Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.44
FANG's Cash to Debt is ranked lower than
51% of the 455 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.47 vs. FANG: 0.44 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
FANG' s Cash to Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.01  Med: 0.09 Max: N/A
Current: 0.44
Equity to Asset 0.69
FANG's Equity to Asset is ranked higher than
70% of the 432 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.51 vs. FANG: 0.69 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
FANG' s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.41  Med: 0.59 Max: 0.79
Current: 0.69
0.41
0.79
F-Score: 4
Z-Score: 3.97
M-Score: -3.19
WACC vs ROIC
6.99%
-19.25%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) -141.94
FANG's Operating margin (%) is ranked lower than
61% of the 444 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -75.59 vs. FANG: -141.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
FANG' s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -165.71  Med: 30.68 Max: 45.77
Current: -141.94
-165.71
45.77
Net-margin (%) -124.95
FANG's Net-margin (%) is ranked lower than
57% of the 444 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -92.22 vs. FANG: -124.95 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
FANG' s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -124.95  Med: -0.78 Max: 39.09
Current: -124.95
-124.95
39.09
ROE (%) -26.60
FANG's ROE (%) is ranked lower than
52% of the 444 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -22.27 vs. FANG: -26.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
FANG' s ROE (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -30.36  Med: -0.33 Max: 14.92
Current: -26.6
-30.36
14.92
ROA (%) -18.11
FANG's ROA (%) is ranked lower than
52% of the 509 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -16.59 vs. FANG: -18.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
FANG' s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -18.81  Med: -0.18 Max: 8.39
Current: -18.11
-18.81
8.39
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) -21.40
FANG's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
54% of the 491 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -26.87 vs. FANG: -21.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
FANG' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -26.31  Med: 5.67 Max: 15.87
Current: -21.4
-26.31
15.87
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) 23.10
FANG's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
86% of the 370 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -10.10 vs. FANG: 23.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
FANG' s Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 11.55 Max: 62.1
Current: 23.1
0
62.1
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) 106.90
FANG's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
90% of the 268 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -1.40 vs. FANG: 106.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
FANG' s EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 53.45 Max: 151.1
Current: 106.9
0
151.1
» FANG's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Oprt. Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q3 2015

FANG Guru Trades in Q3 2015

Jim Simons 90,300 sh (+622.40%)
Paul Tudor Jones 8,940 sh (+219.29%)
RS Investment Management 505,520 sh (+6.57%)
T Boone Pickens 56,600 sh (+0.59%)
Kyle Bass Sold Out
Steven Cohen Sold Out
» More
Q4 2015

FANG Guru Trades in Q4 2015

Steven Cohen 148,300 sh (New)
T Boone Pickens 81,410 sh (unchged)
RS Investment Management 398,035 sh (-21.26%)
Jim Simons 67,800 sh (-24.92%)
Paul Tudor Jones 3,860 sh (-56.82%)
» More
Q1 2016

FANG Guru Trades in Q1 2016

Columbia Wanger 525,000 sh (New)
RS Investment Management 440,911 sh (+10.77%)
Jim Simons Sold Out
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
T Boone Pickens 60,905 sh (-25.19%)
Steven Cohen 2,000 sh (-98.65%)
» More
Q2 2016

FANG Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Paul Tudor Jones 7,560 sh (New)
Jim Simons 12,900 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 131,100 sh (+6455.00%)
Columbia Wanger 453,480 sh (-13.62%)
RS Investment Management 366,158 sh (-16.95%)
T Boone Pickens 38,053 sh (-37.52%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with FANG

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - E&P » Oil & Gas E&P
Compare:NYSE:SWN, OTCPK:OISHF, OTCPK:SVRGF, NYSE:RRC, NYSE:CPG, OTCPK:TRMLF, NYSE:PE, NYSE:ECA, OTCPK:KLYCY, OTCPK:LUPEY, OTCPK:AETUF, NYSE:AR, NYSE:NFX, NYSE:CHK, NYSE:EGN, NYSE:NFG, OTCPK:PREKF, OTCPK:PEYUF, OTCPK:PTXLF, NYSE:MUR » details
Traded in other countries:7DB.Germany,
Diamondback Energy Inc is an independent oil and natural gas company. It is currently engaged in the acquisition, development, exploration and exploitation of unconventional, onshore oil and natural gas reserves in the Permian Basin in West Texas.

Diamondback Energy Inc was incorporated in Delaware on December 30, 2011. The Company is an independent oil and natural gas company. It is currently engaged in the acquisition, development, exploration and exploitation of unconventional, onshore oil and natural gas reserves in the Permian Basin in West Texas. The Company markets the majority of the oil and natural gas production from properties it operates for both its account and the account of the other working interest owners in these properties. The Company's oil and natural gas operations are subject to various types of legislation, regulation and other legal requirements enacted by governmental authorities.

