Switch to:

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 7/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.09
ETP's Cash to Debt is ranked higher than
59% of the 96 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 0.06 vs. ETP: 0.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
ETP' s 10-Year Cash to Debt Range
Min: 0.01  Med: 0.02 Max: N/A
Current: 0.09
Equity to Asset 0.26
ETP's Equity to Asset is ranked lower than
75% of the 102 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 0.41 vs. ETP: 0.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
ETP' s 10-Year Equity to Asset Range
Min: 0.06  Med: 0.28 Max: 0.44
Current: 0.26
0.06
0.44
Interest Coverage 2.88
ETP's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
76% of the 76 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 5.27 vs. ETP: 2.88 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
ETP' s 10-Year Interest Coverage Range
Min: 1.04  Med: 2.33 Max: 5.65
Current: 2.88
1.04
5.65
F-Score: 8
Z-Score: 1.56
M-Score: -2.91
WACC vs ROIC
2.99%
6.54%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 4.89
ETP's Operating margin (%) is ranked lower than
67% of the 105 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 13.13 vs. ETP: 4.89 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
ETP' s 10-Year Operating margin (%) Range
Min: 3.33  Med: 9.26 Max: 20.81
Current: 4.89
3.33
20.81
Net-margin (%) 2.48
ETP's Net-margin (%) is ranked lower than
70% of the 105 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 10.15 vs. ETP: 2.48 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
ETP' s 10-Year Net-margin (%) Range
Min: -3.37  Med: 4.87 Max: 14.61
Current: 2.48
-3.37
14.61
ROE (%) 2.60
ETP's ROE (%) is ranked lower than
75% of the 106 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 8.31 vs. ETP: 2.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
ETP' s 10-Year ROE (%) Range
Min: -50.79  Med: 14.85 Max: 41.99
Current: 2.6
-50.79
41.99
ROA (%) 2.55
ETP's ROA (%) is ranked lower than
66% of the 109 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 4.25 vs. ETP: 2.55 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
ETP' s 10-Year ROA (%) Range
Min: -3.13  Med: 4.84 Max: 10.45
Current: 2.55
-3.13
10.45
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 8.52
ETP's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
60% of the 105 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 10.26 vs. ETP: 8.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
ETP' s 10-Year ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range
Min: 6.45  Med: 14.26 Max: 20.99
Current: 8.52
6.45
20.99
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) 67.30
ETP's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
96% of the 73 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 1.70 vs. ETP: 67.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
ETP' s 10-Year Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: 0  Med: 4.40 Max: 81
Current: 67.3
0
81
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) 14.30
ETP's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
72% of the 68 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 5.30 vs. ETP: 14.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
ETP' s 10-Year EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: 0  Med: 8.70 Max: 40.8
Current: 14.3
0
40.8
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) 11.20
ETP's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
59% of the 63 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 5.30 vs. ETP: 11.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
ETP' s 10-Year EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: 0  Med: 10.90 Max: 111.1
Current: 11.2
0
111.1
» ETP's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Guru Trades

Q3 2014

ETP Guru Trades in Q3 2014

John Keeley 18,211 sh (+20.05%)
Mario Gabelli Sold Out
Ken Fisher 7,206 sh (-14.38%)
Jim Simons 577,813 sh (-23.99%)
» More
Q4 2014

ETP Guru Trades in Q4 2014

Ken Fisher 8,615 sh (+19.55%)
John Keeley Sold Out
Jim Simons 47,964 sh (-91.70%)
» More
Q1 2015

ETP Guru Trades in Q1 2015

Jim Simons 1,275,213 sh (+2558.69%)
Ken Fisher 6,211 sh (-27.90%)
» More
Q2 2015

ETP Guru Trades in Q2 2015

Ken Fisher 8,109 sh (+30.56%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with ETP

