Hide

FocusBar

Subscribe to Premium Member
Switch to:

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a companyย’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 4.364
ERB's Cash to Debt is ranked higher than
61% of the 124 Companies
in the Global Medical Instruments & Supplies industry.

( Industry Median: 6.43 vs. ERB: 4.364 )
ERB' s 10-Year Cash to Debt Range
Min: 4.36   Max: No Debt
Current: 4.36

Equity to Asset 0.556
ERB's Equity to Asset is ranked lower than
58% of the 124 Companies
in the Global Medical Instruments & Supplies industry.

( Industry Median: 0.47 vs. ERB: 0.556 )
ERB' s 10-Year Equity to Asset Range
Min: 0.54   Max: 0.75
Current: 0.56

0.54
0.75
F-Score: 3
Z-Score: 0.63
M-Score: -2.67
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the companyย’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
ย•ย•3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rankย•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) -19.30
ERB's Operating margin (%) is ranked lower than
69% of the 124 Companies
in the Global Medical Instruments & Supplies industry.

( Industry Median: 7.00 vs. ERB: -19.30 )
ERB' s 10-Year Operating margin (%) Range
Min: -56.7   Max: 1.4
Current: -19.3

-56.7
1.4
Net-margin (%) -19.7
ERB's Net-margin (%) is ranked lower than
68% of the 124 Companies
in the Global Medical Instruments & Supplies industry.

( Industry Median: 3.30 vs. ERB: -19.7 )
ERB' s 10-Year Net-margin (%) Range
Min: -52.2   Max: 0.9
Current: -19.7

-52.2
0.9
ROE (%) -30.7
ERB's ROE (%) is ranked lower than
69% of the 124 Companies
in the Global Medical Instruments & Supplies industry.

( Industry Median: 4.80 vs. ERB: -30.7 )
ERB' s 10-Year ROE (%) Range
Min: -58.1   Max: 1.1
Current: -30.7

-58.1
1.1
ROA (%) -19.2
ERB's ROA (%) is ranked lower than
69% of the 124 Companies
in the Global Medical Instruments & Supplies industry.

( Industry Median: 2.40 vs. ERB: -19.2 )
ERB' s 10-Year ROA (%) Range
Min: -40.5   Max: 0.9
Current: -19.2

-40.5
0.9
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) -40.70
ERB's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
72% of the 124 Companies
in the Global Medical Instruments & Supplies industry.

( Industry Median: 14.00 vs. ERB: -40.70 )
ERB' s 10-Year ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range
Min: -196.8   Max: 2.6
Current: -40.7

-196.8
2.6
Revenue Growth (%) -7.9
ERB's Revenue Growth (%) is ranked lower than
60% of the 124 Companies
in the Global Medical Instruments & Supplies industry.

( Industry Median: 4.40 vs. ERB: -7.9 )
ERB' s 10-Year Revenue Growth (%) Range
Min: -7.9   Max: 14.8
Current: -7.9

-7.9
14.8
ยป ERB's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2012

ERB Guru Trades in Q2 2012

Jim Simons 87,000 sh (-2.68%)
» More
Q3 2012

ERB Guru Trades in Q3 2012

Jim Simons 86,600 sh (-0.46%)
» More
Q4 2012

ERB Guru Trades in Q4 2012

Jim Simons 86,600 sh (unchged)
» More
Q1 2013

ERB Guru Trades in Q1 2013

Jim Simons 86,300 sh (-0.35%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with ERB



No Insider Trades Found!

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/B 2.29
ERB's P/B is ranked higher than
53% of the 124 Companies
in the Global Medical Instruments & Supplies industry.

( Industry Median: 2.41 vs. ERB: 2.29 )
ERB' s 10-Year P/B Range
Min: 0.46   Max: 7.03
Current: 2.29

0.46
7.03
P/S 1.70
ERB's P/S is ranked higher than
65% of the 124 Companies
in the Global Medical Instruments & Supplies industry.

( Industry Median: 2.40 vs. ERB: 1.70 )
ERB' s 10-Year P/S Range
Min: 0.42   Max: 43.25
Current: 1.7

0.42
43.25
EV-to-EBIT -70.77
ERB's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
71% of the 124 Companies
in the Global Medical Instruments & Supplies industry.

