Switch to:
Also traded in: Germany, Mexico

GuruFocus Financial Strength Rank measures how strong a company’s financial situation is. It is based on these factors

1. The debt burden that the company has as measured by its Interest coverage (current year).
2. Debt to revenue ratio. The lower, the better
3. Altman Z-score.

A company ranks high with financial strength is likely to withstand any business slowdowns and recessions.

Financial Strength : 4/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Cash-to-Debt 0.07
ICE's Cash-to-Debt is ranked lower than
98% of the 706 Companies
in the Global Financial Exchanges industry.

( Industry Median: 9999.00 vs. ICE: 0.07 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Cash-to-Debt only.
ICE' s Cash-to-Debt Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.07  Med: 2.63 Max: No Debt
Current: 0.07
Equity-to-Asset 0.19
ICE's Equity-to-Asset is ranked lower than
80% of the 658 Companies
in the Global Financial Exchanges industry.

( Industry Median: 0.54 vs. ICE: 0.19 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Equity-to-Asset only.
ICE' s Equity-to-Asset Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -0.33  Med: 0.19 Max: 0.92
Current: 0.19
-0.33
0.92
Interest Coverage 12.17
ICE's Interest Coverage is ranked lower than
64% of the 572 Companies
in the Global Financial Exchanges industry.

( Industry Median: 132.47 vs. ICE: 12.17 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Interest Coverage only.
ICE' s Interest Coverage Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 12.17  Med: 20.09 Max: 25.22
Current: 12.17
12.17
25.22
Piotroski F-Score: 7
Altman Z-Score: 0.54
Beneish M-Score: -2.50
WACC vs ROIC
5.04%
7.21%
WACC
ROIC
GuruFocus Profitability Rank ranks how profitable a company is and how likely the company’s business will stay that way. It is based on these factors:

1. Operating Margin
2. Trend of the Operating Margin (5-year average). The company with an uptrend profit margin has a higher rank.
••3. Consistency of the profitability
4. Piotroski F-Score
5. Predictability Rank•

The maximum rank is 10. A rank of 7 or higher means a higher profitability and may stay that way. A rank of 3 or lower indicates that the company has had trouble to make a profit.

Profitability Rank is not directly related to the Financial Strength Rank. But if a company is consistently profitable, its financial strength will be stronger.

Profitability & Growth : 9/10

vs
industry
vs
history
Operating Margin % 36.37
ICE's Operating Margin % is ranked higher than
71% of the 689 Companies
in the Global Financial Exchanges industry.

( Industry Median: 14.06 vs. ICE: 36.37 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Operating Margin % only.
ICE' s Operating Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 33.27  Med: 54.13 Max: 61.56
Current: 36.37
33.27
61.56
Net Margin % 23.87
ICE's Net Margin % is ranked higher than
67% of the 690 Companies
in the Global Financial Exchanges industry.

( Industry Median: 10.13 vs. ICE: 23.87 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Net Margin % only.
ICE' s Net Margin % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 14.68  Med: 33.2 Max: 41.9
Current: 23.87
14.68
41.9
ROE % 9.31
ICE's ROE % is ranked higher than
68% of the 697 Companies
in the Global Financial Exchanges industry.

( Industry Median: 4.37 vs. ICE: 9.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROE % only.
ICE' s ROE % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 3.18  Med: 14.87 Max: 24.92
Current: 9.31
3.18
24.92
ROA % 1.82
ICE's ROA % is ranked higher than
55% of the 712 Companies
in the Global Financial Exchanges industry.

( Industry Median: 1.48 vs. ICE: 1.82 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROA % only.
ICE' s ROA % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.5  Med: 1.68 Max: 14.63
Current: 1.82
0.5
14.63
ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % 137.06
ICE's ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
78% of the 547 Companies
in the Global Financial Exchanges industry.

( Industry Median: 12.64 vs. ICE: 137.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % only.
ICE' s ROC (Joel Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 103.61  Med: 437.08 Max: 632.19
Current: 137.06
103.61
632.19
3-Year Revenue Growth Rate 31.40
ICE's 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate is ranked higher than
81% of the 540 Companies
in the Global Financial Exchanges industry.

( Industry Median: 5.00 vs. ICE: 31.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate only.
ICE' s 3-Year Revenue Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 26.2 Max: 58.2
Current: 31.4
0
58.2
3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate 37.40
ICE's 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate is ranked higher than
77% of the 417 Companies
in the Global Financial Exchanges industry.

