Switch to:

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 6/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash to Debt 1.26
HP's Cash to Debt is ranked higher than
68% of the 77 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.23 vs. HP: 1.26 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash to Debt only.
HP' s 10-Year Cash to Debt Range
Min: 0.12  Med: 0.89 Max: 7.55
Current: 1.26
0.12
7.55
Equity to Asset 0.68
HP's Equity to Asset is ranked higher than
78% of the 67 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.53 vs. HP: 0.68 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity to Asset only.
HP' s 10-Year Equity to Asset Range
Min: 0.63  Med: 0.67 Max: 0.8
Current: 0.68
0.63
0.8
Interest Coverage 226.64
HP's Interest Coverage is ranked higher than
72% of the 46 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 10.50 vs. HP: 226.64 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
HP' s 10-Year Interest Coverage Range
Min: 2.8  Med: 44.80 Max: 226.64
Current: 226.64
2.8
226.64
F-Score: 7
Z-Score: 4.07
M-Score: -3.27
WACC vs ROIC
10.75%
15.21%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 9/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating margin (%) 28.23
HP's Operating margin (%) is ranked higher than
85% of the 73 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 4.28 vs. HP: 28.23 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating margin (%) only.
HP' s 10-Year Operating margin (%) Range
Min: -2.08  Med: 24.46 Max: 38.8
Current: 28.23
-2.08
38.8
Net-margin (%) 18.41
HP's Net-margin (%) is ranked higher than
88% of the 73 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.72 vs. HP: 18.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net-margin (%) only.
HP' s 10-Year Net-margin (%) Range
Min: 0.74  Med: 17.75 Max: 27.57
Current: 18.41
0.74
27.57
ROE (%) 14.67
HP's ROE (%) is ranked higher than
88% of the 77 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -0.33 vs. HP: 14.67 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE (%) only.
HP' s 10-Year ROE (%) Range
Min: 0.48  Med: 12.86 Max: 28.1
Current: 14.67
0.48
28.1
ROA (%) 10.48
HP's ROA (%) is ranked higher than
93% of the 81 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -0.36 vs. HP: 10.48 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA (%) only.
HP' s 10-Year ROA (%) Range
Min: 0.31  Med: 9.37 Max: 17.9
Current: 10.48
0.31
17.9
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) 19.75
HP's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
86% of the 80 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 1.13 vs. HP: 19.75 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) only.
HP' s 10-Year ROC (Joel Greenblatt) (%) Range
Min: 1.82  Med: 20.28 Max: 39.33
Current: 19.75
1.82
39.33
Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) 13.30
HP's Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
71% of the 51 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 9.50 vs. HP: 13.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) only.
HP' s 10-Year Revenue Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: -22.1  Med: 14.40 Max: 38.9
Current: 13.3
-22.1
38.9
EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) 16.60
HP's EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
83% of the 52 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -4.20 vs. HP: 16.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) only.
HP' s 10-Year EBITDA Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: -25.4  Med: 15.00 Max: 92.4
Current: 16.6
-25.4
92.4
EPS Growth (3Y)(%) 17.40
HP's EPS Growth (3Y)(%) is ranked higher than
76% of the 45 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -12.70 vs. HP: 17.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EPS Growth (3Y)(%) only.
HP' s 10-Year EPS Growth (3Y)(%) Range
Min: -55  Med: 8.70 Max: 374.4
Current: 17.4
-55
374.4
» HP's 10-Y Financials

Financials


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Oprt. Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow

» Details

Guru Trades

Q2 2014

HP Guru Trades in Q2 2014

Louis Moore Bacon 50,000 sh (New)
Joel Greenblatt 65,153 sh (+20.12%)
Paul Tudor Jones 3,200 sh (+3.23%)
Ken Fisher 442,300 sh (+0.12%)
FPA Capital Fund 177,700 sh (unchged)
Andreas Halvorsen Sold Out
Arnold Van Den Berg Sold Out
Jeremy Grantham Sold Out
Pioneer Investments 216,094 sh (-0.73%)
First Pacific Advisors 364,700 sh (-1.51%)
Ron Baron 2,568,475 sh (-9.01%)
James Barrow 1,325,677 sh (-16.92%)
Chuck Royce 1,519,568 sh (-35.26%)
John Hussman 125,000 sh (-37.50%)
Ray Dalio 16,683 sh (-67.02%)
» More
Q3 2014

