Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany, Mexico

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 1.23
NYSE:FLR's Cash-to-Debt is ranked higher than
54% of the 1031 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.99 vs. NYSE:FLR: 1.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
NYSE:FLR' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.26  Med: 4.24 Max: N/A
Current: 1.23
Equity-to-Asset 0.34
NYSE:FLR's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
64% of the 1007 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.42 vs. NYSE:FLR: 0.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
NYSE:FLR' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.25  Med: 0.38 Max: 0.46
Current: 0.34
0.25
0.46
Interest Coverage 8.60
NYSE:FLR's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
63% of the 862 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 24.43 vs. NYSE:FLR: 8.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
NYSE:FLR' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.6  Med: 42.62 Max: 111.66
Current: 8.6
8.6
111.66
Piotroski F-Score: 5
Altman Z-Score: 3.79
Beneish M-Score: -2.02
WACC vs ROIC
9.50%
9.40%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 4/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 3.15
NYSE:FLR's Operating Margin % is ranked lower than
65% of the 1016 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 5.01 vs. NYSE:FLR: 3.15 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
NYSE:FLR' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.63  Med: 4.28 Max: 5.65
Current: 3.15
2.63
5.65
Net Margin % 1.48
NYSE:FLR's Net Margin % is ranked lower than
69% of the 1021 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 3.42 vs. NYSE:FLR: 1.48 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
NYSE:FLR' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.48  Med: 2.41 Max: 3.23
Current: 1.48
1.48
3.23
ROE % 9.10
NYSE:FLR's ROE % is ranked higher than
55% of the 1016 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 7.81 vs. NYSE:FLR: 9.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
NYSE:FLR' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.1  Med: 16.06 Max: 29.14
Current: 9.1
9.1
29.14
ROA % 3.17
NYSE:FLR's ROA % is ranked higher than
50% of the 1038 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 3.13 vs. NYSE:FLR: 3.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
NYSE:FLR' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.17  Med: 6.84 Max: 11.79
Current: 3.17
3.17
11.79
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 55.66
NYSE:FLR's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
80% of the 1030 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 17.74 vs. NYSE:FLR: 55.66 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
NYSE:FLR' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 55.66  Med: 90.83 Max: 142.19
Current: 55.66
55.66
142.19
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate -6.70
NYSE:FLR's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked lower than
73% of the 845 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 2.70 vs. NYSE:FLR: -6.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
NYSE:FLR' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -9  Med: 4.35 Max: 17.4
Current: -6.7
-9
17.4
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate -11.40
NYSE:FLR's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked lower than
80% of the 691 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 8.90 vs. NYSE:FLR: -11.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
NYSE:FLR' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 1.75 Max: 42.6
Current: -11.4
0
42.6
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate -21.00
NYSE:FLR's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked lower than
81% of the 632 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 8.60 vs. NYSE:FLR: -21.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
NYSE:FLR' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -37.8  Med: 9.7 Max: 62.1
Current: -21
-37.8
62.1
GuruFocus has detected 2 Warning Signs with Fluor Corp $NYSE:FLR.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» NYSE:FLR's 10-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-05-17 Est.)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2016

FLR Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Caxton Associates 395,100 sh (New)
Jim Simons 405,800 sh (+556.63%)
Pioneer Investments 467,696 sh (+18.18%)
Ken Fisher 16,050 sh (+1.94%)
John Buckingham 71,185 sh (+0.17%)
David Dreman 5,289 sh (unchged)
Dodge & Cox 7,195 sh (-14.29%)
Alan Fournier 180,800 sh (-20.11%)
Joel Greenblatt 242,157 sh (-73.15%)
» More
Q3 2016