( Industry Median: 8.70 vs. ICE: 37.40 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate only.
ICE' s 3-Year EBITDA Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 16.7 Max: 81.7
Current: 37.4
0
81.7
3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate 45.60
ICE's 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate is ranked higher than
79% of the 408 Companies
in the Global Financial Exchanges industry.

( Industry Median: 7.00 vs. ICE: 45.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate only.
ICE' s 3-Year EPS without NRI Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 17.35 Max: 102.2
Current: 45.6
0
102.2
GuruFocus has detected 6 Warning Signs with Intercontinental Exchange Inc $ICE.
More than 500,000 people have already joined GuruFocus to track the stocks they follow and exchange investment ideas.
» ICE's 10-Y Financials

Financials (Next Earnings Date: 2017-05-04)


Revenue & Net Income
Cash & Debt
Operating Cash Flow & Free Cash Flow
Operating Cash Flow & Net Income

» Details

Guru Trades

Q1 2016

ICE Guru Trades in Q1 2016

John Rogers 4,097 sh (New)
Daniel Loeb 225,000 sh (New)
Jim Simons 147,213 sh (+68.83%)
Pioneer Investments 1,398,060 sh (+16.73%)
Caxton Associates Sold Out
Louis Moore Bacon Sold Out
Murray Stahl 10,505 sh (-6.96%)
RS Investment Management 24,655 sh (-24.22%)
Steven Cohen 104,900 sh (-39.05%)
Paul Tudor Jones 3,800 sh (-92.22%)
» More
Q2 2016

ICE Guru Trades in Q2 2016

Louis Moore Bacon 65,113 sh (New)
Andreas Halvorsen 1,133,502 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 9,931 sh (+161.34%)
Jim Simons 291,498 sh (+98.01%)
John Rogers 4,235 sh (+3.37%)
Pioneer Investments 1,428,973 sh (+2.21%)
RS Investment Management 24,995 sh (+1.38%)
Daniel Loeb Sold Out
Murray Stahl 10,413 sh (-0.88%)
Steven Cohen 37,000 sh (-64.73%)
» More
Q3 2016

ICE Guru Trades in Q3 2016

Joel Greenblatt 4,341 sh (New)
Ray Dalio 5,300 sh (New)
Steve Mandel 1,207,229 sh (New)
Paul Tudor Jones 32,601 sh (+228.28%)
Jim Simons 430,398 sh (+47.65%)
Pioneer Investments 1,456,081 sh (+1.90%)
Murray Stahl 10,430 sh (+0.16%)
John Rogers Sold Out
Louis Moore Bacon Sold Out
Steven Cohen Sold Out
Andreas Halvorsen Sold Out
» More
Q4 2016

ICE Guru Trades in Q4 2016

Steven Cohen 258,696 sh (New)
Andreas Halvorsen 1,857,390 sh (New)
Ray Dalio 34,000 sh (+28.30%)
Jim Simons 2,360,390 sh (+9.68%)
Murray Stahl 52,150 sh (unchged)
Pioneer Investments 6,643,848 sh (-8.74%)
Steve Mandel 4,225,637 sh (-29.99%)
Joel Greenblatt 4,031 sh (-81.43%)
Paul Tudor Jones 3,826 sh (-97.65%)
» More
» Details

Insider Trades

Latest Guru Trades with ICE

(List those with share number changes of more than 20%, or impact to portfolio more than 0.1%)

No Entry found in the selected group of Gurus. You can
  • 1. Modify your Personalized List of Gurus, or
  • 2. Click on Premium Premium Tools above to check out all the Gurus, or
  • 3. Click on Premium Plus Premium Plus above for the stocks picks of all the institutional investment advisors (>4000)
» Interactive Charts

Peter Lynch Chart ( What is Peter Lynch Charts )

Business Description

Industry: Brokers & Exchanges » Financial Exchanges    NAICS: 523210    SIC: 6231
Compare:NAS:CME, OTCPK:HKXCY, OTCPK:DBOEY, OTCPK:LDNXF, NAS:NDAQ, NAS:CBOE, OTCPK:OSCUF, OTCPK:ASXFY, OTCPK:SPXCY, OTCPK:TMXXF, OTCPK:BOLYY, OTCPK:JSEJF, OTCPK:OTCM, OTCPK:NZSTF, NAS:GLBR » details
Traded in other countries:IC2.Germany, ICE.Mexico,
Headquarter Location:USA
Intercontinental Exchange Inc is an operator of regulated exchanges, clearing houses and listings venues, and a provider of data services for commodity and financial markets. Its segments are Trading & Clearing segment, and Data & Listings.