HP Guru Trades in Q3 2014

Steven Cohen 160,000 sh (New)
Jim Simons 254,600 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 7,202 sh (+125.06%)
Ray Dalio 20,400 sh (+22.28%)
James Barrow 1,342,177 sh (+1.24%)
Ken Fisher 442,873 sh (+0.13%)
Louis Moore Bacon 50,000 sh (unchged)
Pioneer Investments 215,954 sh (unchged)
John Hussman Sold Out
Ron Baron 2,456,457 sh (-4.36%)
Chuck Royce 1,408,025 sh (-7.34%)
First Pacific Advisors 332,600 sh (-8.80%)
FPA Capital Fund 157,800 sh (-11.20%)
Joel Greenblatt 47,743 sh (-26.72%)
» More
Q4 2014

HP Guru Trades in Q4 2014

David Dreman 1,989 sh (New)
Michael Price 100,000 sh (New)
Joel Greenblatt 206,066 sh (+331.62%)
Pioneer Investments 486,047 sh (+125.07%)
Jim Simons 505,100 sh (+98.39%)
Chuck Royce 1,595,140 sh (+13.29%)
Ken Fisher 444,952 sh (+0.47%)
Ray Dalio Sold Out
FPA Capital Fund Sold Out
Steven Cohen Sold Out
Paul Tudor Jones Sold Out
Louis Moore Bacon Sold Out
First Pacific Advisors Sold Out
James Barrow Sold Out
Ron Baron 1,588,212 sh (-35.35%)
» More
Q1 2015

HP Guru Trades in Q1 2015

Kyle Bass 8,019 sh (New)
First Pacific Advisors 1,255,535 sh (New)
Prem Watsa 3,157 sh (New)
FPA Capital Fund 651,635 sh (New)
Kyle Bass 8,019 sh (New)
David Dreman 3,447 sh (+73.30%)
Michael Price 132,500 sh (+32.50%)
Steven Cohen 100,000 sh (unchged)
Jim Simons Sold Out
Joel Greenblatt Sold Out
Pioneer Investments 485,589 sh (-0.09%)
Ken Fisher 439,880 sh (-1.14%)
Chuck Royce 1,091,380 sh (-31.58%)
Ron Baron 709,529 sh (-55.33%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with HP

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Guru Investment Theses on Helmerich & Payne Inc

Baron Funds Comments on Helmerich & Payne Inc - Mar 20, 2015

Helmerich & Payne, Inc. (HP) is the leading land drilling contractor in the U.S. Shares fell in the fourth quarter on investor disappointment over fiscal fourth quarter earnings and pessimism about the outlook for U.S. land drilling given the plunge in oil prices. We believe Helmerich is in a relatively better position to weather this downturn due to strong contract backlog, built-in fleet growth from existing contracts, and a bullet-proof balance sheet. We think the long-term trends of rig fleet renewal and Helmerich’s competitive advantages will re-emerge when oil prices stabilize. (Jamie Stone)

From Ron Baron (Trades, Portfolio)’s Baron Growth Fund Q4 2014 Quarterly Report.



Check out Ron Baron latest stock trades

Baron Funds Comments on Helmerich & Payne Inc - Oct 24, 2014

Helmerich & Payne, Inc. (HP) is the leading land drilling contractor in the U.S. Shares fell in the quarter despite the fact that rising demand for its new rigs spurred clients to continue to add to the company’s record backlog of new rig contracts. The company’s fiscal third quarter earnings were a bit below expectations, which contributed to the stock weakness, but it appears that most of the weakness was related to concerns that lower oil prices would short-circuit the upturn in U.S. drilling. (Jamie Stone)

From Ron Baron (Trades, Portfolio)’s Baron Partners Fund Q3 2014 Report.

