Switch to:

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 8/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.40
FPP's Cash to Debt is ranked higher than
72% of the 857 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.73 vs. FPP: 0.40 )
FPP' s 10-Year Cash to Debt Range
Min: 0.01   Max: No Debt
Current: 0.4

Equity to Asset 0.50
FPP's Equity to Asset is ranked higher than
74% of the 873 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.55 vs. FPP: 0.50 )
FPP' s 10-Year Equity to Asset Range
Min: 0.2   Max: 0.81
Current: 0.5

0.2
0.81
Interest Coverage 8.86
FPP's Interest Coverage is ranked higher than
71% of the 568 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 15.61 vs. FPP: 8.86 )
FPP' s 10-Year Interest Coverage Range
Min: 0.34   Max: 9999.99
Current: 8.86

0.34
9999.99
F-Score: 5
Z-Score: 2.81
M-Score: -3.41
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 9/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 21.78
FPP's Operating margin (%) is ranked higher than
86% of the 884 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 5.97 vs. FPP: 21.78 )
FPP' s 10-Year Operating margin (%) Range
Min: -24.71   Max: 39.62
Current: 21.78

-24.71
39.62
Net-margin (%) 12.13
FPP's Net-margin (%) is ranked higher than
85% of the 884 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 2.79 vs. FPP: 12.13 )
FPP' s 10-Year Net-margin (%) Range
Min: -26.36   Max: 29.16
Current: 12.13

-26.36
29.16
ROE (%) 10.19
FPP's ROE (%) is ranked higher than
89% of the 954 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -0.51 vs. FPP: 10.19 )
FPP' s 10-Year ROE (%) Range
Min: -61.54   Max: 18.89
Current: 10.19

-61.54
18.89
ROA (%) 5.12
FPP's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
89% of the 992 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -0.72 vs. FPP: 5.12 )
FPP' s 10-Year ROA (%) Range
Min: -12.41   Max: 13.67
Current: 5.12

-12.41
13.67
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 10.79
FPP's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
91% of the 978 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -0.65 vs. FPP: 10.79 )
FPP' s 10-Year ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range
Min: -14.27   Max: 24.04
Current: 10.79

-14.27
24.04
Revenue Growth (%) 14.00
FPP's Revenue Growth (%) is ranked higher than
81% of the 661 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 11.20 vs. FPP: 14.00 )
FPP' s 10-Year Revenue Growth (%) Range
Min: 0   Max: 60.2
Current: 14

0
60.2
EBITDA Growth (%) 20.50
FPP's EBITDA Growth (%) is ranked higher than
87% of the 606 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 4.90 vs. FPP: 20.50 )
FPP' s 10-Year EBITDA Growth (%) Range
Min: 0   Max: 77.4
Current: 20.5

0
77.4
EPS Growth (%) 14.50
FPP's EPS Growth (%) is ranked higher than
83% of the 516 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 3.20 vs. FPP: 14.50 )
FPP' s 10-Year EPS Growth (%) Range
Min: 0   Max: 86.6
Current: 14.5

0
86.6
» FPP's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Guru Trades

Q1 2013

FPP Guru Trades in Q1 2013

Jim Simons 186,600 sh (+4.07%)
» More
Q2 2013

FPP Guru Trades in Q2 2013

Jim Simons 194,700 sh (+4.34%)
» More
Q3 2013

FPP Guru Trades in Q3 2013

Jim Simons 206,600 sh (+6.11%)
» More
Q4 2013

FPP Guru Trades in Q4 2013

Jim Simons 218,400 sh (+5.71%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with FPP



No Insider Trades Found!
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/E(ttm) 33.10
FPP's P/E(ttm) is ranked higher than
56% of the 469 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 21.70 vs. FPP: 33.10 )
FPP' s 10-Year P/E(ttm) Range
Min: 8.11   Max: 222
Current: 33.1

8.11
222
P/B 3.50
FPP's P/B is ranked lower than
56% of the 941 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.50 vs. FPP: 3.50 )
FPP' s 10-Year P/B Range
Min: 0.81   Max: 14.18
Current: 3.5

0.81
14.18
P/S 4.20
FPP's P/S is ranked higher than
51% of the 892 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 3.50 vs. FPP: 4.20 )
FPP' s 10-Year P/S Range
Min: 0.95   Max: 21.59
Current: 4.2

0.95
21.59
PFCF 40.50
FPP's PFCF is ranked higher than
50% of the 238 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 15.80 vs. FPP: 40.50 )
FPP' s 10-Year PFCF Range
Min: 3.8   Max: 133
Current: 40.5

