Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 3/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 0.02
HCLP's Cash to Debt is ranked lower than
98% of the 1473 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 10.50 vs. HCLP: 0.02 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
HCLP' s Cash to Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.02  Med: 0.15 Max: No Debt
Current: 0.02
Equity to Asset 0.24
HCLP's Equity to Asset is ranked lower than
86% of the 746 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 0.59 vs. HCLP: 0.24 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
HCLP' s Equity to Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.14  Med: 0.40 Max: 0.91
Current: 0.24
0.14
0.91
F-Score: 4
Z-Score: 1.57
M-Score: -3.85
WACC vs ROIC
9.19%
-8.88%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 5/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) -11.37
HCLP's Operating margin (%) is ranked lower than
61% of the 761 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: -0.83 vs. HCLP: -11.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
HCLP' s Operating margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 12.43  Med: 35.26 Max: 54.9
Current: -11.37
12.43
54.9
Net-margin (%) -16.20
HCLP's Net-margin (%) is ranked lower than
62% of the 763 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: -2.42 vs. HCLP: -16.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
HCLP' s Net-margin (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 8.32  Med: 36.71 Max: 45.6
Current: -16.2
8.32
45.6
ROE (%) -34.31
HCLP's ROE (%) is ranked lower than
70% of the 1356 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: -11.01 vs. HCLP: -34.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
HCLP' s ROE (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -8.39  Med: 73.94 Max: 175.14
Current: -34.31
-8.39
175.14
ROA (%) -11.33
HCLP's ROA (%) is ranked lower than
54% of the 1492 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: -9.04 vs. HCLP: -11.33 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
HCLP' s ROA (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -4.23  Med: 25.48 Max: 31.38
Current: -11.33
-4.23
31.38
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) -10.23
HCLP's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
53% of the 1427 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: -12.05 vs. HCLP: -10.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
HCLP' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -7.14  Med: 42.11 Max: 50.44
Current: -10.23
-7.14
50.44
» HCLP's 10-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: Est. 2016-10-27)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Oprt. Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2015

HCLP Guru Trades in Q2 2015

Chuck Royce Sold Out
Jim Simons 9,249 sh (-95.48%)
» More
Q3 2015

HCLP Guru Trades in Q3 2015

Jim Simons 421,348 sh (+4455.61%)
» More
Q4 2015

HCLP Guru Trades in Q4 2015

Jim Simons 246,549 sh (-41.49%)
» More
Q1 2016

HCLP Guru Trades in Q1 2016

Jim Simons 23,649 sh (-90.41%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with HCLP

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Metals & Mining » Industrial Metals & Minerals
Compare:OTCPK:GALXF, OTCPK:MJDLF, OTCPK:FTMNF, OTCPK:IPMLF, OTCPK:PILBF, OTCPK:AMVMF, OTCPK:GGPXF, NYSE:MTRN, OTCPK:PTTMF, OTCPK:MNDJF, OTCPK:URPTF, OTCPK:RVRLF, OTCPK:NXGEF, OTCPK:CGOOF, OTCPK:WNARF, OTCPK:URNXF, OTCPK:ATUSF, OTCPK:NYRSY, AMEX:PLG, AMEX:DNN » details
Traded in other countries:HCU.Germany,
Hi-Crush Partners LP is a producer and supplier of monocrystalline sand, a mineral that is used as a proppant to enhance the recovery rates of hydrocarbons from oil and natural gas wells.