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/E(ttm) 54.80
ETP's P/E(ttm) is ranked lower than
80% of the 88 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 26.40 vs. ETP: 54.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/E(ttm) only.
ETP' s 10-Year P/E(ttm) Range
Min: 6.81  Med: 17.64 Max: 345.86
Current: 54.8
6.81
345.86
Forward P/E 22.52
ETP's Forward P/E is ranked lower than
60% of the 89 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 19.08 vs. ETP: 22.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward P/E only.
N/A
PE(NRI) 63.20
ETP's PE(NRI) is ranked lower than
85% of the 88 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 25.20 vs. ETP: 63.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE(NRI) only.
ETP' s 10-Year PE(NRI) Range
Min: 4.42  Med: 17.43 Max: 3303
Current: 63.2
4.42
3303
P/B 2.00
ETP's P/B is ranked higher than
58% of the 102 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 2.12 vs. ETP: 2.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
ETP' s 10-Year P/B Range
Min: 1.01  Med: 1.96 Max: 3.92
Current: 2
1.01
3.92
P/S 0.35
ETP's P/S is ranked higher than
89% of the 106 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 2.71 vs. ETP: 0.35 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
ETP' s 10-Year P/S Range
Min: 0.34  Med: 0.75 Max: 1.83
Current: 0.35
0.34
1.83
POCF 7.10
ETP's POCF is ranked higher than
72% of the 92 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 9.59 vs. ETP: 7.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
ETP' s 10-Year POCF Range
Min: 3.06  Med: 8.17 Max: 26.99
Current: 7.1
3.06
26.99
EV-to-EBIT 21.39
ETP's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
53% of the 87 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 21.50 vs. ETP: 21.39 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
ETP' s 10-Year EV-to-EBIT Range
Min: 8.1  Med: 15.70 Max: 27.1
Current: 21.39
8.1
27.1
PEG 11.09
ETP's PEG is ranked lower than
91% of the 33 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 3.47 vs. ETP: 11.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG only.
ETP' s 10-Year PEG Range
Min: 0.06  Med: 2.18 Max: 629.14
Current: 11.09
0.06
629.14
Shiller P/E 28.95
ETP's Shiller P/E is ranked lower than
55% of the 56 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 25.71 vs. ETP: 28.95 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller P/E only.
ETP' s 10-Year Shiller P/E Range
Min: 7.83  Med: 18.52 Max: 33.27
Current: 28.95
7.83
33.27
Current Ratio 1.32
ETP's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
62% of the 106 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 1.14 vs. ETP: 1.32 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
ETP' s 10-Year Current Ratio Range
Min: 0.16  Med: 1.03 Max: 1.81
Current: 1.32
0.16
1.81
Quick Ratio 1.02
ETP's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
52% of the 106 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 1.01 vs. ETP: 1.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
ETP' s 10-Year Quick Ratio Range
Min: 0.12  Med: 0.77 Max: 1.37
Current: 1.02
0.12
1.37
Days Inventory 12.12
ETP's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
51% of the 78 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 12.02 vs. ETP: 12.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
ETP' s 10-Year Days Inventory Range
Min: 8.45  Med: 24.88 Max: 57.07
Current: 12.12
8.45
57.07
Days Sales Outstanding 18.56
ETP's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
78% of the 98 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 31.36 vs. ETP: 18.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
ETP' s 10-Year Days Sales Outstanding Range
Min: 14.07  Med: 26.73 Max: 67.64
Current: 18.56
14.07
67.64