3.8
133
EV-to-EBIT 22.70
FPP's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
59% of the 639 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 17.12 vs. FPP: 22.70 )
FPP' s 10-Year EV-to-EBIT Range
Min: 5.4   Max: 603.2
Current: 22.7

5.4
603.2
PEG 0.60
FPP's PEG is ranked higher than
78% of the 233 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.03 vs. FPP: 0.60 )
FPP' s 10-Year PEG Range
Min: 0.37   Max: 37.12
Current: 0.6

0.37
37.12
Shiller P/E 46.50
FPP's Shiller P/E is ranked higher than
53% of the 321 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 24.56 vs. FPP: 46.50 )
FPP' s 10-Year Shiller P/E Range
Min: 13.25   Max: 190
Current: 46.5

13.25
190

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Tangible Book 3.40
FPP's Price/Tangible Book is ranked lower than
54% of the 919 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.60 vs. FPP: 3.40 )
FPP' s 10-Year Price/Tangible Book Range
Min: 0.96   Max: 27.08
Current: 3.4

0.96
27.08
Price/DCF (Projected) 7.30
FPP's Price/DCF (Projected) is ranked lower than
63% of the 263 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.70 vs. FPP: 7.30 )
FPP' s 10-Year Price/DCF (Projected) Range
Min: 6   Max: 11.68
Current: 7.3

6
11.68
Price/Median PS Value 1.10
FPP's Price/Median PS Value is ranked higher than
61% of the 821 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 0.90 vs. FPP: 1.10 )
FPP' s 10-Year Price/Median PS Value Range
Min: 0.34   Max: 3.98
Current: 1.1

0.34
3.98
Price/Graham Number 2.20
FPP's Price/Graham Number is ranked higher than
58% of the 460 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 1.40 vs. FPP: 2.20 )
FPP' s 10-Year Price/Graham Number Range
Min: 0.92   Max: 46.74
Current: 2.2

0.92
46.74
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) 4.40
FPP's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) is ranked higher than
64% of the 656 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: 5.70 vs. FPP: 4.40 )
FPP' s 10-Year Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) Range
Min: 0.2   Max: 18.4
Current: 4.4

0.2
18.4
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) -1.14
FPP's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) is ranked higher than
88% of the 753 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas E&P industry.

( Industry Median: -12.50 vs. FPP: -1.14 )
FPP' s 10-Year Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) Range
Min: -5.2   Max: 37.5
Current: -1.14

-5.2
37.5

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - E&P » Oil & Gas E&P
Compare:OJSCY, APC, APA, HRTPY, SGTZY » details
Traded in other countries:F4Y.Germany
FieldPoint Petroleum Corporation, a Colorado corporation, was formed on March 11, 1980, to acquire and enhance mature oil and natural gas field production in the mid-continent and the Rocky Mountain regions. The Company is engaged in the acquisition, operation and development of oil and natural gas properties, which are located in Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Central Texas and Wyoming as of December 31, 2011 and 2010. The Company's business strategy is to continue to expand its reserve base and increase production and cash flow through the acquisition of producing oil and natural gas properties. As of December 31, 2011, the Company had varying ownership interest in 361 gross productive wells located in five states. The Company operates 67 of the 360 wells; the other wells are operated by independent operators under contracts that are standard in the industry. It is a primary objective of the Company to operate some of the oil and natural gas properties in which it has an economic interest, and the Company will also partner with larger oil and natural gas companies to operate certain oil and natural gas properties in which the Company has an economic interest. The demand for oil and natural gas is dependent upon a number of factors, including the availability of other domestic production, crude oil imports, the proximity and size of oil and natural gas pipelines in general, other transportation facilities, the marketing of competitive fuels, and general fluctuations in the supply and demand for oil and natural gas. The oil and natural gas industry is highly competitive in all aspects. The Company competes with major oil companies, numerous independent oil and natural gas producers, individual proprietors, and investment programs. The Company's operations are subject to numerous federal, state and local laws and regulations controlling the discharge of materials into the environment or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment.

Personalized Checklist








Within your circle of competence?
Macro economic environment favorable?
High quality business?
Enough margin of safety with stocks?
Gurus are buying?
Insiders are buying?
Management capable and shareholder friendly?
Catalyst for stock price to appreciate?
Your level of confidence with the research?

Add Notes, Comments or Ask Questions

User Comments

No comment yet

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
Free 7-day Trial
FEEDBACK
Hide