Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.06
EQM's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
52% of the 91 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 0.06 vs. EQM: 0.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
EQM' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.06  Med: 0.14 Max: No Debt
Current: 0.06
Equity-to-Asset 0.65
EQM's Equity-to-Asset is ranked higher than
86% of the 106 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 0.40 vs. EQM: 0.65 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
EQM' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.27  Med: 0.6 Max: 0.89
Current: 0.65
0.27
0.89
Interest Coverage 13.65
EQM's Interest Coverage is ranked higher than
70% of the 100 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 4.78 vs. EQM: 13.65 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
EQM' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.53  Med: 10.8 Max: 146.41
Current: 13.65
5.53
146.41
Piotroski F-Score: 4
Altman Z-Score: 4.33
Beneish M-Score: -2.40
WACC vs ROIC
7.79%
20.73%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 71.63
EQM's Operating Margin % is ranked higher than
97% of the 106 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 17.39 vs. EQM: 71.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
EQM' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 35.85  Med: 65.25 Max: 71.63
Current: 71.63
35.85
71.63
Net Margin % 73.13
EQM's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
95% of the 106 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 8.44 vs. EQM: 73.13 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
EQM' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 17.53  Med: 50.37 Max: 73.13
Current: 73.13
17.53
73.13
ROE % 22.27
EQM's ROE % is ranked higher than
86% of the 107 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 6.81 vs. EQM: 22.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
EQM' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.45  Med: 19.21 Max: 23.02
Current: 22.27
8.45
23.02
ROA % 19.36
EQM's ROA % is ranked higher than
93% of the 112 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 2.96 vs. EQM: 19.36 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
EQM' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.63  Med: 16.36 Max: 20.88
Current: 19.36
3.63
20.88
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 22.92
EQM's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
86% of the 109 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 7.95 vs. EQM: 22.92 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
EQM' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.95  Med: 23.03 Max: 29.79
Current: 22.92
8.95
29.79
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate 2.30
EQM's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked higher than
72% of the 80 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: -11.40 vs. EQM: 2.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
EQM' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0 Max: 16.4
Current: 2.3
0
16.4
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate 3.10
EQM's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked higher than
52% of the 75 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 3.00 vs. EQM: 3.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
EQM' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0 Max: 17.7
Current: 3.1
0
17.7
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate 28.40
EQM's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked higher than
68% of the 62 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 7.70 vs. EQM: 28.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
EQM' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0 Max: 65.9
Current: 28.4
0
65.9
GuruFocus has detected 2 Warning Signs with EQT Midstream Partners LP $EQM.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» EQM's 10-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-04-27)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q1 2016

EQM Guru Trades in Q1 2016

Jim Simons 37,500 sh (New)
T Boone Pickens 15,000 sh (-77.92%)
» More
Q2 2016

EQM Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Chris Davis 78,960 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 3,000 sh (New)
Jim Simons 217,500 sh (+480.00%)
T Boone Pickens 1,210 sh (-91.93%)
» More
Q3 2016

EQM Guru Trades in Q3 2016

Chris Davis 129,292 sh (+63.74%)
Steven Cohen Sold Out
T Boone Pickens Sold Out
Jim Simons 82,600 sh (-62.02%)
» More
Q4 2016

EQM Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Chris Davis 132,352 sh (+2.37%)
Jim Simons Sold Out
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with EQM

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - Midstream » Oil & Gas Midstream    NAICS: 211111    SIC: 1389
Compare:NYSE:ENLK, NYSE:AM, NYSE:SHLX, AMEX:CQH, NYSE:DCP, NYSE:TLLP, OTCPK:KEYUF, NYSE:ENBL, NYSE:PAGP, OTCPK:IPPLF, NYSE:BWP, NYSE:TEGP, NYSE:SXL, NYSE:TCP, NYSE:EEP, NYSE:NS, NYSE:GEL, OTCPK:ATGFF, NYSE:TEP, NYSE:WES » details
Traded in other countries:EQT.Germany,
Headquarter Location:USA
EQT Midstream Partners LP owns, operates, acquires and develops midstream assets in the Appalachian Basin. It provides natural gas transmission, storage and gathering services.