Check out Ron Baron latest stock trades

Baron Funds Comments on Helmerich & Payne - May 21, 2014

Shares of Helmerich & Payne, Inc. (HP), the leading land drilling contractor in the U.S., rose significantly in the first quarter. Over the past three years, Helmerich's market share has increased to 23% from 16%, while generating higher margins and returns than its main competitors. Its share price benefited from growing optimism that U.S. horizontal drilling activity will increase, spurring customer demand for new rigs. Helmerich also signed its biggest international contract in a decade in the first quarter. Helmerich is a best-in-class operator and remains a core position. (James Stone)





From Baron Funds' first quarter 2014 letter to shareholders.



Check out Ron Baron latest stock trades

Baron Funds Comments on Helmerich & Payne - May 02, 2014

Helmerich & Payne, Inc. (HP), is the leading land drilling energy contractor in the U.S. Over the past three years, Helmerich's market share has increased to 23% from 16%, while generating higher margins and returns than its main competitors. It has benefited from growing optimism that U.S. horizontal drilling activity will increase, spurring customer demand for new rigs. The company also signed its biggest international contract in a decade. Helmerich is a best-in-class operator and remains a core position. (James Stone)



From Baron Funds' first quarter 2014 letter to investors.



Check out Ron Baron latest stock trades

Baron Funds Comments on Helmerich & Payne - May 02, 2014

Shares of Helmerich & Payne, Inc. (HP), the leading land drilling contractor in the U.S, rose significantly. Over the past three years, Helmerich's market share has increased to 23% from 16%, while the company generated higher margins and returns than its main competitors. The company's share price benefited from growing optimism that U.S. horizontal drilling activity will increase, spurring additional customer demand for new rigs. During the quarter, Helmerich also signed its biggest international contract in a decade.



From Baron Funds' first quarter 2014 commentary.