( Industry Median: 16.12 vs. ERB: -70.77 )
ERB' s 10-Year EV-to-EBIT Range
Min: 18.2   Max: 338.2
Current: -70.77

18.2
338.2

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Net Current Asset Value 4
ERB's Price/Net Current Asset Value is ranked lower than
61% of the 124 Companies
in the Global Medical Instruments & Supplies industry.

( Industry Median: 12.40 vs. ERB: 4 )
ERB' s 10-Year Price/Net Current Asset Value Range
Min: 2   Max: 20.5
Current: 4

2
20.5
Price/Tangible Book 2.5
ERB's Price/Tangible Book is ranked higher than
51% of the 124 Companies
in the Global Medical Instruments & Supplies industry.

( Industry Median: 4.80 vs. ERB: 2.5 )
ERB' s 10-Year Price/Tangible Book Range
Min: 0.9   Max: 4.9
Current: 2.5

0.9
4.9
Price/Median PS Value 0.9
ERB's Price/Median PS Value is ranked higher than
65% of the 124 Companies
in the Global Medical Instruments & Supplies industry.

( Industry Median: 0.90 vs. ERB: 0.9 )
ERB' s 10-Year Price/Median PS Value Range
Min: 0.4   Max: 5.6
Current: 0.9

0.4
5.6
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) -7.29
ERB's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) is ranked higher than
52% of the 124 Companies
in the Global Medical Instruments & Supplies industry.

( Industry Median: 8.11 vs. ERB: -7.29 )
ERB' s 10-Year Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) Range
Min: -10.2   Max: -4.9
Current: -7.29

-10.2
-4.9

Business Description

ERBA Diagnostics Inc was incorporated on June 28, 1999 under the laws of the State of Delaware. It is the parent corporation of the following three subsidiaries: elta Biologicals, S.r.l.; Diamedix Corporation; and ImmunoVision, Inc. Through these subsidiaries, it develops, manufactures and markets diagnostic test kits, or assays, and automated systems that are used to aid in the detection of disease markers primarily in the areas of autoimmune and infectious diseases. These tests, which are designed to aid in the identification of the causes of illness and disease, assist physicians in selecting appropriate patient treatment. Its tests are based on Enzyme Linked ImmunoSorbent Assay, or ELISA, technology, a clinical testing methodology used worldwide. Specific tests are prepared using a 96 well microplate format whereby specific antigens are typically coated on the wells of a microplate during the manufacturing process. A test using ELISA technology involves a series of reagent additions to the microplate causing a reaction that result in a visible color in the wells. The amount of color is directly proportionate to the amount of the specific analyte in the patient sample. Its kits are designed to be performed either manually or in an automated format. In addition to its line of diagnostic kits, it also designs and manufactures laboratory instruments that perform the tests and provide fast and accurate results, while reducing labor costs. Its existing proprietary instruments, named the Mago 4, Mago 4S, Mago Plus and Aptus systems, include a fully-automated ELISA processor operating with its own user-friendly software, which allows customers to perform tests in an automated mode. In 2009, it updated the Mago Plus instrument to include the capability to process ELISA and ImmunoFluorescent Assay, or IFA, simultaneously. In the fourth quarter of 2009, it completed the development of, received European regulatory approvals for, and began non-domestic commercial deliveries of, an upgraded version of the Mago Plus instrument, named the Mago 4, which performs both ELISA and IFA techniques simultaneously, performs positive sample identification and utilizes disposable pipette tips. The Mago 4 offers an enhanced automation solution to customers who prefer a more compact, lower-priced instrument with features and benefits similar to many of the other instruments currently offered in the marketplace. In 2010, it continued the development of a variation of the Mago Plus, named the Mago 4S, for the market in the United States. The Mago 4S also performs both ELISA and IFA techniques simultaneously. In January 2011, it received the required 510(k) regulatory clearance for the Mago 4S and, later in 2011; it began to market the instrument in the United States. It also develops, manufactures and markets raw materials, such as antigens used in the production of diagnostic kits. The testing, manufacturing and sale of its products are subject to regula
Company Website
SEC Reports
Industry: Medical Instruments & Supplies
Compare:BIO, VIVO, TRIB, TMO, IMA, KOOL
ยป More Articles for ERB

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com

Personalized Checklist








Within your circle of competence?
Macro economic environment favorable?
High quality business?
Enough margin of safety with stocks?
Gurus are buying?
Insiders are buying?
Management capable and shareholder friendly?
Catalyst for stock price to appreciate?
Your level of confidence with the research?

GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names
Free 7-day Trial