EQT Midstream Partners LP was incorporated in Delaware on January 18, 2012. The Company owns, operates, acquires and develops midstream assets in the Appalachian Basin. It provides midstream services to EQT and third parties in the Appalachian Basin across 22 counties in Pennsylvania and West Virginia through two assets: the transmission and storage system and the gathering system. The Company's transmission and storage system included an approximately 700-mile Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC)-regulated interstate pipeline that connects to five interstate pipelines and multiple distribution companies. The transmission system is supported by 14 associated natural gas storage reservoirs with approximately 400 MMcf per day of peak withdrawal capacity and 32 Bcf of working gas capacity and 27 compressor units. The transmission assets had total throughput capacity of approximately 3.1 Bcf per day. It also operates the Allegheny Valley Connector (AVC) facilities. The Company's gathering system included approximately 185 miles of high pressure gathering lines with approximately 1.4 Bcf per day of total firm gathering capacity and multiple interconnect points with Company's transmission and storage system. Its gathering system also includes approximately 1,500 miles of FERC-regulated low pressure gathering lines. All of the Company's assets and operations are located in the continental United States. Its principal competitors in its natural gas transmission and storage market include companies that own natural gas pipelines. In addition, it also competes with companies that are building high pressure gathering facilities that are not subject to FERC jurisdiction to move volumes to interstate pipelines. The Company is subject to federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations.

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 14.82
EQM's PE Ratio is ranked higher than
81% of the 81 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 23.92 vs. EQM: 14.82 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
EQM' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 12.93  Med: 20.57 Max: 79.36
Current: 14.82
12.93
79.36
PE Ratio without NRI 14.82
EQM's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked higher than
82% of the 80 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 23.96 vs. EQM: 14.82 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
EQM' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 12.93  Med: 20.57 Max: 78.46
Current: 14.82
12.93
78.46
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 20.33
EQM's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked higher than
64% of the 28 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 22.22 vs. EQM: 20.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
EQM' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 12.46  Med: 18.5 Max: 21.57
Current: 20.33
12.46
21.57
PB Ratio 3.12
EQM's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
67% of the 106 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 2.18 vs. EQM: 3.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
EQM' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.53  Med: 3.49 Max: 9.46
Current: 3.12
1.53
9.46
PS Ratio 8.31
EQM's PS Ratio is ranked lower than
89% of the 106 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 3.14 vs. EQM: 8.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
EQM' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.14  Med: 8.23 Max: 15.7
Current: 8.31
5.14
15.7
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 11.36
EQM's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
67% of the 94 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 9.86 vs. EQM: 11.36 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
EQM' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.94  Med: 11.08 Max: 20.74
Current: 11.36
5.94
20.74
EV-to-EBIT 13.52
EQM's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
89% of the 111 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 20.94 vs. EQM: 13.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
EQM' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.3  Med: 13.4 Max: 20
Current: 13.52
7.3
20
EV-to-EBITDA 12.08
EQM's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
74% of the 111 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 13.97 vs. EQM: 12.08 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
EQM' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.4  Med: 12.05 Max: 17.6
Current: 12.08
6.4
17.6
Current Ratio 1.98
EQM's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
79% of the 108 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 1.05 vs. EQM: 1.98 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
EQM' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.33  Med: 1.19 Max: 2.17
Current: 1.98
0.33
2.17
Quick Ratio 1.98
EQM's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
80% of the 108 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 0.95 vs. EQM: 1.98 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
EQM' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.33  Med: 1.19 Max: 2.17
Current: 1.98
0.33
2.17
Days Sales Outstanding 10.25
EQM's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
90% of the 98 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 35.87 vs. EQM: 10.25 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
EQM' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.83  Med: 14.72 Max: 43.36
Current: 10.25
6.83
43.36
Days Payable 178.63
EQM's Days Payable is ranked higher than
92% of the 80 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 44.51 vs. EQM: 178.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
EQM' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 73.76  Med: 200.32 Max: 285.67
Current: 178.63
73.76
285.67

