Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 1.51
NAS:FANG's Cash-to-Debt is ranked higher than
58% of the 449 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.72 vs. NAS:FANG: 1.51 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
NAS:FANG' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.03  Med: 0.09 Max: 77.98
Current: 1.51
0.03
77.98
Equity-to-Asset 0.69
NAS:FANG's Equity-to-Asset is ranked higher than
70% of the 423 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.51 vs. NAS:FANG: 0.69 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
NAS:FANG' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.49  Med: 0.65 Max: 0.84
Current: 0.69
0.49
0.84
Piotroski F-Score: 6
Altman Z-Score: 3.65
Beneish M-Score: -1.73
WACC vs ROIC
6.25%
-2.40%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % -13.02
NAS:FANG's Operating Margin % is ranked higher than
66% of the 429 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -45.13 vs. NAS:FANG: -13.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
NAS:FANG' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -165.71  Med: 26.89 Max: 45.77
Current: -13.02
-165.71
45.77
Net Margin % -31.31
NAS:FANG's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
59% of the 429 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -49.17 vs. NAS:FANG: -31.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
NAS:FANG' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -123.26  Med: -11.03 Max: 39.09
Current: -31.31
-123.26
39.09
ROE % -6.79
NAS:FANG's ROE % is ranked higher than
62% of the 420 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -13.16 vs. NAS:FANG: -6.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
NAS:FANG' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -30.36  Med: -1.77 Max: 14.92
Current: -6.79
-30.36
14.92
ROA % -4.74
NAS:FANG's ROA % is ranked higher than
61% of the 496 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -9.02 vs. NAS:FANG: -4.74 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
NAS:FANG' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -18.84  Med: -1.44 Max: 8.39
Current: -4.74
-18.84
8.39
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % -4.37
NAS:FANG's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
66% of the 470 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -13.05 vs. NAS:FANG: -4.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
NAS:FANG' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -26.31  Med: 3.54 Max: 15.87
Current: -4.37
-26.31
15.87
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate 12.60
NAS:FANG's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked higher than
86% of the 369 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -18.20 vs. NAS:FANG: 12.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
NAS:FANG' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 12.6 Max: 62.1
Current: 12.6
0
62.1
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate -42.80
NAS:FANG's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
77% of the 303 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -21.60 vs. NAS:FANG: -42.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
NAS:FANG' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: -21.4 Max: 127.5
Current: -42.8
0
127.5
GuruFocus has detected 6 Warning Signs with Diamondback Energy Inc $NAS:FANG.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» NAS:FANG's 10-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-05-15 Est.)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q1 2016

FANG Guru Trades in Q1 2016

Columbia Wanger 525,000 sh (New)
RS Investment Management 440,911 sh (+10.77%)
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Jim Simons Sold Out
T Boone Pickens 60,905 sh (-25.19%)
Steven Cohen 2,000 sh (-98.65%)
» More
Q2 2016

FANG Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Paul Tudor Jones 7,560 sh (New)
Jim Simons 12,900 sh (New)
Steven Cohen 131,100 sh (+6455.00%)
Columbia Wanger 453,480 sh (-13.62%)
RS Investment Management 366,158 sh (-16.95%)
T Boone Pickens 38,053 sh (-37.52%)
» More
Q3 2016

FANG Guru Trades in Q3 2016

Eric Mindich 833,639 sh (New)
George Soros 2,680 sh (New)
T Boone Pickens 50,957 sh (+33.91%)
Columbia Wanger 491,963 sh (+8.49%)
Steven Cohen 138,049 sh (+5.30%)
Jim Simons Sold Out
Paul Tudor Jones 6,967 sh (-7.84%)
» More
Q4 2016

FANG Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Caxton Associates 26,721 sh (New)
Eric Mindich 1,478,139 sh (+77.31%)
Paul Tudor Jones 11,651 sh (+67.23%)
Steven Cohen 145,000 sh (+5.04%)
T Boone Pickens 51,441 sh (+0.95%)
George Soros Sold Out
Columbia Wanger 439,587 sh (-10.65%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with FANG