FLR Guru Trades in Q3 2016

Ray Dalio 43,866 sh (New)
John Rogers 269,566 sh (New)
Pioneer Investments 675,116 sh (+44.35%)
David Dreman 5,289 sh (unchged)
Dodge & Cox 7,195 sh (unchged)
Caxton Associates Sold Out
John Buckingham 70,676 sh (-0.72%)
Ken Fisher 13,905 sh (-13.36%)
Alan Fournier 126,100 sh (-30.25%)
Jim Simons 247,400 sh (-39.03%)
Joel Greenblatt 63,735 sh (-73.68%)
» More
Q4 2016

FLR Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Jeremy Grantham 7,400 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 8,700 sh (New)
Paul Singer 37,100 sh (New)
John Rogers 436,266 sh (+61.84%)
Pioneer Investments 769,262 sh (+13.95%)
John Buckingham 75,418 sh (+6.71%)
Ken Fisher 14,055 sh (+1.08%)
Dodge & Cox 7,195 sh (unchged)
Jim Simons Sold Out
Alan Fournier Sold Out
Ray Dalio Sold Out
Joel Greenblatt Sold Out
David Dreman 222 sh (-95.80%)
» More
Q1 2017

FLR Guru Trades in Q1 2017

Ken Fisher 13,572 sh (-3.44%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with FLR

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Engineering & Construction » Engineering & Construction    NAICS: 237990    SIC: 1629
Compare:OTCPK:SHMUY, OTCPK:KAJMY, NYSE:JEC, OTCPK:CCOHY, OTCPK:SNCAF, OTCPK:BCKIF, NYSE:ACM, NYSE:PWR, OTCPK:COABF, OTCPK:KPELY, OTCPK:SKBSY, OTCPK:PUODY, OTCPK:JGCCY, NYSE:EME, OTCPK:ACSAY, OTCPK:WSPOF, OTCPK:HOCFY, OTCPK:NCCBF, NYSE:MTZ, NYSE:CBI » details
Traded in other countries:FLU.Germany, FLR.Mexico,
Headquarter Location:USA
Fluor Corp through its subsidiaries is engaged in professional services providing engineering, procurement, construction and maintenance as well as project management services.

Fluor is a global provider of engineering, procurement, fabrication, construction, and maintenance services to a wide range of customers, including oil and gas, manufacturing, and mining companies, along with the U.S. federal government. The majority of its revenue and backlog comes from oil and gas projects. Fluor aims to leverage its wide capabilities and global reach to win larger and more complex projects. The company generated 2015 revenue and adjusted operating income of $18.1 billion and $1.0 billion, respectively, and employs 59,000.

