Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 1.51
NAS:FANG's Cash-to-Debt is ranked higher than
57% of the 433 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.79 vs. NAS:FANG: 1.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
NAS:FANG' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.03  Med: 0.09 Max: 77.98
Current: 1.51
0.03
77.98
Equity-to-Asset 0.69
NAS:FANG's Equity-to-Asset is ranked higher than
70% of the 408 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.50 vs. NAS:FANG: 0.69 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
NAS:FANG' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.49  Med: 0.65 Max: 0.84
Current: 0.69
0.49
0.84
Piotroski F-Score: 6
Altman Z-Score: 3.53
Beneish M-Score: -1.73
WACC vs ROIC
7.36%
-2.40%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % -13.02
NAS:FANG's Operating Margin % is ranked higher than
71% of the 415 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -53.60 vs. NAS:FANG: -13.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
NAS:FANG' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -165.71  Med: 26.89 Max: 45.77
Current: -13.02
-165.71
45.77
Net Margin % -31.31
NAS:FANG's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
63% of the 415 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -62.24 vs. NAS:FANG: -31.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
NAS:FANG' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -123.26  Med: -11.03 Max: 39.09
Current: -31.31
-123.26
39.09
ROE % -6.79
NAS:FANG's ROE % is ranked higher than
68% of the 406 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -18.49 vs. NAS:FANG: -6.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
NAS:FANG' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -30.36  Med: -1.77 Max: 14.92
Current: -6.79
-30.36
14.92
ROA % -4.74
NAS:FANG's ROA % is ranked higher than
67% of the 482 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -12.56 vs. NAS:FANG: -4.74 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
NAS:FANG' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -18.84  Med: -1.44 Max: 8.39
Current: -4.74
-18.84
8.39
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % -4.37
NAS:FANG's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
73% of the 460 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -20.50 vs. NAS:FANG: -4.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
NAS:FANG' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -26.31  Med: 3.54 Max: 15.87
Current: -4.37
-26.31
15.87
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate 12.60
NAS:FANG's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked higher than
82% of the 370 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -13.60 vs. NAS:FANG: 12.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
NAS:FANG' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 12.6 Max: 62.1
Current: 12.6
0
62.1
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate -42.80
NAS:FANG's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
84% of the 274 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -15.20 vs. NAS:FANG: -42.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
NAS:FANG' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: -21.4 Max: 127.5
Current: -42.8
0
127.5
GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with Diamondback Energy Inc $NAS:FANG.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» NAS:FANG's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q1 2016

FANG Guru Trades in Q1 2016

Columbia Wanger 525,000 sh (New)
RS Investment Management 440,911 sh (+10.77%)
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Jim Simons Sold Out
T Boone Pickens 60,905 sh (-25.19%)
Steven Cohen 2,000 sh (-98.65%)
» More
Q2 2016

FANG Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Paul Tudor Jones 7,560 sh (New)
Jim Simons 12,900 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 131,100 sh (+6455.00%)
Columbia Wanger 453,480 sh (-13.62%)
RS Investment Management 366,158 sh (-16.95%)
T Boone Pickens 38,053 sh (-37.52%)
» More
Q3 2016

FANG Guru Trades in Q3 2016

Eric Mindich 833,639 sh (New)
George Soros 2,680 sh (New)
T Boone Pickens 50,957 sh (+33.91%)
Columbia Wanger 491,963 sh (+8.49%)
Steven Cohen 138,049 sh (+5.30%)
Jim Simons Sold Out
Paul Tudor Jones 6,967 sh (-7.84%)
» More
Q4 2016

FANG Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Caxton Associates 26,721 sh (New)
Eric Mindich 1,478,139 sh (+77.31%)
Paul Tudor Jones 11,651 sh (+67.23%)
Steven Cohen 145,000 sh (+5.04%)
T Boone Pickens 51,441 sh (+0.95%)
George Soros Sold Out
Columbia Wanger 439,587 sh (-10.65%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with FANG

