 sh (-34.56%)
Paul Tudor Jones 68,100 sh (-46.85%)
Jim Simons 183,000 sh (-67.02%)
» More
Q3 2015

DAR Guru Trades in Q3 2015

Joel Greenblatt 563,335 sh (New)
Mario Cibelli 995,000 sh (+33.56%)
Steven Cohen 300,000 sh (unchged)
Tom Gayner 65,000 sh (unchged)
Jim Simons Sold Out
Ken Fisher 2,131,573 sh (-3.77%)
Paul Tudor Jones 52,697 sh (-22.62%)
Steven Cohen 1,500,800 sh (-54.85%)
» More
Q4 2015

DAR Guru Trades in Q4 2015

James Barrow 302,588 sh (New)
Ken Fisher 2,115,971 sh (-0.73%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with DAR

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/E(ttm) 22.65
DAR's P/E(ttm) is ranked lower than
54% of the 130 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 21.05 vs. DAR: 22.65 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/E(ttm) only.
DAR' s P/E(ttm) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.57  Med: 21.88 Max: 217.5
Current: 22.65
3.57
217.5
Forward P/E 11.85
DAR's Forward P/E is ranked higher than
80% of the 82 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 16.18 vs. DAR: 11.85 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward P/E only.
N/A
PE(NRI) 22.65
DAR's PE(NRI) is ranked higher than
52% of the 99 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 22.81 vs. DAR: 22.65 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE(NRI) only.
DAR' s PE(NRI) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.56  Med: 21.87 Max: 217.5
Current: 22.65
3.56
217.5
P/B 0.84
DAR's P/B is ranked higher than
81% of the 221 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1.72 vs. DAR: 0.84 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
DAR' s P/B Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.78  Med: 2.17 Max: 5.91
Current: 0.84
0.78
5.91
P/S 0.41
DAR's P/S is ranked higher than
77% of the 221 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 0.92 vs. DAR: 0.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
DAR' s P/S Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.34  Med: 1.03 Max: 1.87
Current: 0.41
0.34
1.87
PFCF 9.51
DAR's PFCF is ranked higher than
60% of the 100 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 14.05 vs. DAR: 9.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PFCF only.
DAR' s PFCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.45  Med: 16.31 Max: 180
Current: 9.51
4.45
180
POCF 3.66
DAR's POCF is ranked higher than
82% of the 148 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 7.46 vs. DAR: 3.66 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
DAR' s POCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.18  Med: 10.13 Max: 23.07
Current: 3.66
3.18
23.07
EV-to-EBIT 17.45
DAR's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
58% of the 145 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 16.24 vs. DAR: 17.45 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
DAR' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.1  Med: 12.80 Max: 67
Current: 17.45
2.1
67
EV-to-EBITDA 7.32
DAR's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
73% of the 165 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 11.14 vs. DAR: 7.32 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
DAR' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.8  Med: 8.40 Max: 21
Current: 7.32
1.8
21
PEG 1.19
DAR's PEG is ranked higher than
52% of the 42 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1.25 vs. DAR: 1.19 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG only.
DAR' s PEG Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.22  Med: 0.71 Max: 7.82
Current: 1.19
0.22
7.82
Shiller P/E 12.89
DAR's Shiller P/E is ranked higher than
81% of the 37 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 22.54 vs. DAR: 12.89 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller P/E only.
DAR' s Shiller P/E Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 12.55  Med: 31.45 Max: 290.67
Current: 12.89
12.55
290.67
Current Ratio 2.21
DAR's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
74% of the 162 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1.40 vs. DAR: 2.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
DAR' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.25  Med: 1.43 Max: 6.38
Current: 2.21
0.25
6.38
Quick Ratio 1.40
DAR's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
56% of the 162 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1.26 vs. DAR: 1.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
DAR' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.19  Med: 1.12 Max: 6.01
Current: 1.4
0.19
6.01
Days Inventory 51.36
DAR's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
73% of the 127 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 24.28 vs. DAR: 51.36 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
DAR' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.51  Med: 15.54 Max: 27.27
Current: 51.36
9.51
27.27
Days Sales Outstanding 38.56
DAR's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
80% of the 125 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 65.50 vs. DAR: 38.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
DAR' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 18.27  Med: 29.21 Max: 44.03
Current: 38.56
18.27
44.03
Days Payable 20.14
DAR's Days Payable is ranked lower than
75% of the 106 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 38.22 vs. DAR: 20.14 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
DAR' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.64  Med: 17.95 Max: 48.14
Current: 20.14
9.64
48.14