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 25.79
FLR's PE Ratio is ranked lower than
72% of the 804 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 15.80 vs. FLR: 25.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
FLR' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.37  Med: 20.88 Max: 47.26
Current: 25.79
7.37
47.26
Forward PE Ratio 18.25
FLR's Forward PE Ratio is ranked lower than
64% of the 168 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 17.06 vs. FLR: 18.25 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PE Ratio without NRI 25.79
FLR's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked lower than
72% of the 801 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 15.67 vs. FLR: 25.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
FLR' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.37  Med: 19.55 Max: 46.85
Current: 25.79
7.37
46.85
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 18.78
FLR's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked lower than
65% of the 491 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 13.16 vs. FLR: 18.78 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
FLR' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.63  Med: 20.32 Max: 115.54
Current: 18.78
5.63
115.54
PB Ratio 2.28
FLR's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
72% of the 1003 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.32 vs. FLR: 2.28 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
FLR' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.95  Med: 2.88 Max: 7.28
Current: 2.28
1.95
7.28
PS Ratio 0.39
FLR's PS Ratio is ranked higher than
68% of the 982 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.65 vs. FLR: 0.39 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
FLR' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.25  Med: 0.43 Max: 0.98
Current: 0.39
0.25
0.98
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 15.41
FLR's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
62% of the 352 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 11.14 vs. FLR: 15.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
FLR' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 7.21  Med: 21.44 Max: 338
Current: 15.41
7.21
338
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 10.23
FLR's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
57% of the 448 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 9.07 vs. FLR: 10.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
FLR' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.28  Med: 13.56 Max: 30.15
Current: 10.23
5.28
30.15
EV-to-EBIT 11.31
FLR's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
51% of the 1022 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 11.82 vs. FLR: 11.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
FLR' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.2  Med: 9.4 Max: 24.5
Current: 11.31
3.2
24.5
EV-to-EBITDA 8.26
FLR's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked higher than
57% of the 1058 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 9.37 vs. FLR: 8.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
FLR' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.8  Med: 7.9 Max: 19.5
Current: 8.26
2.8
19.5
Shiller PE Ratio 15.41
FLR's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked higher than
62% of the 168 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 20.34 vs. FLR: 15.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
FLR' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 12.81  Med: 21.8 Max: 37.57
Current: 15.41
12.81
37.57
Current Ratio 1.47
FLR's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
50% of the 957 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.48 vs. FLR: 1.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
FLR' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.89  Med: 1.47 Max: 1.76
Current: 1.47
0.89
1.76
Quick Ratio 1.07
FLR's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
66% of the 957 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.29 vs. FLR: 1.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
FLR' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.76  Med: 1.07 Max: 1.27
Current: 1.07
0.76
1.27
Days Inventory 31.77
FLR's Days Inventory is ranked lower than
55% of the 840 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 25.59 vs. FLR: 31.77 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
FLR' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 16.93  Med: 26.33 Max: 31.78
Current: 31.77
16.93
31.78
Days Sales Outstanding 32.60
FLR's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
82% of the 742 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 72.76 vs. FLR: 32.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
FLR' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 16.42  Med: 20.38 Max: 32.6
Current: 32.6
16.42
32.6
Days Payable 31.82
FLR's Days Payable is ranked lower than
78% of the 657 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 82.51 vs. FLR: 31.82 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
FLR' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 20.13  Med: 25.87 Max: 31.82
Current: 31.82
20.13
31.82

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 1.63
FLR's Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
71% of the 1096 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 2.38 vs. FLR: 1.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
FLR' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.44  Med: 1.01 Max: 2
Current: 1.63
0.44
2
Dividend Payout Ratio 0.42
FLR's Dividend Payout Ratio is ranked lower than
66% of the 632 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.29 vs. FLR: 0.42 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout Ratio only.
FLR' s Dividend Payout Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.13  Med: 0.17 Max: 0.42
Current: 0.42
0.13
0.42
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate 9.50
FLR's 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate is ranked higher than
56% of the 480 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 6.60 vs. FLR: 9.50 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate only.
FLR' s 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 7.7 Max: 18.9
Current: 9.5
0
18.9
Forward Dividend Yield % 1.61
FLR's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
73% of the 1068 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 2.50 vs. FLR: 1.61 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 2.76
FLR's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked lower than
53% of the 1369 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 2.90 vs. FLR: 2.76 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
FLR' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.74  Med: 1.71 Max: 3.39
Current: 2.76
0.74
3.39
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio 4.80
FLR's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
98% of the 497 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: -2.30 vs. FLR: 4.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
FLR' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -2.8  Med: -0.1 Max: 5
Current: 4.8
-2.8
5

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Tangible-Book 2.98
FLR's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked lower than
75% of the 913 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.47 vs. FLR: 2.98 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
FLR' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.29  Med: 3.16 Max: 5.88
Current: 2.98
2.29
5.88
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 1.04
FLR's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked higher than
56% of the 472 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.17 vs. FLR: 1.04 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
FLR' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.97  Med: 1.36 Max: 4.53
Current: 1.04
0.97
4.53
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 0.88
FLR's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
76% of the 840 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 1.15 vs. FLR: 0.88 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
FLR' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.52  Med: 0.9 Max: 1.85
Current: 0.88
0.52
1.85
Price-to-Graham-Number 1.85
FLR's Price-to-Graham-Number is ranked lower than
73% of the 630 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 0.98 vs. FLR: 1.85 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Graham-Number only.
FLR' s Price-to-Graham-Number Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.16  Med: 1.73 Max: 2.55
Current: 1.85
1.16
2.55
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 8.86
FLR's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
60% of the 1251 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 6.84 vs. FLR: 8.86 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
FLR' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 4.1  Med: 10.6 Max: 31.3
Current: 8.86
4.1
31.3
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % 3.39
FLR's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked lower than
58% of the 495 Companies
in the Global Engineering & Construction industry.