Atlanta-based Intercontinental Exchange's operations include futures exchanges in Canada, the U.K., and the U.S. The company also has a large clearinghouse operation. Products include a large line of energy and agricultural commodity derivatives as well as products linked to stock indexes and trading services for credit default swaps. The acquisition of NYSE Euronext added products such as interest-rate derivatives, equities and U.S. stock options.

Top Ranked Articles about Intercontinental Exchange Inc

Halvorsen Bought 13 New Holdings in 2nd Quarter Intercontinental Exchange, Microsoft were leading investments
Andreas Halvorsen (Trades, Portfolio), founder and chief investment officer for Viking Global Investors, invested in 13 new holdings in the second quarter. Read more...
Daniel Loeb Invests in Intercontinental Exchange Company is expanding while reporting excellent financial results over the previous 10 years
During the first quarter Daniel Loeb (Trades, Portfolio) purchased 225,000 shares of Intercontinental Exchange Inc. (NYSE:ICE) at an average price of $243.36 per share. Read more...
HiddenLevers Accelerates Stress Testing on Fixed Income Assets

NEW YORK, NY--(Marketwired - May 13, 2016) - HiddenLevers, the leading portfolio stress testing platform for Financial Advisors and Asset Managers, now has universal fixed income modeling. Financial professionals subscribing to HiddenLevers risk management software can get instant risk analytics on millions of fixed income securities. "Our bond universe coverage just got a huge shot in the arm," said Praveen Ghanta, Co-founder HiddenLevers. "When the Oil Crash started taking its toll on fixed income in 2015, it was proof that our risk model works. Stress testing laid bare which high-yield issues would be most impacted by Oil volatility. Our audience started asking for every name under the sun, and we listened." High-yield bonds were ground zero for the impact of tanking Oil prices, but only a fifth of them were related to energy. Advisors using the HiddenLevers RIA risk toolkit could distinguish divergent behavior in high-yield issues, for both themselves and for their clients. To get best-of-breed fixed income data, HiddenLevers tapped Interactive Data Corporation, a leading provider of fixed income evaluated pricing and subsidiary of Intercontinental Exchange (NYSE: ICE). "Combining Interactive Data's expertise and range of fixed income evaluations with HiddenLevers risk analytics engine and scenario-based stress testing gives the market a powerful new tool," said Andrew Hausman, President of Interactive Data's pricing and reference data division. "We are pleased to support HiddenLevers innovation in risk technology." Better Bond Models = Better Discussions "Other risk analytics providers might only use one or two proxies for all bonds -- and many advisors might not realize this," said Raj Udeshi, Co-founder HiddenLevers. "We are a big data platform, with the ability to get more specific -- identify each individual bond's vulnerability to Oil Prices, several market indices, and of course, 10y Treasuries. The ability to illustrate these vulnerabilities for the client or prospect is what makes asset gatherers love us." By digging deeper to show the divergent behavior of bonds to certain macro indicators, HiddenLevers creates new opportunities in fixed income. A portfolio manager can use stress testing to replace fixed income allocations damaged by exposure to Oil prices. An RIA can show why their allocation should withstand the impact of market events like Oil volatility, a Housing Rebound, Tech Bubble 2.0, and more. A registered rep can articulate why a more expensive managed fixed income product was chosen over an individual bond, fulfilling the DOL fiduciary mandate. "The first HiddenLevers success stories came when US Treasuries got downgraded in the 2011 debt ceiling debacle," said Ghanta. "Our scenario analysis showed that the bond market would stay strong, counter-intuitively, and the pros have been using us to stress test fixed income assets ever since." "We can now offer a strong risk profile for every CUSIP out there," said Udeshi. "New audiences with huge bond exposure should be able to take advantage of our stress testing platform now, from fixed income asset managers and corporate treasuries to pensions and endowments. Their need on risk analysis is no less." About HiddenLevers

HiddenLevers is quickly becoming the premier portfolio stress testing solution for both portfolio managers and financial advisors everywhere. Cloud-based since its inception, the comprehensive risk tech platform includes a library of macro scenario research, interactive stress testing and scenario analysis, risk profiles for portfolios, automated risk monitoring, and thoughtful client-facing output. HiddenLevers has offices in New York City and Atlanta.  Image Available: http://www2.marketwire.com/mw/frame_mw?attachid=3007442




Contact:

Raj C. Udeshi

HiddenLevers

1 212 292 3147

Email Contact





Read more...