Hi-Crush Partners LP is a Delaware limited partnership formed on May 8, 2012 to acquire selected sand reserves and related processing and transportation facilities of Hi-Crush Proppants LLC. The Company is a domestic producer and supplier of monocrystalline sand, a specialized mineral that is used as a proppant to enhance the recovery rates of hydrocarbons from oil and natural gas wells. Its reserves consist of Northern White sand, a resource existing predominately in Wisconsin and limited portions of the upper Midwest region of the United States, which is valued as a preferred proppant because it exceeds all American Petroleum Institute (API) specifications. It owns, operates and develops sand reserves and related excavation and processing facilities. It operates through a logistics network of rail-served destination terminals strategically located throughout Pennsylvania, Ohio, New York and Texas, with additional terminals currently under construction in Colorado and Texas. The Company owns and operates 857-acre facility with integrated rail infrastructure, located in Wyeville, Wisconsin (the Wyeville facility), which is located in Monroe County, Wisconsin. Its contracted customer base includes North America's providers of pressure pumping services or their subsidiaries. The Company owns or operates 14 destination rail-based terminal locations throughout Pennsylvania, Ohio, New York and Texas, of which five are temporarily idled and six are capable of accommodating unit trains. Its competitors include U.S. Silica Holdings, Inc.; Unimin Corporation; Fairmount Minerals, Ltd.; and Emerge Energy Services LP.

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/B 4.88
HCLP's P/B is ranked lower than
78% of the 1571 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 1.89 vs. HCLP: 4.88 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
HCLP' s P/B Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.85  Med: 5.64 Max: 17.58
Current: 4.88
0.85
17.58
P/S 1.31
HCLP's P/S is ranked higher than
56% of the 759 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 1.75 vs. HCLP: 1.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
HCLP' s P/S Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.35  Med: 2.84 Max: 23.91
Current: 1.31
0.35
23.91
PFCF 43.44
HCLP's PFCF is ranked lower than
80% of the 274 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 15.56 vs. HCLP: 43.44 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PFCF only.
HCLP' s PFCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.03  Med: 13.69 Max: 368.85
Current: 43.44
5.03
368.85
POCF 6.81
HCLP's POCF is ranked higher than
60% of the 456 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 8.79 vs. HCLP: 6.81 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
HCLP' s POCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.38  Med: 7.90 Max: 33.01
Current: 6.81
1.38
33.01
EV-to-EBIT -20.34
HCLP's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 471 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 15.98 vs. HCLP: -20.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
HCLP' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -23  Med: 9.70 Max: 22.7
Current: -20.34
-23
22.7
EV-to-EBITDA -38.95
HCLP's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
99.99% of the 534 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 10.83 vs. HCLP: -38.95 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
HCLP' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -44.1  Med: 8.30 Max: 20.1
Current: -38.95
-44.1
20.1
Current Ratio 2.67
HCLP's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
62% of the 1432 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 1.73 vs. HCLP: 2.67 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
HCLP' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.91  Med: 2.94 Max: 5.87
Current: 2.67
0.91
5.87
Quick Ratio 1.82
HCLP's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
60% of the 1432 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 1.33 vs. HCLP: 1.82 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
HCLP' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.82  Med: 2.11 Max: 5.5
Current: 1.82
0.82
5.5
Days Inventory 38.76
HCLP's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
78% of the 623 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 74.53 vs. HCLP: 38.76 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
HCLP' s Days Inventory Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 36.07  Med: 48.97 Max: 67.2
Current: 38.76
36.07
67.2
Days Sales Outstanding 42.17
HCLP's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked lower than
56% of the 616 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 33.93 vs. HCLP: 42.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
HCLP' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 44.57  Med: 74.87 Max: 96.42
Current: 42.17
44.57
96.42
Days Payable 18.85
HCLP's Days Payable is ranked lower than
77% of the 496 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 44.62 vs. HCLP: 18.85 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Payable only.
HCLP' s Days Payable Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 15.44  Med: 44.84 Max: 280.47
Current: 18.85
15.44
280.47

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield 4.15
HCLP's Dividend Yield is ranked higher than
80% of the 609 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 2.03 vs. HCLP: 4.15 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield only.
HCLP' s Dividend Yield Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.11  Med: 5.69 Max: 49.32
Current: 4.15
2.11
49.32
Yield on cost (5-Year) 4.15
HCLP's Yield on cost (5-Year) is ranked higher than
68% of the 804 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 2.48 vs. HCLP: 4.15 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Yield on cost (5-Year) only.
HCLP' s Yield on cost (5-Year) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.11  Med: 5.69 Max: 49.32
Current: 4.15
2.11
49.32