Check out Ron Baron latest stock trades

Top Ranked Articles about Helmerich & Payne Inc

FPA Capital Fund Comments on Helmerich & Payne Inc and Ensco PLC
During the first quarter of 2015, we swapped our position in Ensco (“ESV”) for Helmerich and Payne (HP) (“H&P”) because we believe they offered similar upside but H&P has less downside risk. H&P is the country’s biggest and most profitable onshore drilling contractor. At the time of our decision, H&P’s dividend yield was smaller (4.55% vs 10.37%) but it was still substantial and more secure than ESV’s dividend. Since our swap, Ensco cut its dividend exactly 80% (as of the end of the first quarter H&P yielded 4.04% vs 2.85% for ESV). We agree with ESV’s decision to cut its dividend. The market was not valuing the company based on this large dividend and there might be better ways to use those funds today such as buying back shares or purchasing distressed assets on the cheap. Read more...
FPA Capital Adds Two Stakes to Portfolio in First Quarter
The FPA Capital Fund (Trades, Portfolio) has a reputation for investing in smaller companies, and it lived up to that reputation with the two new buys it made in the first quarter of 2015 – Helmerich & Payne Inc (HP) and Dana Holding Corp (DAN). Read more...
FPA Capital Fund Buys Helmerich & Payne in Q1
The FPA Capital Fund (Trades, Portfolio) follows a deep value stock picking approach for the long term, with turnover averaging less than 20% over 20 years. Over the past 20 years, the fund has returned an average of 12.47%, slightly outperforming the Russell 2500 Index’s 11.21%. Read more...
Baron Funds Comments on Helmerich & Payne Inc
Helmerich & Payne, Inc. (HP) is the leading land drilling contractor in the U.S. Shares fell in the fourth quarter on investor disappointment over fiscal fourth quarter earnings and pessimism about the outlook for U.S. land drilling given the plunge in oil prices. We believe Helmerich is in a relatively better position to weather this downturn due to strong contract backlog, built-in fleet growth from existing contracts, and a bullet-proof balance sheet. We think the long-term trends of rig fleet renewal and Helmerich’s competitive advantages will re-emerge when oil prices stabilize. (Jamie Stone) Read more...
Baron Funds Comments on Helmerich & Payne Inc
Helmerich & Payne, Inc. (HP) is the leading land drilling contractor in the U.S. Shares fell in the quarter despite the fact that rising demand for its new rigs spurred clients to continue to add to the company’s record backlog of new rig contracts. The company’s fiscal third quarter earnings were a bit below expectations, which contributed to the stock weakness, but it appears that most of the weakness was related to concerns that lower oil prices would short-circuit the upturn in U.S. drilling. (Jamie Stone) Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
P/E(ttm) 10.40
HP's P/E(ttm) is ranked lower than
61% of the 38 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 7.90 vs. HP: 10.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/E(ttm) only.
HP' s 10-Year P/E(ttm) Range
Min: 4.03  Med: 12.35 Max: 360.56
Current: 10.4
4.03
360.56
Forward P/E 51.28
HP's Forward P/E is ranked lower than
87% of the 31 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 15.15 vs. HP: 51.28 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward P/E only.
N/A
PE(NRI) 10.40
HP's PE(NRI) is ranked lower than
62% of the 37 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 7.60 vs. HP: 10.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE(NRI) only.
HP' s 10-Year PE(NRI) Range
Min: 4.02  Med: 12.35 Max: 405.63
Current: 10.4
4.02
405.63
P/B 1.46
HP's P/B is ranked lower than
80% of the 79 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.69 vs. HP: 1.46 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/B only.
HP' s 10-Year P/B Range
Min: 0.83  Med: 1.81 Max: 3.56
Current: 1.46
0.83
3.56
P/S 1.90
HP's P/S is ranked lower than
79% of the 67 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.77 vs. HP: 1.90 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful P/S only.
HP' s 10-Year P/S Range
Min: 0.91  Med: 2.42 Max: 4.52
Current: 1.9
0.91
4.52
PFCF 233.66
HP's PFCF is ranked lower than
100% of the 22 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 5.86 vs. HP: 233.66 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PFCF only.
HP' s 10-Year PFCF Range
Min: 15.5  Med: 36.55 Max: 509.69
Current: 233.66
15.5
509.69
POCF 5.31
HP's POCF is ranked lower than
85% of the 53 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 2.49 vs. HP: 5.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful POCF only.
HP' s 10-Year POCF Range
Min: 2.58  Med: 7.95 Max: 16.65
Current: 5.31
2.58
16.65
EV-to-EBIT 6.37
HP's EV-to-EBIT is ranked higher than
69% of the 45 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 8.94 vs. HP: 6.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
HP' s 10-Year EV-to-EBIT Range
Min: -145.6  Med: 8.10 Max: 220.8
Current: 6.37
-145.6
220.8
PEG 0.58
HP's PEG is ranked lower than
53% of the 15 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.49 vs. HP: 0.58 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG only.
HP' s 10-Year PEG Range
Min: 0.07  Med: 0.68 Max: 40.92
Current: 0.58
0.07
40.92
Shiller P/E 14.00
HP's Shiller P/E is ranked lower than
77% of the 26 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 10.35 vs. HP: 14.00 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller P/E only.
HP' s 10-Year Shiller P/E Range
Min: 7.81  Med: 17.91 Max: 48.05
Current: 14
7.81
48.05
Current Ratio 4.01
HP's Current Ratio is ranked higher than
82% of the 77 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 1.72 vs. HP: 4.01 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
HP' s 10-Year Current Ratio Range
Min: 1.34  Med: 2.49 Max: 7.05
Current: 4.01
1.34
7.05
Quick Ratio 3.69
HP's Quick Ratio is ranked higher than
82% of the 77 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 1.59 vs. HP: 3.69 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
HP' s 10-Year Quick Ratio Range
Min: 1.16  Med: 2.21 Max: 6.68
Current: 3.69
1.16
6.68
Days Inventory 19.22
HP's Days Inventory is ranked higher than
58% of the 48 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 24.94 vs. HP: 19.22 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Inventory only.
HP' s 10-Year Days Inventory Range
Min: 10.45  Med: 17.72 Max: 39.59
Current: 19.22
10.45
39.59
Days Sales Outstanding 58.72
HP's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
53% of the 64 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 59.61 vs. HP: 58.72 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
HP' s 10-Year Days Sales Outstanding Range
Min: 46.31  Med: 69.77 Max: 99.25
Current: 58.72
46.31
99.25