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - E&P » Oil & Gas E&P    NAICS: 211111    SIC: 1311
Compare:OTCPK:OISHF, NYSE:PE, NYSE:EQT, NYSE:COG, NYSE:NFX, OTCPK:PTXLF, OTCPK:LNDNF, NYSE:ECA, NYSE:RRC, OTCPK:DETNF, NYSE:CPG, NYSE:XEC, OTCPK:TRMLF, OTCPK:PEGFF, OTCPK:MGYOY, OTCPK:AETUF, OTCPK:SSLTY, NYSE:CHK, NYSE:NFG, NYSE:EGN » details
Traded in other countries:7DB.Germany,
Diamondback Energy Inc is an independent oil and natural gas company. It is currently engaged in the acquisition, development, exploration and exploitation of unconventional, onshore oil and natural gas reserves in the Permian Basin in West Texas.

Diamondback Energy Inc was incorporated in Delaware on December 30, 2011. The Company is an independent oil and natural gas company. It is currently engaged in the acquisition, development, exploration and exploitation of unconventional, onshore oil and natural gas reserves in the Permian Basin in West Texas. The Company markets the majority of the oil and natural gas production from properties it operates for both its account and the account of the other working interest owners in these properties. The Company's oil and natural gas operations are subject to various types of legislation, regulation and other legal requirements enacted by governmental authorities.

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
Forward PE Ratio 28.09
FANG's Forward PE Ratio is ranked lower than
56% of the 135 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 23.98 vs. FANG: 28.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PB Ratio 2.15
FANG's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
72% of the 408 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.20 vs. FANG: 2.15 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
FANG' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.41  Med: 2.52 Max: 4.09
Current: 2.15
1.41
4.09
PS Ratio 14.30
FANG's PS Ratio is ranked lower than
86% of the 388 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 3.36 vs. FANG: 14.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
FANG' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.54  Med: 10.5 Max: 15.84
Current: 14.3
5.54
15.84
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 22.72
FANG's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
85% of the 260 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 8.16 vs. FANG: 22.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
FANG' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.7  Med: 13.91 Max: 25.67
Current: 22.72
7.7
25.67
EV-to-EBIT 5.28
FANG's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
70% of the 110 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 11.79 vs. FANG: 5.28 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
FANG' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -105.2  Med: 18.5 Max: 46.6
Current: 5.28
-105.2
46.6
Current Ratio 8.56
FANG's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
88% of the 464 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.25 vs. FANG: 8.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
FANG' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.34  Med: 0.75 Max: 8.56
Current: 8.56
0.34
8.56
Quick Ratio 8.55
FANG's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
88% of the 463 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.13 vs. FANG: 8.55 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
FANG' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.31  Med: 0.68 Max: 8.55
Current: 8.55
0.31
8.55
Days Inventory 4.98
FANG's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
89% of the 194 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 28.71 vs. FANG: 4.98 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
FANG' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.98  Med: 49.1 Max: 232.78
Current: 4.98
4.98
232.78
Days Sales Outstanding 48.71
FANG's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
55% of the 369 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 50.54 vs. FANG: 48.71 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
FANG' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 29.42  Med: 61.39 Max: 163.23
Current: 48.71
29.42
163.23
Days Payable 135.35
FANG's Days Payable is ranked higher than
68% of the 220 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 76.90 vs. FANG: 135.35 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
FANG' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 27.96  Med: 173.65 Max: 715.14
Current: 135.35
27.96
715.14

Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -18.30
FANG's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked lower than
68% of the 364 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -9.30 vs. FANG: -18.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
FANG' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -36  Med: -18.3 Max: 0
Current: -18.3
-36
0