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Tangible Book 5.63
HCLP's Price/Tangible Book is ranked lower than
78% of the 1521 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 2.10 vs. HCLP: 5.63 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
HCLP' s Price/Tangible Book Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.87  Med: 10.98 Max: 31.47
Current: 5.63
1.87
31.47
Price/Median PS Value 0.44
HCLP's Price/Median PS Value is ranked higher than
86% of the 708 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: 1.01 vs. HCLP: 0.44 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
HCLP' s Price/Median PS Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.18  Med: 1.01 Max: 8.3
Current: 0.44
0.18
8.3
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) -4.91
HCLP's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked lower than
52% of the 1697 Companies
in the Global Industrial Metals & Minerals industry.

( Industry Median: -4.30 vs. HCLP: -4.91 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
HCLP' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -5.02  Med: 10.10 Max: 23.3
Current: -4.91
-5.02
23.3

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $289.7
EPS (TTM) $ -1.27
Beta1.23
Short Percentage of Float7.26%
52-Week Range $3.55 - 20.97
Shares Outstanding (Mil)37.06

Analyst Estimate


Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /home/gurufocu/public_html/modules/stock/estimate.php on line 163
Dec16 Dec17 Dec18
Revenue (Mil $) 217 322 395
EPS ($) -1.25 -0.13 0.68
EPS w/o NRI ($) -1.25 -0.13 0.68
EPS Growth Rate
(3Y to 5Y Estimate)
10.00%
Dividends Per Share ($)
» More Articles for HCLP

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Seven Little Known Stocks With Rapid Revenue Growth Jul 23 2015 
Hi-Crush Partners: Well-Positioned For Growth Jan 19 2015 
Will Vale Come Out of its Woes in 2015? Dec 29 2014 
3 Cheapest Basic Material Dividend Stocks with Highest YTD Performance Jul 13 2013 

More From Other Websites
Hi-Crush Partners LP breached its 50 day moving average in a Bearish Manner : HCLP-US : July 27,... Jul 27 2016
Hi-Crush Partners LP Announces Timing of Second Quarter 2016 Financial Results and Conference Call Jul 26 2016
Hi-Crush Partners LP Announces Timing of Second Quarter 2016 Financial Results and Conference Call Jul 26 2016
Jefferies Sees Oilfield Services Demand Growing: 4 Top Stocks to Add Now Jul 18 2016
What Does the Future Hold for HCLP and EMES? Jul 13 2016
What Do Short Interest Levels for EMES and HCLP Indicate? Jul 13 2016
Are Institutional Investors Interested in Hi-Crush Partners? Jul 12 2016
Why Emerge Energy and Hi-Crush Partners Are Reducing Leverage Jul 12 2016
How Do Cash Flows for EMES and HCLP Look? Jul 12 2016
Is Hi-Crush Partners (HCLP) Stock a Solid Choice Right Now? Jul 12 2016
Why Coherus Biosciences, Hortonworks and 3 Other Stocks Are Posting Big Gains Today Jul 11 2016
Hi-Crush Partners upgraded by Jefferies Jul 11 2016
Why Have HCLP and EMES Surged in 2016? Jul 08 2016
HI-CRUSH PARTNERS LP Files SEC form 8-K, Financial Statements and Exhibits Jun 17 2016
Expect Much Higher Oil Prices As The Cycle Comes To An End Jun 15 2016
Here’s Why These Five Stocks Are on the Move Today Jun 15 2016
Hi-Crush Partners LP Announces Pricing of Upsized Primary Offering of Common Units Jun 14 2016
Hi-Crush Partners LP Announces Pricing of Upsized Primary Offering of Common Units Jun 14 2016
Hi-Crush Partners LP Announces Primary Offering of Common Units Jun 14 2016

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)