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
Forward P/E 37.45
FANG's Forward P/E is ranked lower than
69% of the 99 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 29.59 vs. FANG: 37.45 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward P/E only.
N/A
P/B 3.30
FANG's P/B is ranked lower than
83% of the 422 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.06 vs. FANG: 3.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
FANG' s P/B Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.41  Med: 2.53 Max: 4.09
Current: 3.3
1.41
4.09
P/S 14.26
FANG's P/S is ranked lower than
86% of the 411 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 2.60 vs. FANG: 14.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
FANG' s P/S Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.54  Med: 10.08 Max: 15.58
Current: 14.26
5.54
15.58
POCF 17.83
FANG's POCF is ranked lower than
83% of the 275 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 6.75 vs. FANG: 17.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
FANG' s POCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.7  Med: 13.08 Max: 25.65
Current: 17.83
7.7
25.65
Current Ratio 2.10
FANG's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
65% of the 494 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.23 vs. FANG: 2.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
FANG' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.45  Med: 0.77 Max: 2.73
Current: 2.1
0.45
2.73
Quick Ratio 2.09
FANG's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
68% of the 494 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.15 vs. FANG: 2.09 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
FANG' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.34  Med: 0.76 Max: 2.71
Current: 2.09
0.34
2.71
Days Inventory 6.22
FANG's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
85% of the 203 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 28.51 vs. FANG: 6.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
FANG' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 6.22  Med: 61.71 Max: 232.78
Current: 6.22
6.22
232.78
Days Sales Outstanding 62.78
FANG's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
69% of the 382 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 44.85 vs. FANG: 62.78 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
FANG' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 29.42  Med: 66.63 Max: 163.23
Current: 62.78
29.42
163.23
Days Payable 87.06
FANG's Days Payable is ranked higher than
55% of the 231 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 73.48 vs. FANG: 87.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
FANG' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 27.96  Med: 211.95 Max: 715.14
Current: 87.06
27.96
715.14

Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -21.80
FANG's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked lower than
72% of the 365 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -8.20 vs. FANG: -21.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
FANG' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -36  Med: -10.9 Max: 0
Current: -21.8
-36
0

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Tangible Book 3.30
FANG's Price/Tangible Book is ranked lower than
80% of the 396 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.19 vs. FANG: 3.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
FANG' s Price/Tangible Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.53  Med: 2.41 Max: 4.05
Current: 3.3
1.53
4.05
Price/Median PS Value 1.42
FANG's Price/Median PS Value is ranked lower than
75% of the 363 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.89 vs. FANG: 1.42 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
FANG' s Price/Median PS Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.63  Med: 1 Max: 1.43
Current: 1.42
0.63
1.43
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) -7.61
FANG's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
62% of the 501 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -13.70 vs. FANG: -7.61 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
FANG' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -7.7  Med: 3.2 Max: 9.2
Current: -7.61
-7.7
9.2

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $426.2
EPS (TTM) $ -7.89
Beta0.74
Short Percentage of Float10.13%
52-Week Range $55.48 - 99.69
Shares Outstanding (Mil)78.03

Analyst Estimate

Dec16 Dec17 Dec18
Revenue (Mil $) 482 852 1,123
EPS ($) 0.81 2.84 4.39
EPS w/o NRI ($) 0.81 2.84 4.39
EPS Growth Rate
(3Y to 5Y Estimate)
52.68%
Dividends Per Share ($)
» More Articles for FANG

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Andreas Halvorsen Continues Buying Oil & Gas Stocks With Stake in Gulfport Energy Feb 01 2016 
T. Boone Pickens' Largest New Buys During Second Quarter Sep 24 2015 
GMT Capital Corp Starts to Invest in Leisure Industry Aug 04 2015 
Why You Should Buy EQT During an Oil & Gas Exploration and Production Flush Oct 23 2013 

More From Other Websites
Deutsche Bank Says Permian Basin Oil Stocks Still Best Buys Sep 26 2016
U.S. Oil Rig Count Climbs By 2 But Permian, Eagle Ford See Dips Sep 23 2016
[$$] Oil Explorers Shielded From Commodity Swings Sep 23 2016
Analyzing ConocoPhillips’s Production Mix Sep 23 2016
Diamondback Dominates Shale-Rich Permian Basin With Conservative Deals Sep 19 2016
Who Will Win The Permian's Latest Bidding War? Sep 16 2016
Breaking Down Marathon Oil’s 2Q Production Costs and Margins Sep 16 2016
Diamondback Energy, Inc. – Value Analysis (NASDAQ:FANG) : September 15, 2016 Sep 15 2016
Diamondback Energy, Inc. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : FANG-US :... Sep 14 2016
Chevron Seen Pouring Up To $3 Billion In Permian Basin Sep 13 2016
Callon Buys Oil and Gas Assets From ArcLight-Backed Element for $327M Sep 07 2016
3 Must-Buy Energy Stocks for September Aug 31 2016
Permian-Focused Parsely, Laredo Benefit From Low-Cost Shale Center Aug 30 2016
Did Oil-Weighted Stocks Outperform Crude Oil? Aug 30 2016
Not All Shale Stocks Are Equal: Which Ones Are Buys? Aug 29 2016
Diamondback's Current Valuation Provides Little Upside In Williams Capital's View Aug 29 2016
Returns of Upstream Stocks with High and Low Implied Volatilities Aug 29 2016
Coverage initiated on Diamondback Energy by Williams Capital Group Aug 29 2016
Why Diamondback Energy (FANG) Could Be Positioned for a Surge Aug 26 2016
Oil-Weighted Stocks’ Performance Compared to Crude Oil Aug 23 2016

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)