Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.34
FANG's Cash to Debt is ranked lower than
56% of the 470 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.61 vs. FANG: 0.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
FANG' s Cash to Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.01  Med: 0.09 Max: N/A
Current: 0.34
Equity to Asset 0.71
FANG's Equity to Asset is ranked higher than
71% of the 445 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.51 vs. FANG: 0.71 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
FANG' s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.41  Med: 0.6 Max: 0.79
Current: 0.71
0.41
0.79
F-Score: 4
Z-Score: 4.60
M-Score: -3.28
WACC vs ROIC
6.73%
-12.48%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) -75.26
FANG's Operating margin (%) is ranked lower than
53% of the 457 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -64.37 vs. FANG: -75.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
FANG' s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -165.71  Med: 30.68 Max: 45.77
Current: -75.26
-165.71
45.77
Net-margin (%) -82.83
FANG's Net-margin (%) is ranked lower than
51% of the 457 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -77.97 vs. FANG: -82.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
FANG' s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -123.26  Med: -0.78 Max: 39.09
Current: -82.83
-123.26
39.09
ROE (%) -17.98
FANG's ROE (%) is ranked higher than
52% of the 447 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -19.22 vs. FANG: -17.98 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
FANG' s ROE (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -30.36  Med: -0.33 Max: 14.92
Current: -17.98
-30.36
14.92
ROA (%) -12.56
FANG's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
52% of the 526 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -13.77 vs. FANG: -12.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
FANG' s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -18.84  Med: -0.18 Max: 8.39
Current: -12.56
-18.84
8.39
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) -11.40
FANG's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
63% of the 504 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -21.87 vs. FANG: -11.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
FANG' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -26.31  Med: 5.67 Max: 15.87
Current: -11.4
-26.31
15.87
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) 23.10
FANG's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
87% of the 385 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -11.40 vs. FANG: 23.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
FANG' s Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 11.55 Max: 62.1
Current: 23.1
0
62.1
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) 106.90
FANG's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
90% of the 277 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -1.40 vs. FANG: 106.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
FANG' s EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 53.45 Max: 151.1
Current: 106.9
0
151.1
» FANG's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Oprt. Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q4 2015

FANG Guru Trades in Q4 2015

Steven Cohen 148,300 sh (New)
T Boone Pickens 81,410 sh (unchged)
RS Investment Management 398,035 sh (-21.26%)
Jim Simons 67,800 sh (-24.92%)
Paul Tudor Jones 3,860 sh (-56.82%)
» More
Q1 2016

FANG Guru Trades in Q1 2016

Columbia Wanger 525,000 sh (New)
RS Investment Management 440,911 sh (+10.77%)
Jim Simons Sold Out
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
T Boone Pickens 60,905 sh (-25.19%)
Steven Cohen 2,000 sh (-98.65%)
» More
Q2 2016

FANG Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Jim Simons 12,900 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 7,560 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 131,100 sh (+6455.00%)
Columbia Wanger 453,480 sh (-13.62%)
RS Investment Management 366,158 sh (-16.95%)
T Boone Pickens 38,053 sh (-37.52%)
» More
Q3 2016

FANG Guru Trades in Q3 2016

George Soros 2,680 sh (New)
Eric Mindich 833,639 sh (New)
T Boone Pickens 50,957 sh (+33.91%)
Columbia Wanger 491,963 sh (+8.49%)
Steven Cohen 138,049 sh (+5.30%)
Jim Simons Sold Out
Paul Tudor Jones 6,967 sh (-7.84%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with FANG

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - E&P » Oil & Gas E&P
Compare:OTCPK:SVRGF, NYSE:AR, OTCPK:OISHF, NYSE:PE, NYSE:NFX, NYSE:RRC, NYSE:CPG, OTCPK:TRMLF, OTCPK:PTXLF, OTCPK:AETUF, NYSE:CHK, OTCPK:KLYCY, NYSE:SWN, NYSE:EGN, OTCPK:LNDNF, NYSE:MUR, OTCPK:PREKF, NYSE:RICE, NYSE:COG, NYSE:VET » details
Traded in other countries:7DB.Germany,
Diamondback Energy Inc is an independent oil and natural gas company. It is currently engaged in the acquisition, development, exploration and exploitation of unconventional, onshore oil and natural gas reserves in the Permian Basin in West Texas.

Diamondback Energy Inc was incorporated in Delaware on December 30, 2011. The Company is an independent oil and natural gas company. It is currently engaged in the acquisition, development, exploration and exploitation of unconventional, onshore oil and natural gas reserves in the Permian Basin in West Texas. The Company markets the majority of the oil and natural gas production from properties it operates for both its account and the account of the other working interest owners in these properties. The Company's oil and natural gas operations are subject to various types of legislation, regulation and other legal requirements enacted by governmental authorities.