Ratios

vs
industry
vs
history
PE Ratio 25.80
ICE's PE Ratio is ranked lower than
63% of the 492 Companies
in the Global Financial Exchanges industry.

( Industry Median: 20.17 vs. ICE: 25.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio only.
ICE' s PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 13.24  Med: 23.88 Max: 153.21
Current: 25.8
13.24
153.21
Forward PE Ratio 20.24
ICE's Forward PE Ratio is ranked lower than
70% of the 155 Companies
in the Global Financial Exchanges industry.

( Industry Median: 16.81 vs. ICE: 20.24 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward PE Ratio only.
N/A
PE Ratio without NRI 25.80
ICE's PE Ratio without NRI is ranked lower than
62% of the 489 Companies
in the Global Financial Exchanges industry.

( Industry Median: 20.43 vs. ICE: 25.80 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PE Ratio without NRI only.
ICE' s PE Ratio without NRI Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 13.15  Med: 23.83 Max: 160.88
Current: 25.8
13.15
160.88
Price-to-Owner-Earnings 20.38
ICE's Price-to-Owner-Earnings is ranked lower than
61% of the 224 Companies
in the Global Financial Exchanges industry.

( Industry Median: 16.44 vs. ICE: 20.38 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Owner-Earnings only.
ICE' s Price-to-Owner-Earnings Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 13.85  Med: 20.55 Max: 66.34
Current: 20.38
13.85
66.34
PB Ratio 2.31
ICE's PB Ratio is ranked lower than
69% of the 670 Companies
in the Global Financial Exchanges industry.

( Industry Median: 1.27 vs. ICE: 2.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PB Ratio only.
ICE' s PB Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 1.62  Med: 2.95 Max: 20.71
Current: 2.31
1.62
20.71
PS Ratio 6.14
ICE's PS Ratio is ranked lower than
61% of the 651 Companies
in the Global Financial Exchanges industry.

( Industry Median: 4.05 vs. ICE: 6.14 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PS Ratio only.
ICE' s PS Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 5.01  Med: 7.43 Max: 30.61
Current: 6.14
5.01
30.61
Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow 20.53
ICE's Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
63% of the 195 Companies
in the Global Financial Exchanges industry.

( Industry Median: 13.36 vs. ICE: 20.53 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow only.
ICE' s Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 11.61  Med: 20.88 Max: 107.25
Current: 20.53
11.61
107.25
Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow 17.06
ICE's Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow is ranked lower than
60% of the 228 Companies
in the Global Financial Exchanges industry.

( Industry Median: 12.54 vs. ICE: 17.06 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow only.
ICE' s Price-to-Operating-Cash-Flow Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 10.43  Med: 17.32 Max: 88.76
Current: 17.06
10.43
88.76
EV-to-EBIT 18.85
ICE's EV-to-EBIT is ranked lower than
58% of the 603 Companies
in the Global Financial Exchanges industry.

( Industry Median: 15.70 vs. ICE: 18.85 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBIT only.
ICE' s EV-to-EBIT Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -34.3  Med: 15.3 Max: 44
Current: 18.85
-34.3
44
EV-to-EBITDA 14.76
ICE's EV-to-EBITDA is ranked lower than
54% of the 617 Companies
in the Global Financial Exchanges industry.

( Industry Median: 13.49 vs. ICE: 14.76 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful EV-to-EBITDA only.
ICE' s EV-to-EBITDA Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -29.2  Med: 12.95 Max: 41.3
Current: 14.76
-29.2
41.3
PEG Ratio 1.74
ICE's PEG Ratio is ranked lower than
53% of the 178 Companies
in the Global Financial Exchanges industry.

( Industry Median: 1.59 vs. ICE: 1.74 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful PEG Ratio only.
ICE' s PEG Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.35  Med: 1.68 Max: 9.66
Current: 1.74
0.35
9.66
Shiller PE Ratio 43.14
ICE's Shiller PE Ratio is ranked lower than
89% of the 93 Companies
in the Global Financial Exchanges industry.

( Industry Median: 25.07 vs. ICE: 43.14 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Shiller PE Ratio only.
ICE' s Shiller PE Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 31.37  Med: 41.51 Max: 47.05
Current: 43.14
31.37
47.05
Current Ratio 0.97
ICE's Current Ratio is ranked lower than
88% of the 338 Companies
in the Global Financial Exchanges industry.