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - E&P » Oil & Gas E&P    NAICS: 211111    SIC: 1311
Compare:NYSE:PE, OTCPK:OISHF, NYSE:EQT, NYSE:NFX, NYSE:RRC, NYSE:AR, NYSE:COG, NYSE:XEC, NYSE:ECA, OTCPK:SVRGF, OTCPK:LNDNY, OTCPK:TRMLF, NYSE:CPG, OTCPK:MGYOY, NYSE:CHK, NYSE:WPX, NYSE:EGN, NYSE:NFG, OTCPK:SSLTY, OTCPK:AETUF » details
Traded in other countries:7DB.Germany,
Headquarter Location:USA
Diamondback Energy Inc is an independent oil and natural gas company. It is currently engaged in the acquisition, development, exploration and exploitation of unconventional, onshore oil and natural gas reserves in the Permian Basin in West Texas.

Diamondback Energy is an independent oil and gas producer in the United States. The company operates exclusively in the Permian (Midland) Basin. At the end of 2016, the company reported net proven reserves of 205 million barrels of oil equivalent. Net production averaged about 43,000 barrels per day in 2016, at a ratio of 73% oil, 15% natural gas liquids, and 11% natural gas.

Top Ranked Articles about Diamondback Energy Inc

Diamondback Energy, Inc. Schedules First Quarter 2017 Conference Call for May 3, 2017
Viper Energy Partners LP, a Subsidiary of Diamondback Energy, Inc., Schedules First Quarter 2017 Conference Call for May 3, 2017
Viper Energy Partners LP, a Subsidiary of Diamondback Energy, Inc., Announces Appointment to the Board of Directors

MIDLAND, Texas, March 29, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Travis Stice, Chief Executive Officer of Viper Energy Partners LP (NASDAQ:VNOM) ("Viper" or the “Company”), a subsidiary of Diamondback Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ:FANG) ("Diamondback"), is pleased to announce the appointment of Spencer D. Armour, III to the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of its General Partner and its Audit Committee, effective March 22, 2017.
Mr. Armour has over 30 years of executive and entrepreneurial experience in the energy services industry. Mr. Armour currently serves as President of PT Petroleum LLC in Midland, Texas. He was the Vice President of Corporate Development for Basic Energy Services, Inc. from 2007 to 2008, which acquired Sledge Drilling Corp., a company Mr. Armour co-founded and served as Chief Executive Officer for from 2005 to 2006. From 1998 through 2005, he served as Executive Vice President of Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc., which acquired Lone Star Mud, Inc., a company Mr. Armour founded and served as President for from 1986 to 1997. Mr. Armour has served as a director of ProPetro Holding Corp. since February 2013. He also served on the Patterson – UTI Board of Directors from 1999 through 2001. Mr. Armour received a B.S. in Economics from the University of Houston in 1977 and was appointed to the University of Houston System Board of Regents in 2011 by former Texas Governor Rick Perry. Mr. Stice continued, “We are thrilled to have Spencer join Viper’s Board of Directors. With over three decades of energy services experience and a deep knowledge of industry dynamics within the Permian Basin, Spencer adds further depth and expertise to Viper’s leadership and is well suited to serve as a Director of the General Partner.”  About Viper Energy Partners LP Viper is a limited partnership formed by Diamondback to own, acquire and exploit oil and natural gas properties in North America, with a focus on oil-weighted basins, primarily the Permian Basin in West Texas. About Diamondback Energy, Inc. Diamondback is an independent oil and natural gas Company headquartered in Midland, Texas focused on the acquisition, development, exploration and exploitation of unconventional, onshore oil and natural gas reserves in the Permian Basin in West Texas. Diamondback's activities are primarily focused on the horizontal exploitation of multiple intervals within the Wolfcamp, Spraberry, Clearfork, Bone Spring and Cline formations.
Investor Contact:
Adam Lawlis
1 432.221.7467
[email protected]