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
Forward P/E 36.63
FANG's Forward P/E is ranked lower than
62% of the 99 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 33.11 vs. FANG: 36.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward P/E only.
N/A
P/B 3.27
FANG's P/B is ranked lower than
81% of the 438 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.16 vs. FANG: 3.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
FANG' s P/B Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.41  Med: 2.57 Max: 4.09
Current: 3.27
1.41
4.09
P/S 16.36
FANG's P/S is ranked lower than
86% of the 419 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 3.27 vs. FANG: 16.36 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
FANG' s P/S Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.54  Med: 10.22 Max: 17.04
Current: 16.36
5.54
17.04
POCF 24.62
FANG's POCF is ranked lower than
88% of the 275 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 8.21 vs. FANG: 24.62 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
FANG' s POCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.7  Med: 13.46 Max: 25.68
Current: 24.62
7.7
25.68
Current Ratio 1.48
FANG's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
55% of the 509 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.25 vs. FANG: 1.48 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
FANG' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.45  Med: 0.81 Max: 2.73
Current: 1.48
0.45
2.73
Quick Ratio 1.46
FANG's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
57% of the 508 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.14 vs. FANG: 1.46 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
FANG' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.34  Med: 0.77 Max: 2.71
Current: 1.46
0.34
2.71
Days Inventory 5.73
FANG's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
86% of the 208 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 27.77 vs. FANG: 5.73 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
FANG' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.73  Med: 61.71 Max: 232.78
Current: 5.73
5.73
232.78
Days Sales Outstanding 41.96
FANG's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
60% of the 396 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 47.98 vs. FANG: 41.96 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
FANG' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 31.7  Med: 66.63 Max: 163.23
Current: 41.96
31.7
163.23
Days Payable 118.52
FANG's Days Payable is ranked higher than
67% of the 237 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 69.33 vs. FANG: 118.52 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
FANG' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 27.96  Med: 211.95 Max: 715.14
Current: 118.52
27.96
715.14

Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -21.80
FANG's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked lower than
71% of the 373 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -8.90 vs. FANG: -21.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
FANG' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -36  Med: -10.9 Max: 0
Current: -21.8
-36
0

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Tangible Book 3.33
FANG's Price/Tangible Book is ranked lower than
79% of the 409 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.29 vs. FANG: 3.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
FANG' s Price/Tangible Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.53  Med: 2.43 Max: 4.05
Current: 3.33
1.53
4.05
Price/Median PS Value 1.63
FANG's Price/Median PS Value is ranked lower than
77% of the 346 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.00 vs. FANG: 1.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
FANG' s Price/Median PS Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.62  Med: 1.01 Max: 1.68
Current: 1.63
0.62
1.68
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) -3.49
FANG's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
69% of the 518 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -12.00 vs. FANG: -3.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
FANG' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -3.57  Med: 3.2 Max: 9.2
Current: -3.49
-3.57
9.2

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $456.4
EPS (TTM) $ -5.52
Beta0.60
Short Percentage of Float6.33%
52-Week Range $55.48 - 113.23
Shares Outstanding (Mil)78.07

Analyst Estimate

Dec16 Dec17 Dec18
Revenue (Mil $) 509 944 1,295
EPS ($) 0.92 3.10 5.09
EPS w/o NRI ($) 0.92 3.10 5.09
EPS Growth Rate
(3Y to 5Y Estimate)
53.14%
Dividends Per Share ($)
» More Articles for FANG

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
12 Questions With Joseph Calandro Dec 07 2016 
Andreas Halvorsen Continues Buying Oil & Gas Stocks With Stake in Gulfport Energy Feb 01 2016 
T. Boone Pickens' Largest New Buys During Second Quarter Sep 24 2015 
GMT Capital Corp Starts to Invest in Leisure Industry Aug 04 2015 
Why You Should Buy EQT During an Oil & Gas Exploration and Production Flush Oct 23 2013 

More From Other Websites
4 Energy Stocks to Gain from Trump's Preferred EPA Chief Dec 08 2016
Diamondback Gives Back Half Its Breakout Gains Dec 08 2016
12 Questions With Joseph Calandro Dec 07 2016
Zacks Industry Outlook Highlights: Diamondback Energy, Matador Resources, TC PipeLines, Chevron and... Dec 07 2016
ReneSola (SOL) Grapples with Unfavorable Industry Dynamics Dec 07 2016
Is Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG) A Good Stock to Buy? Dec 06 2016
Diamondback Stock Breaks Out Then Drops (FANG) Dec 06 2016
W&T Offshore (WTI) Looks Good: Stock Adds 11% in Session Dec 06 2016
Noble Energy (NBL) Hits 52-Week High on Asset Sale Strategy Dec 06 2016
Murphy Oil Unit Expects to Win Mexico's Block 5 Platform Dec 06 2016
What Are Stone Energy’s Lifting Costs? Dec 05 2016
Oil Caps 12% Weekly Gain, But U.S. Rig Count Highest Since January Dec 02 2016
Cramer: We Need the FANGs to Bite on This Critical Day Dec 02 2016
EP Energy (EPE) Worth a Look: Stock Adds 5.7% in Session Dec 02 2016
Cramer: Not What Bulls Wanted to See Dec 01 2016
ETFs with exposure to Diamondback Energy, Inc. : December 1, 2016 Dec 01 2016
Why the Earnings Streak Will Continue for Diamondback Energy (FANG) Dec 01 2016
Cramer: Trump's Picks for Commerce, Treasury Are Get-It-Done Guys Nov 30 2016
U.S. Crude Production Hits Highest Level In Nearly 6 Months Nov 30 2016

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)