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 4.13
EQM's Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 112 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 6.90 vs. EQM: 4.13 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
EQM' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.92  Med: 2.72 Max: 4.33
Current: 4.13
0.92
4.33
Dividend Payout Ratio 0.59
EQM's Dividend Payout Ratio is ranked higher than
92% of the 112 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 1.29 vs. EQM: 0.59 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout Ratio only.
EQM' s Dividend Payout Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.34  Med: 0.57 Max: 0.63
Current: 0.59
0.34
0.63
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate 25.30
EQM's 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate is ranked higher than
85% of the 61 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 8.70 vs. EQM: 25.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate only.
EQM' s 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0 Max: 92.7
Current: 25.3
0
92.7
Forward Dividend Yield % 4.40
EQM's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 110 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 7.47 vs. EQM: 4.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 4.12
EQM's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 107 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 9.04 vs. EQM: 4.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
EQM' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.92  Med: 2.71 Max: 4.33
Current: 4.12
0.92
4.33
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -19.00
EQM's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked lower than
73% of the 75 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: -8.10 vs. EQM: -19.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
EQM' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -30.8  Med: 0 Max: 0
Current: -19
-30.8
0

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Tangible-Book 3.12
EQM's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked lower than
54% of the 92 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 2.96 vs. EQM: 3.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
EQM' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.61  Med: 3.17 Max: 5.31
Current: 3.12
1.61
5.31
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 4.79
EQM's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked lower than
72% of the 47 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 2.10 vs. EQM: 4.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
EQM' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.76  Med: 4.76 Max: 4.79
Current: 4.79
4.76
4.79
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 1.01
EQM's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
65% of the 92 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 1.15 vs. EQM: 1.01 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
EQM' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.66  Med: 1 Max: 1.2
Current: 1.01
0.66
1.2
Price-to-Graham-Number 1.43
EQM's Price-to-Graham-Number is ranked higher than
68% of the 60 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 1.98 vs. EQM: 1.43 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Graham-Number only.
EQM' s Price-to-Graham-Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.42  Med: 1.5 Max: 2.43
Current: 1.43
1.42
2.43
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 7.40
EQM's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
89% of the 112 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 4.78 vs. EQM: 7.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
EQM' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5  Med: 7.4 Max: 13.6
Current: 7.4
5
13.6

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $735.6
EPS (TTM) $ 5.21
Beta1.07
Short Percentage of Float3.75%
52-Week Range $69.20 - 82.99
Shares Outstanding (Mil)80.58
» More Articles for EQM

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
3 Undervalued Companies Feb 23 2017 
3 Small MLPs Eyeing Big Growth Apr 11 2014 
Share Action Following IPO Suggests Near-Term Distribution Increases for EQT Midstream Partners Sep 12 2012 

More From Other Websites
Cramer's lightning round: This drug stock is simply not good enough for your portfolio Apr 21 2017
Top 7 Energy Stocks to Own for 2017 Apr 21 2017
Is EQT Midstream a Great Stock for Value Investors? Apr 20 2017
EnLink Midstream Partners’ Implied Volatility Rose the Most Apr 20 2017
Is EQT Midstream (EQM) a Suitable Pick for Value Investors? Apr 19 2017
EQT Midstream Partners, LP and EQT GP Holdings, LP Announce First Quarter 2017 Joint Earnings... Apr 11 2017
EQT Midstream Partners LP breached its 50 day moving average in a Bullish Manner : EQM-US : April 7,... Apr 07 2017
MLPs with the Maximum Potential Upside after 1Q17 Apr 06 2017
Antero Midstream Has the Most Buys, and Cone Midstream Has the Most Holds Mar 27 2017
Antero Midstream Has Industry-Leading Distribution Growth Mar 24 2017
Is EQT Midstream Attractively Priced Compared to Its Peers? Mar 24 2017
Antero Midstream Has the Highest 2017 Planned Capex among Its Peers Mar 24 2017
Rice Midstream Has the Lowest Leverage among Its Peers Mar 23 2017
Antero Midstream is Outperforming Its Peers in 2017: Key Highlights Mar 22 2017
EQT Midstream Partners LP : EQM-US: Dividend Analysis : February 03rd, 2017 (record date) : By the... Mar 20 2017
EQT Midstream Partners LP breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : EQM-US : March... Mar 17 2017
A Look at MLPs with an Attractive Potential Upside Mar 13 2017
EQT Midstream Partners, LP and EQT GP Holdings, LP 2016 Tax Packages Mar 06 2017
Steven Schlotterbeck Takes the Reins as CEO for EQT Mar 01 2017
3 Undervalued Companies Feb 23 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)