Read more...
Diamondback Energy, Inc. Expands Management Team

MIDLAND, Texas, March 15, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Diamondback Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ:FANG) (“Diamondback” or the “Company”) today announced it has expanded its officer group, creating Executive Officer, Senior Vice President and Vice President officer levels consistent with and to further accommodate the Company’s growth.   
Travis Stice, Chief Executive Officer, announced that Michael L. Hollis was promoted to President and Chief Operating Officer, and that Thomas F. Hawkins has joined the Company as Senior Vice President of Land.   Mr. Stice also stated that Teresa L. Dick, Randall J. Holder, Paul S. Molnar and Russell D. Pantermuehl were promoted to Executive Vice President positions, Mathew Kaes Van’t Hof was promoted to Senior Vice President, and the Company designated four new Vice President positions. Also announced was the promotion of Adam T. Lawlis to Director, Investor Relations. The Company’s senior management team is: Executive Officers * Travis D. Stice  Chief Executive Officer* Michael L. Hollis  President & Chief Operating Officer* Teresa L. Dick  Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President and Assistant Secretary* Randall J. Holder  Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary* Paul S. Molnar  Executive Vice President, Exploration and Business Development* Russell D. Pantermuehl  Executive Vice President, Reservoir Engineering Sr. Vice Presidents * Thomas F. Hawkins  Senior Vice President, Land* Mathew Kaes Van’t Hof  Senior Vice President, Strategy and Corporate Development Vice Presidents * Kara B. Blubaugh-Few  Vice President, Accounting and Controller* David L. Cannon  Vice President, Geoscience* W. Marc Dingler IV  Vice President, Legal and Deputy General Counsel* Daniel N. Wesson  Vice President, Operations, Delaware Basin Mr. Stice further stated, “These promotions reflect the contributions made by these individuals in growing Diamondback Energy into one of the premier oil companies in the Permian Basin. This expansion of the executive team allows us to provide additional development opportunities and recognize employees as we continue to drive superior shareholder returns. Further, the Board of Directors’ promotion of Mr. Hollis to President and Chief Operating Officer recognizes his outstanding leadership as Chief Operating Officer for the last two years.”  About Diamondback Energy, Inc. Diamondback is an independent oil and natural gas Company headquartered in Midland, Texas focused on the acquisition, development, exploration and exploitation of unconventional, onshore oil and natural gas reserves in the Permian Basin in West Texas. Diamondback's activities are primarily focused on the horizontal exploitation of multiple intervals within the Wolfcamp, Spraberry, Clearfork, Bone Spring and Cline formations.
Investor Contact:
Adam Lawlis
1 432.221.7467
[email protected]


Read more...
Diamondback Energy, Inc. Announces Closing of Acquisition from Brigham Resources

MIDLAND, Texas, March 01, 2017 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Diamondback Energy, Inc. (NASDAQ:FANG) ("Diamondback" or the "Company") today announced the closing of its previously announced acquisition of leasehold interests and related assets from Brigham Resources Operating, LLC and Brigham Resources Midstream, LLC ("the Sellers" or "Brigham Resources") for an aggregate purchase price of $2.55 billion. The incremental purchase price is attributable to the acquisition of additional leasehold acreage as well as mineral interests on the properties and other post effective date adjustments. 
On February 28, 2017, the Company completed the acquisition of 80,185 net leasehold acres in Pecos and Reeves counties, which includes an incremental 3,866 net leasehold acres from the 76,319 net leasehold acres previously announced in December 2016. Also included are mineral interests covering 1,321 net royalty acres, including an incremental 172 net royalty acres from the 1,149 net royalty acres initially disclosed. "Diamondback's successful completion of this transaction represents the collective efforts of our team to secure a leading resource footprint in the Southern Delaware Basin. With the transaction completed, our focus now shifts to developing this asset and expanding our track record of achieving efficient, low-cost operations from the Midland Basin into the Delaware Basin,” stated Travis Stice, Chief Executive Officer of Diamondback. About Diamondback Energy, Inc. Diamondback is an independent oil and natural gas Company headquartered in Midland, Texas focused on the acquisition, development, exploration and exploitation of unconventional, onshore oil and natural gas reserves in the Permian Basin in West Texas. Diamondback's activities are primarily focused on the horizontal exploitation of multiple intervals within the Wolfcamp, Spraberry, Clearfork, Bone Spring and Cline formations. Forward Looking Statements This news release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. All statements, other than historical facts, that address activities that Diamondback assumes, plans, expects, believes, intends or anticipates (and other similar expressions) will, should or may occur in the future are forward-looking statements, including specifically the statements regarding the proposed activities associated with the assets included in the acquisition announced above. The forward-looking statements are based on management's current beliefs, based on currently available information, as to the outcome and timing of future events. These forward-looking statements involve certain risks and uncertainties that could cause the results to differ materially from those expected by the management of Diamondback. Information concerning these risks and other factors can be found in Diamondback's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including its Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K, which can be obtained free of charge on the Securities and Exchange Commission's web site at http://www.sec.gov. Diamondback undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement.
Investor Contact:

Adam Lawlis

1 432.221.7467

[email protected]

Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
Forward PE Ratio 28.17
FANG's Forward PE Ratio is ranked lower than
61% of the 283 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 23.70 vs. FANG: 28.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PB Ratio 2.11
FANG's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
70% of the 420 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.22 vs. FANG: 2.11 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
FANG' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.41  Med: 2.5 Max: 4.09
Current: 2.11
1.41
4.09
PS Ratio 14.47
FANG's PS Ratio is ranked lower than
85% of the 405 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 3.60 vs. FANG: 14.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
FANG' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.65  Med: 10.8 Max: 16.1
Current: 14.47
5.65
16.1
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 22.94
FANG's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
87% of the 267 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 8.20 vs. FANG: 22.94 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
FANG' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.87  Med: 14.61 Max: 25.67
Current: 22.94
7.87
25.67
EV-to-EBIT -72.27
FANG's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 209 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 16.34 vs. FANG: -72.27 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
FANG' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -105.2  Med: 17.2 Max: 46.6
Current: -72.27
-105.2
46.6
EV-to-EBITDA 170.73
FANG's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
97% of the 399 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 12.98 vs. FANG: 170.73 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
FANG' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -62.4  Med: 15.7 Max: 178.22
Current: 170.73
-62.4
178.22
Current Ratio 8.56
FANG's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
88% of the 480 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.23 vs. FANG: 8.56 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
FANG' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.34  Med: 0.75 Max: 8.56
Current: 8.56
0.34
8.56
Quick Ratio 8.55
FANG's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
88% of the 479 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.12 vs. FANG: 8.55 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
FANG' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.31  Med: 0.68 Max: 8.55
Current: 8.55
0.31
8.55
Days Inventory 4.98
FANG's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
89% of the 201 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 28.39 vs. FANG: 4.98 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
FANG' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.98  Med: 49.1 Max: 232.78
Current: 4.98
4.98
232.78
Days Sales Outstanding 48.71
FANG's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
59% of the 381 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 55.27 vs. FANG: 48.71 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
FANG' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 29.42  Med: 61.39 Max: 163.23
Current: 48.71
29.42
163.23
Days Payable 135.35
FANG's Days Payable is ranked higher than
64% of the 238 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 88.02 vs. FANG: 135.35 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
FANG' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 27.96  Med: 173.65 Max: 715.14
Current: 135.35
27.96
715.14

Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -18.30
FANG's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked lower than
69% of the 365 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -9.80 vs. FANG: -18.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
FANG' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -36  Med: -18.3 Max: 0
Current: -18.3
-36
0

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Net-Cash 558.06
FANG's Price-to-Net-Cash is ranked lower than
100% of the 81 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 4.44 vs. FANG: 558.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Net-Cash only.
FANG' s Price-to-Net-Cash Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 550.11  Med: 561.44 Max: 582.39
Current: 558.06
550.11
582.39
Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value 56.12
FANG's Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value is ranked lower than
97% of the 111 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 3.75 vs. FANG: 56.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value only.
FANG' s Price-to-Net-Current-Asset-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 55.32  Med: 56.46 Max: 58.56
Current: 56.12
55.32
58.56
Price-to-Tangible-Book 2.12
FANG's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked lower than
67% of the 393 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.28 vs. FANG: 2.12 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
FANG' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.53  Med: 2.13 Max: 2.95
Current: 2.12
1.53
2.95
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 1.34
FANG's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked lower than
70% of the 345 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.02 vs. FANG: 1.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
FANG' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.6  Med: 0.87 Max: 1.4
Current: 1.34
0.6
1.4
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % -1.41
FANG's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
56% of the 565 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -3.19 vs. FANG: -1.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
FANG' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -1.42  Med: 3.2 Max: 8.6
Current: -1.41
-1.42
8.6