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield 4.06
HP's Dividend Yield is ranked lower than
77% of the 93 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 6.67 vs. HP: 4.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield only.
HP' s 10-Year Dividend Yield Range
Min: 0.25  Med: 0.57 Max: 4.41
Current: 4.06
0.25
4.41
Dividend Payout 0.41
HP's Dividend Payout is ranked higher than
56% of the 43 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.48 vs. HP: 0.41 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout only.
HP' s 10-Year Dividend Payout Range
Min: 0.04  Med: 0.12 Max: 8
Current: 0.41
0.04
8
Dividend growth (3y) 113.60
HP's Dividend growth (3y) is ranked higher than
94% of the 17 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 11.20 vs. HP: 113.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend growth (3y) only.
HP' s 10-Year Dividend growth (3y) Range
Min: 1.8  Med: 3.80 Max: 113.6
Current: 113.6
1.8
113.6
Yield on cost (5-Year) 45.30
HP's Yield on cost (5-Year) is ranked higher than
86% of the 93 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 7.84 vs. HP: 45.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Yield on cost (5-Year) only.
HP' s 10-Year Yield on cost (5-Year) Range
Min: 2.79  Med: 6.36 Max: 49.21
Current: 45.3
2.79
49.21
Share Buyback Rate -0.20
HP's Share Buyback Rate is ranked higher than
73% of the 56 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: -4.20 vs. HP: -0.20 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Share Buyback Rate only.
HP' s 10-Year Share Buyback Rate Range
Min: 17.7  Med: -0.60 Max: -21.8
Current: -0.2

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price/Tangible Book 1.46
HP's Price/Tangible Book is ranked lower than
74% of the 77 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.87 vs. HP: 1.46 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Tangible Book only.
HP' s 10-Year Price/Tangible Book Range
Min: 0.88  Med: 1.51 Max: 3.5
Current: 1.46
0.88
3.5
Price/Projected FCF 1.24
HP's Price/Projected FCF is ranked lower than
61% of the 28 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 1.00 vs. HP: 1.24 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Projected FCF only.
HP' s 10-Year Price/Projected FCF Range
Min: 1.22  Med: 2.50 Max: 62.63
Current: 1.24
1.22
62.63
Price/DCF (Earnings Based) 0.37
HP's Price/DCF (Earnings Based) is ranked lower than
67% of the 3 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.18 vs. HP: 0.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/DCF (Earnings Based) only.
N/A
Price/Median PS Value 0.79
HP's Price/Median PS Value is ranked lower than
75% of the 65 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.46 vs. HP: 0.79 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Median PS Value only.
HP' s 10-Year Price/Median PS Value Range
Min: 0.45  Med: 0.95 Max: 1.66
Current: 0.79
0.45
1.66
Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value 0.47
HP's Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value is ranked higher than
58% of the 12 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.54 vs. HP: 0.47 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value only.
HP' s 10-Year Price/Peter Lynch Fair Value Range
Min: 0.19  Med: 0.77 Max: 4.94
Current: 0.47
0.19
4.94
Price/Graham Number 0.82
HP's Price/Graham Number is ranked lower than
65% of the 34 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 0.55 vs. HP: 0.82 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price/Graham Number only.
HP' s 10-Year Price/Graham Number Range
Min: 0.45  Med: 0.98 Max: 4.83
Current: 0.82
0.45
4.83
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) 15.70
HP's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) is ranked higher than
82% of the 80 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 2.60 vs. HP: 15.70 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) only.
HP' s 10-Year Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) (%) Range
Min: 0.5  Med: 12.20 Max: 31.4
Current: 15.7
0.5
31.4
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) 23.30
HP's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) is ranked higher than
83% of the 30 Companies
in the Global Oil & Gas Drilling industry.