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Net-Cash 564.72
FANG's Price-to-Net-Cash is ranked lower than
100% of the 76 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 4.25 vs. FANG: 564.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Net-Cash only.
FANG' s Price-to-Net-Cash Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 557.61  Med: 561.44 Max: 565.33
Current: 564.72
557.61
565.33
Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value 56.79
FANG's Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value is ranked lower than
96% of the 102 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 3.26 vs. FANG: 56.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value only.
FANG' s Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 56.07  Med: 56.46 Max: 56.85
Current: 56.79
56.07
56.85
Price-to-Tangible-Book 2.15
FANG's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked lower than
68% of the 379 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.26 vs. FANG: 2.15 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
FANG' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.53  Med: 2.13 Max: 2.95
Current: 2.15
1.53
2.95
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 1.36
FANG's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked lower than
65% of the 331 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.01 vs. FANG: 1.36 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
FANG' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.6  Med: 0.89 Max: 1.36
Current: 1.36
0.6
1.36
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 18.97
FANG's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
93% of the 473 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -8.70 vs. FANG: 18.97 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
FANG' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.1  Med: 3.2 Max: 19.21
Current: 18.97
2.1
19.21

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $527.1
EPS (TTM) $ -2.26
Beta0.70
Short Percentage of Float6.22%
52-Week Range $67.52 - 114.00
Shares Outstanding (Mil)90.14

Analyst Estimate

Dec17 Dec18 Dec19
Revenue (Mil $) 1,211 1,687 2,590
EPS ($) 3.81 5.40 10.26
EPS without NRI ($) 3.81 5.40 10.26
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
41.80%
Dividends per Share ($)
» More Articles for NAS:FANG

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
12 Questions With Joseph Calandro Dec 07 2016 
Andreas Halvorsen Continues Buying Oil & Gas Stocks With Stake in Gulfport Energy Feb 01 2016 
T. Boone Pickens' Largest New Buys During Second Quarter Sep 24 2015 
GMT Capital Corp Starts to Invest in Leisure Industry Aug 04 2015 
Why You Should Buy EQT During an Oil & Gas Exploration and Production Flush Oct 23 2013 

More From Other Websites
W&T Offshore’s Lease Operating Expense Guidance Feb 27 2017
U.S. Oil Rig Count Climbs For Sixth Week, Hits Highest Since October 2015 Feb 24 2017
Interim CEO of Struggling Nutritional Supplements Retailer Buys Nearly $5 Million Worth of Stock,... Feb 24 2017
How to Dig Deep for Value in These Exuberant Markets Feb 23 2017
Value Investors Have to Go Deeper Feb 23 2017
Diamondback Energy, Inc. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : FANG-US : February... Feb 23 2017
DIAMONDBACK ENERGY, INC. Financials Feb 22 2017
For a Shale Play, the Permian Is Still the Place to Be Feb 21 2017
Surging Earnings Estimates Signal Good News for Diamondback Energy (FANG) Feb 21 2017
Diamondback Energy 4Q Net 90 Cents a Share Feb 19 2017
Diamondback Energy, Inc. :FANG-US: Earnings Analysis: 2016 By the Numbers : February 16, 2017 Feb 16 2017
Oil Stockpiles Jump But Cushing Sees Dip; Shale Firm Sees Muted Costs Feb 15 2017
Edited Transcript of FANG earnings conference call or presentation 15-Feb-17 2:30pm GMT Feb 15 2017
Nasdaq, S&P 500 Go For Seven Straight; Earnings Lift Diamondback Feb 15 2017
A solution to improve your patience as a trader Feb 15 2017
Diamondback Energy, Inc. :FANG-US: Earnings Analysis: Q4, 2016 By the Numbers : February 15, 2017 Feb 15 2017
DIAMONDBACK ENERGY, INC. Files SEC form 8-K, Results of Operations and Financial Condition,... Feb 15 2017
Diamondback, Devon Energy Beat, Lift Capex Views; Fossil Dives On Miss Feb 14 2017
Diamondback beats Street 4Q forecasts Feb 14 2017
Diamondback beats Street 4Q forecasts Feb 14 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)