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $527.1
EPS (TTM) $ -2.26
Beta0.70
Short Percentage of Float5.89%
52-Week Range $82.19 - 114.00
Shares Outstanding (Mil)90.14

Analyst Estimate

Dec17 Dec18 Dec19
Revenue (Mil $) 1,229 1,767 2,616
EPS ($) 4.12 5.50 9.54
EPS without NRI ($) 4.12 5.50 9.54
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
41.80%
Dividends per Share ($)
» More Articles for FANG

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Diamondback Energy, Inc. Schedules First Quarter 2017 Conference Call for May 3, 2017 Apr 24 2017 
Viper Energy Partners LP, a Subsidiary of Diamondback Energy, Inc., Schedules First Quarter 2017 Con Apr 24 2017 
Viper Energy Partners LP, a Subsidiary of Diamondback Energy, Inc., Announces Appointment to the Boa Mar 29 2017 
Diamondback Energy, Inc. Expands Management Team Mar 15 2017 
Diamondback Energy, Inc. Announces Closing of Acquisition from Brigham Resources Mar 01 2017 
12 Questions With Joseph Calandro Dec 07 2016 
Andreas Halvorsen Continues Buying Oil & Gas Stocks With Stake in Gulfport Energy Feb 01 2016 
T. Boone Pickens' Largest New Buys During Second Quarter Sep 24 2015 
GMT Capital Corp Starts to Invest in Leisure Industry Aug 04 2015 
Why You Should Buy EQT During an Oil & Gas Exploration and Production Flush Oct 23 2013 

More From Other Websites
Energy Stocks And Industry News: Oil, Gas, Solar, Coal Apr 26 2017
Diamondback Energy, Inc. Schedules First Quarter 2017 Conference Call for May 3, 2017 Apr 24 2017
Viper Energy Partners LP, a Subsidiary of Diamondback Energy, Inc., Schedules First Quarter 2017... Apr 24 2017
Betting on Oil's Turnaround? Here's Where to Put Your Money Apr 24 2017
Can Southwestern Energy Report Higher Net Profits in 1Q17? Apr 21 2017
Diamondback Energy, Inc. – Value Analysis (NASDAQ:FANG) : April 20, 2017 Apr 20 2017
Charts in Focus: Marathon Oil’s 4Q16 Production Costs, Margins Apr 20 2017
Diamondback Energy, Inc. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : FANG-US : April... Apr 19 2017
This Is Why Crude Oil Prices Are Driving MRO’s Stock Price Apr 18 2017
I Still Can't Believe Apache Corp. Spent $399 Million on Securing This Massive Shale Discovery Apr 17 2017
U.S. Oil Stockpiles Rise By 1.6 Million, Production Hits 9.2 Million Apr 05 2017
What OPEC Really Thinks About Current Oil Prices Apr 05 2017
Why Crude Oil Prices Impact ConocoPhillips’s Stock Price Apr 05 2017
Why Cobalt International Energy Stock Failed to Rally in 1Q17 Apr 04 2017
Diamondback Energy, Inc. breached its 50 day moving average in a Bullish Manner : FANG-US : April 3,... Apr 03 2017
[$$] 8 Energy Picks That Can Rise Even With Cheap Oil Mar 31 2017
3 Little-Known Energy Companies to Put on Your Radar Mar 31 2017
Zacks.com featured highlights: Inogen, Diamondback Energy, Radiant Logistics, Mitek Systems and LPL... Mar 31 2017
Beat Market with 5 Stocks Having Earnings Surprise Potential Mar 30 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)