( Industry Median: 7.44 vs. FLR: 3.39 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
FLR' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.5  Med: 13.2 Max: 37.5
Current: 3.39
1.5
37.5

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $19,037
EPS (TTM) $ 1.99
Beta1.37
Short Percentage of Float3.11%
52-Week Range $44.05 - 58.37
Shares Outstanding (Mil)139.74

Analyst Estimate

Dec17 Dec18 Dec19
Revenue (Mil $) 20,251 21,393 22,564
EPS ($) 2.88 3.40 3.68
EPS without NRI ($) 2.88 3.40 3.68
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
16.91%
Dividends per Share ($) 0.82 0.87 0.89
» More Articles for FLR

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Great Lakes Announces Changes to Board of Directors Jan 26 2017 
John Rogers Boosts Berkshire, Rockwell Collins, Tiffany Dec 14 2016 
Stocks to Buy and Sell If Bernie Sanders Is Elected Apr 14 2016 
CF Industries Among Stocks Trading Below Peter Lynch Value Feb 11 2016 
The Best Companies of the Construction Industry – October 2015 Oct 08 2015 
Gulf Coast LNG Projects Dominate 2016's Top 10 Spending Projects in U.S. Southwest Region, an Indust Aug 14 2015 
Weekly 3-Year Low Highlights: NBL, WFM, FLR, LPL Aug 04 2015 
Should you follow these analysts and buy Chicago Bridge and Iron Mar 18 2015 
Engineering Firm Fluor Should Prioritize Margins Dec 19 2014 
After Recent Price Drop, Fluor (FLR) Looks Mighty Attractive Dec 02 2014 

More From Other Websites
Fluor to Present at Wells Fargo Industrials Conference Apr 25 2017
Fluor Awarded Offshore Compression Platform FEED by BP Apr 24 2017
Some U.S. Nuclear Workers Are Staying Home on Westinghouse Woes Apr 13 2017
Marathon Petroleum selects Fluor for more work on major refinery project Apr 11 2017
Fluor Selected by Marathon for Contract at Two Texas Refineries Apr 10 2017
Fluor Secures Texas Contract for U.S. 287 Expansion Project Apr 06 2017
Fluor Wins Bid-Build U.S. 287 Infrastructure Project in Texas Apr 05 2017
Fluor Corporation to Hold First Quarter Earnings Conference Call Apr 03 2017
Fluor Finishes Construction of Dow Chemical’s Ethylene Production Facility on Schedule Mar 30 2017
Westinghouse's largest creditor continues work on power plant projects, expects to be compensated Mar 30 2017
Who will pay to keep S.C. nuclear project moving forward during Westinghouse bankruptcy? Mar 29 2017
SCANA agrees to pay contractor to keep Summer nuclear project going during bankruptcy case Mar 29 2017
Today’s charts: Caterpillar, Deere, Fluor climb on report Trump’s infrastructure plan could come... Mar 28 2017
Today's charts: Caterpillar, Deere, Fluor Corporation climb on talk of Trump's... Mar 28 2017
Babcock Shares Weigh in London as Nuclear Clean-Up Contract Pulled Mar 27 2017
Trump’s Wall Is 30 Feet of Scary Politics for Builders Mar 24 2017
Fluor Secures 5-Year Maintenance Contract from Huntsman Mar 21 2017
Fluor’s Stork Secures New Five-Year Maintenance Contract with Huntsman at Four Sites in Texas Mar 20 2017
Fluor (FLR) Down 6% Since Earnings Report: Can It Rebound? Mar 20 2017
600+ companies are bidding to build Trump's 'border wall' — including one from Mexico Mar 16 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)