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Projected FCF 0.47
DAR's Price/Projected FCF is ranked higher than
89% of the 106 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1.15 vs. DAR: 0.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Projected FCF only.
DAR' s Price/Projected FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.08  Med: 1.11 Max: 2.68
Current: 0.47
0.08
2.68
Price/DCF (Earnings Based) 0.80
DAR's Price/DCF (Earnings Based) is ranked higher than
91% of the 22 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 2.48 vs. DAR: 0.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/DCF (Earnings Based) only.
N/A
Price/Median PS Value 0.39
DAR's Price/Median PS Value is ranked higher than
92% of the 189 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 0.87 vs. DAR: 0.39 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
DAR' s Price/Median PS Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.03  Med: 0.73 Max: 1.72
Current: 0.39
0.03
1.72
Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value 2.73
DAR's Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value is ranked higher than
56% of the 39 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 1.10 vs. DAR: 2.73 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value only.
DAR' s Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.34  Med: 0.73 Max: 7.36
Current: 2.73
0.34
7.36
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) 5.68
DAR's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
67% of the 160 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 2.40 vs. DAR: 5.68 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
DAR' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.5  Med: 7.80 Max: 47.6
Current: 5.68
1.5
47.6
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) 18.79
DAR's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked higher than
76% of the 62 Companies
in the Global Waste Management industry.

( Industry Median: 8.42 vs. DAR: 18.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
DAR' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -20.9  Med: 26.20 Max: 36.1
Current: 18.79
-20.9
36.1

More Statistics

Revenue(Mil) $3588
EPS $ 0.38
Beta0.91
Short Percentage of Float5.74%
52-Week Range $8.15 - 17.96
Shares Outstanding(Mil)164.73

Analyst Estimate

Dec15 Dec16 Dec17
Revenue(Mil) 3,448 3,551
EPS($) 0.34 0.56 0.71
EPS without NRI($) 0.34 0.56 0.71

Business Description

Industry: Waste Management » Waste Management
Compare:BG, ADM, CPO, DLM, MGPI » details
Traded in other countries:43D.Germany,
Darling Ingredients Inc was incorporated in Delaware in 1962 under the name "Darling-Delaware Company, Inc. On December 28, 1993, Darling changed its name from "Darling-Delaware Company, Inc." to "Darling International Inc. It is a developer & producer of natural ingredients from edible & inedible bio-nutrients, creating customized specialty solutions for customers in the food, pet food, pharmaceutical, feed, fuel, bioenergy & fertilizer industries. The Company recycles all aspects of animal by-product streams into useable and specialty ingredients, such as gelatin, tallow, feed-grade fats, meat and bone meal, poultry meal, yellow grease, fuel feed stocks, green energy, natural casings and hides. Its value-added products include edible fats, bone products, fertilizers and blood products. The Company also recovers and converts used cooking oil and commercial bakery residuals into valuable feed and fuel ingredients. In addition, the Company provides grease trap collection services and sells used cooking oil collection equipment to restaurants and collects and land applies primarily food residuals. The Company operates in five continents United States, Canada, Europe, China, Australia, and South America. The Company operated in North America and its operations were organized into two segments, Rendering and Bakery. The Rendering segment under The Rothsay brand collected two primary types of animal by-products, (i) beef and pork by-products and (ii) poultry by-products, which are collected primarily from meat and poultry processors, grocery stores, butcher shops and food service establishments. These rendering materials are collected in one of two manners. Certain large suppliers, such as large meat processors and poultry processors, are furnished with bulk containers into which the raw material is loaded. The Company provides the remaining suppliers, primarily grocery stores and butcher shops, with containers in which to deposit the raw material. The Company's North American Rendering segment produces finished products primarily through the grinding, cooking, separating, drying, and blending of various raw materials. The process starts with the collection of animal by-products (including fat, bones, feathers, offal and other animal by-products). The animal by-products are ground and heated to extract water and separate oils and grease from animal tissue as well as to sterilize and make the material suitable as an ingredient for animal feed. The separated oils, tallows, and greases are then centrifuged and/or refined for purity. The remaining solid product is pressed to remove additional oils to create meals. The meal is then sifted through screens and ground further if necessary to produce an appropriately sized protein meal. The bakery feed division, which operates solely within the United States, collects bakery residual materials and processes the raw materials into BBP, including Cookie Meal, an animal feed ingredient primarily
» More Articles for DAR

