Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 4/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.02
HCLP's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
97% of the 1511 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 632.99 vs. HCLP: 0.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
HCLP' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.02  Med: 0.15 Max: No Debt
Current: 0.02
Equity-to-Asset 0.55
HCLP's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
55% of the 694 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 0.58 vs. HCLP: 0.55 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
HCLP' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.14  Med: 0.4 Max: 0.55
Current: 0.55
0.14
0.55
Piotroski F-Score: 3
Altman Z-Score: 2.34
Beneish M-Score: -26.19
WACC vs ROIC
8.54%
-16.79%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % -32.87
HCLP's Operating Margin % is ranked lower than
74% of the 715 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 1.28 vs. HCLP: -32.87 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
HCLP' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -33.16  Med: 34.63 Max: 54.9
Current: -32.87
-33.16
54.9
Net Margin % -39.30
HCLP's Net Margin % is ranked lower than
75% of the 718 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 0.21 vs. HCLP: -39.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
HCLP' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -39.64  Med: 31.81 Max: 45.6
Current: -39.3
-39.64
45.6
ROE % -40.72
HCLP's ROE % is ranked lower than
73% of the 1363 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: -10.65 vs. HCLP: -40.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
HCLP' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -40.72  Med: 32.84 Max: 175.14
Current: -40.72
-40.72
175.14
ROA % -17.04
HCLP's ROA % is ranked lower than
59% of the 1530 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: -9.67 vs. HCLP: -17.04 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
HCLP' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -17.04  Med: 15.39 Max: 31.11
Current: -17.04
-17.04
31.11
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % -17.08
HCLP's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
52% of the 1456 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: -14.33 vs. HCLP: -17.08 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
HCLP' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -17.08  Med: 25.94 Max: 50.4
Current: -17.08
-17.08
50.4
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate -13.40
HCLP's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked lower than
67% of the 627 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: -3.80 vs. HCLP: -13.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
HCLP' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0 Max: -13.4
Current: -13.4
GuruFocus has detected 2 Warning Signs with Hi-Crush Partners LP $HCLP.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» HCLP's 10-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-05-22 Est.)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q4 2015

HCLP Guru Trades in Q4 2015

Jim Simons 246,549 sh (-41.49%)
» More
Q1 2016

HCLP Guru Trades in Q1 2016

Jim Simons 23,649 sh (-90.41%)
» More
Q2 2016

HCLP Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Leon Cooperman 100,000 sh (New)
Jim Simons Sold Out
» More
Q3 2016

HCLP Guru Trades in Q3 2016

Leon Cooperman Sold Out
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with HCLP

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Metals & Mining » Industrial Metals & Minerals    NAICS: 212399    SIC: 1499
Compare:NYSE:HSC, OTCPK:TMMFF, NYSE:MUX, OTCPK:SRUXF, NYSE:DDC, OTCPK:NXGEF, OTCPK:GALXF, OTCPK:AFRBY, OTCPK:LUCRF, OTCPK:AMVMF, AMEX:KLDX, NYSE:MTRN, OTCPK:NYRSY, OTCPK:SLGGF, OTCPK:PXMFF, OTCPK:IPGDF, NAS:SND, NAS:MPVD, OTCPK:FTMNF, NYSE:CINR » details
Traded in other countries:HCU.Germany,
Hi-Crush Partners LP is a producer and supplier of monocrystalline sand, a mineral that is used as a proppant to enhance the recovery rates of hydrocarbons from oil and natural gas wells.

Hi-Crush Partners is one of the leading suppliers of sand used in the hydraulic fracturing of oil and gas wells. It produces Northern White sand from three mines in Wisconsin. The company delivers sand in most major basins via its extensive logistics network. The company is structured as a master limited partnership.

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PB Ratio 3.38
HCLP's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
70% of the 1620 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 2.05 vs. HCLP: 3.38 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
HCLP' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.02  Med: 5.63 Max: 17.58
Current: 3.38
1.02
17.58
PS Ratio 3.41
HCLP's PS Ratio is ranked lower than
72% of the 725 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 1.88 vs. HCLP: 3.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
HCLP' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.4  Med: 3.41 Max: 13.15
Current: 3.41
0.4
13.15
EV-to-EBIT -17.82
HCLP's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 525 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 17.95 vs. HCLP: -17.82 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
HCLP' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -24  Med: 10.25 Max: 22.7
Current: -17.82
-24
22.7
EV-to-EBITDA -23.89
HCLP's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 565 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 10.62 vs. HCLP: -23.89 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
HCLP' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -35.2  Med: 9.05 Max: 20.1
Current: -23.89
-35.2
20.1
Current Ratio 2.79
HCLP's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
57% of the 1463 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 2.22 vs. HCLP: 2.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
HCLP' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.61  Med: 2.49 Max: 5.19
Current: 2.79
0.61
5.19
Quick Ratio 1.98
HCLP's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
53% of the 1463 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 1.72 vs. HCLP: 1.98 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
HCLP' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.41  Med: 1.86 Max: 4.54
Current: 1.98
0.41
4.54
Days Inventory 46.71
HCLP's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
70% of the 581 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 74.72 vs. HCLP: 46.71 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
HCLP' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 36.07  Med: 46.65 Max: 67.2
Current: 46.71
36.07
67.2
Days Sales Outstanding 94.33
HCLP's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
81% of the 583 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 35.22 vs. HCLP: 94.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
HCLP' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 44.57  Med: 76.36 Max: 94.33
Current: 94.33
44.57
94.33
Days Payable 32.37
HCLP's Days Payable is ranked lower than
64% of the 432 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 50.10 vs. HCLP: 32.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
HCLP' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 32.37  Med: 38.48 Max: 280.47
Current: 32.37
32.37
280.47

Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate -100.00
HCLP's 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate is ranked lower than
100% of the 232 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: -20.60 vs. HCLP: -100.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate only.
HCLP' s 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0 Max: -100
Current: -100
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 3.26
HCLP's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked higher than
67% of the 899 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 2.14 vs. HCLP: 3.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
HCLP' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0 Max: 0
Current: 3.26
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -25.00
HCLP's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked lower than
67% of the 1133 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: -12.60 vs. HCLP: -25.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
HCLP' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -25  Med: -3 Max: 0
Current: -25
-25
0

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Tangible-Book 3.49
HCLP's Price-to-Tangible-Book is ranked lower than
68% of the 1575 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 2.26 vs. HCLP: 3.49 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Tangible-Book only.
HCLP' s Price-to-Tangible-Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.47  Med: 4.92 Max: 16.26
Current: 3.49
2.47
16.26
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 17.85
HCLP's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked lower than
91% of the 382 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 2.01 vs. HCLP: 17.85 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
HCLP' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 15.85  Med: 23.02 Max: 23.02
Current: 17.85
15.85
23.02
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 1.00
HCLP's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
50% of the 615 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 1.08 vs. HCLP: 1.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
HCLP' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.19  Med: 1.13 Max: 2.63
Current: 1
0.19
2.63
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % -5.63
HCLP's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked lower than
56% of the 1746 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: -4.17 vs. HCLP: -5.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
HCLP' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -6.34  Med: 9.05 Max: 17.5
Current: -5.63
-6.34
17.5

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $204.4
EPS (TTM) $ -1.85
Beta0.89
Short Percentage of Float4.17%
52-Week Range $4.25 - 23.30
Shares Outstanding (Mil)87.64

Analyst Estimate

Dec17 Dec18 Dec19
Revenue (Mil $) 349 420 414
EPS ($) -0.01 1.23 2.35
EPS without NRI ($) -0.01 1.23 2.35
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
13.74%
Dividends per Share ($) 0.95 0.51 1.26
» More Articles for HCLP

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Seven Little Known Stocks With Rapid Revenue Growth Jul 23 2015 
Hi-Crush Partners: Well-Positioned For Growth Jan 19 2015 
Will Vale Come Out of its Woes in 2015? Dec 29 2014 
3 Cheapest Basic Material Dividend Stocks with Highest YTD Performance Jul 13 2013 

More From Other Websites
Hi-Crush Partners, Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Starbucks, Ford and Amazon highlighted as Zacks... Mar 24 2017
[$$] We Have a Big 'Crush' on This Cheap Energy Play Mar 24 2017
Bull of the Day: Hi-Crush partners (HCLP) Mar 24 2017
HI-CRUSH PARTNERS LP Files SEC form 8-K, Completion of Acquisition or Disposition of Assets,... Mar 21 2017
Hi-Crush Partners LP Announces Completion of Acquisitions and Underwriter's Exercise of... Mar 21 2017
Iamgold Completes Senior Notes Offering Worth $400 Million Mar 21 2017
Houston frac sand co. to mine popular West Texas destination Mar 16 2017
HI-CRUSH PARTNERS LP Files SEC form 8-K, Change in Directors or Principal Officers, Financial... Mar 15 2017
Here’s Why Adeptus Health, Weatherford, U.S. Silica Holdings, and Two More Are Deep in the Red Mar 14 2017
A Look at MLPs with an Attractive Potential Upside Mar 13 2017
What Wall Street Analysts Recommend for HCLP and EMES Mar 10 2017
Are Institutional Investors Bullish on HCLP and EMES? Mar 10 2017
HI-CRUSH PARTNERS LP Files SEC form 8-K, Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement, Completion of... Mar 09 2017
Trumpcare Won't Make Health Insurers Sick Mar 09 2017
What’s Driving Increased Proppant Use by HCLP, EMES? Mar 09 2017
Why Frac Sand Producers Are Optimistic about 2017 Mar 09 2017
Analyzing Hi-Crush Partners’, Emerge Energy’s Cash Flow Measures Mar 09 2017
What Do EMES’s and HCLP’s Frac Sand Volumes Indicate? Mar 08 2017
HCLP, EMES: What’s Driving Frac Sand MLP Stocks? Mar 08 2017
Should Hi-Crush (HCLP) Be On Your Radar Now? Mar 06 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)