( Industry Median: 3.69 vs. HP: 23.30 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) only.
HP' s 10-Year Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) (%) Range
Min: -11.9  Med: 17.70 Max: 62
Current: 23.3
-11.9
62

Analyst Estimate

Sep15 Sep16 Sep17
Revenue(Mil) 3,021 2,697 2,829
EPS($) 2.59 1.32 3.08
EPS without NRI($) 2.59 1.32 3.08

Business Description

Industry: Oil & Gas - Drilling » Oil & Gas Drilling
Compare:SDRL, ESV, PES, OMVJF, SBR » details
Traded in other countries:HPC.Germany,
Helmerich & Payne Inc was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on February 3, 1940, and is successor to a business originally organized in 1920. The Company is engaged in contract drilling of oil & gas wells for others & in the ownership, development & operation of commercial real estates. Its business is composed of three reportable segments: U.S. Land, Offshore & International Land. Its U.S. Land operations drill in Oklahoma, California, Texas, Wyoming, Colorado, Louisiana, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Utah, Arkansas, New Mexico, Montana, North Dakota, West Virginia and Nevada. Offshore operations are conducted in the Gulf of Mexico, and offshore of California and Equatorial Guinea. Its International Land segment operated in six international locations: Ecuador, Colombia, Argentina, Tunisia, Bahrain and United Arab Emirates. It is also engaged in the ownership, development and operation of commercial real estate and the research and development of rotary steerable technology. Each of the businesses operates independently of the others through wholly-owned subsidiaries. Its real estate investments located within Tulsa, Oklahoma, include a shopping center containing approximately 441,000 leasable square feet, multi-tenant industrial warehouse properties containing approximately one million leasable square feet and approximately 210 acres of undeveloped real estate. BHP Billiton, Devon Energy Production Co. LP and Occidental Oil and Gas Corporation including affiliates, are its three largest contract drilling customers.
» More Articles for HP

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
Consider Exposure To Onshore Rig Stocks May 25 2015 
FPA Capital Fund Comments on Helmerich & Payne Inc and Ensco PLC May 22 2015 
First Pacific Advisors Purchase New Positions During 1QFY15 May 22 2015 
Value Investing Is Perfect For The Cynical May 19 2015 
Prem Watsa Buys All Oil and Gas Stocks in Q1 May 15 2015 
FPA Capital Fund First Quarter 2015 Commentary May 06 2015 
FPA Capital Adds Two Stakes to Portfolio in First Quarter May 05 2015 
Understanding The Benjamin Graham Formula Correctly Apr 28 2015 
Positive On Helmerich & Payne After Results Apr 27 2015 
Growing & Undervalued : Helmerich & Payne Inc. Apr 21 2015 

More From Other Websites
Is Texas The Future Of America? Jul 01 2015
The 10 Worst Tech Stocks in the S&P 500 This Year Jun 30 2015
4 Stocks Ready to Pop: Mead Johnson, Equifax, Helmerich & Payne, Polaris Jun 29 2015
HELMERICH & PAYNE INC Files SEC form 8-K, Other Events, Financial Statements and Exhibits Jun 25 2015
HELMERICH & PAYNE INC Files SEC form 8-K, Regulation FD Disclosure, Financial Statements and... Jun 23 2015
HELMERICH & PAYNE INC Files SEC form 10-Q/A, Quarterly Report Jun 17 2015
Elon Musk's Ventures-Bringing His Visions to Life Jun 11 2015
HP, Intel Get Strange China Bedfellow In Online Lottery Site Jun 10 2015
HP almost bought a $9.3 billion company before walking away from the deal Jun 05 2015
HELMERICH & PAYNE INC Files SEC form 8-K, Other Events Jun 03 2015
Where big money investors are placing their bets May 29 2015
Why Sentiment Is Very Positive for Land Drillers at Energy Conference May 29 2015
Coverage initiated on Helmerich & Payne by JP Morgan May 29 2015
HELMERICH & PAYNE INC Files SEC form 8-K, Regulation FD Disclosure, Financial Statements and... May 20 2015
Buy These 3 High-Dividend Oil Stocks While They’re Still Cheap May 19 2015
Prem Watsa Buys All Oil and Gas Stocks in Q1 May 15 2015
Zacks Rank #5 Additions for Friday - Tale of the Tape May 15 2015
Oil Services: 'Take Profits and Take a Summer Vacation' May 11 2015
UBS Says to Buy the Big 3 Land Drillers Now May 07 2015
The Company Gaining Market Share During Tough Times May 04 2015

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)
FEEDBACK