( Industry Median: 1.88 vs. ICE: 0.97 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Current Ratio only.
ICE' s Current Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.97  Med: 1.05 Max: 9
Current: 0.97
0.97
9
Quick Ratio 0.97
ICE's Quick Ratio is ranked lower than
86% of the 338 Companies
in the Global Financial Exchanges industry.

( Industry Median: 1.80 vs. ICE: 0.97 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Quick Ratio only.
ICE' s Quick Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.97  Med: 1.05 Max: 9
Current: 0.97
0.97
9
Days Sales Outstanding 47.60
ICE's Days Sales Outstanding is ranked higher than
51% of the 374 Companies
in the Global Financial Exchanges industry.

( Industry Median: 49.99 vs. ICE: 47.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Days Sales Outstanding only.
ICE' s Days Sales Outstanding Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 32.57  Med: 38.76 Max: 115.2
Current: 47.6
32.57
115.2

Dividend & Buy Back

vs
industry
vs
history
Dividend Yield % 1.16
ICE's Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
85% of the 552 Companies
in the Global Financial Exchanges industry.

( Industry Median: 2.85 vs. ICE: 1.16 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Yield % only.
ICE' s Dividend Yield % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.29  Med: 1.16 Max: 1.39
Current: 1.16
0.29
1.39
Dividend Payout Ratio 0.29
ICE's Dividend Payout Ratio is ranked higher than
98% of the 320 Companies
in the Global Financial Exchanges industry.

( Industry Median: 0.51 vs. ICE: 0.29 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Dividend Payout Ratio only.
ICE' s Dividend Payout Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.17  Med: 0.27 Max: 0.31
Current: 0.29
0.17
0.31
3-Year Dividend Growth Rate 73.60
ICE's 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate is ranked higher than
95% of the 233 Companies
in the Global Financial Exchanges industry.

( Industry Median: 7.20 vs. ICE: 73.60 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate only.
ICE' s 3-Year Dividend Growth Rate Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0  Med: 0 Max: 73.6
Current: 73.6
0
73.6
Forward Dividend Yield % 1.31
ICE's Forward Dividend Yield % is ranked lower than
82% of the 516 Companies
in the Global Financial Exchanges industry.

( Industry Median: 2.99 vs. ICE: 1.31 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Dividend Yield % only.
N/A
5-Year Yield-on-Cost % 1.16
ICE's 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % is ranked lower than
86% of the 665 Companies
in the Global Financial Exchanges industry.

( Industry Median: 3.42 vs. ICE: 1.16 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % only.
ICE' s 5-Year Yield-on-Cost % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.29  Med: 1.16 Max: 1.39
Current: 1.16
0.29
1.39
3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio -1.10
ICE's 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio is ranked higher than
52% of the 305 Companies
in the Global Financial Exchanges industry.

( Industry Median: -1.30 vs. ICE: -1.10 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio only.
ICE' s 3-Year Average Share Buyback Ratio Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: -21.1  Med: -5.1 Max: 0
Current: -1.1
-21.1
0

Valuation & Return

vs
industry
vs
history
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF 1.35
ICE's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF is ranked lower than
56% of the 211 Companies
in the Global Financial Exchanges industry.

( Industry Median: 1.22 vs. ICE: 1.35 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF only.
ICE' s Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-Projected-FCF Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.93  Med: 1.24 Max: 1.89
Current: 1.35
0.93
1.89
Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-DCF (Earnings Based) 1.29
ICE's Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-DCF (Earnings Based) is ranked lower than
52% of the 27 Companies
in the Global Financial Exchanges industry.

( Industry Median: 1.25 vs. ICE: 1.29 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Intrinsic-Value-DCF (Earnings Based) only.
N/A
Price-to-Median-PS-Value 0.83
ICE's Price-to-Median-PS-Value is ranked higher than
74% of the 561 Companies
in the Global Financial Exchanges industry.

( Industry Median: 1.05 vs. ICE: 0.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Median-PS-Value only.
ICE' s Price-to-Median-PS-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.76  Med: 1.01 Max: 3.2
Current: 0.83
0.76
3.2
Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value 1.83
ICE's Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value is ranked lower than
62% of the 118 Companies
in the Global Financial Exchanges industry.

( Industry Median: 1.34 vs. ICE: 1.83 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value only.
ICE' s Price-to-Peter-Lynch-Fair-Value Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 0.78  Med: 1.69 Max: 4.83
Current: 1.83
0.78
4.83
Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % 5.34
ICE's Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % is ranked higher than
58% of the 831 Companies
in the Global Financial Exchanges industry.