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield 7.70
ETP's Dividend Yield is ranked higher than
68% of the 117 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 6.59 vs. ETP: 7.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield only.
ETP' s 10-Year Dividend Yield Range
Min: 4.4  Med: 6.88 Max: 14.73
Current: 7.7
4.4
14.73
Dividend Payout 4.84
ETP's Dividend Payout is ranked lower than
90% of the 91 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 1.14 vs. ETP: 4.84 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout only.
ETP' s 10-Year Dividend Payout Range
Min: 0.16  Med: 1.21 Max: 17.88
Current: 4.84
0.16
17.88
Dividend growth (3y) 1.90
ETP's Dividend growth (3y) is ranked lower than
81% of the 57 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 8.40 vs. ETP: 1.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend growth (3y) only.
ETP' s 10-Year Dividend growth (3y) Range
Min: 0  Med: 5.00 Max: 31.3
Current: 1.9
0
31.3
Yield on cost (5-Year) 8.04
ETP's Yield on cost (5-Year) is ranked higher than
52% of the 117 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 8.13 vs. ETP: 8.04 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Yield on cost (5-Year) only.
ETP' s 10-Year Yield on cost (5-Year) Range
Min: 4.6  Med: 7.18 Max: 15.4
Current: 8.04
4.6
15.4
Share Buyback Rate -17.10
ETP's Share Buyback Rate is ranked lower than
72% of the 74 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: -7.80 vs. ETP: -17.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Share Buyback Rate only.
ETP' s 10-Year Share Buyback Rate Range
Min: 0  Med: -15.60 Max: -102.1
Current: -17.1

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Tangible Book 5.63
ETP's Price/Tangible Book is ranked lower than
81% of the 86 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 2.94 vs. ETP: 5.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
ETP' s 10-Year Price/Tangible Book Range
Min: 1.7  Med: 3.58 Max: 52.96
Current: 5.63
1.7
52.96
Price/Median PS Value 0.47
ETP's Price/Median PS Value is ranked higher than
92% of the 96 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 0.96 vs. ETP: 0.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
ETP' s 10-Year Price/Median PS Value Range
Min: 0.38  Med: 1.04 Max: 2.3
Current: 0.47
0.38
2.3
Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value 9.00
ETP's Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value is ranked lower than
92% of the 25 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 2.42 vs. ETP: 9.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value only.
ETP' s 10-Year Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value Range
Min: 0.26  Med: 1.42 Max: 581.73
Current: 9
0.26
581.73
Price/Graham Number 2.21
ETP's Price/Graham Number is ranked lower than
66% of the 68 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 1.72 vs. ETP: 2.21 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Graham Number only.
ETP' s 10-Year Price/Graham Number Range
Min: 0.69  Med: 1.44 Max: 5.98
Current: 2.21
0.69
5.98
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) 4.70
ETP's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
62% of the 103 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 4.00 vs. ETP: 4.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
ETP' s 10-Year Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range
Min: 3.7  Med: 6.40 Max: 12.3
Current: 4.7
3.7
12.3
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) -0.20
ETP's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked lower than
54% of the 56 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Midstream industry.

( Industry Median: 1.90 vs. ETP: -0.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
ETP' s 10-Year Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range
Min: -16.9  Med: 2.45 Max: 77.6
Current: -0.2
-16.9
77.6