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Private Capital Sells Stake in Cisco Systems Jun 30 2015 
Mario Cibelli Adds to Stakes in SeaWorld, Fidelity National Financial Jun 09 2015 
Weekly 3-Year Low Highlights: ABI, YOKU, DAR, BPT, EFC Mar 23 2015 
Mario Cibelli Adds to Largest Stakes in His Portfolio Mar 21 2015 
Canaccord Genuity Weighs in on 4 Bio-resource Stocks Mar 05 2015 
Archer-Daniels-Midland Is a Major Processor Expanding Abroad Dec 12 2014 
Oil Industry Stocks to Fuel Your Portfolio Jun 29 2014 
An Ancient Business Still Prospers Jun 19 2011 
Darling International - Fat Money May 31 2010 
Darling International Inc Reports Operating Results (10-Q) Nov 12 2009 

More From Other Websites
DARLING INGREDIENTS INC. Files SEC form 8-K, Regulation FD Disclosure, Financial Statements and... Jan 13 2016
Darling Ingredients, Inc. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : January 7, 2016 Jan 07 2016
Starwood Value Really Wants to Change Yahoo's Board, Management, and Business Strategy Jan 06 2016
Darling Ingredients, Inc. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bullish Manner : December 22, 2015 Dec 22 2015
DARLING INGREDIENTS INC. Financials Dec 08 2015
Darling Ingredients, Inc. Earnings Analysis: Q3, 2015 By the Numbers Dec 08 2015
DARLING INGREDIENTS INC. Files SEC form 8-K, Other Events, Financial Statements and Exhibits Dec 07 2015
Darling Ingredients Regretfully Announces The Passing Of O. Thomas Albrecht, A Member Of The Board... Dec 07 2015
Darling Ingredients Regretfully Announces The Passing Of O. Thomas Albrecht, A Member Of The Board... Dec 07 2015
Is Darling Ingredients Inc. (DAR) A Good Stock To Buy? Dec 01 2015
Darling Ingredients, Inc. – Value Analysis (NYSE:DAR) : December 1, 2015 Dec 01 2015
Darling Ingredients, Inc. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : November 30, 2015 Nov 30 2015
Here is What Hedge Funds Think About Bitauto Hldg Ltd (ADR) (BITA) Nov 29 2015
Here is What Hedge Funds Think About Pegasystems Inc. (PEGA) Nov 26 2015
Edited Transcript of DAR earnings conference call or presentation 13-Nov-15 1:30pm GMT Nov 13 2015
Darling reports 3Q loss Nov 12 2015
Darling reports 3Q loss Nov 12 2015
Darling Ingredients (DAR) Stock Falls in After-Hours Trading on Quarterly Loss Nov 12 2015

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
FEEDBACK