( Industry Median: 3.74 vs. ICE: 5.34 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % only.
ICE' s Earnings Yield (Greenblatt) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 2.3  Med: 5.5 Max: 11.6
Current: 5.34
2.3
11.6
Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % 17.38
ICE's Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % is ranked higher than
63% of the 240 Companies
in the Global Financial Exchanges industry.

( Industry Median: 10.74 vs. ICE: 17.38 )
Ranked among companies with meaningful Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % only.
ICE' s Forward Rate of Return (Yacktman) % Range Over the Past 10 Years
Min: 9.5  Med: 18.4 Max: 77.2
Current: 17.38
9.5
77.2

More Statistics

Revenue (TTM) (Mil) $5,958
EPS (TTM) $ 2.37
Beta0.56
Short Percentage of Float0.87%
52-Week Range $47.62 - 61.98
Shares Outstanding (Mil)593.45

Analyst Estimate

Dec17 Dec18 Dec19
Revenue (Mil $) 4,697 4,945 5,187
EPS ($) 3.00 3.44 3.90
EPS without NRI ($) 3.00 3.44 3.90
EPS Growth Rate
(Future 3Y To 5Y Estimate)
-20.67%
Dividends per Share ($) 0.80 0.91 1.02
» More Articles for ICE

Headlines

Articles On GuruFocus.com
FactSet Completes Acquisition of Interactive Data Managed Solutions, Wealth Management Solutions Pro Apr 03 2017 
FactSet Strengthens Global Wealth Management Offering, Agrees to Acquire Interactive Data Managed So Jan 27 2017 
Halvorsen Bought 13 New Holdings in 2nd Quarter Sep 08 2016 
Daniel Loeb Invests in Intercontinental Exchange Jun 16 2016 
HiddenLevers Accelerates Stress Testing on Fixed Income Assets May 13 2016 
Weekly 52-Week Highs Highlights: Altera, Paychex, Becton Dickinson, Intercontinental Exchange Nov 10 2015 
Bitcoin Ropes In ‘Duncan Niederauer’ Former NYSE CEO To Conquer New Highs Mar 26 2015 
Intercontinental Exchange After the NYSE Deal Jan 22 2015 
Guru-Held Stocks Trading At Historical Low P/B Oct 08 2014 
8 Dividend Stocks Bubbling Cash Like Lava Sep 12 2014 

More From Other Websites
Gold Trading Systems Experience Growing Pains Apr 19 2017
CME Group shuts loss-making London derivatives and clearing units Apr 12 2017
ICE Data Services Launches Innovative Reference Data Solution for Exchange Traded Derivatives Apr 11 2017
CBOE Holdings (CBOE) March Volume Rises, Q1 RPC to Decline Apr 07 2017
ICE Clear Credit Expands Clearing for Global Financial Corporate Single Name CDS Apr 07 2017
Traders Asked for This Futures Contract, But They Aren’t Using It Apr 06 2017
ICE Agents Go From Friend to Foe Apr 06 2017
Intercontinental Exchange's (ICE) March Volume Improves Apr 06 2017
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. : ICE-US: Dividend Analysis : March 16th, 2017 (record date) : By... Apr 05 2017
Intercontinental Exchange Reports March Statistics; ICE ADV up 30% y/y Driven by Financials up 53%... Apr 05 2017
These 4 Financial Sector Stocks Are Breaking Out: Citi, BlackRock and More Apr 04 2017
Should You Avoid Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) Stock Now? Apr 04 2017
DERIVATIVES-Euronext agrees clearing terms with ICE after LCH SA bid fails Apr 03 2017
Euronext signs up ICE to replace LSE derivatives clearing unit Apr 03 2017
FactSet Completes Acquisition of Interactive Data Managed Solutions, Wealth Management Solutions... Apr 03 2017
German Lawmaker Warns U.S. Exchanges Against Deutsche Boerse Bids Mar 30 2017
German lawmaker warns U.S. exchanges against Deutsche Boerse bids Mar 30 2017
U.S. exchanges warned against Deutsche Boerse bid Mar 30 2017
Choppy trading in LSE shares after EU blocks Deutsche-Boerse deal Mar 29 2017

Personalized Checklist

Checklist has been moved to "Checklist" tab.

Get WordPress Plugins for easy affiliate links on Stock Tickers and Guru Names | Earn affiliate commissions by embedding GuruFocus Charts
GuruFocus Affiliate Program: Earn up to $400 per referral. ( Learn More)