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - Midstream » Oil & Gas Midstream
Compare:WES, ENB, ETE, KMP, SE » details
Traded in other countries:4ETA.Germany,
Energy Transfer Partners LP is a Delaware limited partnership. The Company is managed by its general partner, Energy Transfer Partners GP, L.P. (ETP GP), and ETP GP is managed by its general partner, Energy Transfer Partners, L.L.C. (ETP LLC), which is owned by Energy Transfer Equity, L.P., another publicly traded master limited partnership (ETE). The Company's business activities are: Natural gas operations, including: natural gas midstream and intrastate transportation and storage through Southern Union and La Grange Acquisition, L.P., which conducts business under the assumed name of ETC OLP; and interstate natural gas transportation and storage through ET Interstate and Southern Union. ET Interstate is the parent company of Transwestern, ETC FEP, ETC Tiger and CrossCountry. Southern Union is the parent company of Panhandle, which provides transportation and storage services through Panhandle, Trunkline and Sea Robin transmission systems. Refined product and crude oil operations, includes: refined product and crude oil transportation through Sunoco Logistics; and retail marketing of gasoline and middle distillates through Sunoco. Other operations, includes: natural gas compression services through ETC Compression; a limited partner interest in AmeriGas; natural gas distribution operations through Southern Union; and an approximate 30% non-operating interest in a refining joint venture. The Company's midstream segment focuses on the gathering, compression, treating, blending, processing and marketing of natural gas, and its operations are currently concentrated in the Austin Chalk trend of southeast Texas, the Permian Basin of west Texas and New Mexico, the Barnett Shale in north Texas, the Bossier Sands in east Texas, and the Uinta and Piceance Basins in Utah and Colorado. The Company's intrastate transportation and storage business owns and operates approximately 7700 miles of natural gas transportation pipelines and three natural gas storage facilities. The Company's propane operations extend from coast to coast with concentrations in the western, upper midwestern, northeastern and southeastern regions of the United States. The Company's propane business has grown mainly through acquisitions of retail propane operations and, to a lesser extent, through internal growth. The Company's competitors include integrated oil companies, interstate and intrastate pipelines and companies that gather, compress, treat, process, transport, store and market natural gas. Its operations are subject to extensive federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations that require expenditures for remediation at operating facilities and waste disposal sites.
» More Articles for ETP

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
High Yield Jul 13 2015 
High Yield Jul 13 2015 
Large Insider Buys At These Three Companies Oct 15 2014 
Analysts vs Logarithm: Who Should You Look At Mar 26 2014 
Weekly 52-Week High Highlight: ETP, ICE, LBTYK, FITB Nov 23 2013 
Mario Gabelli and Ken Fisher's Pick in Energy Midstream, Digs on Renaissance Technologies Bid Nov 18 2013 
My 4 Favorite High-Yield Large Caps with Buy Rating and 9 Additional to Consider Sep 25 2013 
Insider Buys Sep 16 2013 
My 3 Favorite Dividend-Paying Large Caps with Cheap Price Ratios Apr 23 2013 
Energy Transfer (ETE and ETP) MLP: Reasonably Attractive Apr 15 2013 

More From Other Websites
Sunoco LP Completes Acquisition of Susser Holdings Corporation Jul 31 2015
Sunoco LP Completes Acquisition of Susser Holdings Corporation Jul 31 2015
Sunoco LP Completes Acquisition of Susser Holdings Corporation Jul 31 2015
Phillips 66, Energy Transfer and Sunoco Logistics Form Joint Venture to Construct Crude Oil Pipeline... Jul 30 2015
Phillips 66, Energy Transfer and Sunoco Logistics Form Joint Venture to Construct Crude Oil Pipeline... Jul 30 2015
Energy Transfer Merger Proposal Upsets Williams Partners’ Plans Jul 30 2015
Williams Earnings Are Fine, Deals Are the Question Jul 30 2015
Kinder Morgan’s Project Backlog Increased by $3.7 billion in 2Q15 Jul 29 2015
Natural Gas Prices Fell Last Week: Impact on Energy MLPs Jul 29 2015
Cardtronics Renews ATM Services Agreement With Sunoco Jul 29 2015
Energy Transfer Equity: Top Midstream Loser on Monday, July 27 Jul 28 2015
Energy Transfer Equity Completes Two-for-One Unit Split Jul 27 2015
Energy Transfer Equity Completes Two-for-One Unit Split Jul 27 2015
What to Watch in the Week Ahead and on Monday, July 27 Jul 24 2015
Energy MLPs Have Been Destroyed, and Analyst Has 4 to Buy Now Jul 24 2015
Cramer Likes High-Dividend Energy MLPs -- Should You? Jul 24 2015
Cramer: If you can handle pain, buy MLPs Jul 23 2015
Energy Transfer Partners Announces Eighth Consecutive Quarterly Cash Distribution Increase Jul 23 2015
Energy Transfer Equity Announces Eleventh Consecutive Quarterly Cash Distribution Increase Jul 23 2015

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
FEEDBACK